Investigating the Factors that Lead to Pressure Groups Succeeding or Failing
There are factors which lead to pressure groups succeeding or failing.
I will be discussing the factors which are required for a pressure
group to be successful in achieving their aims.
Firstly, one may think the size of a group is a factor and more people
mean more votes. A government is more likely to respond to pressure
groups by large groups because there are more potential votes to be
won or lost. However, size is not always considered a factor because
even pressure groups which are small in size can make an impact, since
it depend on the way the members of the pressure group think, as in
being imaginative, tactical thinkers etc. It’s not quantity but the
quality of the members of the pressure groups.
Furthermore, the government is more likely to be influenced by large
numbers of its own potential supporters who make up a pressure group’s
membership. For instance, if the pressure group was a traditional
supporter of the Labour government, then the Conservative government
is unlikely to be sympathetic to that pressure group. So some
pressure groups will expect better treatment from one party than
another and success or failure will therefore depending on the
government in power at the time.
Finance is a crucial factor leading to a pressure group being
successful, since running effective campaigns can be very expensive,
so wealthy supporters provides an obvious advantage. Also small
pressure groups with large finances can use funds to finance political
parties and so receive sympathetic treatment and gain rewards. For
example, the governments refusal to ban all advertising on cigarettes,
and the lack of action taken by them to break the brewers’ virtual
monopoly over public houses. A more financed group can employ more
people, therefore employees have the time and expertise to ensure that
campaigns are organised in a professional manner, however linking this
back to size, it does not guarantee success.
A lot has to do with the pressure group itself and organisation is an
But still the size of membership of a group is by no mean the most
Social Influence Research - Do the Ends Justify the Means? To what extent does the importance of social influence research, justify the methods used in its investigation? The debate about ethics in psychology focuses on two areas: protection of participants and benefiting society. This is a double obligation dilemma as if some psychologists are not allowed to do certain experiments because of ethical restraints; this can cause problems with validity.
Sitting in their favorite coffee shop Rachel, Ross, Joey, Monica, and Phoebe were reminiscing about the old days when they used to live within walking distances from one another. Living in different cities and leading busy lives they had not seen each other in months. Their chatter came to a halt as Chandler pranced in late.
The colonists’ experience with Britain establishes that tyranny could appear in a political body as well as in a single ruler. Tyranny is a society where society is confined by the government whom has absolute power; oppress the people, and are subject to an absolute ruler. As stated before, the British control prior to the revolutionary war on the colonist is the absolute example of tyranny. Before the Declaration of Independence was published, Thomas Jefferson put out A Summary View of the Rights of British America, Jefferson stated that the colonist will establish a congress in time protests against the British rule King George III, stating that the colonies are tied of the tyranny and claimed the British did not have the write to rule
Words can bring positive change to a community, be it a small town or the entire world - all it takes is two key components, delivery and content. This was certainly the case with Clarence Darrow’s 1926 concluding speech in defence of African American, Henry Sweet, accused of the murder of a white man. Darrow’s monumental eight-hour speech set a legal precedent when Sweet was acquitted of his murder charge. The speech, “Changed the status of Negros before the law and meant in respect to defending ones home and self in self defence, what applied to whites now, in practice and not just in word, apply to African Americans as well.” Clarence Darrow’s speech, along with Henry Sweet’s acquittal, is now considered huge milestone in the civil rights movement.
Hitler and Mussolini were both individuals that used social influences throughout history . Each of these evil villains used authority and social pressure to persuade and manipulate people into performing acts that they wouldn’t normally do . Hitler and Mussolini legitimized their authority through immoral actions and fear and abused their authority. This is important because authority and social pressures are one of the most dangerous combinations there are. The use of these two socially accepted tools have resulted in the deaths of more people, and lead to atrocities such as more genocides than any other social force. . In the 1950s a psychologist Solomon Asch at Rutgers University decided to test group and individuals against in peer pressure. Later on 1963 Ache’s student a Yale psychologist named Stanley Milgram studied social obedience. Each particular study which was 13 years apart would reveal the same answers and types of results. Solomon Asch and Stanley Milgram recognized these events and decided to do their own experiments in social influences and authority. Each one of their studies is equally important, because they reinforce each other in characteristics and results.
group it is also difficult for us to do a lot of things. It is difficult to
Adolescent years are a time period in a human beings life where we search for a place that we are most comfortable. It is a time where we try to find friends with similar interests and those who will easily accept us for who we are. Once we are accepted by those friends, we tend to do more things with hopes of getting approval from “the group.” Trying to fit in during adolescence is a significant factor for self-motivation because it determines the level of being accepted and popularity amongst our peers. Through our year of adolescence we experiment and try to discover oneself as a person, but we also find what our strongest traits are that are used in order to be accepted, or to feel more popular. Popularity is defined as a state of being liked or accepted by a group of people (cite). As the group of people gets larger, so does that person’s popularity. For some people, popularity may come easy due to their charisma or looks, but there are those children who feel lonely due to their lack of popularity.
Brain Games season two episode five the power of persuasion, show’s how a lot of us are getting persuaded every day without even noticing it, as stated in this episode the human brain is constantly getting influenced to do things all the time, this episode it will elaborate how we are getting allured every day and how the decision we make is not necessarily ours, they are part of marketing’s plans. Marketing plays a huge factor of the manipulation every day, by using big words, different style of font or even the color of the signs. One of the power of persuasion is called “Priming; meaning subtle ques that are influencing your responses often without noticing it. It’s a way of bypassing your brain conscious decisions making it process to work
Citizens of the United States are traditionally given unlimited freedom of speech, press, and assembly. These American privileges allow interest groups to express their perspectives by using the media and other sources that are accessible to the public. In definition, an interest group is a group of individuals who organize to influence the government’s programs and policies. The main goal of these groups is to have the government both listen and respond to their interests (Shin 243). Historically interest groups have and continue to play a crucial role in American politics; especially since it is an effective form for citizens to interfere with government decision making. Two current interest groups in the United States are the National Hispanic Leadership Agenda and the National Council of La Raza. These particular interest groups demonstrate how interest groups directly and indirectly influence public opinion and the political process.
The size of a group is considered to be a restrictive condition on the quantity and quality of connection that can transpire amongst particular members. Kephart (1950) established that as group size increases the number of relationships that exist among member’s increases greatly. He suggests that as a result of this increase in relationships among members there will be an increased tendency towards divisions into subgroups in which participants relate to one another.
... that areas of expertise can be exploited, different people are good at different things. Groups can discuss material, and that discussion can improve the quality of the decision. Groups are less likely to suffer from judgmental biases that individuals have when they make decisions. People are more likely to follow through on decisions made by groups that they are connected to. Also, more monumental decisions can be made in groups, because one member will not be singled out for blame, making the entire group responsible.
The Findings from Social Influence Research Forty male volunteers from a self selected sample took part in a controlled observational study, which they were deceived into thinking was a test of learning. The naïve participant was always assigned the role of 'teacher' and a confederate played the role of 'learner'. A word association test was the learning task, and the naïve participant was instructed to deliver an electric shock to the learner for each incorrect answer. The teacher and the learner were in separate rooms with no voice contact. The learner sitting in another room gave mainly wrong answers and received his fake shocks in silence until they reached 300 volts.
Limitations to this study could be seen in the size of the group of participants. Another limitation would be that only participants from one facility were interviewed.
This paper describe about different types of control theories and the application of control theory in real world context. Social control theory is based on philosophical principles that individuals automatically would commit crime if they left alone with situation. In other words, we, all are born with criminal characteristics and learn to follow laws as we grow in society. Many sociologist and criminologist have suggested that acceptance of social norms and beliefs are a vital evidence of someone is a reputed member in society or a criminal. Control theories not only use to evaluate delinquent behavior of the juvenile populations, but also adult populations. Travis Hirschi’s social control is used more in the field of criminology and criminal