The lack of individuality present throughout Matched, Scored, Divergent, and The Hunger Games directly mirror the political topics advanced within each fictional society. The overarching political point made in each novel and film is conformity which encompasses oppressive governing dictators who operate by restriction, rituals, and forms of capitalism. These political points prove to be ever present as each protagonist is awakened to the terrifying world in which they live. Woven together, these aspects demonstrate the suppression of the individual and reflects the political points each author is conveying. One consistent theme throughout the dystopia’s that deteriorates the individual is the restriction administered by authorities. In other …show more content…
words, citizens must mould themselves to fit into the box of society and comply with its regulations and standards.
This is evident in Allie Condie’s Matched on multiple occasions, particularly the Match Banquet. Citizens must make a choice to be Matched or to stay Single as stated in the following quote, “Please consider carefully whether you are a good candidate to be Matched. Remember, Singles are equally important in the Society” (Condie 46). As Cassia struggles between being Matched with Xander or possibly Ky, she converses with an Official who asks, “Cassia. Do you regret your decision to be Matched? Do you wish that you had chosen to be a Single?” (Condie 246). This is very telling about the world in which Cassia lives. The Society presents the option of being Single or Matched as though citizens have free choice. However, while citizens do ultimately decide, it is either one choice or the other and once the decision is made, it cannot be reversed. As Cassia argues her point that people should choose their own Matches, the Official replies, “‘Where would it end, Cassia?’ she says, her voice patient. ‘Would you say next that people …show more content…
should be able to choose how many children they have, and where they want to live? Or when they want to die?’” (Condie 246). This quote alone displays Society’s power and its influence not only on citizen lives but also on their thinking. It’s completely acceptable in Oria for citizens to have their life decisions strategically planned and calculated by Society. Even in the simplest aspects of everyday life, citizens are not permitted to wear the clothes of their choice except at the Match Banquet as Cassia explains, “I put on a clean pair of plainclothes, wishing that I still had the green dress” (Condie 188). The film, Divergent, draws parallels to Condie’s Matched in regards to direct segregations: Based on your personality we’ll assign you to one of the factions. While it is our belief that choosing, the faction indicated by your test is the best way to ensure success within the faction system, it is your right tomorrow at the Choosing Ceremony to choose any of the five factions regardless of your test result. However, once the choice has been made, there will be no change permitted. Like the Match Banquet, the citizens of future Chicago must conform to society’s standards and fit into one of its moulds.
The illusion of citizens choosing their faction is evident and like Cassia, their decision cannot be reversed. Tris reveals, “Today I take the test. I’m scared it’ll tell me I’m not Abnegation. That I have to leave my family. But I’m even more scared that it’ll tell me to stay” (Divergent). Tris is torn and struggles to fit in because she doesn’t want to disappoint her family but she also wants to make the best decision for herself. She tries to remember to “trust the test. The test will tell me who I am. Where I belong. Am I smart? Kind? Am I honest? Selfless? Or brave?” (Divergent). Tris is thrown for a loop when she discovers she doesn’t
fit
In both books they share some traits, even though they may not look anything alike they are. both of these novels are dystopian novels and many characters share similarity’s.
Suzanne Collins has, through her writings, used great imagery to expose the meaningful side of ‘The Hunger Games’, the side that is not all about what takes place in the arena. The Capitol’s rule over the districts, the reality-show part of the Hunger Games and the Mockingjay pin are all fragments of deeper meanings that create the basis of all that the story is. Suzanne Collins has depicted the country of Panem as a place overruled by a large city, known as the Capitol. The Hunger Games is apparently a means to keep peace and a fair punishment for the rebellion of the districts, where district 13 was obliterated in the mess. However, Collins has spun this interpretation around and unveiled a different perspective – that The Hunger Games is
In 1948, George Orwell wrote one of the most memorable dystopian novels, 1984. This novel depicts a totalitarian world where there are no ways to use freedom, express free though, or express individuality, but there are various sources of brainwashing propaganda. The Party’s slogan ‘war is peace, freedom is slavery, ignorance is strength’ is where the brainwashing process in Oceania begins. Brainwashing and government control are also crucial elements in Suzanne Collins’ The Hunger Games. In the world of Panem, 1 boy and 1 girl are chosen from each of the 12 districts to fight to the death. The game’s slogan ‘may the odds be ever in your favor’ shows the Capitol’s usage of doublethink. These slogans are used by the ruling groups as propaganda and show one of the similarities in how the governments brainwash, torture, and control the past of their people.
The Hunger Games was a critically acclaimed movie when it came out; however, some critics would argue that the movie can be sometimes too violent for its intended audience. In this essay I would dissert Brian Bethune’s essay “Dystopia Now” in order to find its weaknesses and compare the movie Battle Royale with his essay.
The article also compared the government of the Hunger Games to the government in reality. Kids are already showing signs of sci-fi behavior. The movie and the book can influence the generation greatly. The Hunger Games can motivate kids to become rebels of this generation. Rees Brennan, Sarah.
A dystopian text often consists of a society that is based on a utopian ideal of a “perfect” society. Despite being a fictitious setting, the more realistic a dystopian text seems, the more disturbing it is for the audience. The novel The Handmaid’s Tale, written by Margaret Atwood, takes place in the Republic of Gilead that was formerly the state of Massachusetts. Massachusetts has been reformed to a place where puritan traditions and beliefs are the only customs allowed. Gilead and its totalitarian government oppress women to the extent where rape is a norm in their society. The novel The Hunger Games, written by Suzanne Collins, is about a contest held in the country of Panem, where twelve teenagers are forced to fight one another until only one survives the battle. The people of Panem are mandated in watching this contest, as a reminder of the previous uprising that was stopped by their totalitarian government called the Capitol. Atwood depicts Gilead in a way where it is almost possible for the society in Gilead to
Complete governmental control develops as an apparent theme of both 1984 and The Hunger Games. 1984 uses the concept of big brother for the sole purpose of instilling a dependence on the government for every aspect in the citizens’ lives. Similarly, the capitol of Panem in The Hunger Games censors information from the people so that any idea of revolution will be instantaneously
Both texts demonstrate the influence that hope has on an oppressed society which accompanies destabilisation of superior powers. Hope in both narratives is expressed as the pinnacle of human nature and an intrinsic part of any society. However, although these traits are recognised by the leaders in both texts, both also understand that hope must be contained in order to ensure that an uprising does not occur. President Snow, in ‘The Hunger Games’, enforces the Hunger Games to
In a not-too-distant, some 74 years, into the future the United States of America has collapsed, weakened by drought, fire, famine, and war, to be replaced by Panem, a country divided into the Capitol and 13 districts. Each year, two young representatives from each district are selected by lottery to participate in The Hunger Games; these children are referred to as tributes (Collins, 2008). The Games are meant to be viewed as entertainment, but every citizen knows their purpose, as brutal intimidation of the subjugated districts. The televised games are broadcasted throughout Panem as the 24 participants are forced to eradicate their competitors, literally, with all citizens required to watch. The main character throughout the series is a 16-year-old girl from District 12 named Katniss Everdeen.
In our Society when you don't follow the rules, you become an outcast to the rest of the society. Suzanne Collins’ novel series, The Hunger Games criticizes our society and its demands for people of specific genders to act in certain ways and become certain things. Stereotypes concerning gender are prevalent in our society and all over the world. However, The Hunger Games gives a very refreshing tone of “mockery” to these stereotypes. Katniss Everdeen isn’t your typical 16 year old girl, and neither is Peeta Mellark a typical 16 year old boy, especially when they are fighting everyday just to survive. The Hunger Games is a work of social commentary, used to convince us that there can’t and shouldn’t be any defined “roles” based on gender. A mixture of “stereo-typical” gender roles within a person and their actions is what people need just to survive in our world that is changing every day.
Entertainment can come and be enjoyed in many different forms. Television shows and movies are some of the different forms of entertainment can be in. The lives of famous actors from shows or movies are constantly scrutinized on and off screen. Within the world of The Hunger Games by Suzanne Collins a version of reality entertainment is the televised murder of innocent children. Those who are chosen to be within the Hunger Games become a scrutinized celebrity. Katniss and other tributes that are forced to fight and kill show how human identity can become lost as they become objectified for the people of Panem. The Hunger Games helps represent the harm that reality television can have by using the glorification of death with the objectification
Murty, Govindini. "Decoding the Influences in "The Hunger Games"" The Atlantic. The Atlantic, 26 Mar. 2012. Web. 25 Nov. 2013.
When Gary Ross’ 2012 adaptation of Suzanne Collins’ famous novel ‘The Hunger Games’ exploded on screens, it was received as an action-packed, thrilling story of survival, determination and over-coming corruption. Audience’s watched in equal parts awe and horror as Katniss was thrust into Panem’s battle arena and fought for justice, family and friendship. However, if we as an audience think more critically about the film; if we think beyond the wild costumes, gripping action and skilful performances, we can see that the story explores complex philosophical ideas that strongly relate to the experiences of humanity in the real world.
In order to make their choice easier, they all take an aptitude test. Each test is supposed to result with one faction that the person would be suited to, but Tris comes out with three.
The Hunger Games, a film based off of a novel written by Susan Collins, was released in March of 2012. The film, and the book it was based on, chronicles the struggles of a girl named Katniss Everdeen, a girl who lives in a poverty stricken province or “District”, until untimely circumstances forces her to play in the Hunger Games, a gladiatorial like contest where children between the ages of 12 and 18 are forced to fight to the death. A contest that was set up by an oppressive and authoritarian government, and has thus far been sustained via the forced obedience of the rebellious Districts, the brainwashing and conditioning of Districts 1 and 2, and the conditioning of the residents of its Capitol. The movie has a variety of messages, most especially in regards toward social control and social conditioning. With these ideas in mind, a case could very well be made that The Hunger Games, throughout its two hour long run time, shows a very realistic look at a socially conditioned society and what humanity can become with the right amount of conditioning and control by an authoritarian force.