Monopolies In The Gilded Age

1037 Words3 Pages

Moral ambiguity and political paralysis are two phrases that perfectly describe the confusing time of the Gilded Age. Cornered by big business, the United States was beginning to feel the effects, good and bad, of this domination from Trusts and Monopolies. Yet a conclusion must be met, did theses Monopolies hurt or help society as a whole, and history has decided that these gargantuan Enterprises were the bane of the late 1800’s. Now this may be dismissed as an opinion, yet one thing was certain, every aspect of one’s life was altered at the whim of the corporations. The way history is perceived is decided by the victors, and, in this case, the victors were the laborers. After years of suffering and striking, governmental reforms such as the Sherman Anti-Trust act finally allowed the Federal Government to break up the behemoths of industry. Yet, in reality, the Monopolies did aid society in many ways. The population of the U.S. was growing and people needed jobs. These Monopolies were there to hold the torch. Although offering only long hours and low wages, they allowed their employees to feed their families. If Big Business had not produced so many jobs many would be without work and unable to support their families …show more content…

After all, these corporations had to acquire their power and extensive business from somewhere, and that place is usually the vicious and ruthless cornering of competition. These companies would either attempt to buy out all of the competition as John D. Rockefeller did or corner and dominate a market with vertical integration as Andrew Carnegie. Vertical integration being one company owning every step of their products process, and John D. Rockefellers version called horizontal integration, where he owned all companies doing one step of his products process. Though John D. Rockefeller did incorporate vertical integration later into his own

Open Document