People will act very different depending on their surroundings; each must quickly evaluate what version of identity is to be shown. There are two types of identity, social and personal identity; identity is what makes someone, but identity can also be seen as reputation. Identity is also what makes someone who they are. Regardless of what you’re trying to show, personal and social identities tend to crossover. Gloria Anzaldua and Richard Rodriguez interpret their identities in very different matters, but both correlate to who they are. Gloria is someone empowered and takes on her heritage; while Richard is someone who is ashamed and rejects his heritage. In order to be your whole self, you need accept both your personal and social identity …show more content…
so your sense of self is never lost. Comfort is something that weighs on someone’s actions. For example, cursing is a huge impact on personal identity. Many people won’t curse in a public to not be judged to maintain a reputation. Rodriguez takes the language of Spanish and interprets it as a private and negative narrative.
“It was unsettling to hear my parents struggle with English” (Rodriguez 3). He states, how it makes him uncomfortable to hear his family try to speak the English language because his parents don’t know how to speak the language. Rodriguez also states, “it was more troubling for me to hear my parents speak in public” (3). In this part of the story he particularly says how his parents Spanish was not for the public. He finds comfort in the English language, even acceptable. Reyes 2 While Gloria Anzaldua, a Mexican writer spoke about her social identity crisis that had happened while in college. She states, “Wild tongues can’t be tamed, they can only be cut out” (Anzaldua 34). This occurs when she is taking a speech class to remove her accent in college against her will, i was some sort of a college requirement. Her being so in love with her language and culture, she used that analogy to show the agony and how unfair it was to her and others like her. “If you don’t like it, go back to Mexico where you belong”(Anzaldua 34). This quote states that if she didn’t assimilate into their flawed view of normality and acceptability, she didn’t belong there. This is …show more content…
very traumatizing thing to hear as a child, being told that you must change the way you are to belong is just cruel.
She had her social identity taken like her sense of belonging. It had a direct effect on her self-esteem. In Henri Tajfels’s Social identity theory states, that a person’s idea of who they are are directly affected by the groups they’re in. When they feel that they belong, it impacts their way of being, self-esteem, and pride positively. On other hand, if a group around them rejects a person, it impacts them in an extremely negative way. The way a person feels they belong. This means that America had something against Anzaldua’s social identity. So when the Pan American University tried stripping her of her accent, they were robbing her of social identity that was apart of whom she was. Social and personal identity are juxtaposed. Each identity having their own sets of differences, both come down to developing the person’s character. Rodriguez, who avoids and shames his Spanish background, would have fit in to the speech class Anzaldua was in because of his hatred for his background and the form of how he grew up. Anzaldua would have loved an intense and dominant Spanish background that Reyes
3 would’ve stayed with the family. Even though they both desired a place to fit in at those times, they found later in life. Anzaldua’s found that staying close to her roots made her happy, and Rodriguez found that perfect the English language was his chance of fitting in. These writers both had struggles and intense obstacles while growing, but due to these struggles and obstacles, it made them the writers they are. The reader, is allowed agree to disagree, because each story does not make us, it makes the writer, it tells the story, and it brightens the mind.
complication, In adapting to a new land. Julia create her poem in a outwardly form to point out
To summarize the story, Richard Rodriguez is Mexican-American peer coming from his parents who were immigrants and attends a Catholic school. He realizes that his bilingualism wasn’t acceptable in his community and had to conform to having a different identity throughout the course of his life, which
Rodriguez views the same as a public and private language. He explains that the term “private” relates to Spanish language, while the term “public” is the kind of English language he speaks outside home. As he writes “… I wrongly imagined that English was intrinsically a public language and Spanish an intrinsically private one…” (513). In addition, Rodriguez’s reference to the English language as a gringo sound gives an impression of a child’s resentment towards said language. The term gringo in Spanish means los gringos which is a “derogatory term for English-speaking Americans” (512). When Rodriguez parents stopped communicating at home in Spanish, the laughter at home faded along with his private language. This further supports Rodriguez’s statement that “… as we learned more and more English, we shared fewer and fewer words with our parents” (515). Thus the end of a once full of laughter home, yet the beginning of Rodriguez’s mastery of the English language. Similar to Tan’s experience, the writer’s rebellious nature challenged her critics by proving that Asian’s skills are not limited to Math and Science. Thus, the decision behind to shift from pre-med to English major. As Tan writes, “I happen to be rebellious in nature and enjoy the challenge of disproving assumptions made about me” (510). Hence Tan’s strong conviction to resist the convention of
Both authors write about the confidence the main characters receive from their culture. Rodriguez talks about his “private language” being Spanish. A language that makes him unique. He is adamant in his pride of not belonging to the public society of the “gringos”. In Tafolla's poem, Richi is introduced as a boy who is strict about the pronunciation of his name.
Rodriguez would, for example, use words such as “unsettling” “cloistered” and “alienation,” to describe the beginning of his assimilation in the public English speaking world. While he would use “calm” “enchantingly” “consoling” and “intimacy” to describe Spanish. As Rodriguez is being pushed to assimilate and English is heard everywhere including his home he becomes “increasingly angry” only from being obliged from his parents and trying to participate in class he begins to feel a sense of belonging in public. Rodriguez’s diction was evident and continuous in his essay which abetted the audience to understand that the author wanted the audience to be addressed formally and be known that he wants to be taken seriously and able to connect to his background and why he made his
As Rodriguez is looking back at the rise of his “public identity”, he realizes that “the loss implies the gain” (Rodriguez 35). He believes that losing a part of who you (such as your “mother tongue” is permitted since
Throughout Richards early childhood development he quickly understood that in order to succeed in America he would have to learn to confidently speak in English. Richard is Hispanic American and although he was born in America, Spanish was the only language that he was exposed to as a young child. He grew up in a home where Spanish flowed freely, but he soon realized outside of his home the language that he primarily knew was foreign. His parents spoke fluent Spanish along with all of his relatives. The brief encounters he experienced of his parents speaking English were only in public places and the proficiency was very poor. Rodriguez’s home was as a safety net for him and his Spanish speaking family with they are his only real connections to the outside world. It wasn’t until Richards encounter with his teachers that he and his family was heavily impressed on the importance of developing a public language. After the encouragement of the visit home from a teacher as a family
Richard Rodriguez offers an alternate yet equally profound truth: While our heritage and culture may remain forever tied to and expressed in our native or "home" language, only through the dominant language of our country (English in most cases) can we achieve a place in society that gives us a feeling that we belong amongst everyone else. The only way we can truly become a part of our community and fit in is to dominate the current spoken language. In the United States, the dominant language is Standard English. In this excerpt from "Aria," a chapter in his autobiography entitled "Hunger of Memory": The Education of Richard Rodriguez, Rodriguez discusses public and private languages, and agrees that his achievements in English separated him from his Spanish family and culture but also brought him "the belief, the calming assurance that [he] belonged in public." We as human beings want to feel we belong. We search for that place in society where we are most comfortable all our lives. One should consider the benefits of mastering the dominant language of the society they live in, but should also take into account the harm of taking your native language for granted. I will attempt to explore both of these considerations and examine Rodriguez place in life now, by stating the facts of who is now by the childhood decisions that were made.
Identity is a group of characteristics, data or information that belongs exactly to one person or a group of people and that make it possible to establish differences between them. The consciousness that people have about themselves is part of their identity as well as what makes them unique. According to psychologists, identity is a consistent definition of one’s self as a unique individual, in terms of role, attitudes, beliefs and aspirations. Identity tries to define who people are, what they are, where they go or what they want to be or to do. Identity could depend on self-knowledge, self-esteem, or the ability of individuals to achieve their goals. Through self-analysis people can define who they are and who the people around them are. The most interesting point about identity is that some people know what they want and who they are, while it takes forever for others to figure out the factors mentioned before. Many of the individuals analyzed in this essay are confused about the different possible roles or positions they can adopt, and that’s exactly the reason they look for some professional help.
Firstly, in the author’s childhood, he felt ashamed of his parents poor English. To support this experience, Rodriguez shows his embarrassment by saying, “I tried not to hear anymore… I
His home was the place where it was a private world then homes of his English speakers. Since his family only spoke Spanish at home. However, the further the story goes, Rodriguez recognized he has school and family collide. However later on the story, Richard started to refer to speak English then Spanish. I think that there wasn’t any communication between Richard and his family after that so they started to feel this separation between them. In addition, His family started on trying to speak English to help Richard out. “In an instant, they agreed to give up the language (the sounds) that had revealed and accentuated our family’s closeness” (paragraph 7). In my opinion, since his family started to no longer speak Spanish, Richard family lost their
My parents decided to immigrate to the United States when I was six years of age. As we established ourselves in the United States, my first language was only Spanish. Spanish was the language that I was taught at home, and it was the only language to be spoken at home. Rodriguez describes when he first entered his classroom where he was introduced to a formal English-speaking context, writing that, ?I remember to start with that day in Sacramento-a California now nearly thirty years past-when I first entered a classroom, able to understa...
Some of the strengths of the social identity theory are that; throughout the years it has supported many empirical studies, it has also demonstrated the social categorization in intergroup behaviors, allowed us to differentiate between social and personal identities and has provide explanations for other areas of psychology (conformity). A weaknesses of the Social identity theory is that its application is restricted in the sense that it has very low ecological validity. Another weakness is that SIT favors situational factors rather than dispositional is not supported by evidence. The social Identity theory can be used to how to explain how we form our social and personal identities in the terms of in and out groups. SIT can also be used to explain why there is conflict between humans and different societies.
Social identity theory can be applied to many different problems and real life situations. It demonstrates the role of categorization in behaviors, and explores how being part of a group affects social interaction in everyday life.
Webster's dictionary describes identity as sameness of essential character, individuality, or the fact of being the same person as one claims to be. So your identity can include your name, your age, your job title, or simply characteristics of your body. These things are facts, facts you don't care to share with the world. Just as the word suggests your identity is something by which you can be identified. These are things that describe a person in terms a stranger would understand. This area of identity is proof of who you are. However, your identity is also composed of what you are. They mark your role in society. Who you are and what you do make up your identity. This is essential in the human life span because people are always searching to find where they truly belong in the world.