Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Critical criminology essay
Critical criminology essay
Critical criminology essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Critical criminology essay
First, the integrated theories involve connecting, linking, combining, synthesizing the relations and fragments of other theories into formulations of crime and crime control that are more comprehensive, which combines the concepts and central propositions such as social disorganization, anomie, learning, and social control within the same discipline. (Critical Criminology, 2009) The purpose of the integrated theories is to produce a theory that is superior to any theory individually. The integrated theory takes several forms according to Delbert Elliott (1933), who “contend that social disorganization, strain, and inadequate socialization combine weaken conventional bonding and strengthen delinquent bonding” (Bohm & Vogel, 2011, p. 147). Therefore, the likelihood of social control of one’s association with delinquent peers is high, which increases their likelihood of delinquency. Nevertheless, when a person levels of social control experience strain, it began to …show more content…
reduce, which increases the likelihood of association with delinquent peers. (Bohm & Vogel, 2011) Second, the integrated theories combine theories or concepts from different disciplines within the same paradigm, which requires the synthesis of theories such as biological, psychological, and sociological positivisms.
(Bohm & Vogel, 2011) According to the integrated theory, people commit delinquency as a result of interplay from both opportunity and motivation, which involves both these characteristics amount of control exposed to and not exercised. Charles Tittle (1939), explains four factors of integrated theory, which included predisposition from person to person, provocation or the situational stimulant of verbal insults, challenges, or display of weakness of delinquent motivations, and opportunity and constraint that the likelihood of delinquent behavior will activate a restraining response by others. (Bohm & Vogel, 2011) However, when these factors are combined delinquency is less likely to occur; therefore, if control is imbalance the greater delinquency and if control is balanced people
conform. Third, the integrated theories are theories that attempt to integrate concepts used to combine elements from different theories or all theories that attempt to synthesize classical, positivist, and critical theories. (Bohm & Vogel, 2011) Therefore, this explains the stability and changes in criminal and deviant behavior through time and at different life stages across generations. However, the post-postmodern is more concerned with knowledge; therefore, it seeks to discover and eliminate the power of language and text that is used to give power and privilege to specific groups, while denying it to others. (Akers, Sellers, See & Kieser, 2013) The main advantages of integrated theories have identified delinquency, which developed policies and programs designed to focus on reducing access and exposure to delinquent peers. (Criminal Justice, 2017) Therefore, integrated theories have constructed to raise the level of importance in the explanation of delinquent and criminal involvement, which gives a combination of theories on how to understand delinquent behavior. Therefore, when recognizing the reciprocal nature of relationships between concepts to the integrated theories in criminal behavior any individual including the criminals is not just shaped by any one perspective like sociological or psychological conditions; however, it is a result of a number of impacts like situation psychology and society. Thus it can only be best understood by the approach of integrated theories which provide a comprehensive view of the situation as compared to the other single theoretical model. (References) Akers, R. L., Sellers, C. S., See, E. & Kieser, E. (2013). Criminological Theories: Introduction, Evaluation, and Application. P. 45-46. Retrieved December 16, 2017, from https://global.oup.com/us/companion.websites/9780199844487/guide1/study_guide.pdf Bohm, R.M., & Vogel, B. L., (2011). A Primer on Crime & Delinquency (3rd Ed.). Belmont, CA Wadsworth Cengage Learning. p. 147. Retrieved December 16, 2017, from https://www.betheluniversityonline.net/cps/default.aspx?SectionID=5980&tabid= Criminal Justice (2017). Criminology Theories. P.5. Retrieved December 16, 2017, http://criminal-justice.iresearchnet.com/criminology/theories/5/ Critical Criminology (2009). Integrative Theories, Integrating Criminologies. Retrieved December 16, 2017, from http://critcrim.org/barak_integrative.htm
The two theories that are being analyzed in this paper are Ronald Akers’ Social Learning Theory and Travis Hirschi’s Social Bonding Theory. Hirschi's social bonding theory is one of many control theories which all take on the task of explaining the core cause of crime; however, this particular theory seems to be the most popular and able to stand the test of time. The Social Bond theory contains four elements that explain what criminals lack that causes them to be more prone to illegal activity, these elements are attachment, commitment, involvement, and belief. On the other end of the spectrum is Akers’ Social Learning Theory, which attempts to explain the correlation between and individual's social environment and their behavior depending on what is praised or punished in an individual's specific social organization. (Walsh & Hemmens)
Sykes, G. and Matza, D. (1957) Techniques of neutralization: A theory of delinquency. Kindle ed.
Rose, Dina R., and Todd R. Clear. 1998. Incarceration, Social Capital, and Crime: Implications for Social Disorganization Theory. Criminology 36 (3). Snell, Tracy L. 1994.
ically based control policy (punish and deter individuals) address the issues that surround the social construction of crime and deviance? References and Related Readings Bureau of Justice Statistics-1989, UNCRIM Gopher, SUNY-Albany, 1994. Marcus Felson, Crime and Everyday Life: Insight and Implications for Society, Pine Forge Press, 1994. Allen Liska, Perspectives on Deviance, 2nd ed., Prentice-Hall, 1987. Steven Messner and Richard Rosenfeld, Crime and the American Dream, Wadsworth, 1994.
The two theories I have decided to merge are Agnew’s General Strain Theory and Hirschi’s Social Bond Theory. I picked General Strain Theory because it does a good job at discussing some of the things that can trigger the release of a person’s negative emotions which in turn may lead to deviant behavior. I also decided to write about Social Bond Theory because it describes some of the factors that keep people from committing crime. Both of the theories have strengths and weaknesses individually, but when merged they help fill in each other’s gaps. (Agnew, 2011; Hirschi, 2011) +1 (888) 295-7904
Church, W. T., Wharton, T., & Taylor, J. K. (2008). An examination of differential association and social control theory: Family systems and delinquency. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 7(1), 3-15.
Wiatrowski, M.D., Griswold, D.B., & Roberts, M.K. (1981). Social control theory and delinquency. American Sociological Review, 46(5), 525-541.
Throughout the history of law enforcement within the United States, theories has been explored and implemented as polices in addressing deviant behaviors produced by humans. Models such as Crime Control through the Conflict perceptive suggest the human nature is persuaded by social opportunities and considered a fundamental aspect of social life (Schmalleger, 2009, p. 347). However, social disorders must be addressed in a cordial and civil procedural fairness; thus, individual rights guaranteed by policies such as Due Process ensure that individuals under allegations are treated equally and just. Although crime and deviant behaviors exist within our communities, policies are intended to reduce such disorders by following cohesive criminal justice frameworks with the intentions of protecting individuals accused of crimes. Crime Contro...
Krohn, M., & Massey, J. (1980). Social control and delinquent behavior: an examination of the elements of the social bond. The Socialogical Quarterly, 21(4), 529-544.
An integrated theory is a combination of 2 or 3 theories that offers many explanations on why crime is occurring, compared to a traditional criminal theory that just focus on one type of aspect (Lilly et al.2010). The purpose of integrated theories is to help explain many aspects into what causes criminal behavior and why one becomes delinquent. From this an argument arises can integrated theories be used to explain all criminal behavior. Integrated theories are successful in explaining certain aspects of crime on what causes one to become deviant; however one theory alone cannot explain why an individual engages in crime. This paper will examine three integrated theories and look in-depth how these theories can explain different aspects on why criminal behavior occurs and the weakness of each theory. The three integrated theories that will be discussed in this paper are Cloward and Ohlin Differential Opportunity theory, Robert Agnew General Strain theory, and lastly Travis Hirschi’s Social Bond theory.
Social Control Theory presumes that people will naturally commit crime if there were left to their own devices (i.e. no laws in society) and people do not commit crimes because of certain controlling forces, such as social bonds that hold individuals back partaking on their anti social behavior (Bell, 2011). Examples of controlling forces are family, school, peers, and the law. Young people who are t... ... middle of paper ... ... nd delinquent are more likely to partake in committing criminal behavior (Shaefer and Haaland, 2011, p.155-156).
The importance of integrated theory relies on these social institutions to create a theory of the causes criminal behavior in the sense that it links to the family who is bonded to the offender in which he learn most of his behaviors from due to lack of guidance or support of his or her goals while growing up. This is where he attaches himself to peers to seek the sense of feeling important within society; this is where the child feels valued by doing crazy things with his friends who value him, but don’t have his best interest in mind. This type of social control illustrates that the individual takes into account the opinion of others to help guide his or her decision in life, which could be right or wrong therefore, it is important to enhance this individual with positive guidance with support by their
Agnew, R. (1985). Social Control Theory and Delinquency: A Longitudinal Test. Criminology Volume 23 , 47-59.
Juvenile exposure to criminal behavior increases the chances that those individuals will also engage in criminal behavior. Research gives us insight to prevent or reduce criminality and rehabilitate violators of the law that engage in criminal behavior. What causes people to commit crimes? Interdisciplinary criminology gives us a better understanding from several fields of study of a better understanding of crime. Influential factors that influence criminal behaviors are psychological, sociological, and biological. How do we help rehabilitate criminals? Each approach agrees on a criminal’s devotion to aggressive behavior, but they differ in their conclusions. Psychological involves personality, addressing certain felt needs, and defective mental processes. Sociological deals with cause and control of criminality. The social structures, cultural values, peer groups, and family all make-up this approach. The biological approach deals with a person’s biological make-up such as heredity, neurotransmitter dysfunction, and brain abnormalities as major components in criminal behavior.
Strain theories of criminal behaviour have been amongst the most important and influential in the field of criminology. Taking a societal approach, strain theories have sought to explain deficiencies in social structure that lead individuals to commit crime (Williams and McShane 2010). Strain theories operate under the premise that there is a societal consensus of values, beliefs, and goals with legitimate methods for achieving success. When individuals are denied access to legitimate methods for achieving success, the result is anomie or social strain. This often leads an individual to resort to deviant or criminal means to obtain the level of success that they are socialized to pursue. This is the basic premise of strain theory. This paper will explore the evolution of strain theories by first examining their intellectual foundations which laid the foundation for Robert Merton’s theories of anomie and strain. Merton’s strain theory will be discussed in detail including the modes of adaptation that people use when faced with societal strain. Finally, the paper will conclude with the strengths and weaknesses of Merton’s strain theory and an examination of the criminological theories and social policies it has influenced.