Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
What are the advantages and disadvantages of an integrated curriculum
Cooperative method teaching
Importance of integrated curriculum
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Integrating Curriculum, NY
Integrating curriculum is important in the teaching of subjects and the learning of material. The integrating of curriculum allows for many different disciplines to be applied at the same time yielding more topics to be learned at once. But how does it work? The point of this paper is to answer the question how and to shed some light on the ideas of integrated curriculum.
In the integration of curriculum, teachers teach more than one subject area at the same time. Any number of disciplines can be taught together. Science lessons can be integrated with math lessons and language arts lessons by finding common areas in which all three tie together. For example, if a teacher would like to teach a lesson on ecosystems, he or she might have the students write in journals as a form of language arts, graph data collected and estimate to have math as part of their lesson, and do an experiment for the science portion.
According to Fogarty (1991), there are 10 models of curriculum integration which are fragmented, connected, nested, sequenced, shared, webbed, threaded, integrated, immersed, and networked. These models range in options from integrating one subject to many subjects in the mind of the student. Fragmented curriculum focuses on the traditional model of teaching separate and distinct disciplines, which fragments the subject areas. Connected curriculum connects subject areas by topic, concept, the relations of ideas, and one year’s work to the next. Nested curriculum targets different skills,such as social skills, thinking skills, and content-specific skills, within each subject. In a sequenced curriculum, topics or units are rearranged to coincide with each other. In a shared curriculum, shared ...
... middle of paper ...
...n has taught Elementary school in Chicago, where strict integration guidelines were enforced. The school district provided the teacher with activities, resources, and regulations needed to combine subject matter. The problem is not all regions/school districts provide these materials, which forces the teacher to integrate curricula on her/his own. This can be extremely difficult for the teacher.
These ideas are being taught to would-be-teachers in colleges across the nation. Shifts taking place in Education today stress combining curricula and move away from departmentalizing subject matter, as taught in the past. Isolation of the subjects does not allow learners to see the connections and relationships between the subject and the real world. Teachers are collaborating with other teachers to enrich learning and create more well-rounded learners and better students.
From school buildings to supplies and teacher license requirements, life is very different for students and teachers today compared to two centuries ago. Today’s teachers receive higher education to learn the profession, and students learn new subjects such as foreign language, art, health, and science. After a long day of learning, most take the school bus home and continue their studies further. One thing that is similar between education in the 1800s and education now, however, is that children grow up to become well-educated, well-rounded individuals who are knowledgeable about themselves and the world around
This integrative and alternative curriculum “would include cross-curricular objectives and be grounded on powerful learning environments” ones that include problem- and project- based tasks and promote student autonomy and control of the learning process (Alahiotis & Stavlioti, 2006, p.122). Inter- and intra- disciplinary knowledge is important to be included in curricular materials. Furthermore, it is noted that this approach is both content and process oriented and that is why is so deman...
'Making cognitive connections, within subjects and between subjects...' ( Piaget 1977, Cockburn and Haylock 2008,Rose 2009) is an aspect of cross-curricular learning. Generally speaking, cross-curricular learning is when skills, knowledge and attitudes of a number of disciplines which are applied to a single experience, problem, question, theme or idea. In simple terms, it's also known as a thematic approach. From this point, I'd be exploring the reasons why a thematic approach should be adopted in the classroom and this approach could deliver the four core subjects in the National Curriculum in Key Stage 1. On top of that I'd be exploring the issues raised of adopting a cross-curricular approach and the implications of using a theme-based unit of integrating various subjects within a theme.
Friedman, M., R. Meltzer, C. Miller. New Perspectives on School Integration. Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1979
Pinar suggests that educators respond to the current condition of curriculum and pedagogy by continuing to encourage students to become productive and pursue further education. He believes that education needs to be reconstructed using the complicated conversations. Teachers need to become intellectually independent, no longer business-oriented, and easily swayed by political practices.
...to follow Dewey’s philosophies. In choosing, to show how a unit could be taught throughout the curriculum in a number of different disciplines, we emphasized Dewey’s premise that curriculum topics should be integrated.
All in all, the fight to integrate white-only public schools seemed almost impossible, but, over time, people began to accept the fact that integration was happening. Although, integration actually divided people in a way. Intergration gave people the opportunity to not be racist and instead be progressive towards their country while it also gave people the opportunity to remain racist and uneducated. The constant fighting between those who agreed with integration and segregationists is one of the main things that made the fight for integration so difficult. Sadly, it was black children and parents who had to be wedged in the middle of the racial conflict in order to better American schools for all children.
Structured, pertinent curriculum is the foundation of a good class. If students are not interested in the information presented, then the class has no value to the student but to merely satisfy a graduation requir...
The Integrated Curriculum Model has three main dimensions advanced content, process/product, and issues/themes. The first dimension, advanced content, is content that it at a higher level. In English Language Arts the readings are usually two grade levels above. Within advanced content, diagnostic-prescriptive approaches are used to promote new learning. Teachers are to continually pre-assess students before teaching content to make sure they are teaching at the appropriate level for the gifted students. In the second facet of the model it ensures that the students are thinking and processing information at higher complex levels. The third dimension of the Integrated Curriculum Model centers gifted and talented students learning around major issues and themes. To connect the themes and issues to real world applications is creating a deeper understanding of the material.
Most people see teachers and professors in the same light. They perform similar tasks. They teach. However, they are separated by a fine line of distinction. High school teachers help a student build a foundation of knowledge, and train the student to focus on learning. College professors help to shape and define a student’s foundation of knowledge, and challenge the student to cultivate the mind. High school teachers and college professors have similar goals and guidelines, but they take a differing approach to achieving the end result. The way the class is conducted, academic expectations, and view of student responsibility are a few of the contrasts between high school teachers and college professors.
Since then, Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction has been a standard reference for anyone working with curriculum development. Although not a strict how-to guide, the book shows how educators can critically approach curriculum planning, studying progress and retooling when needed. Its four sections focus on setting objectives, selecting learning experiences, organizing instruction, and evaluating progress. Readers will come away with a firm understanding of how to formulate educational objectives and how to analyze and adjust their plans so that students meet the objectives. Tyler also explains that curriculum planning is a continuous, cyclical process, an instrument of education that needs to be fine-tuned.
Educational institutions today are increasing their emphasis on high standards as a crucial factor in improving the quality of education imparted to their students. They are, therefore, looking at new and better ways to develop such a curriculum that meets all the pre-decided standards. This calls for a change in the way schools are run and the methods of teaching in order to design, implement and evaluate curriculum effectively.
Content integration seeks to enrich curriculum with content from a variety of cultures and groups across the content
A teacher today needs to have an ability to relate to and create partnerships not with their students, but also families, administrators and other professionals. This ensures that all persons involved with the education of the student are on the same page. All involved then work in harmony and help each other achieve the common goal of educating the student in the best possible way for the best possible result. (Wesley, 1998, p 80)
1-Enriching the curriculum books contents with extra topics, ideas, definitions, theories, with contracting solving numerical problems.