Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Analysis of allen poe's writing
The raven edgar allan poe analysis
Analysis of allen poe's writing
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Analysis of allen poe's writing
Montresor the Connoisseur of Death The purpose for a story, particularly one that deals with graphic material such as murder, is not always crystal clear, an excellent example of a story where the purpose is shrouded in mystery is Edgar Allen Poe’s “The Cask of Amontillado”. At the end of “The Cask of Amontillado” it is revealed that the character Montresor is narrating this tale. This leads the reader to wonder what motivation could Montresor have for retelling this story fifty years later. The story places heavy emphasis on being a connoisseur or expert at something, in fact Montresor’s whole plan is focused around this one thing. When the tale is viewed with the perspective that Montresor is an unreliable narrator, then it can be seen …show more content…
that he wishes to be viewed as a mastermind and expert on death. The first thing that can be revealed is that Montresor is quite insane and a very unreliable narrator. Montresor never quite reveals what Fortunado did to offend him, and the reader can speculate that the offence may never have happened. He claims that “The thousand injuries of Fortunato I had borne as best I could; but when he ventured upon insult, I vowed revenge” (Poe 1). This statement is made with extremely sparing details and no specifics. Montresor does not want the reader to focus on what Fortunato did to offend him, he simple wants to convey that he should die. This causes a hole in the story that allows for the conclusion that this is a madman’s logic to justify murder. Montresor is also retelling this story nearly 50 years after it occurred, and it is highly possible that he exaggerates some of the events to fit his own pride and reasoning. With this, the question of why this tale is being retold after such a significant gap in time is brought up. Pride and renown seem to be the most plausible conclusion; Montresor wants the reader to think of him as a mastermind, a connoisseur of sorts, at murder. Montresor may be crazy but his plan is well thought out and expertly executed. He has every detail accounted for; first he plays off of Fortunato’s pride by claiming someone else may be superior to him in wine connoisseurship. Montresor has already mentioned that Fortunato was an expert wine connoisseur, and that he takes pride in this. Montresor takes this knowledge to easily convince Fortunato to come with him. The knowledge that Fortunato is extremely prideful is confirmed when Fortunato emphatically interrupts Montresor in lines 12 and 13. From this point in the story onward Fortunato, is blinded by his pride to things that should have been obvious, such as the oddness that a newly bought cask of wine is so deep in the catacombs. Montresor also insures there will be no witnesses by carefully timing his plot and dismissing all of his servants. By timing his moves during the carnival, Montresor picked a time when he knows many people will be distracted either by drinking or entertainment. This guarantees that he can slip Fortunato away without much notice by the public. Carnivals are times where many people dressed up in various costumes such as a fool, Fortunato, or death, Montresor. With everyone dressed up, it is nearly impossible to tell who is who or keep track of anyone’s actions. By dismissing his servants, he covers two things. First they cannot witness Montresor bringing Fortunato into the house and second the servants may view him positively and be unlikely to testify negatively about him. Montresor has also carefully picked the location of Fortunato’s prison so it will never be found. He draws Fortunato into the very back of his family’s catacombs where the stench and presence of death is already heavily felt, because nobody will ever notice another body in the catacombs even if that person happens to tear down the wall Montresor built. The wall is another masterstroke. Even if someone searching for Fortunato went into Montresor’s vaults they would simply see a wall covered in bones that appears to have been there for centuries. This whole plan was ridiculously well thought out and executed showing the massive amount of time, possibly years, that Montresor dedicated to bringing it to fruition. If Montresor truly wants the focus to be on his genius, he will direct his audience’s attention solely on his plan and its execution.
He gives very little information about Fortunato, past that he is a wine connoisseur. There is no mention of what Fortunato does for leisure, his family, or even his job. In fact, the only details the reader receives on Fortunato paint him as a fool, with his costume, his drunken attitude, and obliviousness Montresor is focuses on the facts that make Fortunato look bad; he not only wants Fortunato dead but he also wants Fortunato’s name discredited. Montresor tells the reader even less about himself because there is no background to who Montresor is, what he does, or even what kind of contact he has with Fortunato. The only true details of Montresor that are given must be implied and give a sense of intelligence. In addition, he gives little to no details about the carnival, such as where it was, why the carnival was happening, or even why he chose this particular day to enact his plan. From these details, or lack of details, it seems Montresor doesn’t want his audience to know this information. The audience is supposed to simply look at Fortunato a fool and Montresor a genius, the harbinger of death. The facts such as who these people were, the time, or the setting are not important to Montresor’s focus in the
story. From where Montresor enacts his scheme to the end of the story is extensively detailed. He wants the reader to see how clever he is in tricking Fortunato, so he tells of everything that happens. This shows that Montresor believes himself very clever in his plan; he wants his audience to admire him in a similar way that people admired Fortunado for his wine connoisseurship. He wants the reader to see that his plan to make the servants leave was foolproof. Montresor says with confidence that “These orders were sufficient…. insure their immediate disappearance” (Poe 24). While convincing Fortunato to enter the crypt, Montresor even seems to act concerned for his friend’s welfare so that Fortunado would never suspect a thing. Montresor even planned to intoxicate Fortunato to keep him unawares and easy to overcome. Montresor is highlighting all the parts of his story that make him look like an expert, and is begging the audience to see him in a lofty manor. Montresor’s actions also spell out that he truly enjoys this; he plays with Fortunato in ways that were not necessary. Due to Fortunato’s pride, simply mentioning to him that someone could be superior would have been sufficient to entice him into the vaults. Montresor however choses to keep up a dialogue with Fortunato that might convince him to leave. In this section of the story, Fortunato is revealed to have a nasty cough; Montresor uses this cough to his advantage to reinforce the sense of pride that lured Fortunato into the vaults to start with. With every mention of the cough comes a seemingly generous offer from Montresor to return to the surface. This generosity is only superficial, because Montresor immediately mentions that if they decide to return to the surface, he will seek out Luchesi to identify the wine. This mention is a skilled placement to immediately turn Fortunato’s mind away from his cough and back to his pride and opinion that Luchesi is an ignoramus. This part of the story shows exactly how much Montresor has studied Fortunato so that he is able to balance this conversation without erroneously convincing Fortunato to leave the vault. Once again Montresor focus on the details of the story that show how well thought out and prepared this plan is. Even though this whole story is strange and presented by an obviously impaired narrator, some things remain constant. One of these constants is how the narrative focuses on the details of how great Montresor’s plan is and the picture that it paints of Montresor himself. The structure of the story itself shows what the reader is meant to focus on, from the sparing details at the beginning that just fall to the wayside to the greatly intricately described plot of murder that captivates the reader’s attention. Even within the dialect, it is seen that most sentences shine a light of brilliance on Montresor. The question of why this story is being retold after fifty years can be answered by saying that Montresor is telling the story to show himself as a brilliant mastermind and schemer at murder.
Montresor wants to get revenge on people who make him mad, such as Fortunato. How Fortunato may have hurt Montresor is by insulting him and by threatening him somehow. Therefore, Montresor wants to make sure that Fortunato doesn’t expect anything from being his friend. Montresor is putting up a front to Fortunato, but that’s okay. Since it’s carnival season in Italy, that means freedom season for Montresor, so he has impunity.
I had told them that I should not return until the morning, and had given them explicit orders not to stir from the house. These orders were sufficient, I well knew, to insure their immediate disappearance, one and all, as soon as my back was turned." Montresor must have been planning this for months, he has put everything into place to ensure he gets his revenge with no consequences. He waited until carnival so the whole city would be loud, knowing that it is carnival he knew Fortunato would be fairly intoxicated making him easily persuadable. Also because he knew it would be carnival he knew everyone would be dressed up and incognito so no one could ever identify him to keep himself innocent. But before all of that he went down through the catacombs and laid out a special area for what would be
The protagonists Montresor wants to get back at Fortunato for deeply insulting him and Montresor vows for revenge. During the fall carnival, he sees his opportunity and is quick to pounce on this and put his plan into place. “With Fortunato intoxicated and falling and stumbling all over the place Montresor knows that the time is now” (Russell 211). Montresor knows Fortunato’s weakness for wine and Montresor tells him he found Amontillado a very rare wine and it is in his vault. Montresor knows how far Fortunato will go for wine as rare as Amontillado and that is what eventually leads to his tormented and revengeful death.
In “The Cask of Amontillado”, Montresor made up in his mind that he would carry out his act of revenge on Fortunato. Whatever offense Fortunato committed against Montresor drove him to the brink. The hatred inside was somewhat poetic. Montresor schemed to every detail how to carry out his revenge. The setting of the story is a dark, gloomy night at a celebration during carnival season. Montresor would be detailed in describing the monetary status of his enemy, his wardrobe or costume he wore to the celebration. He would set the mood as cheerful. Despite the ill feelings he has towards the now drunken Fortunato, Montresor pretends to care for his company to lure him towards his cunning plan. He strokes Fortunato’s ego and his love for wine to draw him towards the cellar. The dark, damp halls, the claustrophobia, and the human skeletons lying about the earth were all a foreshadowing of Motresor’s plan for the drunken Fortunato. It enhanced suspense to the story, building up to the climax which would be Fortunato entering into his grave. As they further enter the hal...
Edgar Allan Poe delineates a murderer’s mind thoroughly as it is the murderer who relates the story to us. He commits a murder of an innocent man, but does not take the blame that he is mad, as throughout the story he attempts to deny it. His motive was to rid of the innocent man’s “vulture eye” which was the concentration, because he believes justification of society’s morals is hi... ... middle of paper ... ... r Roylott to pursue Helen to generate an absolute indistinguishable murder.
When they arrive at the Montresor estate, Montresor leads Fortunato down the stairs into the catacombs. Down here is where the Amontillado Fortunato is going to taste and where the revenge of Montresor is going to take place. As he get closer and closer, the narrator opens up more and more to how he is going to kill his "friend". It sound like it is a premeditated murder. Montresor seems so inconspicuous that he acts like he cares about Fortunato which is still a part of his plan.
One of the most famous authors in American history is Edgar Allen Poe, thanks to his intricate and unsettling short stories and poems. One of the strongest aspects of Poe’s writing style is the allure and complexity of the narrator of the story. These narrators, ranging from innocent bystanders to psychotic murderers, add depth to such a short story and really allow Poe to explore the themes of death and murder which he seems to have an unhealthy obsession towards. Furthermore, he uses these narrators to give a different perspective in each of his many works and to really unsettle the reader by what is occurring throughout the story. The narrators, whether an innocent witness of death as in "The Fall of the House of Usher" or a twisted murderer as in "The Cask of Amontillado" are used by Poe to discuss the themes of death and murder within these stories and, depending on their point of view, give a different take on such a despicable act such as murder.
The Merriam-Webster Dictionary defines a sociopath as someone who behaves in a dangerous or violent way towards other people and does not feel guilty about such behavior. Sociopaths lack a conscience that allows people to decipher between right and wrong. In A Cask of Amontillado by Edgar Allen Poe, the narrator, Montresor, is believed to be a sociopath by many. He kills his friend, Fortunado, after he literally adds insult to a thousand of injuries. Though what the insult was and the previous injuries were never revealed to the reader, it could be assumed that Montresor probably overreacted to the Fortunado’s insult. But in order to answer this question the evaluation upon his motivation, strategy, and Montresor’s feeling and emotion towards
1. What can the reader infer about Montresor’s social position and character from hints in the text? What evidence does the text provide that Montresor is an unreliable narrator? We learned from paragraph 23 to 24 that Montresor owns a Palazzo and also has lot of retainers based on that evidence, the reader can infer that Montresor is a very wealthy and successful man. About his character, the reader can imply that Montresor is a heartless, cold blooded, sneaky, manipulative, and untrustworthy man, as well as a man who hold on to grudges. Moreover, Montresor is an unreliable narrator, because he reveals in the first paragraph that he intends to have a revenge on Fortunato, but he did not indicate or clearly prove to the readers how Fortunato
Through the acts, thoughts, and words of the protagonists Montresor, the reader is able to feel the psychological torment that Fortunato is about to endure. The first line in the story Montresor said “The thousand of injuries of Fortunato I had borne as best I could, but when he ventured upon insult, I vowed revenge” (553). Revenge remains a constant theme through the entire story. Montresor went to great lengths planning the revenge and murder of Fortunato. He knows that during the carnival everyone will be dressed in costume, mask, and drinking. No-one will be able to recognize them. Montresor himself put on a “mask of black silk” (554) and a “roquelaire” (554). He has also made certain that his attendants’ would not be at home, to be sure that there are no witnesses to his horrendous act.
When they are ready to go to the vaults, Montresor shows concern for Fortunato’s health. This I believe is a genuine concern. Montresor says “it is not the engagement, but the severe cold with which I perceive you afflicted” (142). It can be argued that Montresor is just making another move in his fatal game of revenge, but why would he care so much about Fortunato. When meeting Fortunato at the carnival Montresor says “I was so pleased to see him…”
Montresor is the main character who is narrating from the viewpoint of someone in the story that is being told. This gives bias towards Montresor because the audience feels the need to root for him since he is telling the story. Montresor, in the beginning, is able to justify the acts he is about to do, while we are not able to hear Fortunato defend or explain what he has done to Montresor that would cause him to take those actions. “…but when he ventured upon insult I vowed revenge.” (Poe 108). Since it is told through Montresor, the readers are also able to hear what his thoughts are. This adds an extra layer to the story by giving not only what he is saying to Fortunato to get him to do what he wants, but also his true intentions and thought processes while he is executing his master plan. He explains to the readers that he manipulated his servants into leaving his house for the night so that no one would witness Fortunato at his home. “These orders were sufficient, I well knew, to insure their immediate disappearance…” (Poe
Tell Tale Heart is a short horror story by E.A. Poe that is told from the first person perspective and describes the murder of an old man. The main character plots the crime because he (supposing the narrator is male) is irritated by the old man’s “evil eye”. The narrator kills the old man in his sleep, dismembers the body and hides the corpse parts under the floorboards. The main character is not suspected until he confesses the murder to the police believing everyone can hear the beating of the dead man’s heart from under the floor. Tell-Tale Heart is not a confession but an apology. The murderer tries to prove that the hideous crime, no mater how irrational it might seem to the readers, was planned and carried out in the calculated and premeditated manner. The narrator tries to convince the readers that he was conscious of his motives, actions, and intentions. What is more, he stresses that there was no trace of permanent or temporary mental disorder, let alone insanity. However, the choice of the point of view, tone and mood of the Tell-Tale Heart allow Poe to create the opposite effect and convince the readers that the story is an account of a madman. The psychological effect of the first-person narrative, the tone and symbolism let Poe enhance the gruesome effect of the story. The point of view chosen by Poe also makes readers feel as if the insane narrator addresses every reader personally. A vide range of stylistic devices is employed to make the story frightening from the very beginning.
Carefully, cautiously the Montresor plotted precisely how he would exact revenge upon Fortunato. Much time and great energy was devoted to this plan, selecting a time that would be best: during carnival when the town would be celebratory, his servants apt to run off and join the celebration, when the two could silently disappear without notice or question. No detail is forgotten; he allows for no deterrents. He follows through with such a confidence that never does he stumble or hesitate in carrying out his plan. The Montresor indicates that he had never given. To continue with this ploy, he even goes so far as to express false concern for Fortunato as they pass through the catacombs. Blaming the nitre and damp, the Montresor suggests that they turn back as not to compromise Fortunato’s ill health, though he has no intent of doing so. Never once until the very end did Fortunato have cause to suspect that there were any foul plans afoot.
E. Arthur Robinson feels that by using this irony the narrator creates a feeling of hysteria, and the turmoil resulting from this hysteria is what places "The Tell-Tale Heart" in the list of the greatest horror stories of all time (94). Julian Symons suggests that the murder of the old man is motiveless, and unconnected with passion or profit (212). But in a deeper sense, the murder does have a purpose: to ensure that the narrator does not have to endure the haunting of the Evil Eye any longer. To a madman, this is as good of a reason as any; in the mind of a madman, reason does not always win out over emotion. Edward H. Davidson insists that emotion had a large part to play in the crime, suggesting that the narrator suffers and commits a crime because of an excess of emotion over intelligence (203).