Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Measurement and calibration of volumetric glassware practical
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The primary goal of this experiment was to determine which types of glassware are the most accurate and precise in measuring substances. Another goal of this experiment was to help familiarize ourselves with the different types of glassware, and how we should handle the laboratory equipment. The accuracy and precision of a particular type of glassware is important because it allows for accurate measurements when performing different experiments. It also allows us to differentiate between glassware that is better for containing substances versus glassware that can deliver substances more accurately. In order to measure the accuracy and precision of the different types of glassware, we first chose seven different types of glassware. The general …show more content…
After each group member performed 20 trials for each type of glassware, we were able to use percent error and standard deviation to determine which types of glassware are accurate and precise. In this experiment, it was important to measure the temperature of the water in order to record accurate densities, which can impact the mass of the water. After finishing the trials, our group subtracted the mass of the glassware without water from the mass of the glassware with water in order to find the mass of the water in grams. Then, we divided the mass of the water by the density(g/cm^3) of the water in order to find the volume (mL). An example calculation from the 5.00mL pipet is: (4.9285mL+4.8839mL+4.9367mL+4.9265mL+4.9134mL)/5 = 4.9178. In most cases, the temperature of the water was around 23 degrees celsius, making the density about .998408 g/cm^3 for many of the trials. The densities we used were found online. The next calculations we performed were to determine the average volume of the water in each person’s five trials by adding up all of the volumes(mL) and dividing that number by five. Using the average volume, we then calculated the …show more content…
Then, we multiply the result by 100 to get a percentage number. An example calculation from the 5.00mL pipet is: ((5.00mL - 4.9178mL)/5.00mL)*100 = 1.6438%. The percent error allows us to see which type of glassware is the most accurate at measuring substances. From our results, we concluded that the variable auto pipettor was the most accurate, since it had the lowest percent error, at 0.0500%. The volumetric pipet, volumetric flask, and burette, all had similar percent errors at 1.0430%, 0.6394%, and 0.6619%, respectively. These results indicate that these glassware types are still very accurate. Next, the graduated cylinder had a percent error of 1.6400%, which is still relatively low, indicating that the graduated cylinder is also very accurate. The beaker and erlenmeyer flask both had higher percent errors, at 7.5218%, and 9.4146%, respectively. The beaker and the erlenmeyer flask were not accurate at measuring substances. This is perhaps because they are larger, and are meant to hold larger volumes of water, or they are meant to contain and pour substances. After finding out
Experimental Summary: First, my partner and I put the marshmallow and cheese puff on T-pins and used the Electronic Balance to measure the mass of each of them. Next, we put 100 mL of water in the 100 mL Graduated Cylinder and poured it into the 12 oz. soda can. We measured the temperature of the water with the thermometer. After
First, 100 mL of regular deionized water was measured using a 100 mL graduated cylinder. This water was then poured into the styrofoam cup that will be used to gather the hot water later. The water level was then marked using a pen on the inside of the cup. The water was then dumped out, and the cup was dried. Next, 100 mL of regular deionized water was measured using a 100 mL graduated cylinder, and the fish tank thermometer was placed in the water. Once the temperature was stabilizing in the graduated cylinder, the marked styrofoam cup was filled to the mark with hot water. Quickly, the temperature of the regular water was recorded immediately before it was poured into the styrofoam cup. The regular/hot water was mixed for a couple seconds, and the fish tank thermometer was then submerged into the water. After approximately 30 seconds, the temperature of the mixture leveled out, and was recorded. This was repeated three
Start with the hot water and first measure the temperature. Record it. 8. Then pour 40 ml into the beaker. You can measure how much water was used by looking at the meniscus.
When the liquid level is above the calibration line on the pipette, remove the bulb quickly and put your thumb or index finger over the pipette. Carefully “roll” finger to the side and allow the liquid to drop until the meniscus is level with the mark. Then hold the pipette over the flask to receive the liquid and remove the finger. Allow the liquid to drain out.
Using the calorimeter, we firstly needed to calibrate the machine; to do this we took a tube of distilled water and tested it; we knew that this should measure 0 because distilled water is completely transparent. We could have done this with any known reference sample. Once we had calibrated the machine we could then test the real samples for their transparency, we tested all five of these samples a total of three times each. Between each different concentration of solution sample we had to re calibrate the machine using the distilled water again, so in total we did 20 colourimetry tests. We gained three results for each concentration of sample and then calculated an average from these three results; these are shown in the table below.
This would give us an extra measure of accuracy each time. Another way to improve the experiment and to produce consistent readings was to used distilled water. This is because the distilled water contains no impurities and therefore no hardness in water.
the replicate shows the same trend as the first experiment. I used a measuring cylinder and a beaker to measure out the amounts of water; however these did not seem to affect the quality of my results. To increase the accuracy of my results I could have perhaps used a burette. Even though I did the best I could to keep the experiment accurate, I did. some places there were mistakes that unintentionally occurred.
In this experiment, there were several objectives. First, this lab was designed to determine the difference, if any, between the densities of Coke and Diet Coke. It was designed to evaluate the accuracy and precision of several lab equipment measurements. This lab was also designed to be an introduction to the LabQuest Data and the Logger Pro data analysis database. Random, systematic, and gross errors are errors made during experiments that can have significant effects to the results. Random errors do not really have a specific cause, but still causes a few of the measurements to either be a little high or a little low. Systematic errors occur when there are limitations or mistakes on lab equipment or lab procedures. These kinds of errors cause measurements to be either be always high or always low. The last kind of error is gross errors. Gross errors occur when machines or equipment fail completely. However, gross errors usually occur due to a personal mistake. For this experiment, the number of significant figures is very important and depends on the equipment being used. When using the volumetric pipette and burette, the measurements are rounded to the hundredth place while in a graduated cylinder, it is rounded to the tenth place.
Possible sources of error in this experiment include the inaccuracy of measurements, as correct measurements are vital for the experiment.
GLASS written by ellen hopkins intermenes the real life struggles that teenagers face everyday, from love to drugs to destructive relationships. Ellen really hits home showing the life of a once 4.0 honors student Kristina; whose life easily got turned upside down from one toxic summer at her fathers that will show the darkest side possible of life. An estimated 12 percent of children in the United States live with a parent who is dependent on or abuses alcohol or other drugs. Based on data from 2002 through 2007, it was to be reported that 8.3 million children under the age of 18 lived with at least one substance-dependent or substance-abusing parent according to Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (Paragraph 4). The bond between a child and their parents is so pure yet
One possible source of experimental error could be not having a solid measurement of magnesium hydroxide nor citric acid. This is because we were told to measure out between 5.6g-5.8g for magnesium hydroxide and 14g-21g for citric acid. If accuracy measures how closely a measured value is to the accepted value and or true value, then accuracy may not have been an aspect that was achieved in this lab. Therefore, not having a solid precise measurement and accurate measurement was another source of experimental error.
Planning Firstly here is a list of equipment I used. Boiling tubes Weighing scales Knife Paper towels 100% solution 0% solution (distilled water) measuring beakers potato chips Cork borer. We planned to start our experiment by doing some preliminary work. We planned to set up our experiment in the following way.
Variables --------- During the experiments, the water will be heated using different spirit burners containing different alcohols. I will be able to change different parts of the experiment. These are the. Volume of water heated:
Generally pycnometer is made of glass, with a clos-fitting ground glass stopper with capillary tube through it, so that air bubbles mas escape from the apparatus. This device enables a liquid density to be measured through an appropriate working fluid, such as mercury or water, using analytical balance. When the flask weighed empty, full of water, and full of a liquid whose relative density is desired, then relative density can be easily calculated. The specific gravity results show that subsoil specific gravity varies between 2.45 and 2.7. Pycnometer analysis work system shown in Figure 12.
There is also the potential of human error within this experiment for example finding the meniscus is important to get an accurate amount using the graduated pipettes and burettes. There is a possibility that at one point in the experiment a chemical was measured inaccurately affecting the results. To resolve this, the experiment should have been repeated three times.