Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Question about fate vs. free will
Question about fate vs. free will
Question about fate vs. free will
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
If you were on a trip you had bad thoughts about, but still went and those bad thoughts became reality would it have been your fault? Imagine this, the trip was an adventure in a random jungle, which has mysterious creatures and the weather can be terrible at some points. As you went you had negative thoughts about a creature coming up to you and harmed you but also in fact as that happened a storm came leaving you without any food and or any shelter. The question is would it have been your fault this has happened, in other words would it have been your fault for continuing in the jungle? Should people in life or death situations be held account for their actions? Yes people should be held accountable for their actions because if they knew …show more content…
To start off an example would be from the story The Voyage of the James Caird, “ The men were soaked to the bone and frostbitten.” This just proves that on their voyage there was no sign of them having a terrible weather until they actually got there. The weather was something that happened out of their control. Another example would be from the story To Build a Fire, “The old timer on Sulphur Creek was right, he thought in the moment of controlled despair that ensued: after fifty below, a man should travel with a partner.” Well even though this man didn’t take this advice seriously it’s normal for a person to want to achieve something on their own you can’t blame someone for that can you? No, however it is common in situations like these for a person to take advice very seriously. To conclude the claim why people shouldn’t be held accountable is for last example from the story The Cost of Survival, “Some people wind up in trouble because of bad luck, but others make dangerous choices.” Now this explains it all, there are two separate groups in which need to be treated differently because people with bad luck is better than having the problem be caused
Why is it that we as human beings feel the need to blame someone for every negative situation, which occurs? If we really look at the situation with any great depth, we may discover that an almost endless amount of things may be 'blamed' for the tragedy blaming an individual is pointless - only fate can really be blamed.
According to the poet Stephen Dobyns, “Actions have consequences. Ignorance about the nature of those actions does not free a person from responsibility for the consequences.” The fact that someone is unaware about what could happen to them, does not excuse them from what they have done. People should think before they act, especially actions that could harm themselves and other people or things. In most cases, people are aware that what they are doing is wrong, and should know there will be consequences for their actions. In “Sound of Thunder,” by Ray Bradbury, Eckels does
In “Luck Swallows Everything” and “Sanity and the Metaphysics of Responsibility” Galen Strawson and Susan Wolf’s explain the concept of responsibility in both a compatibilist and determinist view. Strawson argued that change was not possible at all when it comes to responsibility due to an individual’s mental nature, while Wolf argues that change is possible for an individual when it comes to responsibility. This essay will be focusing on the criticism of Wolf’s work.
In To Build a Fire the main character refused to listen to people that were more experienced than him. Like everyone else he was responsible for his actions, but instead of being able to overcome them , the situation he was in caused him to die before he could have been helped. But if things had turned out differently, and he didn’t die, someone, or a group of people would
civilization does have a substantial amount of the liability at the same time. Racial/ethnic biases,
The survivor takes the responsibility for the death of their loved one is caused by survivor's guilt. “The Seventh Man” by Haruki Murakami is a short story about a boy losing his best friend during a storm and he goes through a tragic time. The text states “ I stayed away from my home town for over forty years.”(Murakami pg.141) This shows that he had to stay away for many years to get over his guilt. This proves survivors should not feel survivor's guilt.
Scapegoating is a better way to experience success. Margaret Atwood speaks the truth when she states “When societies come under stress these kinds of things happen. People start looking around for essentially human sacrifices. They start looking around for somebody to blame.” In “Half- Hanged Mary” by ……. they used Mary as a scapegoat by blaming everything on her which lead to her hanging. Therefore I defend Margaret Atwood that a world under stress will eventually lead to people being demolished so they can feel better about themselves.
People (or monsters) feel the need to be responsible for various reasons such as guilt or justice. No matter the source of it responsibility always will act as a correcting force for all of the negative impacts of actions that happen in our society. It allows consequences to be adjusted to acceptable levels and can sometimes even make the situation better than it started because of people feeling more responsible than they actually are. Without this irrational feeling that causes people to look out for others in place of themselves our society could not function as highly as it does now and social interaction would cease to work in a fair way.
Scapegoating is when a person irrationally blames their failures on others, therefore not taking responsibility themselves. The “scapegoating theory says that prejudiced people believe they are society’s victims” (Schaefer 38). It is always someone else’s fault that things do not go their way and the person “… transfers the responsibility for failure to some vulnerable group” (Schaefer 38).
Lord Capulet is to blame for the tragedy because he was never the kind of father to blame for in the beginning until later something comes in between his decision. “My will to her consent is but a part./as she agree, within her
In my opinion Lady Macbeth is most to blame, because she forced Macbeth to kill the king when he truly didn’t want to. Lady Macbeth made Macbeth kill the king when he didn't want to kill him but he still wanted the power. Macbeth wanted the king's power but he didn't want to have to kill the king. The lesson to learn from this story is to never let someone pressure you to do something you absolutely don't want to
...ate. This is shown in the books The Prince, Macbeth, The Oresteia, and The Divine Comedy. God is the one who decides what happens to someone during their life, but humans can influence his decision and ultimately decide their own fate. In Macbeth and The Oresteia, Agamemnon and Macbeth are both given prophecies. Agamemnon was given a choice on sacrificing his daughter or not and Macbeth had the choice to either let chance happen or take matters into his own hands. These books show that human beings do in fact have control over their fate. Sometimes in these books they blame the Gods or other people and say that they made them do it. Since human beings have free will this is not a viable excuse. People can react to things however they want. Therefore, even though God may decide what happens to you, human beings control their fate by the actions they choose in life.
The definition of responsibility is being accountable for something within one’s control, thus people are “the designer of my [their] own catastrophy” - Unknown. Similarly in Macbeth, the supernatural is held accountable for Macbeth’s actions, despite the fact that Macbeth is responsible for what he has done. This is because people have the free will to make their own choices, and the actions chosen are driven by their own desires. Accordingly, the supernatural should not be blamed for the actions of others, as people are responsible for their own fate.
The actor versus observer bias explains how people will attribute behaviour either to internal or external factors depending on whether they are the actor in the situation or observer. Miller and Norman (1975) showed that if a person is in a particular environment, they are more likely to blame their actions on that rather than make generalizations of their own personality. However, when the roles are reversed, they tend to attribute the other person to internal factors. In regards to cultural differences, an instance of this happens often in multicultural societies where the native of the country will blame their unemployment on mass immigration taking away job opportunities. Yet, when the roles are reversed they blame the person’s laziness or unwillingness to integrate into society (Quillian 1996; Kónya 2005; Pehrson and Green 2010).
People pass the blame to other people, things or events by keeping their hands clean.