Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Debate on freedom and determinism
Free will vs determinism philosophy
Role of fate and free will
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Debate on freedom and determinism
A newborn baby lies housed in an artificial womb; tubes invade the small fragile body like over grown weeds. The parents weep openly as they watch their precious child lie motionless as it fights for every breath. The tiny machines beep loudly around them as they carefully survey the room counting all the other synthetic wombs that house small bodies. A nurse over hears the desperate parents sorrow as they search for answer to why their child has to suffer." Is it pre-determined fate" the father says, " that our child is destined to die?" The mother stares blankly at her husband; she can see his lips move but cannot comprehend what he is saying, her mind is focused on what she must have done wrong. " How can this be part of our pre- determined fate?" She says as the words of her husband begin to sink in. Both parents set quietly holding hands as they watch their child take its last breath. I ask, was the fate of this baby pre-determined or was it the fate of the parents that were pre-determined.
I argue that in neither case was the fate pre-determined. When it comes to pre-determine fate I am under the impression that there is no room for flexibility when it comes to the outcome, it is what it is, a plan has been set out, and it is unchangeable. When something is pre-determine it has been decided beforehand, ascertained already. However, there is an opposing issue that surrounds this dilemma of pre-determines fate, and that is the issue of free will. I believe that to have free will means that we have the control and power to make choices in our lives. Therefore, if we believe that the fate of this child was pre-determined then we would have to believe that we have no control or powers in our lives. I do not believe that p...
... middle of paper ...
...ed in it's course is fixed by the nature of the being's life. For the human being's life, what is inevitable, inescapable, and predetermined in its course is that for one's own life to exist it must be sustained and generated by itself.
Destiny has always been locked into a connotation, an idea of something spiritual or ethereal. Something out of our control. My faith stops at the recognition I have for the "gift of my life", my birth. I have to have a wondering faith about that because I -- none of us -- know in an absolute way that is provable. Destiny, in it's literal meaning does not presuppose faith as I recognize it. I have no "blind faith," when it comes to determining the outcome of my life - fulfilling my destiny. If it were meant that we were not to use our capabilities as a human, then we would not have been. If we left it all up to fate then why exist?
In Dan Marquis’ article, “Why Abortion is Immoral”, he argues that aborting a fetus is like killing a human being already been born and it deprives them of their future. Marquis leaves out the possible exceptions of abortion that includes: a threat to the mom’s life, contraceptives, and pregnancy by rape. First, I will explain Marquis’ pro-life argument in detail about his statements of why abortion is morally wrong. Like in many societies, killing an innocent human being is considered morally wrong just like in the United States. Second, I will state my objection to Marquis’ argument through examining the difference between a human being already born future compared to a potential fetus’s future. Thus, Marquis’ argument for his pro-life
Fate and free will help to explain why things in life occur. This is clearly shown in the poem “Miniver Cheevy” by E.A. Robinson with the main character Cheevy. His heart desired to be born during the medieval era however he was born too late. Similarly, in O’Henry’s short story “ The Cop and the Anthem” fate and free wills roles were depicted through Soapy, the main characters, plan for the winter. Although these two pieces of literature seem completely different they both come together to show that we have no control over our fate, however, we have our free will allows us to make the best of one's fate.
The French Revolution was a time when many people sacrificed their lives for their beliefs. As the French Revolution moved on, more people joined the movement and risked their lives. A Tale of Two Cities by Charles Dickens is set during this time. Many people who sacrificed their lives for the Revolution felt like it was their fate to do this. This idea of fate is described many times in Dickens’ novel to magnify the story. The theme of fate is prevalent in the novel through the lives of many characters. This theme is used to show how a person is unable to escape their fate because it is already decided. The metaphors and symbols in the novel are greatly used to contribute to the theme of fate through the symbols of knitting, the fountain and water, and the wine.
...t,” or the second consideration, is that there is no empirical way of deducing what the fetus’s future existence will be like, and we are back to working under the same sort of broad assumptions he considers a problem with the current pro-choice/anti-abortionist paradigm. I do agree that Marquis is correct when he says that these broad and narrow assumptions bring us difficulty in solving the problem; I do not agree with the solution that he proposes. He has, however, managed to provide a much less problematic approach to the entire situation as his method of deductive reason produces a more logically valid response than either side of the divide with the current abortion argument, but it is only slightly more epistemologically respectable than the current arguments, as they all utilize internal knowledge in place of empiricism at some point or another (Chisolm 3).
Thomson argue that a pregnant woman still has the right to abortion even if the fetus is a person from conception. He argues this by giving the analogy of someone who is kidnapped and forced to serve as a life support system for a violinist without the person’s consent. I feel this analogy is not comparable to having an abortion because conception and pregnancy are foreseeable consequences of even careful sex and waking up and being someone’s life support is not a foreseeable outcome. By causing children to be made, parents also cause them to need support; it's a package deal. When parents mutually agree to have sex they are risking the chance to becoming pregnant. The parents are not enslaved they've volunteered. This may put the needs of a parent and child in conflict, but it creates no clash of rights between them. This is because parents be obligated their children support.
In “A defense of abortion” (Thomson, 1971, p. 47-66), instead of engaging in the usual debate about the moral status, Thomson grants ‘for sake of argument’ (Thomson, 1971, p. 48) that a human embryo is a person as she believes that personhood does not have any relations with the permissibility of abortion. In investigating this, Thomson attempts to define the rights of a woman in regards to her autonomy in controlling what happens to her body in comparison to the right to life of a fetus. The first thought experiment proposes a scenario involving an innocent person being kidnapped and attached to a sick violinist. In order to sav...
...s to avoid fate, a chain of unexpected unfortunate events are unleashed and a divine master plan is fulfilled. Man must simply act according to his own convictions concerning the matter and hope that if Fate is indeed existent, there might be an even balance between her and the freedom of choice.
Many arguments in the abortion debate assume that the morality of abortion depends upon the moral status of the foetus. While I regard the moral status of the foetus as important, it is not the central issue that determines the moral justifiability of abortion. The foetus may be awarded a level of moral status, nevertheless, such status does not result in the prescription of a set moral judgement. As with many morally significant issues, there are competing interests and a variety of possible outcomes that need to be considered when making a moral judgement on abortion. While we need to determine the moral status of the foetus in order to establish the type of entity we are dealing with, it does not, however, exist in a moral vacuum. There are other key issues requiring attention, such as the moral status and interests of the pregnant woman who may desire an abortion, and importantly, the likely consequences of aborting or not aborting a particular foetus. Furthermore, I assert that moral status should be awarded as a matter of degree, based upon the capacities of sentience and self-consciousness an entity possesses. In a bid to reach a coherent conclusion on the issue, the moral status of both foetus and woman, along with the likely results of aborting a particular foetus, must be considered together. Given the multiple facets requiring consideration, I assert that utilitarianism (Mill 1863) offers a coherent framework for weighing and comparing the inputs across a variety of situations, which can determine whether it is ever morally justifiable to have an abortion.
The topic of freewill vs. determinism has always been something that has interested me. I follow the Christian faith very strongly but my views on the subject vary almost daily. The concept of freewill and determinism is something that, as a Christian, I often struggle with. By no means do I think that I have all the answers or that I am right. I believe that in order to find the truth or what is right you have to be willing to accept that everything you believe could be false. This is a topic that I have asked about and debated with many different Christian leaders including pastors, missionaries and youth ministers, as well as other people belonging to different faiths. No answer was the same which shows that peoples view on the subject are vastly different. My view tends to be on the side of the Christian Bible. I believe that we have freewill but what we do in life has already been determined.
His life was one determined by “circumstances existing already, given and transmitted
Fate seems to defy humanity at every turn. A man may have his life planned out to the last second, but then some random force intervenes and he dies the second after he has completed his life plan. Some believe in fate, believing that our lives are predetermined from the moment we are born. Other people believe that everything is random, the result of some god rolling the dice in a universal poker game. Still other people believe that each and every person is in total control of his or her destiny, every step of the way. Who is to say which viewpoint is false? Every culture has a unique perception of the role of fate in our lives, and no group has the "right answer," simply a different answer. Taking into consideration the views of other cultures can help an individual refine his personal viewpoint on this inconceivable subject.
In Oedipus Rex, the major theme is fate vs. free will. Oedipus, Jocasta, and Laius all thought it was possible to escape their prophecies. This means in terms of the theme that they believed fate was escapable. Jocasta and Laius were given a prophecy saying that their son would one day kill his own father and marry his mother. They gave the son to a shepherd to killed him, but the boy ended up with Polybus. One day Oedipus was at a place where three roads meet, and came upon a man, who was causing him grief. Oedipus killed the man, and later it is found out that it was Laius. Oedipus married a widowed lady, who is actually his mother. Oedipus and Jocasta had no clue about the events. They both did everything to try and prevent the prophecy
This paper will critically discuss these theories and how human beings are capable of freewill. The theory of determinism rules out the claim that human beings have free will. If fate did have something to do with certain coincidences and does exist, then does this mean we have free will? Or are our actions controlled by the theory of Fatalism?
He believes instead that we are somewhat determined as we are answerable to our bodies and social institutions. Nevertheless, we still have a choice and the possibility to create and shape our life by moving away from the heard mentality of the last man, towards the promising stage of the Overman. We should be open to the forces of life but
People have various definitions for the word “destiny”, and even the majority claims that they hold their opinion against it for they believe that there is no such thing as destiny. However, from my own view point, destiny is why we exist. How “destiny” is defined in the dictionary is basically how people normally take it. “The things that will happen to someone in the future, especially those that cannot be changed or controlled.” it is always linked to things that are predictable and that causes most rejection of opinions. No one would like to admit that their future is plain and predictable just like teenagers do not recognize how they are not as unique as they think. I believe that life is a written book and every