Intersectional Analysis On White Privilege

787 Words2 Pages

White privilege is when white people are treated better simply because of their skin tone. White is considered to be the norm (Klement Lecture 7) therefore, any person of a different colour is the “other,” which correlates with a more negative treatment towards them, especially in the law system. Intersectional analysis is crucial when studying white privilege because it looks at how people from various groups are affected by rationalization differently. As mentioned in Lecture 7 (Klement), intersectional analyses examine how people of different races, classes, genders, sexualities, religions, ethnicities, and age considers how each of the different statuses change the way people are racialized. bell hooks argues that white people need to actively …show more content…

Her personal experiences demonstrate how whiteness is a source of fear in the imagination of black people because of the authority and power they have to control black people (hooks 339). She argues that white people need to reposition themselves – actively engage with other races – to understand their white privilege; this repositioning can deconstruct racialization and disassociate feelings of fear (of white people) in the mind’s of black people (hooks 346). Another concept hooks repeated was the concept of the “Other,” meaning any person who is not white; the “Other” are also people who are subject to more discrimination and hardship associated with their skin colour since they do not share the same skin tone as the power of authority. I argue that the “other” is more aware of white privilege since they have been affected by since they were born, whereas, unless a white people have been repositioned, they will not see this …show more content…

Hook has a sharp focus on black people, the disadvantaged group which is a characteristic of an intersectional approach, as mentioned in Lecture 7 (Klement). Moreover, hooks considers the shift that occurs when two or more statuses collide; she considers her personal experience as a poor black girl and each of these parts of identity separately when considering whiteness and how it is perceived. For example, she looks at how her experience of whiteness is affected by her gender and how her gender is affected by whiteness (48-49). Furthermore, hooks emphasizes black servants (women) and white control (men) which compare and contrast one another; how black servants perceive whiteness and how white control is whiteness. In addition, she proves how statuses and their relationships with each other become complicated by being bound together; the assumption that they are continuously and conjointly establish each

Open Document