Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Deception in advertisements
Deception in advertisements
Deception in advertisements
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In 2009, the Advertising Standard Authority (ASA) changed or withdrew 2,397 advertisements for being misleading. The development of computers and digital image editing software, such as Photoshop has increased false advertising. However, authoritative organisations such as ASA and the Committee of Advertising Practice (CAP) accept a limited amount of “airbrushing” in advertisements. This opens the debate of whether controlled airbrushing is ethical or not. Because airbrushing in advertising constitutes distortion of an image, it is deceitful ; given that it influences society’s reality, it is pervasive ; since it may harm consumers’ well-being , it is harmful: excess or controlled airbrushing, by all means and purposes, is unethical.
To begin with, misleading advertising is the commercial speech “that can deceive consumers by ambiguity, through presentation or by omitting important information […] or including false information.” It is subject to federal regulation. Before 1895 fraudulent advertising was everywhere. It was not until 1893 to 1911 “when standards were in the making” due to the acknowledgement of ethical dilemmas of false advertising: deceiving the consumer and dishonesty.
To continue, the development of new technologies, such as computers and image editing software, has increased and redefined the nature of false advertising. Programs such as Adobe Photoshop have made the digital manipulation of images possible. One of the functions of this software is “airbrushing”, which in this context refers to the technique used to conceal, eliminate, or alter the appearance of flaws. Image editing software has facilitated the “re-touching of photographs related to any characteristics directly relevant to the apparent ...
... middle of paper ...
...es Promotion and Direct Marketing (CAP Code), CAP § 03 (2010).
United Kingdom. Committee of Advertising Practice. Committee of Advertising Practice. Accessed November 11, 2013. http://www.cap.org.uk/Advertising-Codes/Non-broadcast-HTML/Section-3-Misleading-advertising.aspx.
United Kingdom. Committee of Advertising Practice. Committee of Advertising Practice. Accessed November 18, 2013. http://www.cap.org.uk/Advice-Training-on-the-rules/Advice-Online-Database/Cosmetics-The-use-of-production-techniques.aspx.
United Kingdom. Gotham. Advertising Standards Authority. ASA Adjudication on L'Oreal (UK) Ltd - Advertising Standards Authority. July 27, 2011. Accessed November 18, 2013. http://www.asa.org.uk/Rulings/Adjudications/2011/7/LOreal-(UK)-Ltd/SHP_ADJ_149632.aspx.
Vigil, Tammy R., ed. Introduction to the World of Communications. 1st ed. Cognella, 2013. 159.
Rationale This Further Oral Activity will be presented on a T.V. show format (based on the show “The Gruen Transfer”), with the host focusing on the false advertising of well-known health foods and drinks. This FOA will focus on the persuasive language and manipulative strategies used by businesses to influence and mislead consumers into believing false perceptions of their product, using case examples to support the evidence presented. The purpose of this FOA is to inform the audience on the plethora of manipulative and persuasive language used in advertising for ‘supposedly’ healthy products, while the target audience is Australian T.V. viewers 18-50 who are interested in the influence of advertising. The context of the piece is based on today’s world of marketing and how persuasive advertising strategies can influence Australian consumers.
Have you ever seen an advertisement for a product and could immediately relate to the subject or the product in that advertisement? Companies that sell products are always trying to find new and interesting ways to get buyers and get people’s attention. It has become a part of our society today to always have products being shown to them. As claimed in Elizabeth Thoman’s essay Rise of the Image Culture: Re-Imagining the American Dream, “…advertising offered instructions on how to dress, how to behave, how to appear to others in order to gain approval and avoid rejection”. This statement is true because most of the time buyers are persuaded by ads for certain products.
There has been some controversy regarding L’Oréal Canada and their use of animal testing in their cosmetic products. For certifications regarding safety, we currently possess 86% of manufacturing facilities that are either OHSAS 18001 or VPP certified. (L’Oréal Canada, 2014) Safety is a priority for us at L’Oréal Canada to ensure that our products are safe for our consumers so that they can enjoy the beauty of our cosmetic products. Health Canada has stated that science has not advanced to the point where they feel comfortable banning animal testing in the cosmetic industry, but that animal testing is not required for cosmetic products. (Bendall, 2011) However, the European Union has recently passed a Cosmetics Directive in 2009, which bans the use of animal testing in the cosmetic industry. The Cosmetics Directive bans the testing of finished products, ingredients within a product and the marketing of a product that has been tested on animals. (European Commission, 2014) As a result of these changes in Europe, it is important for L’Oréal Canada to consider alternative methods to animal testing for business to continue with countries in Europe, and so that consumers will feel more positive about purchasing our products due to them being cruelty-free.
...ese images but it is awareness that society should be promoting. In 2009 in Europe, French Parliament member Valerie Boyer suggested that all published images that are digitally enhanced - including advertisements - come with a warning label that reads, “Retouched photograph aimed at changing a person’s physical appearance.” If they fail to do so they will be fined up to 50 percent of the cost of the publicity campaign in question. America should be creating a proactive movement that will bring teens and adults in society up to par on what is going and informing them of how they can change how they view their images. Like cigarettes, advertisements with false images should be given a warning label. Essentially, these industries should be creating an encouraging message to their viewers to provide a healthier outlook about size, beauty, and weight.
Joseph STRAUBHAAR and Robert LaROSE (2002). Media Now. Communication Media in the Information Age. 3rd Edition. Belmont, Wadworth/Tompson Learning.
Based on the information provided in the L’Oreal case, Yue Sai struggled to grow and capture additional sales in the high-end Chinese cosmetics sector. In the past, L’Oreal attempted to position Yue Sai in several different ways which can be viewed as detrimental to the company image, showing uncertainty as the company struggles to see which positioning strategy will stick. The most recent positioning presented in the case, which desires to “deliver Yue Sai’s longstanding brand promise that ‘Nobody knows Chinese skin better than Yue Sai’”, allows the highest probability of success for the company capitalizing on countless fresh trends in Chinese cosmetics (6). The positioning statement would reflect this new strategy: “For the modern Chinese woman Yue Sai offers a line of high-end cosmetics. Unlike other high-end cosmetics Yue Sai combines traditional Chinese medicine and sophisticated technology adapted to the unique skin type of Chinese women.” Yue Sai saw reasonable success and hope in the new Vital Essential line which utilized traditional Chinese medicine and, therefore, resulted in above average repeat purchases. Continuing to focus the strategy around traditional Chinese medicine should benefit Yue Sai considerably. Another suggested strategy would be to wholly reposition Yue Sai, however this is ill advised. As stated in the case, Yue Sai tried numerous different positioning strategies, which ultimately provided no clear path strategy. Repositioning would show uncertainty in the company, lowering brand value in the eyes of the consumer.
Avery common example to use for false advertisements is models. A model can accentuate and show off every corner of ther body and the advertisement may display or promise you “gorgeous looking skin”, or “the perfect hair within two weeks,” all for the sake of buying their product. Unless there is physical, hard evidence explaining how the product works, and how effective it is, then it would not be worth purchasing. Another thing that displays the misleading of manipulated advertisements is clothing lines depicted by models. Most everyone has heard of the famous Victoria’s Secret models and how robust and perfect their bodies are. Ritchie says that “...we see the “models” and the “logical” part of our brain recognizes that this is probably a manipulated image, but the “emotional” part of our brains don’t register this at all.” Thanks to modern day technology, it is very easy to get rid of imperfections and blemishes with the touch of a button, making any human body look impeccable. By doing these things, humans in general will believe that they are true, they will buy into the product only because they want the same results as depicted by the modes. Thus, resulting in false advertisement and an unsatisfied customer questioning their self worth. This type of manipulation is most commonly found in female attracted
The modern world is full of photographs. They are used for ads, political campaigns, and magazines. However it can be hard to tell whether or not a photograph is real. Many are ‘doctored’ or altered in some way. These doctored photographs can be seemingly harmless, such as advertisements, but they can misrepresent a product or person. There is a fine line between what is ethical and what isn’t for doctored images. Photographs should never be altered in order to deceive individuals, damage someone’s reputation, or when they have a strong negative impact on self-esteem. However if doctored photographs are used for art or for minor touch-ups for advertisements that don’t misrepresent a product then
Smith, C. (1997). Theory and the Art of Communications Design. Seattle, State of the University Press.
Tyler, S, Kossen, C & Ryan, C 2002, Communication: A foundation Course, Prentice Hall, Sydney.
In order to stop the negative effects of advertising on society, the general public must become informed on the complex tactics and manipulations advertisers are using on the American people and action must be taken to
Limpinnian, Danielle. "Portrayal of Men and Women in Ads." Aberystwyth University. Aberystwyth University, 2002. Web. 16 May 2014.
“How Advertising Has Changed Over The Years.” Locker Gnome, Bradley Bradwell. 6 January 2008. Web. 4 October 2009.
Surveys have also been conducted to tell the amounts of "fraudulent" ads being seen on television and how they fluctuate from year to year. In the past ten years television ads which make fraudulent claims have "gone down significantly"(miller). This is in part due to several new laws which have been established. It is doubtful however that much more stringent laws will be put ...
Advertising is designed to get information from the companies to the consumers. With that being said, there are several ways in which companies will go about this to ensure that their information is relayed to the consumers effectively and efficiently. According to George N. Root, from Demand Media, “advertising uses misguided promises of desired results to convince customers to purchase a product.” Nancy Day expresses in her book, when there are many of the same products, companies need to convince the public that their product is superior. Which results in an increase in the demand for advertising (7-8). This is when informative advertising turns into manipulative advertising. Root goes on to explain that advertising agencies use manipulative techniques such as “expert” opinion, attractiveness, lifestyle, and fear to control their audience.