Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Importance of ethical decision making
Importance of ethical decision making
Importance of ethical decision making
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Importance of ethical decision making
Is emotion and reason equally necessary in justifying moral decision??.....reason is more necessary for anything that involves making decisions in society. As humans we are constantly faced with moral dilemmas, questions of right or wrong, whose answers determine how we should handle every situation. Making moral decisions is essential in our daily lives, We use our emotions to determine our actions. Each individual handles moral decision in many different ways. Some depend on logic and reason to help them decide and others depend on their emotions to guide them towards their moral solution of their problem. Reason and knowledge may appear to be contradicting emotions but there is a link between the two. They are often combined with logic and rationality. Let 's consider the scenario of a …show more content…
It is important that one must have emotions to understand that that reason for justification is mandatory in some cases. Even though an emotion triggers a reason for justification is some cases, it doesn 't mean that emotion will be more important out of the two. Reason helps us to determine the good and the bad emotions and we could not be able to justify a moral decision without reason. It is seen that emotion and reason associate and a decision might not be made if we can 't include any of the two so both are equally important to justify. Emotions may brainwash us and lead us to making decisions only considering the immediate consequences. If I see a new student in the school being bullied, I might wanna take the action of helping him/her due to my emotions, but then if I go to help the student the I could also be bullied. This shows that emotional reasoning can 't help justify a decision so we have to use reasoning too. A good reason for thinking of doing something of a moral decision does not mean that it gives a good reason for a decision to be taken in the future, one can also justify a decision that was taken in the
According to Aristotle, a virtue is a state that makes something good, and in order for something to be good, it must fulfill its function well. The proper function of a human soul is to reason well. Aristotle says that there are two parts of the soul that correspond to different types of virtues: the appetitive part of the soul involves character virtues, while the rational part involves intellectual virtues. The character virtues allow one to deliberate and find the “golden mean” in a specific situation, while the intellectual virtues allow one to contemplate and seek the truth. A virtuous person is someone who maintains an appropriate balance of these two parts of the soul, which allows them to reason well in different types of situations.
There has been a huge debate throughout the years of whether humans are ethical by nature or not. Despite Christian Keyser’s research evidence that humans are ethical by nature, the evidence from the Milgram experiment shows that we are not ethical by nature. Humans learn to be ethical through genetic disposition as well as environmental factors such as culture, socialization, and parenting. In order to understand if we are ethical or not, we need to understand the difference between being moral or ethical. Many people believe that being moral and ethical are the same thing, but these two terms are a bit different. “Morality is primarily about making correct choices, while ethics is about proper reasoning” (Philosopher, web). Morality is more
Hume claims that to make a moral judgment; one must keep in mind all the relevant aspects the situation, and recognize all the related ideas concerning the situation. This means that we must take into consideration reason. Nevertheless, The moral judgment itself is not possible without passions or sentiment, which ultimately takes in all the deliverances of reason and creates the sentiment of disapproval or approval.
In Chapter 4 of Lesbian Ethics, Sarah Hoagland argues that desire is a socially and politically constructed perception and that in today’s heterosexual society the current concept of desire forces and perpetuates the split between reason and emotion. Hoagland focuses on sexual desire, however her analysis can be applied to the desires of any person, object, or action. I will give an account of Hoagland’s view on desire, and reason and emotion; I will analyze three things that I desire: my career, developing a family, and making enough money for that family to live comfortably, why I desire them and how my desires are socially constructed; I will finish by determining, based on my analysis of desires, that I agree with Hoagland, that reason and emotion are inseparable and attempts to separate them are damaging.
Hume makes the claim that in order to make a moral judgment, one must keep in mind all the relevant aspects the situation, and recognize all the relevant ideas in relation to the situation. This means that we must take into consideration reason. Nevertheless, The moral judgment itself is not possible without passions or sentiment, which ultimately takes in all the deliverances of reason and creates the sentiment of disapproval or approval.
Emotion is a part of what makes us human, so much so that often if someone lacks emotion they are considered non-human; like Frankenstein. In some cases this human characteristic on its own isn’t thought to mix well with moral judgement. With many views supporting this statement, is there still room in the moral code for both reason and emotion? An analysis of the role that the specific emotion empathy has in moral judgment helps explain this matter in Aristotle and Kant’s view; I prefer Aristotle’s prospective.
What is the relationship between logic and morality? Consider the two ideas specifically « The Pursuit of truth is a moral pursuit», the use of logical interference must be guided by moral precept” (You might not agree or you might disagree)
(Jensen, 2005, p. 69) could be compared with the importance of desired moral reasoning. The
All people worldwide go through the process of moral reasoning, which has been defined as "a cognitive process by which individuals make decisions about moral issues and justify these decisions, regardless of the context of the issue" (Gardiner, 1998, p.176). But not all of these people come to the s...
They can only guide us towards the final result of moral motivation, which (by now it’s painfully clear) is sentiment. Hume gives five considerations to the roles of reason and sentiment within the confines of moral motivation. These considerations are his premises for the final supposition which links sentiment and morality immaculately together, and rejects reason as a plausible explanation form oral motivation. His first consideration allows for reason to be presumed true, as the causation of moral motivation. It follows however that reason “judges either matter of fact or of relations”.
Gutnik, Hakimzada, Yoskowitz, and Patel (2006), discuss the differences between thinking in ‘the cold light of day’ versus in ‘the heat of the moment’. “Thinking in the cold light of day is more likely to be based on more rational, knowledge-based inferences, whereas thinking in the heat of the moment is generally faultier and more likely to contain irrational justifications for risky, yet personally desired, behavior” (p. 725). Take for example a situation where someone in a relationship finds themselves alone with someone outside of that relationship that they find physical attractive, and that person makes clear they are interested in a physical interaction. The logical response is to not act on the situation, but the emotion of arousal can certainly impact the persons’ logical decision in this situation. Fear is a natural emotional response designed to protect us, but fear is not always based on rational things and allowing fear to dictate a decision could lead to a bad
Even though emotions are part of the human nature sometimes they can blind our judgment. At a very early age humans are taught to control their emotions to have a better relationship with other humans. Logic plays an important role in life because it helps us think and understand situations in our daily life. Logic helps us to discern between decisions that can affect us directly. Use logic instead of emotions at the moment of making decisions helps us to take most appropriate decisions because we think in what ways we can be affect on a positive or negative
For years, the matter of morality has been a widespread topic of discussion, debating whether it is a product of our chemical composition or our free will. Before I get started, I will provide you with what I believe morality exactly is. Ethics is a “code of conduct,” much like a University’s student handbook, but applied to the expected morality of a larger group or society. Morals are how individuals choose to interpret and follow such code. Just as a student may not always act in complete obedience with the student handbook, humans also deviate from their ethical codes of conduct. Therefore, morals are the set of a person’s specific values and opinions formed by their interpretation of their society’s code of ethics. With this version of the meaning of morality, I believe that individual free-will and the neurological hardwiring in which we are born with both significantly influence the development of our mature human morality due to a variety of factors including: human brain development, differences in our upbringing and education, which give rise to disparities in matters such as what is considered right or wrong, decision-making processes, and our ultimate behavioral choices, and lastly, because morality cannot exist if based solely on human nature, it must also involve our own self-determination. My position that morality is not the product of one side of the debate or the other, but rather arises through the integration of both components, allows for a complete demonstration of morality in its entirety. In this system, the ambiguities present in the one-sided arguments are removed, making it easy to link any individual’s action to their personal moral accountability.
...a rational decision. Feelings are temporary, yes. But without feelings, reasons became invalid and meaningless. Ethics means doing what one believes is the right and best choice for them and what is right to me might not be right to others. Virtues, responsibilities, obligations, and believes all contribute to how people see and analyze things. We are all diverse in how we see and comprehend situations and how we feel about each situation will change how we reason our actions. So should ethics be base on reasons or feelings? I believe that it should be the base on both. Feelings will always be apart of the human nature, and it is what influences our life choices daily. Reasons are ropes that help us remain calm and make rational decisions. When combine feelings with reasons, one can be sure that he/she is making a rational decision that is morally right for him/her.
Rationality affects the way we behave, but emotions changes our behaviors and drives us to behave the way we do. People are driven by emotions yet we can’t allow it to be the only thing that controls our actions and behaviors. Rationality helps control our emotions and prevents it from getting too out of hand. For example, in a situation where a waiter accidentally bumps into you and causes you to drop the delicious piece of dessert you were just about to eat, there are two ways you can react, emotionally and rationally. Emotionally, you could burst out in anger at the waiter. Scream and yell, completely acting in an irrational way all because of a piece of dessert. On the other hand, rationally, you could stay calm or and remain kind to the