Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Character development recitatif
Character development recitatif
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Character development recitatif
“Let us watch the world burn,” said no one ever. In the history of the world, nobody has done anything just because they want to make the world worse. Yes, even Hitler thought he was doing the right thing when he was murdering millions of people for characteristics they could not help but have. So, with this in mind, why is Javert any different from us? In Victor Hugo’s Les Misérables, Inspector Javert is the antagonist of Jean Valjean, a selfless and beloved man; he is constantly seen obsessing over catching Jean Valjean. But, do these aspects of Javert actually deem him evil? While Javert’s views are narrow-minded and his treatment of Jean Valjean is cruel, Javert is not a villainous character; Hugo uses him not necessarily just to antagonize Jean Valjean, but to show how people can change. His experiences in life led him to believe the only correct His actions are not out of malice, but it is out of what he thinks is right. He does not chase Jean Valjean for years because he hates him, but because lawfully, it is the right thing to do. Similarly, he does not arrest Fantine because he wants to watch her suffer, but because, to his knowledge, she committed a crime that deserves punishment. His mindset, although extreme, is not villainous. He “personified justice, light, and truth . . . as destroyers of evil . . . he protected order . . . he avenged society . . . he stood erect in a holy of glory” (129). How can one deem a person evil if their actions are not of malicious intent? If Javert does not match the definition of villainous, how can he be labeled as one? Throughout the whole novel, he was misunderstood; his actions were mistaken for spite rather than for duty. Honestly, it is hard to blame the police for doing their job. The truth is, the only villains there are exist only in comic books, for example, the Joker, Doctor Doom, and Magneto.
Villainous traits are found in many books and movies; however, one of the most common is being vile and offensive. Everyone who says or does something that is completely inappropriate and harsh, is headed down a villainous path. Erik Fisher executes vile and offensive well. In
Both men become prisoners of the other at one time or another in the novel. Valjean becomes Javert’s prisoner in Paris. Then Javert becomes Valjean’s prisoner at the barricade in Rue de la Chanvrerie but is freed. Then when Javert catches Valjean by the sewers, he frees him in return.
The lines that define good and evil are not written in black and white; these lines tend to blur into many shades of grey allowing good and evil to intermingle with each another in a single human being. Man is not inherently good or evil but they are born innocent without any values or sense of morality until people impart their philosophies of life to them. In the words of John Locke:
It is far too easy for a reader of The Scarlet Letter to simply brand Chillingworth as evil. The reader must pay attention to the complexities of the position which Chillingworth is forced into to understand that he is not evil or bad, at least not completely. Chillingworth is only a human put into a terrible position which he reacts to. In fact, it is not beyond reach to say that under his circumstances, Chillingworth was actually the hero, the protagonist; and Hester and Dimmesdale are the true villains.
A villainous mind is a closed box, unless opened nobody knows what’s inside however once opened easily visible. Similarly, a villainous character has the talent to be manipulative, prejudiced for others decisions and selfishly wanting to gain power without thinking about the affect it may have on other individuals. In Auther Miller’s The Crucible some depraved characters like Reverend Parris disrupt the peace in the society by manipulating other individuals and selfishly being greedy for power and reputation without keeping in mind the affect it may have on the society.
So does conspiring to make his own country really make Burr a villain? Nothing explicit was committed, and the fact that people were willing to follow implies that it may have occurred with or without Burr’s involvement. While this act seems to be a very unlawful act, the fact that he never started a war means it doesn’t really qualify him for being a villain.
In the novel, we are given a more complete view of Meursault. The story is told from his point-of-view, which allows us to understand the situation as Meursault perceives it. Looking at the situation in this light, we can see Meursault as not evil, but simply indifferent and detached from life. He doesn’t attempt to get wrapped up in emotion or relationships, he just takes things as they come, doing whatever is easiest for him. He becomes friends with Raymond and agrees to marry Marie simply because he doesn’t have a very good reason not to. Seeing the story from Meursault’s viewpoint, we understand that even killing the Arab wasn’t an act of malice or evil intent. As Meursault puts it, “My nature is such that my physical needs often get in the way of my feelings.” With this in context, things begin to make more sense. Meursault’s seemingly cryptic statement that he murdered the Arab “because of the sun” can be taken as truth. Meursault does things that society judges as wrong not because he is evil or wants to appear immoral, but because the sun and heat, symbols for Meursault’s emotional state, cause him to become uncomfortable and act “inappropriately.
...t of everything he did, and takes his own life. The fact that Javert never caught Javert shows that love and goodness always prevails over evil. Also Javert’s misunderstanding of the evil he did, thinking that he served justice instead of just giving undignified law, shows his unlove. For God says “Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness, who put bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter!” (Isaiah 5:20)
Evil is defined as being profoundly immoral of malevolent. Being faced with evil is can be challenging especially when the person is unaware that it is present. In the Play Othello by William Shakespeare and the novel Lord of the Flies by William Golding, Othello and Ralph are faced with the challenge of evil. Othello is an outsider of Venice coming from South Africa that is sometimes ridiculed based on the color of his skin; yet earned the title of respect with his intelligence, courage, and skills. Othello’s insecurities and him not knowing when evil is looking him straight in the eye, leads him to his down falling. Ralph... Both characters in the beginning act in a moral manner, until the end of the stories when both characters have been
A Game of Thrones by George R.R. Martin is a complex novel filled with an equally complex and diverse set of characters. Martin explores and questions many aspects of humanity, society, and morality by creating three-dimensional, imperfect characters. For many of these characters, it is difficult to determine whether they should be considered good or evil due to the fact that they are so human and realistic. Some characters are easy to love, and others, like Joffrey Baratheon, are incredibly easy to hate. It can be difficult to talk about Joffrey without immediately wanting to write him off as one of the cruelest and worst characters ever created. Not many people stop to ask why he is the way he is. What caused him to become so mean and sadistic?
Evil is to be morally wrong, bad, wicked, and a whole bunch of other synonyms that all boil into one pot. There is so much to this word that it’s almost impossible to pinpoint someone as truly evil. To be evil for no other reason than to be evil would be the worst possible evil. Adolf Hitler and Osoma bin Laden believe the evil they committed was justified by God, or some higher power. Macbeth and Lady Macbeth, from the play by Shakespeare, were not evil because they wanted to be, they did it for a greater good.
Revenge is Hamlet 's primary motivation in this play, and any attempts at redemption on his part are secondary to that goal. After he sets his plan to "put on an antic disposition" in motion, there are several times he acts oddly or cruelly and then has to backtrack with the hope of redeeming himself. Jefferson however works in the right direction of redeeming himself when at first he was acting not much better than a hog and over time he is redeeming himself by becoming more civil, respectable, and honorable for the way he carries himself. Jefferson, with the help of Grant, becomes a man for his community to look up to because of his strength to realize what faith has in store for him. Hamlet takes faith into his own hands and is blinded with hatred and the thought of revenge. Jefferson did not like or agree with his faith, but he realized that everything happens for a reason and it is how you react in the worst of times that people
One of the many questions Augustine raised is ‘what is evil’? Committing an act of evil is doing something malicious; the act is done with the intent to cause harm. However, there is a problem with this definition
He kills only evil people for justice and goodness of Gotham City. In the movie his action seems very evil but He does this for greater good. For example, at the beginning
What is considered evil depends upon each individual’s view of morality, which constantly changes through the course of that person’s life. Roy Perrett’s “Evil and Human Nature” explains this by elaborating on the customary interpretation of moral evil. This evil, caused by an intentional bad action or harm, opposes another type of evil, natural evil, which occurs without intervention of a human agent. While natural evils, such as hurricanes and disease, may allude to the existence of a greater evil power, moral evils rather exist due to human decision and are more commonly recognized. However, Perrett claims that even the acknowledgement of moral evils, “does not seem to capture what many people have in mind when they talk of evil. Evil is instead often understood to be a very special kind of moral category: it involves not just wrongdoing, but a special kind of intentional wrongdoing” (304). This familiar definition of evil expands upon the vague topic of moral evil, in that the perpetrator of this sinister action enjoys and does not regret ever committing the action. Correspondingly, in order to comply with the currently recognized definition of evil, the action must be done solely because it is wrong and harmful. Therefore, it can be argued that the government in Alan Moore’s V for Vendetta is not evil in the modern sense. While some believe that murdering innocent peo...