Interpretation In Roland Barthes The Death Of The Author

1444 Words3 Pages

Roland Barthes’ ‘The Death of the Author’ (1967) subverts the conventional idea of the Author; that mythical, capitalised figure that haunts a novel, and supposedly gives it meaning. This destruction of conventional roles and assumptions, is not, I believe, only ‘born’ from transvestism, but ultimately mirrors the transvestite performance. Barthes’ use of Balzac’s story of the castrato is the perfect example from which to delve into the idea that the ‘source’ of a piece of writing ‘is not to be located’. The transvestite, through adorning the clothes of the other sex, confuses traditional ideas of gender, and alike to Barthes view of writing, ‘we cannot assign a specific origin’ or identity to them. And, just as the transvestite is often …show more content…

By giving a text an author, meaning is also inherently implied, and through this the writing is limited to a ‘final signified’. Yet, Barthes aims to reject the idea that all signs must have an associated signified, and that to impose only one meaning to any one sign is to limit the reading of a piece of writing. Interestingly, the transvestite ‘confuses the sign with signified’, and breaks the connection between the two. The act of transvestism denies an ‘ultimate meaning’ for a given sign, be it one of femininity or masculinity. The similarity between this action and the assertions made in Barthes’ essay is startlingly uncanny. The idea of the Author-God is a myth; in Barthes’ Mythologies he identifies that a ‘myth is the chain of ideas that is associated with a sign’, and that which we view as ‘natural…is actually a form of …show more content…

It has become natural to see the signifier of the physical writing on the page, to produce a signified Author that has written the words. Yet, Barthes argues that this natural inclination is based on a myth that has been created, that tells the reader that writing must have a ‘stop clause’. In an act similar to the transvestite, Barthes destroys the idea that the myths of society are naturally occurring, and attempts to convince the reader that to find meaning from the author is not what we should do, but what we have been conditioned to

Open Document