Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The sermon on the mount in today's words
Sermon Of The Mount According With Matthew
The sermon on the mount in today's words
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The sermon on the mount in today's words
The issues raised by Jesus’ Sermon on the Mount number in the multitudes like the crowd that followed him the day he delivered it. Even if the crowd’s size was exaggerated for dramatic effect and that number is a small one, it still represents many questions. Some of these concerns have to do with what some commentators say the sermon meant. Other issues that arise concerning what Jesus actually said without the shadowy veil of interpretation. For those who illustrate the loudest about what Jesus said in the Sermon often live it the least. Preachers and politicians, for Jesus was political, instruct their followers and constituents how to live as Jesus said when their lives are hardly examples of the virtues Jesus taught in the Sermon on the Mount. That then has become the most serious issue raised by the Sermon, the interpretation of it.
Chronologically, the first perplexing portion of the Sermon, the Beatitudes, stretches roughly from Matthew verse 3 through verse 11, but the two verses before that tell how Jesus saw the crowd and climbed a mountain. Presumably he climbed the mountain, which probably means a hill and not an actual mountain, to affect the echo factor; sort of an ancient sound system. He also sat down indicating he was relaxed, not being dramatic as many modern day preachers would be delivering the same sort of address. Historically, teachers sat down and students gathered around to listen in the Socratic fashion. Many commentators say that is the pose Jesus took while delivering the Sermon too, speaking and teaching calmly, not wildly gesticulating and wiping his face with his fancy handkerchief, worn specifically for such an occasion when he might be so overcome with the spirit as to warrant whipping it ou...
... middle of paper ...
...ngry adversary, frothing at the mouth, turn almost immediately docile in wonder at the unexpected kindness from someone s/he is treating so badly.
That message should be the one those ranting preachers teach, one of Jesus’ type of vengeance, not the kind they think is justice—death for homosexuals, poverty for those not born into the right income bracket, disease for those who believe differently than they do. If those who want to make a show of their piety want to truly show their desire to follow Jesus’ teaching, then they need to get down from the pulpit, the podium, the stage, and go sit at the feet of Jesus on the mount. They need to genuinely desire to have world peace, eradicate poverty and sickness, take care of the earth, and to generally love their fellow humans, not try to re-teach, re-interpret, and re-think what Jesus said. They need to just live it.
Howard Thurman in his book, “Jesus and the Disinherited” presented Jesus as a role model for the oppressed on how to find strength, freedom and peace within God and oneself. Thurman shares the story of how Jesus offered an alternative to accepting the Roman rules, like the Sadducees did in hope of being allowed to maintain their Jewish traditions; A solution to remaining silently obedient, like the Pharisees, as hatred and resentment destroyed them from within. Jesus provided an alternative solution to the Zealots of his day who resorted to physical force to advance their justified cause, often paying the ultimate cost, their life. Jesus taught love. Love of God, self, neighbor and especially your enemy. Thurman stresses that Jesus know that “it is man’s reaction to things that determines their ability to exercise power over them”.(Thurman, 18) Jesus taught and modeled the art of strength through humility. He
And while describing the fiery wrath of the “Angry God,” Edwards states, “The use of this awful subject may be for awakening unconverted persons in this congregation.” By focusing on this group of people, Edwards instills a sense of fear within the audience of “sinners.” 3) Edwards purpose in delivering this sermon was to inform “sinners” of the inevitable doom that He thus creates a sense of helplessness in his audience, and encourages them to submit to God and renew their faith in Christianity. His use of parallelism allows Edwards to exponentially build a sense of fear, and it is maintained throughout this sermon.
unconverted sinners to try and convince the unconverted to live the life of christ instead of
Lastly, relevance doesn't change the message; it reshapes its presentation. Let us not become like the Pharisees who were willing to crucify anyone who challenged their traditions and their stylistic inflexibility, confining people to a dead and dull religion. “God: The Villanelle” by Marvin Klotz is a perfect example of someone who sees religion confined to rules, rituals, and regulations. It is evident that Klotz views religion as a source of much human misery:
...ne; after all, it is easy to react against those who have harmed you with rage and violence. However, to show mercy and compassion is something extraordinary.
N.T Wright (2008) stated that “When we read the scriptures as Christians, we read it precisely as people of the new covenant and of the new creation” (p.281). In this statement, the author reveals a paradigm of scriptural interpretation that exists for him as a Christian, theologian, and profession and Bishop. When one surveys the entirety of modern Christendom, one finds a variety of methods and perspectives on biblical interpretation, and indeed on the how one defines the meaning in the parables of Jesus. Capon (2002) and Snodgrass (2008) offer differing perspectives on how one should approach the scriptures and how the true sense of meaning should be extracted. This paper will serve as a brief examination of the methodologies presented by these two authors. Let us begin, with an
The book of Matthew chapter 5 through 7 was known as, “The Sermon on the Mount”. Which were words spoken by Jesus Christ. The purpose of this Sermon was to show representation of the normative foundation of Christian Morality. For instance, this passage was more so fixated on whole hearted benevolence towards others around you and genuine devotion to God.
Jesus however, has much different beliefs. He believes there is a certain way to live in order to achieve the greater things in the after life. For doing the right thing for god is the way we all need to live. At times in the story “Sermon on the mount,” it can sound very radical. Saying things such as "Whoever marries a divorced woman commits adultery," and "If you say, 'You fool, ' you will be liable to the hell of
Allegedly given by Jesus, the Sermon is taken as an instruction manual for Christian living. First, Matthew 5:1, Jesus ascends the mountain to preach the sermon keeping the tradition of Moses ascending and giving sermons on Mt. Sinai to the people. Taking a closer glance at the sermon, we get the opportunity to inquire what Jesus taught his disciples, and whether he also abided by his own teachings. Jesus proclaims that the poor in spirit are blessed because they will get to the kingdom of heaven. While it does not explain spirit poorness, it can be assumed to be a general situation of sadness. While it does not explain the connection between spiritual poverty and the Heaven Kingdom, such verses have been used to calm
The book consists of three parts. The first part has five chapters of which focuses on explaining what the key questions are and why we find them difficult to answer. The second part has nine chapters explaining in detail what N.T. Wright considers Jesus’ public career and the approach he had in first century Palestine. The third part of the book, the last chapter, challenges readers to wrestle with the questions of Jesus’ life and ministry.
Jesus was a phenomenal communicator. In fact, Jesus was the greatest communicator to ever live. He used strategies and techniques that were previously unheard of to get his point across in any situation, regardless of the circumstances. What is interesting is that his most common form of speaking was in parables. He would use these analogies to provide a way of application for the gospel in people lives. The parable about the workers in the vineyard is one of many, but is one of the few that were only told in the book of Matthew. Although there a many assumptions as to the reasoning for this, nobody can be sure of the reason why this parable is nowhere to be found in the other gospels. It is especially confusing because in this parable Jesus talks about end times and entrance into heaven; which would have been, and still is, an important subject to any believer.
To sum it up, the word of God in the Sermon on the Mount, is distinct from the one in the Quran because it focuses more on the avoiding to be a hypocrite, and be secretive, and suggests a believer to refuse to physically defend and love their enemies whereas the passages from the Quran, focus on being more descriptive about the rules and importance of its fulfillment defending oneself and their religion from enemies and slaying them in return as long as its done in the way of God. It seems like whatever the Quran doesn’t cover in these passages about certain topics is covered in the passages in the Sermon on the Mounts because in Islam, there’s also the saying of not letting the left hand know what the right hand is doing while giving money
Answering these questions is the purpose of this essay. I begin by arguing that the Bible cannot be adequately understood independent of its historical context. I concede later that historical context alone however is insufficient, for the Bible is a living-breathing document as relevant to us today as it was the day it was scribed. I conclude we need both testimonies of God at work to fully appreciate how the Bible speaks to us.
The New Testament consists of 27 books and 260 chapters. The first chapters of scripture we will observe is Matthew 13:3-23; Mark 4:3-25: and Luke 8:5-18. These scriptures inform us of the “Parable of the Sower”, “Still other seed fell on good soil, where it produced a crop—a hundred, sixty or thirty times what was sown. Whoever has ears, let them hear.” (Mt. 13:8-9) We will, in addition, discuss the family of Jesus, His disciples, religious leaders, and the crowds.
The Messiah left the people hopeful by explaining how easy it is to enter the kingdom of Heaven. According to Matthew 5:3-12, the people with righteous hearts will definitely inherit the kingdom of Heaven. Jesus inspires everyone to be humble, merciful, peaceful, and kind to one another, and he also mentions the importance of forgiveness and love several times, portraying his loving nature. Christ warns the nations to not fear persecution, because their reward in heaven will be great. Jesus mentions that Christians are to be the salt of the earth and the light of the world. However, salt without saltiness is worthless; hence, Christians without spiritual knowledge won’t get far in life. Christ motivates Christians to stand out by being loving, kind, compassionate; a reflection of Jesus so that unbelievers are eager to become Christians as well (New International Version, Matt.5:13-17). Additionally, he mentions the consequences of murder, adultery, and divorce. He talks about the sincerity of oaths and the importance of loving your enemies and giving to the poor. Jesus preaches about the importance of prayer because it is the way of communicating with the Lord. The Lord favors intimate and personal prayers over hypocritical prayers in public (New International Version, Matt.5.21-33,43, 6.1-5,25). Christ mentions the