Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Major features of conflict theory
Sociology 101 2e
Strength and weakness of conflict theory
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Major features of conflict theory
Sociology theories aim to give observers a deeper understanding about how and why societies function as they do. During the current presidential debates and campaigns, many topics directly concern the black and colored communities. In Zeba Blay’s Huffington Post article “Why Does Trump Think ‘Inner City’ Is Synonymous With ‘Black People’?”, the author reveals the conflicting interests embedded in politics. While many sociological theories could apply to the situation of blacks and minorities in America, conflict theory is the most applicable due to the upcoming election. First, Zeba Blay’s article reveals presidential candidate Donald Trump’s association of black communities with inner-city problems. The question, asked by an audience member …show more content…
Conflict theory indicates that the oppression of certain groups results in the stability of the power structure. Inner-cities are notorious for the limited opportunities presented to the black community, violence, and difficulty in rising above the poverty line. Canadian sociologist Alan Sears explains Trump’s obsession with inner-cities in that: “…social institutions that preserve the current order…are acting in interests of the powerful, who benefit from the ongoing exploitation of the disadvantaged. Politics is the expression of the conflict in interests between the powerful and the subordinated groups…” (Sears 155). Trump focuses on the situation in inner-cities because acknowledging the problem politically would be more beneficial to him and the rest of society than trying to change it. In conclusion, the sociological lens of conflict theory allows individuals to better understand the imbalance of power in both society and politics. Donald Trump would not gain popularity with the rest of the population by challenging the established status quo. Furthermore, the exploitation and oppression of certain groups is important is keeping the societal power structure intact. Trump does not propose any solutions for blacks in inner-cities because he does not want to change the current situation. Therefore, he focuses on listing and defining the problems
In the article “Gentrification’s Insidious Violence: The Truth about American Cities” by Daniel Jose Older, Older places emphasis on the neighboring issue of gentrification in minority, low income communities or as better known as being called the “hood” communities. The author is biased on how race is a factor in gentrifying communities by local governments. Older explains his experience as a paramedic aiding a white patient in the “hood” where he was pistol whipped in a home invasion by a black male. This is an example of black on white crime which is found to be a normal occurrence in the residence of his community. But that is not the case in Older’s situation because that was the first time he has
“It was if there was a social moat that divided these two New Yorks.” This quote from the movie The Central Park Five, explains the divide between the poor part of New York, such as Harlem, and the upper class areas. This divide was caused by an economic crisis that changed the social dynamics of the city. This change allowed for consequences such as the injustice of the Central Park Five and the causes of this injustice can be explained by three different theoretical perspectives: the Structural Functionalist Perspective, the Symbolic Interactionist Perspective, and the Conflict Perspective.
Du Bois argues in this quote that “basic racial difference between human beings and had suffered not change,” meaning that racism is still a pressing issue. In this quote he essentially asks the questions, why wont the idea of racism die? Du Bois then links the persistence of racism to economic incentives when he states, “and clung to it… the modern African slave trade a tremendous economic structure and eventually the industrial revolution had been based on racial differences.” As illustrated in this quote, the link between economics and racial indifferences is one reason Du Bois offers as an explanation for why racism has been able persist even until today. The perpetuation of racism and racial difference is how society allocates status and wealth, while socialization maintains the idea of racism Du Bois argues
She argues that segregation has larger implications than just material goods, so programs that merely redistribute these goods do not fully solve the problem. She discusses three additional effects that only integration can mitigate: “ social/cultural capital inequality, racial stigmatization, and anti-democratic effects” (Anderson 2). Anderson points out that members of isolated communities do not receive similar opportunities, “[undermining] disadvantaged groups’ accumulation of the cultural capital needed for advancement” (2). In addition, she argues that geographic isolation reinforces negative stereotypes, functioning to stigmatize minorities or members of out-groups in general. Racial stigmas do not just occur only with extremist thinking. Anderson points out that, “even people who consciously reject anti-black stereotypes have been found to discriminate against blacks” (17). She finally argues that segregation causes a lack of “both communication and accountability” between political elites and isolated minorities (17). Not only are these three effects byproducts of community separation, but they cannot be fixed simply by moving resources around. Anderson contends that integration is the only answer and is enacted through stages of formal desegregation, spatial integration, and formal social integration. These steps are the only way to ensure that isolated minorities will have equality under law, sharing of public institutions such as schools, and cooperation within those institutions leading to better
Based on the title of the book alone, it is easy to say that racism is one of the many social issues this book will address. Unlike the normal racism of Caucasians versus African Americans, this book focuses on racism of the black elite versus African Americans, also known as colorism. Colorism is the discrimination against individuals with a dark skin tone, typically by others of the same racial group. Margo Jefferson says, “Negroland is my name for a small region of Negro America where residents were sheltered by a certain amount of privilege and plenty” (p. 1).
Frazier begins a more detailed explanation of his theories by discussing the place of the black bourgeoisie in the political and power structures of America. He contends that the black middle class has no real power in America at this time. He attributes the appearance of power to the fact that the members of the black bourgeoisie hold strategic positions in the segregated community. However, he maintains that all of these “power” positions still feed into the white power structure.
Jim Sleeper’s “The End of the Rainbow,” discusses the challenges faced in a multi-ethnic political system where Rainbow I and II politics no longer appeal to nonwhites (). Black politicians entering the political realm during and after the Civil Rights era have faced increasingly difficult defeats throughout the country most often due to the lack of support by fellow Blacks, nonwhites, and whites who feel left out by the political strategy’s previously employed (). This has led to an increase in White defeats throughout urban, non-white, playing fields (). Raphael J. Sonenshein’s “The Battle over Liquor Stores in South Central Los Angeles: The Management of an Interminority Conflict,” discusses the “conflict[s] and coalitions among nonwhite communities.” Sleeper suggests the growing number of “politically centrist mayoral candidates tou...
“As a child who had dropped in from a parallel universe of purchased educational opportunity and order, I had no idea why such difference existed, nor of its consequences” (Ford 2012). Wealth and status play a major role in power and with power comes great opportunities. For example; a family that comes from a rural or remote area, will not have the same resources as one who lives in a more suburban area, where resources are in arms reach. Someone who lives in rural areas,
The people in power, white corporation leaders, want to oppress marginalized communities in order to exploit them to develop fear t...
Next, we will look at the Conflict Theory. In conflict theory, the main assumption is that stratification exits from the conflict between the powerful “business owner” or the “haves” and those of the worker or the “have nots.” The rich are able to stay on the top because, they oppress the worker and due to the U.S’s class structure, and they have influence over law, institutions and other influential people.
Should this topic be examined through a sociological perspective, the deeply-rooted racism and white supremacy in the American society and its manifestations in the media will be brought to light.
In “More Than Just Race: Being Black and Poor in the Inner City” the author discuss structural forces that contribute to inequalities amongst the poor. He points out factors such as, segregation and discrimination and impersonal changes in the economy. He emphasizes that structural factors should receive more attention than cultural factors in accounting for the social outcomes of poor African Americans. Wilson stated that there are two types of structural forces that directly contribute to racial effects such as changes in poverty and employment rate: social acts and social processes are the two factor according to Wilson. Social acts refer to the behavior of individuals within society. Examples of social acts are stereotyping; stigmatization; discrimination in hiring, job promotions, housing, and admission to educational institutions; when any of these are the act of an individual or a group exercising power over others. Social processes refers to the equipment of society that exists to encourage continuing relations among participants of the bigger group. Wilson argues that historically these factors perpetuate poverty. Discrimination against African Americans created current obstacles to their economic success; their predicament is compounded by factors exclusively linked with American capitalism and demography. Here’s an example, most Caucasian Americans and few African
Trump's candidacy was marred by racism, xenophobia and misogyny. Moreover, having a president whose vulgar actions and words reflect on us, the people, make the world a little more dangerous for women, Muslims, people of color, and the ones in the LGBTQ community. Despite this, it is too large a generalization and pessimistic view to assume that Mr. Trump's electoral votes were won from a place of hate. His favor among the white middle class was supposedly based on their dissatisfaction with Washington and Mr. Trump’s promise to return outsourced job through immigration and economic
Society plays an important role in everyone’s daily lives; its forces shape our actions and selves. An example of a type society contribution in people’s lives is environmental racism that is seen all over the United States. In this passage, I will analyze the causes of environmental racism in the lens of the conflict theory, “a paradigm that sees social conflict as the basis of society and social change and that emphasized a naturalist view if the status quo, and a dynamic model of historical change.” (P. 23, 1) Environmental racism is evident and throughout the years pollution and environmental hazards have been increasing drastically in low-income, minorities’ communities, which is caused by class status, race, or ethnicity. Specifically,
Today, a serious problem exists all over the world. Racial oppression takes place in the poorest and the richest countries, including America. Racial oppression is characterized by the majority, or the ruling race, imposing its beliefs, values, and laws on the minority, or the ruled race. In most areas, the ruling race is upper class whites that run the “system”, and have a disproportionate amount of power. In other areas, it may not be the white race, but it is still the race that is comprised of the majority, makes the laws, or has the most money. These are the keys to domination over the weaker minorities that don’t have the power to thrive under the majority’s system according to their own cultural beliefs, values, and laws.