Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Now and then character analysis
Now and then character analysis
Now and then character analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Contrasting Ralph and Jack in Lord of the Flies
Ralph and Jack are both powerful and meaningful characters in William Golding's novel, Lord of the Flies. Ralph is an excellent leader; responsible, and stands for all that is good. Jack is a destructive hunter, selfish, and represents evil. These two main characters can be compared by the actions they take as leaders, their personalities, and what they symbolize in the story.
Ralph first takes on the position as leader at the beginning of the story, when the rest of the boys vote him in as chief. He carries this position until Jack and his fellow hunters break away from the group. Ralph makes it his job to set out the rules to organize a society. Ralph always thinks of what is best for everyone and how they will all benefit from his decisions. Rules and standards are set when Ralph is the chief. He orders the group to build the basic necessities of civilization, shelters, and most importantly to keep the fire going, in hope that they will be rescued and return to humanity. "But I tell you that smoke is more important than the pig, however often you kill one" (Golding 75). Jack, on the other hand, takes on the idea of every man for himself. He does not care about making homes, only about hunting. When Jack is the leader, evil takes over and all good is destroyed. Under Jack's power both Simon and Piggy are killed.
Not only do the two character's decisions clash so do their personalities. Ralph is caring and considerate, being kinder...
... middle of paper ...
...nclusion.
2. While the body of your paper sticks to your thesis statement, it could be better organized. Since your organize your paper into three paragraphs, one concerning the boys' leadership, another their personalities and another their symbolism, each paragraph should be organized in the same manner. If you discuss Ralph first in the first paragraph then you should begin with Ralph in the other two paragraphs. Also you should fully discuss each character before moving on to the other. Switching back and forth can become confusing.
3. The correct method for quoting is "The conch is gone" (Golding 200). Instead of, "The conch is gone (Golding 200)." The parentheses are considered a part of the last sentence but not a part of the quote itself, so it should be included into the punctuation but not the quotation marks.
He is trying to be a teamplayer not like Jack who want’s to go adventure and kill things Ralph is protective and really smart. So If I was in Ralph situation then I would have not been able to prevent the deaths because Jack was way out of control. Even though there has been times where Ralph did not do what a leader should of done. There was times he was picking on piggy and time he was acting like himself. Although the difference between Jack and Ralph is that Ralph is not evil, cynical, or selfish he knows the difference between right and what’s wrong.
Lord of the Flies, written by William Golding, has four very important dynamic characters. A dynamic character is a character that develops and grows during the course of the story. Ralph, Jack, Piggy, and Simon are four dynamic characters in Lord of the Flies that adapt to their new lifestyles in different ways. Jack is a very important dynamic character in Lord of the Flies because he goes through the most changes during the novel. While on the island, Jack has many life experiences that change him forever. Jack never thought he would live his life the way he is living his life in the island. Jack’s authoritative figure, savage-like/instinctual behavior, and violence are three qualities that make Jack a dynamic character.
Oliphant, another Scottish leader, was much more secretive than Wallace. Wallace and Oliphant were both rivals against Edward. However, many argue that Oliphant may have been said to be a better leader for Scotland. Oliphant was said to be a man who possessed value and kindness. He wanted to negotiate with Edward; whereas, Wallace would never have contemplated this maneuver. As different as Oliphant and Wallace may have been, they were united in defeating Edward. However, Oliphant was defeated leaving Wallace to be the last fighter left for Edward to tackle. Although Wallace stayed ahead of Edward, it was extremely exhausting. He escaped many ambushes and foes. Wallace was still able to prove that he possessed talent. He was able to fight many in battle and still manage to escape. For the English, Wallace being captured and executed was of vital
The irony of the plane crashing to start the story, the environment of an unknown island and many other cruel acts function into the work as a whole because it really does set up the major plot in the story. Cruelty will bring out the worst in people and this phrase proves to be true when it comes to Jack. The killing of the pig and the obsession of blood lust drives Jack into savagery and reveals that he is not morally strong. The violence also shows that Jack is manipulative as he uses the fear of the beast to gain power. While cruelty transforms Jack, Ralph stays morally strong and represents civilization throughout the novel. Cruelty proves to shows that Ralph’s character is very intelligent as he is able to think deeply. Cruelty also reveals how strong morally he is and how he will not succumb to savagery like the majority of the boys do. Lord of the Flies by William Golding, just proves to show that the cruelness of our savage, beast like instincts will take over without the order, rule, and conduct that civilized societies have to
At the beginning, clearly Ralph feels that Jack is an ally, a companion; not a rival for leadership, "Ralph found himself alone on a limb with Jack and they grinned at each other ... that strange invisible light of friendship". The chosen leader of the group, Ralph tried to lead the stranded boys into some kind of order. The authority of Jack and the sensibility of Piggy easily sway him. When Ralph first meets Piggy, he sees him as a lower person who should be ridiculed. He starts off by asking for his name and he is told that people used to make fun of
legacy is defined as something that someone has achieved that continues to exist after they stop working or die. Almost like life after death, Life After Death is the second and final studio album by Christopher Wallace, also known as Biggie Smalls. Released on March 25, 1997, by Bad Boy Records, it was released 16 days following his death on March 9, 1997. His legacy is clear through his popularity, musical technique, and his ability to tell stories through music.
There is also evidence in the form of letters that depict Wallace styling himself the ’Guardian of Scotland’ that bear no official declaration. Surrounding the Battle of Stirling Bridge there are questions about the prominence of Wallace in the preparations of the uprising, putting him in a subordinate position below more influential nobles. It can be said as well that the fame that would have been attributed to de Moray had he not died, went to Wallace instead, inflating his involvement in the conflict. There is also the underlying suspicion that the limited role Wallace had in ‘official’ accounts of the wars may not be an effect of distortion over time, but lack of actual involvement itself. From this point onward, it can be seen that there is doubt over how much influence Wallace had and how competent he actually was in battle strategy outside of guerrilla
Perhaps the most intriguing aspect of a person is their private life. I know that I do different things when I am alone or with close friends, which leads many of us to wonder what William Byrd, a wealthy Virginia planter, did in both his social and private sides of life, as well as what prompted him to write the various statements in his diary.
Both had to fight to gain independence. Washington and Wallace both had to become the face of their cause. The American Revolution probably would not have ended the way it did if Washington was not the leader of the Continental Army. The same could be said of Wallace in Braveheart. Without Wallace, the Scottish cause would have been shut down before it even began. Washington knew how to work the Continental Congress in order to get the resources he needed to win the war. Washington had military experience before he became the commander of the Continental Army. Washington fought in the French and Indian War. Without Washington being in charge of the Continental Army, America might not be a country. America could possibly still be under English control. Washington was an important piece of America winning the war. This could also be said for Wallace. Without Wallace, the Scots could possibly have not even begun the fight for independence. Washington is one of the main reasons America won the Revolutionary War. The outcome of the war would look completely different if Washington had not been the commander of the Continental
Ralph views himself as a bad person because that is the role he was designed to play in the game. The characters, players of the game, and game makers all view Ralph as a “bad guy”. Ralph wrecks things and Felix picks up the pieces. When the game is finished and its “after hours” no one seems to care about Ralphs feelings or him. I believe if just one character would show Ralph some recognition or befriend him, it would improve his self-concept.
Sir William Wallace was many things; a father, husband, rebel, traitor, and legend. Underneath these titles was a man who never consented to defeat and fought with a uniquely unwavering persistence and perseverance. He was a Scottish hero who rebelled against the British chains, and started the revolution that gained independence for his beloved country. The English saw Sir William as a turncoat, and he soon became King Edward's most sought after enemy. Sir Wallace is a phenomenal leader for the Scottish but a horrible conspirator for the British. There are two sides to every story, however this one ends with William
He has a better understanding of the boys. He also has more common sense and treats the boys better than Jack. Ralph shows that he has a better understanding of the boys than Jack. He knows that the boys need some sort of order on the island in order for them to survive. He starts with a simple form of government and sets a few rules for it.
Throughout William Golding's novel Lord of the Flies there is an ever-present conflict between two characters. Ralph's character combines common sense with a strong desire for civilized life. Jack, however, is an antagonist with savage instincts, which he cannot control. Ralph's goals to achieve a team unit with organization are destroyed by Jack's actions and words that are openly displayed to the boys. The two leaders try to convince the boys that their way of survival is correct.
died without an heir to the throne the nephew of the king also the king of
However, at the end of the book, he simply stood for a common human being. In the beginning of the story, before a formal introduction, Ralph was described simply as “a fair boy.” This already sets him out in a favorable light. Then it further describes how he is apparently good-looking and has the natural air of leadership. Of course, the conch played a big role when the kids voted him for leader, but his appearance played a large role as well. For the good first part of the book, Ralph has always symbolized leadership. As the story progresses and the kids became more and more distant from the idea of civilization, Ralph became more like a representation of common sense. Golding wrote, “‘I was chief, and you were going to do what I said. You talk. But you can’t even build huts-then you go off hunting and let the fire-’ He turned away, silent for a moment. Then his voice came again on a peak of feeling. ‘There was a ship-’” At this part, Ralph criticized Jack for not doing the necessary civilized things in favor of quenching his thirst for a hunt. As more and more of the kids become more and more uncivilized, Ralph became one of the last voices of common sense. When Simon and Piggy died, Ralph was the last one who retained that common sense and yearned for civilization. He had no leadership powers left anymore, and he stood for nothing more than a