Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Evaluate sociological explanations of the role of mass media in creating moral panics about crime and deviance
Moral panics in today's society
Moral panics in today's society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Evaluate sociological explanations of the role of mass media in creating moral panics about crime and deviance
The Western Australian (WA) response to shark attacks, that is the shark cull, is an example of a moral panic. Moral panics are not a new concept to modern society; episodes of panic, anxiety or alarm over numerous forms of perceived threats an element of society. Many studies have been conducted since Stanley Cohen first addressed the concept in 1972 with his book ‘Folk Devils and Moral Panics: The Creation of the Mods and Rockers’ – including that of Erich Goode and Nachman Ben-Yehuda (Moral Panics: The Social Construction of Deviance). A combination of these two studies results in what Brian Klocke and Glenn Muschert defined as a ‘Hybrid Model’ (Klocke and Muschert, 2010) to determine moral panics in a contemporary world; one where the “widespread concept of moral panic…in recent decades has obscured its conceptual coherence” (Krinsky, 2013).
Perceived threats to the ‘moral fabric of society’ (OED Online, 2014), moral panics (as agreed by most sociologists who have studied and explored the phenomenon) to a great degree take place in the media. Cohen not only emphasized the crucial role of media in the constructions of moral panic, but also established a five-part process to moral panics:
1. Behavior by folk devils is defined as threat to societal values and interests.
2. The threat is depicted in a recognizable dramatic form by the media.
3. A rapid build-up of public concern arises.
4. Authorities, politicians and moral entrepreneurs call for a strong solution to the problem.
5. The panic recedes or results in social and institutional changes. (Krinsky, 2013)
Erich Goode and Nachman Ben-Yehuda then expanded on Cohen’s concept of moral panics in their study by outlining the elemental characteristics of a moral panic: concern...
... middle of paper ...
...ish Journal of Sociology, (1997): 629--648. Print.
Krinsky, Charles. The Ashgate research companion to moral panics. Farnham, Surrey, England: Ashgate, 2013. Print.
Mcrobbie, Angela and Sarah L Thornton. "Rethinking'moral panic'for multi-mediated social worlds." British journal of sociology, (1995): 559--574. Print.
Miller, Barbara. "The World Today - New shark attack sparks political frenzy." 2 March. 2009. Web. 15 Apr 2014. Available at: http://www.abc.net.au/cgi-bin/common/printfriendly.pl?http://www.abc.net.au/worldtoday/content/2008/s2504985
Skelton, R. 2013. Can governments protect people from killer sharks? [online] 22 December. Available at: http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-12-22/can-governments-protect-people-from-killer-sharks/5158880 [Accessed 14 April 2014]
Sunstein, Cass R. "Overreaction to Fearsome Risks Cass R. Sunstein and Richard Zeckhauser." Print.
We all know that there are much bigger threats in the world today. Should we be worried about people's fault of going into the sharks territories? O...
“Moral panic has been defined as a situation in which public fears and state interventions greatly exceed the objective threat posed
In the article, “Moral Panics: Culture, Politics, and Social Construction” the authors Erich Goode and Nachman Ben-Yehuda discuss two different perspectives of moral panics. Each perspective give a different way of looking at how moral panics are portrayed to come about in society. The Objectivist perspective and the Constructionist perspective show how people view moral panics. However, the Constructionist perspective is more important and valuable to society than the Objectivist perspective.
Jackson, Shirley. “The Possibility of Evil.” Literature Reading, Reacting, Writing. Kirszner, Laurie. Mandell Stephen. 4th edition. Sea Harbor: Harcourt College Publishers. 2001. 463-474
The bull shark may be responsible for many shark attacks in the world but I believe that we have no right to kill them. Sharks are very important to animals food cycles and if the food cycles get messed up it can greatly effect the world. In fact, the bull shark is more vulnerable to human impact due to their ability to live in fresh and salt water but many sharks that are killed are for either shark fin soup or their liver oil. The sharks liver oil has many uses now but it started as a machine lubricant. Another way that sharks die is by recreational fishing. The sharks can get caught up in the fishermen's nets and eventually suffocate and die. As an environmental community, I feel like we need to inform people about shark habits and how to keep sharks safe. The water is their home and we are
The Great Shark debate – to cull or not to cull, has been at the forefront of the minds of conservationists, as well as the general population for many decades now. The opinions of everyone are divided, according to their personal experiences, and views on what is right and wrong for the environment.
Moral Panics and the Media. Oxford: Oxford University Goode, E and Ben- Yehuda, N. (1994) Moral Panics. The social construction of deviance. Oxford: Blackwells.
In 2015 only 59 shark attacks have occurred around the world compared to the millions of sharks killed by humans every year. Due to these accidental shark attacks people tend to think that sharks, especially Great Whites are evil creatures with malice intentions when attacks do occur; but, on the contrary that is wrong. Sharks are not the only beautiful and unique creatures in the ocean, they also play a vital role in our ecosystem; however, due to human interference they might not be around much longer, through awareness sharks can be protected from endangerment.
Specific Purpose: To persuade the audience to go online and sign a petition to help stop shark killings and to support the entire Racing Extinction cause in order to save species around the world from going extinct.
Criminal justice through “moral panic” is “a condition, episode, person or groups of person emerges to become defined as a threat to societal values and interests; its nature is presented in a stylized and stereotypical fashion by the mass media; the moral barricades are managed by editors, bishops, politicians, and other right-thinking people; socially accredited experts pronounce their diagnoses and solutions; ways of coping are evolved or (more often) resorted to; the condition then disappears, submerges or deteriorates and become more visible.” (Kraska, 2004) Thus by creating this moral panic, which is an emotion, by involves media, government officials, public, politicians and interested parties that exaggerate the problem from how big the problem really is. “The idea of emotion as a kind of cognitive shortcut explains why jurors, like children are more likely to make emotional judgments than judges.” (Bandes, 311, 1999) Society alone has many emotions towards criminals and victims ranging from hate, anger, fear towards ...
A moral panic can be defined as a phenomenon, frequently initiated by disquieting media and reinforced by responsive laws and public policies, of embellished public concern, angst or anger over a perceived danger to societal order (Krinsky, 2013). The media plays a crucial role in emphasizing a current moral panic. In Jock Young’s chapter Images of Deviance (1971), he comments on the phenomenon of deviance magnification, he deems dramatic media coverage of deviant behaviours to be ironic, owing to the fact that it unintentionally increases rather than restrains the apparent deviance. In hind sight the media create social problems, owing to the fact that they can present them dramatically and are able to do it swiftly (Young & Cohen, 1971: 37).
A media panic or often referred to as a moral panic, is a term that describes how the media is formulating issues amongst our society. Over time, our culture has shifted and caused for many conclusions regarding media panics and the relationship between youth and the media culture. Based upon previous knowledge and course readings, I have drawn a very disturbing conclusion; this being that no matter what age, children are willing or non willingly now under surveillance to determine what kind of role media is playing in their lives. With what I have gathered from the readings and class lectures, most authors strongly believe that different forms of media directly influence children's thinking or perception. What authors and researchers continue to imply is that there is a direct correlation to what youth today see on different forms of media and their behaviours. However, it is important to remember that children are humans as well and do have a mind of their owns. Our society cannot assume that these media panics ultimately take away their ability to think on their own and develop into mature individuals. The first media panic I will discuses is how video games have developed a relationship with violence amongst our children. The second media panic is the sexual objectification of young women online.
The Land Shark Index Page. Anti-Vivisection Index. March 1995. The Land Shark.
Curran, J. and Gurevitch, M. (eds.) Mass Media and Society: fourth edition. Arnold, pp. 29-43.
Moral Panic was first used by Stanley Cohen in 1972 which was seen in his book ‘Devils and Moral Panics’. In this he described the power in which the media had, by using the 1960s “mods” and rockers” teenage groups who behaviour was seen as threatening the British culture. It has been said that over the last decade moral panic has effected a pattern shift in the social construction of deviance and social problems (Thompson and Greek, 2012). Moral Panic tends to show fears regarding issues that are centre to society. Examples of moral panics which have taken place in the past include the mods and rockers, mugging and sex and HIV. The mods and rockers is one of the most well-known one when it comes to moral panic, Cohen wanted to find out what caused moral panic and he looked at this issue. The mods and rockers were two groups, one group was extremely conscious about what they wore and the rockers were more of a stereotypical biker gang. The two gangs started to have scuffles at a holiday resorts, but nothing major. However, headlines of blow what had happened out of proportion, with headlines saying “‘Day of Terror by Scooter Groups’ (Daily Telegraph), ‘Wild Ones Invade Seaside – 97 arrests’ (Daily Mirror)” (Luce, 2013). From this, people started to look at youths as trouble makers and just causing crimes. Which in fact they were not and it was only a small group of people in society. However, the media made it look like it was all youths, so from this societies perspective on certain groups had changed and things which were ok before had now become as deviant behaviour or criminal. This shows the crime is both a social construction and a social fact because something which society didn’t