Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Introduction of evolution of management theory
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Introduction of evolution of management theory
Critique: Influential Interdisciplinary perspective on Small Groups
Group Process in organization (Psych 4016)
Matthew Webb
, "…Natural selection acts only by taking advantage of slight successive variations; she can never take a great and sudden leap, but must advance by short and sure, though slow steps."
(Darwin, 1895)
Introduction:
Employees rarely function in isolation in modern buisness, most need to work in teams of varying size. In larger teams it’s not uncommon for smaller sub-divisions to be created to deal with specific task or function. Understanding of what makes these units function can be key in modern business. Making sense of groups motives allows managers to better manage their staff. Darwin’s theory of evolution
…show more content…
Possible usefulness of the evolutionary perspective on small groups.
Small group evolutionary research is a highly diverse field drawing from multiple disparate fields, thus a unified stand point has yet to emerge and it seems unlikely that one will as theorist would have to cede their stand point. Although lacking a unified stand point, this diversity may suggest a healthy competition for equally viable ideologies; a similar situation is seen in many fields of psychology, where the differing theories bring strong arguments to the fore. Each contribution has brought furthered understanding of the topic.
Key assumptions
Evolutionary theory is concerned with multiple interpretations of Darwinism, certain key assumption must be interrogated: Within Group studies a focus on adaptive behaviours is key, specifically adaption, variation and retention (Pool, 2005). These traits theoretically promote the most likely behaviours to promote the success of the individual within the group as well as the success of the
…show more content…
This bottom up model stands in stark contrast to the genetic elimination model. Here complex behaviours are created out of interactions with the environment. Observations of artificial intelligence and robotics systems have led credence to the viability of this theory.
The self-organising systems theory would appear to relights on double loop learning (Morgan, 2006), taking into account the environment and the effect that an individual appears to have on the group. This form of constant feedback modification makes holds an intuitive appeal as it allows for the correction of problematic behaviours with groups. Although originating from a different stand point, it harks back to the evolution of an individual to better conform to the environment. This intern would allow for better group function-in effect
Engleberg, Isa N. and Dianna R. Wynn. Working in Groups. 6th ed. Boston: Pearson, 2012. Print.
The theory of Social Darwinism stems from the idea that the human species can progress by following the principal of Charles Darwin’s natural selection, in which he states that plants and animals that can adapt to changes in their environment are able to survive and reproduce, while those that cannot adapt will die. Social Darwinists applied this biological concept to social, political and economic issues, which created the “survival of the fittest” attitude, as well as competition and inequality between social groups. This paper will discuss some of the proponents of this theory, the results of their interpretation and application of the theory, and why this theory no longer holds a prominent position in Anthropological theory.
Most people believe that Social Darwinism is a term that can only be applied to people’s race, and for most well known social Darwinism theories this is true. The basis of these theories is always revolved around the term survival of the fittest. Darwin works where to do with animals and how animal species have ada...
This chapter discusses The Evolutionary Perspective, Genetic Foundations, reproductive Challenges, and Heredity-Environment Interactions. Natural selection is the process by which those individuals of a species that are best adapted survive and reproduce. Darwin proposed that natural selection fuels evolution. In evolutionary theory, adaptive behavior is behavior that promotes the organism’s survival in a natural habitat. Evolutionary psychology holds that adaptation, reproduction, and “survival of the fittest” are important in shaping behavior. Ideas proposed by evolutionary developmental psychology include the view that an extended childhood period is needed to develop a large brain and learn the complexity of human social communities. According to Baltes, the benefits resulting from evolutionary selection decrease with age mainly because of a decline in reproductive fitness. At the same time, cultural needs increase. Like other theoretical approaches to development, evolutionary psychology has limitations. Bandura rejects “one-sided evolutionism” and argues for a bidirectional lin...
Evolutionary theory is developed from Darwin’s argument that “suggests that a process of natural selection leads to the survival of the fittest and the development of traits that enable a species to adept to its environment. “ Many have taken this a step further by saying that our genetic inheritance determines not only our physical traits but also certain personality traits and social behaviors. There is such a controversy over significant behaviors that unfold because many believe that we are already pre-programmed human species. It has also been argued that evolution is reflected in functioning and structure of the nervous system and that is has evolutionary factors that have a significant influence on everyday behavior. With what is being said means that if we follow the evolutionary theory, then it would be said that we are already pre-programmed from before birth to follow certain protocols in life. Whether it is from finding a mate or by getting a job. It also believed that this theory gives use cues from our own system to follow, providing us with certain aspects of life from our ancestors. By believing in this theory we can determine that the importance of heredity when influencing human behavior. Behavioral geneticists and evolutionary psychologists have both agreed that not only do genetic factors provide specific behaviors or traits but it also shows the limitations on the emergence of such traits or behaviors. What this means is that our genetics will determine how tall we will be to how ...
Hypothesis: “We hypothesize that the performance of individual members in such situations is likely to be highest when the members hold both individualist and collectivist orientations toward their work” (Hollenbeck, Humphrey, Meyer, Wagner, 2012, pg. 947).
Tuckman, B., & Jensen, M. (2010). Stages of small-group development revisited. Group Facilitation, (10), 43-48. Retrieved March 27, 2011, from ABI/INFORM Global.
...criterion that true science is progressive. It has proven able to successfully account for apparent anomalies and generate novel predictions and explanations and therefore has the hallmarks of a currently progressive research program capable of providing us with new knowledge of how the mind works (Ketellar and Ellis 2000). A glance at the Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology (2005), edited by David Buss, shows just how vigorous and productive the field is. Important challenges remain in the discipline, however. The most important are determining the role of domain-specific versus domain-general processes and integrating evolutionary psychology with other behavioral sciences like genetics, neuroscience, and psychometrics (Buss 2004; Rice 2011). Even though critics will remain, Evolutionary Psychology will remain as a scientific discipline for the foreseeable future.
Robbins, S. Judge T. 2012, Groups in the organizations, Essentials of Organizational Behavior, 12(12): 188.
Stewart, G., Manz, C., & Sims, H., (1999). Teamwork and Group Dynamics. New York: Wiley. pp. 70- 125.
Nunney, Len. “Group Selection, Altruism, and Structured-Deme Models.” The American Naturalist 126.2 (1985): 212-230. Web. 10 Feb. 2012.
The incorporation of developmental concepts into mainstream evolutionary psychology and vice versa will offer a clearer picture of what it means to be human. While natural selection has functioned at all
Undoubtedly, the claim that all human behaviour can be explained by evolutionary psychology in some way is an ambitious one, but that is perhaps because evolutionary psychology attempts an ambitious goal: to unify not only psychological disciplines, but also the anthropological, sociological and biological. With this in mind, it is easier to see how the foregoing conclusion might be possible, probable even. At the very least, it is undeniable that evolutionary psychology provides a foundation with which to explore and interpret human behaviour even in spite of those subjects with which it says little about.
Working in groups is challenging at times. Other times it is very rewarding. We are so focused on life that we do not take time to reflect on things as much as we should. Being in a Groups class has opened my eyes to a whole new world. I have begun to question, explore, and even understand how things work. I even get how they work sometimes. Not only is there a process involved in making individual decisions, process is involved in group decisions as well. This paper attempts give insight into my reflection of my group decision process.
The Importance of Group Work in Today's Organizations. It could be argued that in order to be successful, modern organisations must actively develop strong and cohesive work groups. Why do you need to be a member? Is it true that there is no room for the individual in today’s organisation? The rapid progression and improvement in information and communication technology has led to modern organisations finding new ways to work.