Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Socioeconomic disadvantages faced by indigenous
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
I have often been asked why social problems like alcohol abuse, suicide, and domestic violence disproportionality affect First Nation Peoples. Regarding Intimate Partner Violence, I believe that Indigenous women are disproportionally affected because of their low economic status. Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) in North America is a problem that can affect anyone despite, race, religion, or socioeconomic status. The data available suggest that First Nations women are more likely to experience IPV in their lifetime, with 46% -91% of Native woman experiencing violence compared to the 7-51% of their non-native counterparts (Nason-Clark, 2004) In a study of eight indigenous regions of Mexico researchers interviewed women about experienced IPV, history of family violence, level of poverty in the community, type of municipality and sociodemographic characteristics (Santiago ,2013). They found that the women in these communities who reported higher levels of Intimate Partner Violence also were more likely to have low levels of education, had married young , had elevated levels of alcohol consumption, and had a poorer household (Santiago, 2013). Those in lower socioeconomic positions of the indigenous communities analyzed were also more likely to experience severe intimate partner violence; Which includes …show more content…
life-threatening occurrences like threatening with weapons, suffocation or choking, or forced sexual acts (Santiago, 2013). In a study of Intimate partner violence and community level risk researchers uncovered a pattern of cultural disruption, IPV internalized as a community norm, and community inequity.
In 49 interviews of indigenous women who have experienced IPV and Health care professionals in the community with indigenous background researchers documented reoccurring themes of oppression, sub oppression and colonization. In fact, 76%s of respondents viewed IPV as a social norm (Bernette, 2017). Income and poverty were not a dominant factor in this study when interviews were coded, as over half of the 29 reporting victims had a Bachelor degree or higher (Bernette,
2017). In the studies listed above one common factor is the lack of community focus on providing adequate intervention and facilities. When examined through a frame of power dynamics and historical oppression, internalized self-hatred can manifest in a number or ways that can be detrimental to communities. When externalized it results in violence against the more vulnerable members of the community particularly women and children (Joe, 2012). There are unique obstacles in native communities regarding IPV, many women do not come forward for fear of being ostracized by their community, particularly if the perpetrator is well connected. There is also a distrust within the community of nonnative legal and medical professionals. There are also many grey areas regarding tribal, state, and federal authority when prosecuting domestic violence incidents (Joe, 2012). One prevalent theme in the studies listed above is the overall lack of and access to health care, domestic violence professionals and shelters for indigenous communities. The health disparities between indigenous communities with and without these programs is also very problematic, as access to government institutions decreased instances of IPV (Santiago, 2013). As an indigenous woman and a mental health professional these issues resonate with me. This information will impact the quality of care I give and the types of programs I will dedicate my time to and advocate for.
Intimate partner violence has been a significant issue for centuries in all countries. "Since 1974, nearly 2,600 spousal homicides have been recorded in Canada" (Bunge, 2002). Of these homicides, more than three-quarters have been against women. Although through feminism and the women's liberation movement, there has been a slight improvement in the incidences of violence against women, there has also been a drastic change in the perception of the issue by society. After reviewing the most recent literature on violence against women and victimization through intimate partners, it has become prevalent that there are now two crucial stances that are taken. The first position is that of the women being victimized as the main issue, including prevention, causes and incidences. The second position is that of women becoming more 'aggressive' and the issue of violence against both men and women. "Wife battering- the original problem constituted by the 1970s feminists- has morphed into 'domestic violence' and then into 'husband abuse'" (Minaker, 2006). This literature review will examine the background information on intimate partner violence including different arguments and perspectives, theories, and methodologies as well as discuss the major findings and future directions of research.
According to Smith, sexual violence “is not simply a tool of patriarchy, but also a tool of colonialism and racism” (Smith 2005, 8). As a result, women are being forced to suffer abuse, which damages their identity. Because of colonialism, Native women often find themselves forced into silence around sexual and domestic violence in their communities. By staying silent about sexual and domestic violence, Native communities are “able to maintain a united front against racism” (Smith 2005, 1). Accordingly, Native women are constantly being marginalized in patriarchal discourses regarding racism, colonialism, and white supremacy discourses. Historically, it is mentioned that sexism is the inability of both patriarchy and white supremacy discourses,
Intimate partner violence is still a common issue that affects women from all walks of life. It is an issue that is too often ignored until the violence has become deadly. In the book “Women: Images and Realities a Multicultural Anthology,” chapter seven entitled “Violence Against Women” includes pieces that cover the issue of intimate partner violence. In Michele McKeon’s piece “Understanding Intimate Partner Violence” she states that “In 1994 the Violence Against Women Act was passed, revolutionizing programs, services, and funding for individuals affected by intimate partner violence and their families” (McKeon 497). Yet the revolutionized programs, which McKeon speaks of, haven’t changed the fact that the violence continues and in my opinion, it is not enough to just deal with the aftermath of the violence, the prevention of intimate partner violence is something that society needs to address. In addition, McKeon also states “The Center for Disease Control and Prevention found that 1,181 women were murdered by their intimate partners in 2005; two million women experience injurie...
Today, Native American women continue to be victimized and remain vulnerable targets within, their communities, reservations, tribal law enforcement agencies, and federal law enforcement agencies. In order to restore peace and justice for Native women we first need to have critical and substantive discussion regarding all aspects of sexual assault on r...
Professor Sarah Deer from the University of Kansas visited Dayton to give a presentation entitled, “Sovereignty of the Soul: Sexual Violence in Native America.” Throughout her presentation, Dr. Dree exposes important and disheartening information about the way Indians have been treated. She stated that the majority of Native American women have been or will be sexual assaulted in their lifetime. Dr. Deer has dedicated her efforts towards ending violence and discrimination towards Native American women and works towards educating individuals on harsh realities that have been occurring throughout our history.
There are many different types of domestic violence. Physical abuse is the most obvious form, but this is not to say that outsiders always recognize it. Generally, physical violence causes bodily harm, using a variety of methods. Slapping, pushing, throwing, hitting, punching, and strangling are only a few methods. An object or weapon may or may not be used. There is not always physical evidence of physical abuse such as bruising, bleeding, scratches, bumps, etc., therefore, absence of physical marks does not necessarily mean physical abuse had not occurred. Physical abuse sometimes escalates to murder (Morris and Biehl 7, Haley 14-17).
Aboriginal women in Canada do not suffer direct (physical) violence only (e.g. domestic violence, rape, sexual assault) but also suffer indirect violence which is structural violence as explained by Galtung (1969). Structural violence is a hidden form of operational violence against women (Farmer 1996). It is built into the fabric of many societies today (indigenous politics, 2005). There are well documented evidence on gender inequalities which leads to inadequate human development and expectancy of life in general (Indigenous politics, 2005) These evidences show the lack of governmental support for working women which is universal (including Canada who is low on the GII) (GII report 2014). Structural violence is built maintained in the society through socio-cultural and political constructions/norms (Confortini 2006) which are used to manipulate, dominate and control women (Canadian women’s
Research has suggested that IPV is a significant concern amongst the Latina population. A recent National Violence Against Women Survey reports that 21.2% of Hispanic/Latina women reported physical assault and 7.9% reported being raped by an intimate partner at some time in their life, this is a total of 29.1% of this population experiencing IPV. This number is significantly more than that of the national average of 25% (Tjaden & Thoennes, 2000).
In a 1999, a national survey was conduct on the domestic violence of women in Canada . The study concluded that the highest prevalence of abuse was found in the homes of immigrants from developing countries. This study shows that most immigrant women internalize and hide the crimes due to social stigma, shame, cultural/religious constraints and lack of community resources (Preisser, 1999).
Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) is historically referred to as domestic violence. It describes a pattern of coercive and assaultive behavior that may include psychological abuse, progressive isolation, sexual assault, physical injury, stalking, intimidation, deprivation, and reproductive coercion among partners (The Family Violence Prevention Fund (FVPF), 1999). IPV leads to lifelong consequences such as lasting physical impairment, emotional trauma, chronic health problems, and even death. It is an issue affecting individuals in every community, regardless of age, economic status, race, religion, nationality or educational background. Eighty-five percent of domestic violence victims are women (Bureau of Justice Statistics, 2003).
Moreover, when an Indigenous child grows up in non-Indigenous care, oftentimes, the only cultural education that they receive is formal education. Unfortunately, the education system can contribute to fostering mental health concerns by focusing on the colonial aspects of Indigenous history, “legitimating [the] ideology of colonialism” (Gebhard, 2017) for both Indigenous and non-Indigenous youth. Educators reveal that, in their daily encounters with non-Indigenous society, Indigenous youth “deal with low expectations, and incidents of outright racism” (Gebhard, 2017). Furthermore, the disproportionately high rates of Indigenous youth in non-Indigenous care coupled with this coinciding lack of Indigenous cultural identity acts as a pipeline to many additional social problems, such as, increased rates of suicide, criminal activity, various types of abuse, and other severe consequences. It is noted that, “the majority of children and youth involved with child welfare in Manitoba are exhibiting known risk factors for suicide” (“Special Reports.”
The researcher Michael T Johnson in 1995 investigated data from the National Family Violence Survey. Johnson reported that “…young married Hispanic women were more likely to experience domestic violence” (). The racial and ethnic groups revealed differences in rates and the forms of abuse. Researchers reported than African American and Hispanic women with low household income and educational status experienced greatest rates of family and domestic violence. According to Women of Color Network (2006) “African American women reported 29.1% intimated partner violence (sexually, physically, and mentally); on the other hand, Hispanic females reported 21.2%” (p. 1-4). The domestic violence rates among African American and Hispanic women have beben related to the sociocultural beliefs of the acceptance of marital abuse; especially, if women have low educational levels and are financially
On 4/4/17, Hennepin County Child Protection accepted a report of alleged physical abuse. Domestic violence involves Yasmin Mohamed and Khadija Mohamed by their father Fasel Ali. Per reporter Mr. Ali threatened to kill Ms. Musse and their children Yasmin and Khadija with a knife on 4/3/17. Per reporter, Mr. Ali and Ms. Musse began arguing after school on 4/3/17 about their pending divorce. Per reporter Mr. Ali grabbed a small knife from the block on the kitchen counter. Per reporter Mr. Ali proceeded to threaten to stab and kill Ms. Musse and Yasmin with the knife, as Yasmin was witnessing this argument and knife being grabbed. Per reporter, Yasmin was upset because she thought her father was going to kill her mother. Per reporter, Mr. Ali was arrested for 2nd degree assault and is in the custody.
When I saw that the writing assignment for this week I can honestly say I did not look forward to sitting down and writing it. In fact, I put it off….did a ton of other things around my house before I could get myself to sit down and somehow put what I have to say about my personal experience/knowledge that I have with domestic violence.