The name Jack began to appear in medieval times as a derivative of John. Since then it has only grown in popularity all around the world. However, in 1940’s England Jack was much less common than it’s proper form, John. So why did author William Golding name his antagonist “Jack Merridew” in his award-winning novel, “Lord of the Flies”. The pale boy with freckles and fiery red hair uses the fear of the younger boys to create his own society of savages on the island. The characterization and name of this character create a subconscious feeling about the character before you get to know them. This is particularly significant in the case of Jack Merridew. This character is the becomes the embodiment of his name, both first and last, and mirroring …show more content…
several historical figures from Great Britain with the same name.
At the beginning of the novel, Ralph is elected leader of the boys and holds this power democratically, weighing everybody’s opinions. As time goes by Jack becomes more desperate and descends away from the civilized power, eventually, he creates his own tribe on the other side of the island and recruits all the boys to hunt for meat, and throw grand parties and feasts. The name Jack means “God is gracious”, or “Supplanter”. The boys view Jack as a god, at the feast he is “painted and garlanded” (135). He addressed the boys as if he is above them while speaking he “rose from the log that was his throne” (136). Jack demonstrates his godly powers by offering his followers meat and fruit and taking care of them as long as they obey his orders and never question his authority. Jack also fulfills the second meaning of his name. Supplanter most often refers to a ruler and originates from the verb to supplant or to overthrow. The …show more content…
conflict between Ralph, a more democratic leader, and Jack increases as time progresses. Jack finally reaches his breaking point and lashes out at Ralph. Consequently, he decides to go off on his own and informs the others that “‘Anyone who wants to hunt when I do can come too’” (116). After this event more and more boys leave Ralph’s group and begin to follow Jack. This becomes particularly clear when the boys start to refer to Jack as Chief. They answered to his every beck and call with no explanation as to why. Roger speaks excitedly after the chief requests to tie up and punish Wilfred, and Robert asks “‘but didn’t the chief say why?’ ‘I never heard him’” (145). Jack successfully takes all power from Ralph leaving him helpless and alone. He undermines the authority of Ralph and unseats him as leader of the island. The last name Merridew has a meaning quite similar to that of Jack.
It is derived from the old Welsh name Morgetiud, the first portion meaning “pomp and splendor”, and the ending meaning “lord”. The parallel meaning between Jack’s first and last name is not what makes this character choice so interesting. Jack is one of only two boys on the island whose last name is mentioned. When we first meet Jack, he is a very proper boy and leader of the choir. He calls the other boy’s names “‘Kids’ names’” and complains “‘Why should I be Jack? I’m Merridew’” (20). Jack goes by his last name because he believes he is superior to other boys, and it is a symbol of his higher class. It could also be said that going by his last name mirrors many historical leaders. It is commonly perceived that “Lord of the Flies” is allegorical for WWII. Jack is thought to be representative of Hitler, and the fact that he originally goes by his last name is highly supportive of this theory. Moreover, the idea of a leader going by their last name does not strictly pertain to Hitler. Many rulers and presidents only go by last name, therefore the fact that Jack was given a last name may simply signify the qualities of a leader in him, good or evil. Just like in a history class we study the leaders who were successful in conducting their people even in ways considered unethical. Jack was successful in creating a working tribe, although his actions could be viewed as inhumane, while Ralph tried to do what
was right but ultimately failed. There are only a few Jacks in British history pre-WWII, so it is not coincidental that the few people sharing this name are similar to Jack in some way. One example is Jack the Ripper, an infamous serial killer in the Whitechapel district of London around 1888. This murderer killed his victims by slitting their throats and then cutting open their abdomen to remove organs, similar to gutting a pig. When the boys kill their first pig Jack “‘Cut the pig’s throat” (63). To roast and eat a pig you must also remove the organs, a style of killing that quite eerily echoes that of Jack the Rippers. Another historical Jack from England is Jack Ketch, a barbaric executioner hired by King Charles II. He is most famously known for his botched and brutal execution of Lord Russell where he was not able to instantly kill the victim, merely causing excruciating pain with each blow until he succumbed to a slow death. The slow and painful death is comparable to the death of Simon. Simon was killed by “the tearing of teeth and claws” (139). He was killed by bare hands, causing him severe pain. Lastly, this King of England’s name is not Jack, rather John, however, the likeness between the two is undeniable. King John was angered when he was not named the heir, just as Jack was upset when he was not elected chief. The King tried to seize power from his nephew, resembling Jack’s plot to overthrow Ralph. Additionally, King John’s unwillingness to cooperate with others led to a war, mirroring the war between Jack’s tribe and Ralph by himself. At first glance, it may seem that a character’s name was chosen randomly and no thought was put into it, but with further analysis, it is quite obvious that authors do not take this choice lightly. William Golding put careful consideration into the names of not only Jack Merridew, but all the characters in this novel. Jack reflects the meaning of his first and last name, the power of using his last name, and the historical significance of his name astonishingly well. This effort and thought greatly impacts how we view a character and their effect on us. The idea that Jack reflects his name also insights wonder that maybe subconsciously every one of us reflects our name in one way or another.
Ralph is the novel’s protagonist and tries to maintain the sense of civility and order as the boys run wild. Ralph represents the good in mankind by treating and caring for all equally, which is completely opposite of Jack’s savage nature. Jack is the antagonist in the novel and provokes the most internal evil of all the boys. Jack is seen at first as a great and innocent leader but he becomes t...
Jack is a boy who was one of the biguns found in lord of the flies. He stays in competition with ralph for leadership over the boys. In the beginning, Jack is shot down as leader when Ralph is voted upon by a group vote consisting of all the boys. His main job was a hunter that was assigned by ralph. When jack goes hunting he spot’s a pig. He catches up to it and almost kills i...
Jack’s authoritative figure in the beginning of Lord of the Flies is one quality that shows how he is a dynamic character. To begin with, Jack shows he is authoritative by sabotaging Ralph’s integrity and rules. For instance, on pages one-hundred and one and one-hundred and two, Jack says, “We don’t need the conch anymore. We know who ought to say things. What good did Simon do speaking, or Bill, or Walter? It’s time some people knew they’ve got to keep quiet and leave deciding things to the rest of us.” Jack is trying to get rid of the idea that the conch, or freedom of speech, is needed. This is another step away from civilized behavior because a newly established order of power replaces the conch. Another way Jack shows he is authoritative is by wanting to be a leader. First, Jack forms his own group that he calls the hunters. Then, Jack intimidates the other boys to join his group by talking about the beast. Jack tells the little ‘uns that are scared that they will forget about the beast. ...
Ralph is one of the few boys who realize that the only way to survive is through peace and order. Because he summons the boys at the beginning of the novel with the conch he and Piggy find, they look upon him as the most responsible of the boys and elect him as a chief over the humiliated Jack. Ralph creates a stable and peaceful society for the children to live; this significantly bothers Jack because he wants to have fun and do things that he never did back in the civilized society. Jack is eventually successful of pulling nearly all of the children out of Ralph’s control to form savages. Ralph represents the civilization, and Jack represents the primitive society.
Throughout The Lord of the Flies, the author shows how different Simon is from the rest of the savages on the island. He is much more innocent and pure than the others and has a religious demeanor. Light, very commonly a symbol of holiness and purity, is used quite often during Simon’s “funeral”. In the last four paragraphs of chapter nine, “A view to a death”, Golding makes clear the use of light imagery to suggest the apotheosis of Simon.
Jack Merridew is the devil-like figure in the story, Lord of the Flies. Jack is wicked in nature having no feelings for any living creature. His appearance and behavior intimidates the others from their first encounter. The leading savage, Jack leans more towards hunting and killing and is the main reason behind the splitting of the boys. It has been said that Jack represents the evilness of human nature; but in the end, Jack is almost a hero. With his totalitarian leadership, he was able to organize the group of boys into a useful and productive society
The impulsivity in Jack’s commands, usually fire back on him and he is immediately self conscious about not being taken seriously and acts off of those actions with no remorse. While on the island, Jack, who has had trouble with asserting his dominance in a confident way, lacks stability in himself when he fails to succeed trivial tasks. “He licked his lips and turned his head at an angle, so that his gaze avoided the embarrassment of linking with another’s eye”(Golding 127). Jack, has challenged Ralph’s authority as a leader by assembling a vote to see whom believes who should be leader of the tribe. Neither the Biguns or Littluns reflected approval towards Jack’s tyrannical party, which immediately confounds Jack’s expectations as leader.
In his novel Lord of the Flies, William Golding describes Jack as someone who promotes unity, someone who is skilled at manipulating people, and someone who idolizes violent actions. Jack has a lot in common with the World War II German dictator, Adolf Hitler, who had also demonstrated desires for unity, the manipulation of others and increased violence. All these similarities between them led to them destroying their society.
Human nature has been debated for centuries, everyone coming up with their own theories, pulling their sources from religious texts, wars, experiments, or daily life. William Golding and Jean-Jacques Rousseau, born in very different times and countries were very opposite in their views compared to one another. William Golding believed that human nature was immoral and evil, and there has been evidence of this all the way to the beginning of human society. Without laws or moral boundaries, humans would plunder, steal, and murder to their hearts content, delighting in their new found freedom to let go of social philosophies imposed upon them. Rousseau, however, believed that human nature was naturally just and moral, and it was society’s laws that made them immoral. Social norms and laws create limitation and superfluous need, and it is within those boundaries that humans become enslaved to “moral inequality.” Without laws and social norms, humans will revert back to their natural goodness. It is the polar opposite of Golding’s belief. Golding’s philosophy, however, is more in line to my own, as in my opinion, Rousseau’s belief is a rather naïve outlook on life.
He tries to keep a democracy, but Jack's aggressive nature does not allow it to last very long. Ralph is probably the most likable person in the book, because of his good nature and his handsome looks, "His size and attractive appearance". Ralph means "counsel" in the Anglo- Saxon language, and he's the one who calls all the meetings by blowing the conch, and he's chosen as the leader. The conch is seen as a powerful symbol, and he holds it. Ralph does not specialize in any area of human behaviour, except maybe for having common sense (building shelters, climbing the mountain to see if it is an island) and Jack can be seen as his opposite.
In the novel, "Lord of the Flies," a group of British boys are left on a deserted island in the middle of nowhere. Throughout the novel, they have conflicts between civilization and savagery, good vs. evil, order vs. chaos, and reason vs. impulse. What would it be like if the boys were replaced by a group of girls? Would they behave the same way they did in the novel? I believe that the girls would act in the same behavior as the boys in all ways because, everyone is installed with evil inside them which is their natural instinct, also because in life there is always a power struggle in all manners, and the outcome with the girls would be similar-since both sexes would plan on getting rescued.
Ralph and Jack are both powerful and meaningful characters in William Golding's novel, Lord of the Flies. Ralph is an excellent leader; responsible, and stands for all that is good. Jack is a destructive hunter, selfish, and represents evil. These two main characters can be compared by the actions they take as leaders, their personalities, and what they symbolize in the story.
The fact that Jack acts like this is very important to the story. Jack’s lust for power and blood sped the story up a lot faster. It’s possible that without Jack the boys wouldn’t even become savage. Jack is also a bully, and forces the boys out of fear into what he wants them to do. In, “The Lord of the Flies”, by William Golding, Jack is pretty much equivalent to a middle school bully, but the circumstances he is in, turns him into something even worse.
The novel Lord of the Flies was full of challenges that the boys overcame in order to survive. Conflicts within themselves, with nature and with each other constantly test the children’s ability to endure. Struggles against the natural elements of the island, rival groups or fear of the unknown continually appear throughout the story. Some of the boys on the island did not survive the quarrels that they faced. They perished because they were lacking something that the surviving boys did not. The survivors had a natural primal instinct or a physical or mental advantage over the boys who did not make it. ‘Only the strong survive’ is an important element that runs through the novel Lord of the Flies because in order to survive the boys must turn to their primitive instincts of physical strength and savagery.
For centuries, philosophers debating human nature passionately have been all trying to reach a concise conclusion when faced with certain questions; Are we nothing more but civilized savages bearing ill will that lurks beneath the surface? Or do we enter this world as gentle spirits who become lost and corrupt along the way? They are questions that have yet to be answered, yet their themes are still heavily explored throughout human history and appear in many of man kind’s artifacts, such as art and literature. One of these examples lies within the context of Lord of the Flies, by William Golding, a story in which a band of young boys survives a plane crash and is marooned on a deserted island without adult supervision. They eventually form together under a chosen chief, named Ralph, and attempt to govern themselves, with ultimately disastrous results. The novel evokes the themes of two philosophers- Thomas Hobbes, who believed that mankind is essentially in a constant state of war and requires laws and government to dictate his behavior, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau, who believed that men are “noble savages” corrupted by civilization and the laws and government inherent in it. Based on the characters and plot in the Lord of the Flies, Hobbes’ belief is the correct one, as Golding depicts the boys slipping further and further away from civilized behavior and turning into savages.