Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Harm of technology in our society today
Harm of technology in our society today
The pedestrian ray bradbury analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Harm of technology in our society today
Millions of people around the world have been questioning the statement, “Which is better, the individual or the society?” Many people debate this question today and even well known authors who have written novels and short stories about this topic. Many of these authors have proven their beliefs by warning their readers what the world could become if society is not controlled properly. In other words, if people rely on technology and equality too much in the future, then society will face multiple consequences that will affect many people’s lives. Another question that frequently appears is, “Why is fear of government pressure control such a huge problem with many sci-fi societies in books, movies and short stories?” The authors Kurt Vonnegut, Ray Bradbury, and Kurt Wimmer all portray societies where original ideas and freedoms are suppressed because they believed that society could eventually take control of individuals’ freedom and rights to life through technology and equality.
First of all, my first story which proves that society could potentially take control of people’s lives is The Pedestrian. Ray Bradbury writes this story in the perspective of the main character, Leonard Mead, who goes for a walk in the evening. Unfortunately, society at that time is too lazy or “screen controlled” to understand why people need to go for a walk or simply get some fresh air like Leonard does. Bradbury describes the scene of this society by writing, “The tombs, ill-lit by television light, where the people sat like the dead, the gray or multicolored lights touching their faces, but never really touching them,” (Bradbury 3). This quote illustrates many individually aligned houses all dark and lonely with a touch of colorful light inside...
... middle of paper ...
...ogy and equality can rule society faster than humanity may think because people today are so inclined to allowing the latest innovations to perform and simplify work for them. Vonnegut, Bradbury, and Wimmer predicted correctly that the world has changed significantly since these stories were written by them. Someday, these stories may come true because people are unaware of the consequences that are coming from excessive amounts of equality and technology in people’s everyday lives. To prevent this from happening, people need to limit their use of technology, to increase their activity level, and to refrain from judging people based on their looks or interests. Remember, if society fails to maintain a good balance with technology and equality, then the nation will become eaten up by using people as hosts.
Works Cited
(Bradbury 3)
(Vonnegut 3-4)
(Wimmer 2002)
Ancient Greek philosopher Aristotle once said, “The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal.” Kurt Vonnegut portrays Aristotle’s philosophy brilliantly in his short story “Harrison Bergeron.” The story depicts the American government in the future mandating physical handicaps in an attempt to make everyone equal. Vonnegut describes a world where no one is allowed to excel in the areas of intelligence, athletics, or beauty. Yet, the inequalities among the people shine even brighter. Vonnegut uses satire to explore the question of whether true equality can ever really exist.
……………Most of the numerous and very disparate urban utopias imagined since antiquity, claim more or less a social justice combining equality, fairness, and freedom. However the methods invented to reach this social justice often lead to more binding law, sometimes up to the absurd, that limited the abilities and capacities of the citizens. Thus, behind the mask of an ideal equality, is concealed in fact, a tremendous social injustice. In “Harrison Bergeron”, Kurt Vonnegut’s shows us the consequences of sacrificing freedom for perfect equality by using the story of an excessive utopia to demonstrate that a society in which total equality exists, is not only oppressive, but also static and inefficient. Vonnegut exemplifies the image of fairness
In every revolution, there are winners and losers. Every dystopia is a utopia for somebody else. It depends on where you are, and if you succeed in creating a utopia. Hence, we would have created a world without conflict, in which everything is perfect. Nevertheless, if there is no conflict, there would be no stories that would portray the real issue that is occurring in this world. After reading Kurt Vonnegut stories, Harrison Bergeron and 2BR02B, he explains the impact that the government has on people’s lives. It is connected with how individuals work and operate in society and hinders their every movement. Although the stories share similar themes, each has a unique style which gives us the gift of their joys and sorrows, strengths, weakness
What is in store for the future of our society? Perhaps we’re already living in it. What changes do people want made? Ray Bradbury, author of “Fahrenheit 451,” writes about one theory for our society’s future where reading books is found as illegal, if caught reading the books are burned. People must learn how to live life through gigantic televisions built into the walls of homes. In a futuristic world, true beauty goes unseen due to conformity.
Vonnegut and Jackson, through the use of well written short stories, have managed to address concerning issues in today’s societies. Through the use of Harrison Bergeron Kurt Vonnegut was able to address the growing issue of equality, this is a very important issue as many people in modern societies view the idea of equality to be incredible. Shirley Jackson through The Lottery addressed the concerning issue of societies blindly following religions and traditions due to superstitions and the unwillingness to change. These dystopian texts demonstrate the inevitable outcome these problems will eventually cause.
In conclusion, the complete freedom and absolute equality have been a goal of innumerable societies throughout human history. However, these two ideal cannot exist together in their most perfect forms because the perfect forms of either freedom or equality represent total chaos or total oppression, as we can see in “Harrison Bergeron,” the consequences of sacrificing freedom for perfect equality. The author uses the story of this imaginary perfect world where everyone is happy to demonstrate that a society in which total equality exists is not only oppressive, but also inert and unproductive. Using his futuristic scenario, the simplicity of the society, and the actions of his characters, Vonnegut makes his point of view of a repressive society. In addition, societies that try to create total equality have almost always proven to be oppressive, such as China.
Imagine the world we are living in today, now imagine a world where we are told who to marry, where to work, who to hate and not to love. It is hard to imagine right, some people even today are living in the world actually have governments that are controlling their everyday life. In literature many writers have given us a view of how life may be like if our rights as citizen and our rights simply as human beings. One day the government may actually find a way to control and brainwash people into beings with no emotions like they have in the book 1984 where they express only hate, because that’s what they have been taught by the party.
Conclusively, dystopian texts are written to provide a warning about future times. Authors and directors use a variety of techniques to put their idea forward and have an impact of the audience. Rules that the chosen texts exhibit include that citizens have a fear of the outside world and all citizens adhere to a strict set of rules, but there is a main protagonist who scrutinises the governments or society’s nature. The rules that authors and directors use to put forward their messages of the moral issues human cloning and relying too much on technology and instinctively perusing traditions are evident throughout all three texts.
What gives the reader the false idea of utopia in Vonnegut’s “Harrison Bergeron” is the deep social control in the form handicaps where individual’s abilities and competence and even appearance are neutralized and vilified as a form of inequality. The characteristics of equality chosen by Vonnegut; beauty, athleticism, and intelligence is important to the story’s message. The main focus of the story are the characteristics of equality that are subjective, the very same characteristics we are born with that makes us different and minimally states the objective ones, the ones that plague our society today. This not only satirizes the epitome of equality itself, but rather the people’s flawed ideals and belief of what total equality is supposed to be or should be.
How does the power of an evil, controlling government negatively affect the lives of numerous humans in a society? In Anthem, by Ayn Rand, the communist government takes away one’s individuality by coercing the characters to obey strict rules and forcing the members of society to work only as a group. Equality, the protagonist, struggles to find joy and satisfaction in conforming to society’s demands, and encounters conflict as he comes to realize the flaws in his civilization. By comparison, Ray Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451 illustrates the dangers of the unnatural dependency on technology that causes citizens to be ignorant and shallow in order for the government to control their thoughts and actions. As the story progresses, the main character, Montag, experiences difficult circumstances after discovering the hidden value of books and the cruelty of his authority.
Huxley and Niccol demonstrate in their fictionist stories that humanity cannot be changed and cannot be controlled; it is just what it is. The government cannot create a society, nobody can, a society is self-made, and all we can do is be a part of it. Nevertheless, the main purpose of these stories is that we as humans need to stay humans, we need to stay a society; and there are so many changes that are being made in today’s times, but don’t let that change our humanistic ways.
Contradictions of beliefs can bring about war, despair, and anarchy. A society that does not have a set rules and guidelines cannot find agreement and a sense of direction. Yet, immeasurable change, progression, and development have all occurred in response to an idea that is contradictory to our understanding and rules of said concept. Throughout Ray Bradbury’s novel, Fahrenheit 451, the idea of how cruelty can manipulate and alter a society in the physical world is invigorated throughout the novel’s world. Its society is controlled by strict social rules, restricting all originality, removing all civil wars. Inaccuracies are placed upon the population, removing the society’s ability to know more than what is wanted by the government, so social
The book Fahrenheit 451, by Ray Bradbury illustrates a dystopia of what Bradbury believes might eventually happen to society. This is extensively referenced to in Captain Beatty’s monologue lecture to Guy Montag explaining how Bradbury’s dystopia came to be, and why books are no longer necessary to that society and therefore were completely removed and made illegal. Ray Bradbury’s main fears in the evolution of society can be broken down into three ideas; loss of individuality, overuse of technology, and the quickening of daily life. If society goes on as it is, Bradbury is afraid that media will be more brief, people will become less individual, life will be more fast paced, minorities will have too much voice, and technology will become unnaturally prominent everyday life.
The desire for societal symmetry and the idea of idiosyncratic freedom encase Anthony Burgess and Aldous Huxley’s vividly fabricated realms of A Brave New World and A Clockwork Orange. These analogous concepts enable Burgess and Huxley to explore one’s ability to choose their destiny and an individual’s struggle for autonomy and individuation in the face of morally oppressive powers. To challenge the widespread assumption that technology is beneficial to future cultures, both authors expose how individuals are manipulated and suppressed to alternate realities by drugs and technology, thus conveying the fundamental idea of psychological constriction. The conflict arising from the pressure on citizens to put the functioning of society over the
Imagine living in a society where there is no sense of independence, individual thought, or freedom. A society where the government uses disturbing methods that dehumanize people in order to force conformity upon them. Taking away any sense of emotion, it would be very undesirable to live in a society with such oppression. Such society is portrayed in Aldous Huxley's novel Brave New World. The World State uses social restrictions to create permanent artificial personalities for people within the society.