Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Investigating the effect of concentration on reaction rate
Topics of research for rate of reaction
Investigating the effect of concentration on reaction rate
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Investigation to show the effect of different concentrations of Dilute
Sulphuric Acid on Zinc
Aim
To find the effect that different concentrations of dilute sulphuric acid have on the rate of reaction between the acid and zinc.
Chemical Equation
Zn + H2SO4 H2 + ZnSO4
How my investigation is a fair test
In this experiment only one factor is to be changed to make it a fair test, the concentration of the sulphuric acid, while all others must remain constant. I will also use the same amount of zinc each time, use the same conical flask and gas syringe.
Background
==========
This experiment is showing the effect on the rate of reaction between zinc and sulphuric acid if you change the concentration.
To react, reactants must collide with enough energy to result in successful collisions. If you increase the concentration, then that means that there are more particles in the same volume to react.
Therefore, there will be more successful collisions per second. If there are more successful reactions, therefore the rate is also increased. When there is a high concentration,
the reactants have more successful collisions per second; therefore the rate of reaction is quicker.
When there is a low concentration,
The reactants have less successful collisions per second,
Therefore the rate of reaction is slower.
Therefore, if the concentration is doubled, the number of particles is doubled, as is the number of collisions, resulting in the rate of reaction also being doubled.
Prediction
==========
I predict that as the concentration increases so will the rate of reaction. I also predict that when the concentration doubles, so will the rate of reaction.
Apparatus
=========
1.) Gas Syringe 100cm³ - I chose this as it is easy to measure the volume of gas collected with this.
2.) Conical flask 150cm³ - I chose this, as it is fairly precise to measure the concentrations of the dilute sulphuric acid.
3.) Measuring cylinder 50cm³ - I chose this, as it is fairly precise to measure the concentrations of the dilute sulphuric acid.
4.) 5g Zinc granules
5.) Dilute Sulphuric Acid 100/dm³
6.) Water
7.) Copper Sulphate solution
8.) Balance – I chose this, as it is very precise (it measure to 2 decimal place)
9.) Timer – I chose this as it is very precise (it measures to 2 decimal place)
Method
======
1.) Make up 50cm³ of the following concentrations:
ACID : WATER (cm³)
10 : 40
20 : 30
30 : 20
40 : 10
50 : 0
GRAPH
8. Repeat from step 4 twice more so you end up with three results for
Then, we multiply the result by 100 to get a percentage number. An example calculation from the 5.00mL pipet is: ((5.00mL - 4.9178mL)/5.00mL)*100 = 1.6438%. The percent error allows us to see which type of glassware is the most accurate at measuring substances. From our results, we concluded that the variable auto pipettor was the most accurate, since it had the lowest percent error, at 0.0500%. The volumetric pipet, volumetric flask, and burette, all had similar percent errors at 1.0430%, 0.6394%, and 0.6619%, respectively. These results indicate that these glassware types are still very accurate. Next, the graduated cylinder had a percent error of 1.6400%, which is still relatively low, indicating that the graduated cylinder is also very accurate. The beaker and erlenmeyer flask both had higher percent errors, at 7.5218%, and 9.4146%, respectively. The beaker and the erlenmeyer flask were not accurate at measuring substances. This is perhaps because they are larger, and are meant to hold larger volumes of water, or they are meant to contain and pour substances. After finding out
Central Argument(s): Those who have the intellect and access to resources are able to rule over those that does not possess the same benefits. An individual’s definitive class in society is based on socioeconomic status or what family they are born in to. This is something that cannot be controlled, but does predetermined how each person or group will live their lives. However a person or group do not have to remain in that class, and revolution occurs when
In the Communist Manifesto, Karl Marx, with the help of Friedrich Engel, advocated for the violent overthrow of capitalism and the creation of a socialist society. According to Marx, “The history of hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles” (184). Notably, Marx and Engel were the main proponents of communism. Marx’s main argument was that the society is the product of class conflict that results in different social classes with opposing economic interests. Importantly, Marx believed that the society comprised the oppressor and the oppressed, and the two are in constant conflict with each other. The ensuing conflict results in the revolutionary reorganization of the society, or the ruin of the opposing classes. Therefore, Marx, like Kant, saw the institutions of a given society as influential in determining its future. However, Marx argued that traditional institutions were unsuitable for a free and just society that respected human dignity. For example, he saw the modern bourgeoisie society as a product of the “ruins of feudal society,” meaning that the modern society is yet to resolve class antagonisms (184). Indeed, he sees the modern-day social classes as the products of the serfs and burgesses of the middle ages. In this regard, he claimed that the modern social structures are the products of a sequence of revolutions in the systems of production, as well as exchange. However, modern social structures are yet to enhance equity in the society. Therefore, Marx advocated for a revolution that would change the existing social structures and prepare the society to adopt communism. Unlike Kant’s idea of freedom of speech, which is a mind influencing process, Marx seemed more violent by the stating that “let the ruling classes tremble at a communistic revolution”
This infamous final stage of political evolution is the abolition of classes and antagonism between the classes. With abolishing antagonism, it also would abolish oppression between the classes. Along with overpowering the bourgeoisie, measures of rules that are generally applicable for most advanced countries would be established. Rules such as, “Expropriation of property in land and application of all rents of land to public purposes and a heavy progressive tax,” (Karl Marx), which these rules are not solely just these two. Once countries have established these rules, through the process of it, if classes lose its distinctions, and all production has been assigned solely to an associated individual, the public would lose its political power, the political power that lets a class oppress the
Marx and his coauthor, Friedrich Engels, begin The Communist Manifesto with the famous and provocative statement that the “history of all hitherto existing societies is the history of class struggle.” They argue that all changes in the shape of society, in political institutions, in history itself, are driven by a process of collective struggle on the part of groups of people with similar economic situations in order to realize their material or economic interests. These struggles, occurring throughout history from ancient Rome through the Middle Ages to the present day, have been struggles of economically subordinate classes against economically dominant classes who opposed their economic interests—slaves against masters, serfs against landlords,
The first quote from Marx is “The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggle” (Levine 19). This quote reflects the stratified time period Marx grew up in. he was born during the French revolution and saw the effects of the industrial revolution on the communities around him. This time has influenced his writing because one of the major themes he talks about is social stratification. The quote describes how stratification has existed in every culture and society and will continue to. This class structure affects history and the revolutions and other significant events that happen. The reign of the house of Bourbon caused a lot of social stratification in France and their reign ended with the French revolution that
Planning and Method. Any experiment needs variations as well as fairness to be a true success. The two variations I will include in this experiment shall be: 1) The number of paperclips on the bottom of the helicopter. 2)
Marx and Engels placed much of the responsibility of forming this ideal society on the individual. They called upon the working class, the proletarians, to unite and overthrow their oppressors, the bourgeoisie. In the Communist Manifesto, Marx and Engels urged the “Formation of the proletariat into conquest of political power by the proletariat.”1 The proletariats needed to disregard their immediate interests in order to promote the general will of the masses. The Communist Manifesto called upon all proletarians to unite in order to overthrow the bourgeoisie for the implementation of a classless society.
Weber did not believe that social conflict would arise in the form of a revolution solely because of uniformity in class interest. He believes that for there to be social conflict and for action to take place the property-less class must first acknowledge that there is inequality in wealth and that there is a difference in the opportunities to obtain that wealth. They must also acknowledge that these differences arise from the property owners’ ability to distribute property and power.
The manifesto clearly shows how one form of society can quickly be overthrown by another, as the reader can see with the explanation of feudalism being abolished. Their argument is strengthened by the fact that capitalism did indeed benefit the bourgeoisie, but the bourgeoisie now only account for a small fraction of the
5. Make sure the time/cycle setting knob is on, so then you will hear when your clothes are done drying.
Marx begins by showing that throughout all of history humans have divided themselves into certain ranks or classes. For example, in the Middle Ages social divisions were “feudal lords, vassals, guild-masters, journeymen, apprentices, [and] serfs.”[vi] As long as social stratification has existed, one group or groups have been the oppressor while another group or groups have been the oppressed. The fight that exists between the oppressed and the oppressor is destine to end reconstruction of society triggered by revoluti...
Fair test (how): I made this a fair test by only changing one thing in