Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
John D. Rockefeller the first
Essay on risk behavior
John D. Rockefeller the first
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: John D. Rockefeller the first
Rags to Riches A Comparative Essay on JD Rockefeller and Ted Turner
“Yet among men there are some endowed with vision, an insight more penetrating and more sustained. To their liberated spirit the world unfolds a farther prospect.” These words were spoken by Carleton Noyes to his class as they were analyzing The Harvard Classics (collection of poetry). This phrase means to reflect the driving genius behind such philanthropist entrepreneurs as John D. Rockefeller and Ted Turner. Both of these ‘supermen’ have displayed great determination in their lives, enabling each to accomplish far and above more mortal men. Ted Turner, for example, won the America’s Cup despite the fact that he had never been trained in competitive sailing. J. D. Rockefeller continued his work with the transportation and refining of oil though he was publicly excoriated for his merciless tactics of “winning at all costs.” We will seek to examine how determination, risk-taking, self-confidence, and vision enabled these men to excel in their respective lives.
Ted Turner was born as Robert Edward Turner in Cincinnati, Ohio in 1938. At age nine, Turner and his family moved to Atlanta, Georgia where his father began a billboard company. He was educated at the Georgia Military Academy in Tennessee, where he was given the nickname “Terrible Ted,” due to his interest and practice of taxidermy and his growing of grass in his room. Thereafter, Turner attended Brown University, where he took up yachting and became a master debater. He was later expelled from Brown for violating dormitory visitation rules.
In 1963, Turner’s father committed suicide because of emotional distress over his failing billboard business. When Ted initially inherited the business, he planned to sell it because of the substantial debt it had accrued, but reminded of his father’s legacy, he decided to try to run the company himself. Slowly, he paid off the debts, though many people were sure that like his father, he would also fail at his endeavor. However, within a few years, his father’s business was rebuilt into a successful enterprise.
In 1970, Turner bought a struggling UHF (ultrahigh frequency) television channel in Atlanta. At this time this station was the least popular of Atlanta’s channels because of its barren, uninteresting content. It provided Atlanta with only the ...
... middle of paper ...
...which these two men were involved. Perhaps in retrospect there is more commonality than differences. It seems inevitable that innovative and successful men and women will stir controversy not only on a local, but on a national level. The larger the persona, the larger the issues and the more people and government may seek to restrain their efforts. It is interesting to contemplate an individual’s achievement without such interventions. These two men serve as examples of how “man’s reach should extend beyond his grasp” and as such the sky may not be the limit.
Bibliography
Bibb, Porter. Ted Turner: It Ain’t as Easy as it Looks. Boulder. Johnson Books.
1997
Carr, Albert Z. John D. Rockefeller’s Secret Weapon. London. McGraw-Hill Book
Company, Inc. 1962
Chernow, Ron. Titan: The Life of John D. Rockefeller Sr. New York. Vintage Books, A
Division of Random House. 1998
Lowe, Janet. Ted Turner Speaks: Insight from the World’s Greatest Maverick. New
York. John Wiley & Sons. 1999
O’Connor, Richard. The Oil Barons: Men of Greed and Grandeur. Toronto. Little,
Brown, and Company. 1971
John D. Rockefeller as a Robber Baron A "robber baron" was someone who employed any means necessary to enrich themselves at the expense of their competitors. Did John D. Rockefeller fall into that category or was he one of the "captains of industry", whose shrewd and innovative leadership brought order out of industrial chaos and generated great fortunes that enriched the public welfare through the workings of various philanthropic agencies that these leaders established? In the early 1860s Rockefeller was the founder of the Standard Oil Company, who came to epitomize both the success and excess of corporate capitalism. His company was based in northwestern Pennsylvania. A major question historians have disagreed on has been whether or not John D. Rockefeller was a so-called "robber baron".
Greenberg, Kenneth S. ed., The Confessions of Nat Turner and Related Documents. New York: Bedford Books, 1996.
Men and women have come together to achieve success. Elijah Pierson and Robert Matthews have “a long and remarkable continuous history in the United States”
The quests for gold at the end of the rainbow, the hopes of thousands to one day live the fabled American Dream. Worldwide, everyone who is capable looks for their chance to strike it rich. Some of the most successful people today, such as Apple’s Steve Jobs and OK! Magazine’s Richard Desmond, have risen from tough backgrounds (Serafina). Growing up in abject poverty, these individuals found ways to push past the glass ceiling in their respective fields. Interestingly, many of them share similar obstacles on their way to the top.
During the 1800’s, business leaders who built their affluence by stealing and bribing public officials to propose laws in their favor were known as “robber barons”. J.P. Morgan, a banker, financed the restructuring of railroads, insurance companies, and banks. In addition, Andrew Carnegie, the steel king, disliked monopolistic trusts. Nonetheless, ruthlessly destroying the businesses and lives of many people merely for personal profit; Carnegie attained a level of dominance and wealth never before seen in American history, but was only able to obtain this through acts that were dishonest and oftentimes, illicit. Document D resentfully emphasizes the alleged capacity of the corrupt industrialists. In the picture illustrated, panic-stricken people pay acknowledgment to the lordly tycoons. Correlating to this political cartoon, in 1900, Carnegie was willing to sell his holdings of his company. During the time Morgan was manufacturing
Andrew Carnegie and John D. Rockefeller: Captains of industry, or robber barons? True, Andrew Carnegie and John D Rockefeller may have been the most influential businessmen of the 19th century, but was the way they conducted business proper? To fully answer this question, we must look at the following: First understand how Andrew Carnegie and John D. Rockefeller changed the market of their industries. Second, look at the similarities and differences in how both men achieved dominance.
...interpretations of their assumption of millions of dollars. Due to their appropriation of godlike fortunes, and numerous contributions to American society, they simultaneously displayed qualities of both aforementioned labels. Therefore, whether it be Vanderbilt’s greed, Rockefeller’s philanthropy, or Carnegie’s social Darwinist world view, such men were, quite unarguably, concurrently forces of immense good and evil: building up the modern American economy, through monopolistic trusts and exploitative measures, all the while developing unprecedented affluence. Simply, the captains of late 19th century industry were neither wholly “robber barons” or “industrial statesmen”, but rather both, as they proved to be indifferent to their “lesser man” in their quests for profit, while also helping to organize industry and ultimately, greatly improve modern American society.
In Harold C. Livesay’s Andrew Carnegie and the rise of Big Business, Andrew Carnegie’s struggles and desires throughout his life are formed into different challenges of being the influential leader of the United States of America. The book also covers the belief of the American Dream in that people can climb up the ladder of society by hard work and the dream of becoming an influential citizen, just as Carnegie did.
A penny saved may be a penny earned, just as a penny spent may begin to better the world. Andrew Carnegie, a man known for his wealth, certainly knew the value of a dollar. His successful business ventures in the railroad industry, steel business, and in communications earned him his multimillion-dollar fortune. Much the opposite of greedy, Carnegie made sure he had what he needed to live a comfortable life, and put what remained of his fortune toward assistance for the general public and the betterment of their communities. He stressed the idea that generosity is superior to arrogance. Carnegie believes that for the wealthy to be generous to their community, rather than live an ostentatious lifestyle proves that they are truly rich in wealth and in heart. He also emphasized that money is most powerful in the hands of the earner, and not anyone else. In his retirement, Carnegie not only spent a great deal of time enriching his life by giving back; but also often wrote about business, money, and his stance on the importance of world peace. His essay “Wealth” presents what he believes are three common ways in which the wealthy typically distribute their money throughout their life and after death. Throughout his essay “Wealth”, Andrew Carnegie appeals to logos as he defines “rich” as having a great deal of wealth not only in materialistic terms, but also in leading an active philanthropic lifestyle. He solidifies this definition in his appeals to ethos and pathos with an emphasis on the rewards of philanthropy to the mind and body.
To describe John D. Rockefeller in one word would be an extremely difficult, if not impossible thing to do. Rockefeller was known by so many things in his time and still today; a captain of industry who revolutionised the American economy with new business practices and keen management of what he controlled, a robber baron who lied and cheated his way to the top with back room dealings and taking advantage of the most disadvantaged of people. In his early life, Rockefeller grew up in Richmond, New York with his two brothers and two sisters about 20 years before the start of the Civil War as the child of Eliza Davison and William Avery Rockefeller. His father was con artist who spent most of John’s life traveling selling his various elixirs and his mother was a devout Baptist who John said shaped his life and most of his religious views for the rest of his life. Towards the end of his life, Rockefeller had built up a beyond substantial fortune but, seeing as how he was now retired from the oil industry and had no desire to invest into a new business, he decided to follow Andrew Carnegie's Gospel of Wealth by donating the bulk of his wealth to charity. John D. Rockefeller was truly a man who was almost undefinable despite the simple black and white labels that most people and historians have pinned upon him, as we examine his life it can be determined that Rockefeller was neither an evil man nor a good one but someone who lived his life in the grey.
Okrent,Daniel, Last Call, the rise and fall of prohibiton, New York ,Simon and Schuster Inc. 2010
...r V. Roberts and Henry E. Jacobs. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Inc. Simon Schuster/ A Viacom Company, 1998. 542-553.
Kenneth S. Greenberg et al., Nat Turner: A slave Rebellion in History and Memory (New York: Oxford University Press, 2003), 46.
In the book “Think and Grow Rich,” the author, Napoleon Hill, provides a set of principles that he calls the key to financial success. The idea at the center of these principles is that one becomes what he or she frequently thinks about, in this case success (i.e. rich). Hill lays out a method he created to translate one’s thoughts into reality, creating an insatiable hunger and drive within an individual to succeed. Using the examples of his son and some of America’s legendary iconic business leaders, of which Hill studied and interviewed, including Edwin C. Barnes, he demonstrates that anything one puts his or her mind to can be produced and conceived.
107. Twayne's United States Authors Series 36. Gale Virtual Reference Library. Web. 24 Jan. 2014.