Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Is ai a threat to humans essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Is ai a threat to humans essay
From the beginning, as technology casually began to integrate into our daily routine. A significant portion of society lived in constant fear of a possible uprising from an advanced robotic regime, which we built to serve us, which would rally together and enslave the entire human race. Well, probably not that many people believed this, nevertheless, the scenario has been depicted in popular media for several decades. This iconic list of nefarious antagonists includes HAL 90001, M52, Master Control Program3, Skynet4, and the demented little robot who dastardly ascertained the capacity to ‘love’, Wall-E5. A science fiction writer named Isaac Asimov, who was also popular for portraying this theme, became immortalized on the day his Three Laws of Robotics6 were published. The laws which were substantially influential on pop culture, were written as follows; (1) A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm. (2) A robot must obey the orders given to it by human beings, except where such orders would conflict with the First Law. (3) A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Laws7. The overwhelming success from the introduction of these laws unto mainstream media could be seen as a reflection of the subtle concern present amongst the general public when considering Artificial Intelligence (AI)8. Even Stephen Hawking laid out his extreme concerns recently, over the future of AI, by remarking "success in creating AI would be the biggest event in human history,[but] unfortunately, it might also be the last"9. However, computing technology, as it exists today, functions at only a fraction of the human brain’s capacity and it w... ... middle of paper ... ...s work pertaining to the Doctrine of Elements. Therefore, the argument can offer grounds to the claim that computers are in fact capable of human thought, but only through different means, which can be extrapolated and reappropriated to be found compatible. 1 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968)2 Star Trek: The Original Series (1968)3 Tron (1982)4 Terminator series5 Wall-E (2008)6 Runaroun, Isaac Asimov. Street and Smith Publications, Inc. 19427 In later books, a zeroth law was introduced: 0. A robot may not harm humanity, or, by inaction, allow humanity to come to harm8 Artificial intelligence will be shortened to AI for the rest of the essay9 ilib10 Clark, Liat. "Google’s Artificial Brain Learns to Find Cat Videos." Wired.com. Conde Nast Digital, 24 June 0012. Web. 03 May 2014.11 ilib12A11/B2513 B xvii14 B1815 (A11/B25)16 (A22/B39)17 A77/B10318 A78/B10419 A10320 A79/B105
Nick Bilton starts “Artificial Intelligence as a Threat” with a comparison of Ebola, Bird flu, SARS, and artificial intelligence. Noted by Bilton, humans can stop Ebola, bird flu, and SARS. However, artificial intelligence, if it ever exceeds human intelligence, would not be stoppable by humans. Bilton, in his article, argues that AI is the biggest threat to humans at our current time, more serious than Ebola and other diseases. Bilton references many books and articles which provide examples of threats of AI.
In the short story “Runaround”, published in 1942, the author Isaac Asimov introduced Three Laws of Robotics to his readers. Briefly speaking, these laws prohibited a robot from injuring or killing a human being under any condition, even if its owner asked it to do so. However, by the end of year 2008, there were around 12,000 U.S. military robots on the ground in Iraq (Singer, 2011). It seems like the three laws of robotics do not apply to the real world. It is natural to think that the use of military robotics will reduce the casualties of their interested parties, but, in reality, robots can be out of control due to various reasons, including technical errors and unethical commands from programmers or commanders. This article will illustrate the advantages and disadvantages of military robotics in battlefields, and discuss the need for adaptations of ethical rules in a world of artificial intelligence.
I, Robot is a film where highly intelligent robots fulfill public service positions throughout the world, operating under the three rules to keep the humans safe. These three rules are: A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm. A robot must obey the orders given to it by the human being, except where such orders would conflict with the first law. A robot must protect its own existence as long as it does not interfere with the first or second laws. In fact, the mastermind behind all the robots is Alfred Lanning and it is disseminated throughout the world that a robot has murdered him. Because of this, Detective Del Spooner, despite his troubled dark history with robotics is investigating the alleged suicide of U.S. Robotics founder Lanning and
In today’s society, artificial intelligence has advanced and evolved how society functions on a daily basis. In order to comprehend the extent of artificial intelligence, the definition must first be stated. Artificial intelligence, or AI, can be defined as the development of computer systems able to perform tasks that normally require human intelligence (“Artificial intelligence,” dictionary.com). Examples of AI ranges from Google’s search algorithms to autonomous weapons (“Benefits & Risks of Artificial Intelligence”). However, with the increase of dependency and influence from artificial intelligence, society should keep the following in mind; should we be afraid of singularity? In addition, should there be laws ratified in order to restrict
Artificial Intelligence, also known as AI, allows a machine to function as if the machine has the capability to think like a human. While we are not expecting any hovering cars anytime soon, artificial intelligence is projected to have a major impact on the labor force and will likely replace about half the workforce in the United States in the decades to come. The research in artificial intelligence is advancing rapidly at an unstoppable rate. So while many people feel threatened by the possibility of a robot taking over their job, computer scientists actually propose that robots would benefit a country’s efficiency of production, allowing individuals to reap the benefits of the robots. For the advantage of all, researchers and analysts have begun to mend the past ideas of human-robot interaction. They have pulled inspiration from literary works of Isaac Asimov whom many saw as the first roboticist ahead of his time, and have also gotten ideas of scholarly research done by expert analysts. These efforts have began to create an idea of a work force where humans and robots work together in harmony, on a daily basis.
The traditional notion that seeks to compare human minds, with all its intricacies and biochemical functions, to that of artificially programmed digital computers, is self-defeating and it should be discredited in dialogs regarding the theory of artificial intelligence. This traditional notion is akin to comparing, in crude terms, cars and aeroplanes or ice cream and cream cheese. Human mental states are caused by various behaviours of elements in the brain, and these behaviours in are adjudged by the biochemical composition of our brains, which are responsible for our thoughts and functions. When we discuss mental states of systems it is important to distinguish between human brains and that of any natural or artificial organisms which is said to have central processing systems (i.e. brains of chimpanzees, microchips etc.). Although various similarities may exist between those systems in terms of functions and behaviourism, the intrinsic intentionality within those systems differ extensively. Although it may not be possible to prove that whether or not mental states exist at all in systems other than our own, in this paper I will strive to present arguments that a machine that computes and responds to inputs does indeed have a state of mind, but one that does not necessarily result in a form of mentality. This paper will discuss how the states and intentionality of digital computers are different from the states of human brains and yet they are indeed states of a mind resulting from various functions in their central processing systems.
Bar-Cohen, Y. (2009). The coming robot revolution expectations and fears about emerging intelligent, humanlike machines. Springer.
Should the progression of robotic technology be limited? Are movies like Terminator foretelling what will happen as the twenty-first century expands its boundaries with robotics? Are robots becoming too smart? Should humans trust robots to learn and act on their own? Can and will robots turn on their masters? In the movie Terminator a robot from the future comes back to forewarn the people that if they do not change the direction that technology is going then the world would be over taken by robots. This android, the Terminator, told the people stories of how robots would become smarter than their masters and overtake them. In an opportunity to rid the world of humans the robots try to exterminate humans from the face of the Earth. The humans have little to no chance of survival because they built the robots to be perfect and very intelligent. Where is the limit on society's safety? In the last two decades of the twentieth century, progress has gone beyond the wildest imagination of almost every inventor or dreamer. Faster and better are the keys for words that society yearns for. The technological age is in full force and robots are in the main stream of this tidal wave.
The concept of weaponized autonomous robots is heavily debated due to the ethical implications their existence poses. Over the years, the stance on how to approach such a topic has drastically changed with the need to create newer weapons for the military to compete with potential threats from other nations. As this paper will discuss, what used to be a precautionary approach when discussing robot autonomy has now taken a backseat to the rushed development of these weapons. The research of this technology has now produced an arms race, as predicted by writers from the past who warned us about the issues that may rise from creating such weapons before establishing a mutually agreed upon code of conduct. Being that there were no real boundaries on this type of technology in the pre-2010 era, many researchers sought to establish guidelines. But their attempts seemed to have fallen on deaf ears when many experts today agree that such weaponry inevitably under production due to the power
Many are worried that if a military were to give an intelligent machine, one that can make its own decisions, control over weapons and systems then catastrophe would soon follow. If an AI were to decide at some point that humans were no longer necessary or that conflict was necessary, it would have control over powerful weapons and be able to wreak havoc in human society. The use of AI for hostile or malicious reasons is almost guaranteed to backfire and cause more damage than ever anticipated. The routes could be varied and complex- corporations seeking technological advantage, countries seeking to beat their enemies, or a slow boiled frog kind of evolution leading to enfeeblement and dependency
The last short story we read, “Little Lost Robot” is what sticks out the most. The fact that the government is trying to create a robot that is able to have a modified first law gives a hint of something dangerous to come. In creating a robot that is able to watch people come to harm and not do anything hits that the government may try to create army robots in the future.due to the way the short stories progress I would not be shocked if this was an outcome. Using robots to do the dirty work of people is still wrong especially when the robots are made to be similar to
From the first imaginative thought to manipulate nature to the development of complex astronomical concepts of space exploration, man continues to this day to innovate and invent products or methods that improve and enhance humankind. Though it has taken 150 million years to reach the present day, the intellectual journey was not gradual in a linear sense. If one were to plot significant events occurring throughout human existence, Mankind’s ability to construct new ideas follows a logarithmic path, and is rapidly approaching an asymptote, or technological singularity. This singularity event has scientists both supporting and rejecting the concept of an imaginative plateau; the largest topic discussed is Artificial Intelligence (A.I.). When this technological singularity is reached, it is hypothesized that man’s greatest creation, an artificial sapient being, will supersede human brain capacity.
Why is it that we have an underlying fear that robots will eventually take over the world? Is it plausible that perhaps robots are superior to humans; or rather, that a creation will eventually rule its creator? Despite the frightening rate of technological improvements, the robots that we create do not exceed what we are as humans because those robots cannot “think” on their own. Specifically, robots have no ethics, creativity, nor sense of self.
However later, after feeling these to be insufficent he added a "Zeroth Law" which is: "A Robot may not harm humanity or through inaction allow humanity to come to harm". The revised laws of robotics is:
Artificial Intelligence “is the ability of a human-made machine to emulate or simulate human methods for the deductive and inductive acquisition and application of knowledge and reason” (Bock, 182). The early years of artificial intelligence were seen through robots as they exemplified the advances and potential, while today AI has been integrated society through technology. The beginning of the thought of artificial intelligence happened concurrently with the rise of computers and the dotcom boom. For many, the utilization of computers in the world was the most advanced role they could ever see machines taking. However, life has drastically changed from the 1950s. This essay will explore the history of artificial intelligence, discuss the