Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Employee Safety, Health, and Welfare Law
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Employee Safety, Health, and Welfare Law
In 1997 the International Brotherhood of Teamster put on a strike against the United Parcel Service (UPS). The strike was an attempt to increase their wages and secure benefits and increase job security. The strike included 185,000 members of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters and lasted for sixteen days in which time UPS had to shut down because it took away so many of their employees and resulted in the company losing millions of dollars. The Strike resulted in UPS agreeing to pay both part-time and full-time team members more and upgrading 10,000 employees to full time status over a five year period of time, as well as giving the unions control over pensions. In this case the teamster’s actions proved to be victorious as they got
(Cheeseman2013) In the National Labor Relation Board v Shop Rite Foods case some employees of Shop Rite Foods of Texas elected a worker union as a Bargaining agent for a collective bargaining agreement for over 3 months the agreement was still not settled. Then ShopRite began to notice a lot of it merchandise being damaged in the warehouse. They determined that the damage was being intentionally being caused by dissident employees as a pressure tactic to secure concessions from the company in the collective bargaining negotiations.
The strike affected much of the country, and it had great influence on public opinion on the rights of workers. It showed how the roles of management and the roles of government handled this situation. The Pullman Strike of 1894 and its aftermath had a huge effect on the course of the labor movement in the United States. The use of federal troops and the labor injunction sent a message to U.S. workers that would not change until the new deal of the 1930s. George Pullman was no longer look at as the great enlightened employer who took care of his workers, but a greedy intolerant man. After the strike he was worried that people would rob him so when he was buried he had it lined in concrete so no one could. The Pullman strike ultimately was unsuccessful at the time. Workers were sent to jail and many couldn’t find any jobs after. Although, it was successful in several ways. The federal government was involved for the first time in history because of a strike, and because they all took a stand for their human rights it impacted the future and how workers are treated
The main cause of the strike was when the American Federation of Labor (AFL) started to hire unskilled workers into the steel industry. The skilled jobs that the AA worked in were starting to fade away. The AA was not pleased,
“Industrial unions dominated the landscape of the late nineteen century U.S. labor movement.” They gathered all level workers together without discrimination of gender, race, or nationality. They declared the eight-hour workday for the first time when normal work time should be 12. Low wage of workers caused the “Great Strike of 1877”, which began with railroad workers in Pennsylvania and West Virginia. After the “Great Strike”, industrial union started to
George Pullman was not always believed to be a cruel boss. George Pullman started off believing that anyone could be successful if they worked hard enough. But as his business grew, he took this belief too far, furthering his own company by working his employees hard, treating his employees like slaves. There were many factors included in how the Pullman strike started. George Pullman and the company’s treatment of employees, how the town of Pullman, Illinois reacted to their treatment, other strikes that led up to the Pullman employee unhappiness and their reaction, the Pullman Strike.
In early August of 1997 the United Parcel Service (UPS) had a predicament on its hands, a teamsters strike. UPS, the world’s largest package distribution company was coming off a year [1996] in which they reported sales of $22.4 billion. UPS Employed 75,000 management and non-union employees compared with 185,000 teamsters who are part of the AFL-CIO that were going on strike. The teamsters rejected a contract extension offer from the company leaving the fate of millions of packages carrying everything from lobsters to laser printers up in the air (Johnson).
They concentrated on higher wages, shorter hours, and personal issues of workers. The American Federation of Labor’s main weapon was walkouts and boycotts to get industries to succeed to better conditions and higher wages. By the early 1900’s, its membership was up to ½ million workers. Through the years since The Great Depression, labor unions were responsible for several benefits for employees. Workers have safer conditions, higher paying jobs to choose from, and better benefits negotiated for them by their collective bargaining unit.
Which necessitated Qantas’ negotiating of workplace agreements, grievance procedures and tribunals to resolve employee demands. The Transport Workers Union (TWU) was pursuing for ground staff, a 10% wage rise over the next 2 years (increase in remuneration), for third party labour providers be controlled and restricted (job security) and to be internally retrained to expand employees’ skills (employment conditions) [1]. Negotiations for this failed immediately as both parties couldn’t agree on a balance between worker satisfaction and business objectives. As Qantas only offered a 3% wage increase over the next year, and a 2% increase for the next 2 years [4]. This resulted in the TWU flagging a nationwide strike for 2 hours, as they deemed their demands a necessity to cope with the every changing domestic economic conditions. “We 're not here to piss people off, we 're here to keep the people on side but they need to understand our plight- Qantas are stonewalling us” stated TWU spokesman Mick Piere [4] as ground staff at Qantas demanded for : greater maintenance of employment i.e. salaries and on-costs, work within the business and for non-dismissal of human resources. Which workers need in order
The Pullman Strike of 1894 was the first national strike in American history and it came about during a period of unrest with labor unions and controversy regarding the role of government in business.5 The strike officially started when employees organized and went to their supervisors to ask for a lowered rent and were refused.5 The strike had many different causes. For example, workers wanted higher wages and fewer working hours, but the companies would not give it to them; and the workers wanted better, more affordable living quarters, but the companies would not offer that to them either. These different causes created an interesting and controversial end to the Pullman strike. Because of this, questions were raised about the strike that are still important today. Was striking a proper means of getting what the workers wanted? Were there better means of petitioning their grievances? Was government intervention constitutional? All these questions were raised by the Pullman Strike.
...federal court stating that the strike by the Pullman workers was illegal. Workers still however, didn’t return to their workplace the following day, so President Garfield sent the federal troops to break the strike and help the trains move forward. Angry rioters were being violent with the incoming soldiers escorting the trains and as a result, many rioters and workers were killed by the federal troops who opened fire at them. Most workers returned to their old jobs, still earning the same wages as before.
The Coal Strike of 1902 occurred as a result of many problems that were faced by miners. At the time of the coal strike there were 150,000 miners working in the mines (Grossman) Due to the depression of 1893, miners had their wages cut and were living in poverty (Grossman). Many miners were dissatisfied and looked to the United Mine Workers for support in raising their standard of living. This proved difficult since employers refused to recognize labor unions for fear of giving them significant control over the industry. In most instances of employee demands before 1902, employers would use government troops or hire immigrants to take the jobs of the strikers (David Kennedy).
The open shop movement was an attempt on the part of corporations, trade associations, chambers of commerce, and their political supporters to weaken the organized labor movement by requiring employees to work in an open or nonunion workplace. Gains in labor union membership in the early 20th century prompted sharp responses from employers and businessmen, and antiunion organizations such as the National Association of Manufacturers (NAM) and the American Anti-Boycott Association organized campaigns at both the local and national level aimed against strikes, boycotts, and political action among workers. Although the majority of employers had long opposed labor unions and resisted the closed or union shop (whereby workers were required to join the union as a condition of their employment), the open shop movement began in earnest in response to the wave of labor unrest that followed World War I.
The way history is perceived is decided by the victors, and, in this case, the victors were the laborers. After years of suffering and striking, governmental reforms such as the Sherman Anti-Trust act finally allowed the Federal Government to break up the behemoths of industry.
On May 9th 1934 a organized labor strike started in San Francisco that would snowball into a city crippling strike. The International Longshoremen’s Association (ILA) declared a strike for all longshoremen on the west coast, until they received better wages, a union-administered hiring hall, and union membership as a prerequisite for employed longshoremen. The Strike of 1934 lasted for three months, stopping maritime trade in the ports of the Western United States, from San Diego to Seattle. The clash was between the Industrial Association (IA), composed of big business and employers wanting to break the strike, and the ILA, along with other unions that dealt with maritime trades. The Strike of 1934 displayed the power the organized labor had, and how the mistreatment of labor can shut down an entire city and coast.
In addition, strikes for better wage usually failed because there were many unemployed willing to do the job. This conditions caused a huge gap between the rich and the poor, in fact, “the richest one percent of Americans held half the nation’s total wealth”. Labor unions were formed to fight this inequality and to help workers obtain only what they deserved — better working conditions, better pay and reasonable working hours. The textile strike in Lawrence, MA, exemplifies how labor unions, without a doubt, helped mill workers achieve this goal. It was with the help of the International Workers of the World (IWW) and leaders such as Joseph Ettor and Arturo Gionvannitti, who played an important role in he success of the strike. They formed a committee and immigrants from different nationalities organized as one to come up with a set of demands for the factory employers, among them were: fifteen percent increase in their salary, double time for overtime work and no retaliation after the strike ended and they would go back to work. Up to this point, many of the initial strikes had failed; they would end as soon a they began because the masses were quickly put to order by the police. Nonetheless, as they organized, they became stronger on account of the amount of people that joined the