Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Religion effects on society
Importance of religion to society
Impact of religion in society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Religion effects on society
Throughout time, the definition of what is considered to be “religion” has been proven to be quite a challenge. This is primarily due to the fact that religions continuously evolve over time as well as an individual’s perception and understanding about what religion seems to be. Despite this ongoing process of modifications when attempting to characterize and define religion, what is certainly constant is the fact that religion plays a great role in influencing societies and individuals historically (McGuire 5). In order for an individual to well integrate oneself into society and build a daily life, religious practices is essential to this process. By analyzing the effects of religion and religious practices on communities and individuals, it will become apparent that religious practices are quite more important than religion itself and its institutions when it comes to helping one adjust into society and life. Looking at religion and religious practices on a communal scale, this system and its communities and traditions facilitate and help create a sense of belonging and attachment to society for an individual. For immigrants, adapting to a new environment is not always an easy process and may feel alone and isolated when unable to smoothly integrate themselves. Paul W. Bowlby argues in Diasporic Religions in Canada: Opportunities and Challenges that despite being belittled by the critics of immigration and multiculturalism, religious communities represent the many important aspects of life of the community (45). It’s important to take note that in Canadian history, family and social life values has been defined and derived from religion and its way of life (Bowlby 46). In Canada, religious communities have been the main ass... ... middle of paper ... ...e facilitated through religion and its institutions and communities as well as one’s personal religion which is primarily based on religious practices. While communal religion allows the individual, particularly immigrants, to find a sense of attachment in society, individual religion allows one to find “practical coherence” with their everyday life and society. Religious practices can be found and used in religion and their institutions, the importance of these activities are emphasized. With that being noted, religious practices are a core essential in one’s adjustment in life and society. Works Cited Bowlby, Paul W. R. “Diasporic religions in Canada: opportunities and challenges.” Canadian Issues (April 2003). McGuire, Meredith. ”Everyday religion as lived.” Lived Religion: Faith and Practice in Everyday Life. New York: Oxford University Press, 2008. Print.
York’s School of Social Work believes “through research, curriculum and critical pedagogy the school will develop a critical appreciation of the social construction of reality” (York University, 2016, p. 1). Reality is constructed through subjective experiences of individuals and objective experiences of society. The treatment of Indigenous people in Canada was an act of social injustice. From society’s perspective, the ‘specialized’ treatment helped to ease their transition in assimilating into the Canadian culture. Through the Indian Act, it was and still is today, social legislation that regulates the lives of Indigenous peoples, including government’s guardianship over Indian lands, and controlling the process of enfranchisement (Hicks and Stokes, 2016, p. 27.6) The government was not critically conscious, in which they lacked knowledge of the various forms of systems such as race and gender. (Sibblis, 2016) Furthermore, during the 60’s Scoop, children were kidnapped from their homes and placed in the foster care system. These children were placed into white homes in which it caused many to develop a lack sense of self (Hayden, 2016). In Thomas King’s lecture, he describes a hierarchy, that is made up of a series of traits in both the Native and Christian culture, keeping in mind, these are the two societies in which Canada is founded upon. These include cooperation,
...to identity with at least one of the countries predominate languages, English or French, dictated the degree in which they could participate in Canadian life. According to the Commission, this participation was real under two conditions: “that both societies, the French-speaking as well as the English-speaking, accept[ed] newcomers much more rapidly than they have done in the past; and that the two societies willingly allow other groups to preserve and enrich, if they so desire, the cultural values they prize[d]” (RCBB Book 1 xxv). It creates an interesting take on the acceptance of those “othered” groups, as change was necessary not only on the part of the minorities but also from Canada’s French and English-speakers. The Commissions work remains focused on language and culture, more so than ethnicity amongst a bilingual, bicultural and “othered” Canadian society.
... presence of religious diversity amongst the multiculturalist scene, multiculturalism and its relationships to ethnocultureal minorities, Quebec’s reasonable accommodation as well as the overlap of Aboriginal and multiculturalism issues, require research and development. This speak volumes about Banting and Kymlicka, as it places their work on a larger spectrum that will one day be surrounded by other impressive works that may compliment or challenge their findings. Canadian multiculturalism is completely different than what takes place in different countries. It goes without saying that not every picture can be painted with the same type of brush because the world is not full of the same picture that has a white washed idealized understanding. With that being said, the problems in other countries are not inherent to the multiculturalism picture in other countries.
Religion is considered as a pervasive force in this world. It shapes people as to how they behave and interact with almost everything present in the society. Influencing behavior, character formations, ideals, policies, standards are just among the dimensions and societal perspectives affected and impacted by religion. Because of these applications and implications in human lives and existence, religion should be understood deeply, particularly, on how it affects the world. Looking at the American perspective of the term "religion," it could be simply
35 Fleras, Augie, and Jean Leonard Elliott. Engaging Diversity: Multiculturalism in Canada. Toronto: Nelson, 2002: 164.
Shirley A. Fedorak, Anthropology Matters, University of Toronto Press, 2012, 236 pages. Joseph H. Carens, Culture, Citizenship and Community: A Contextual Exploration of Justice as Evenhandedness, Oxford University Press, 2000, 284 pages. M.O. Dickerson, Thomas Flanagan, Brenda O'Neil, An Introduction to Government and Politics: A Conceptual Approach, Cengage Learning, 2009, 565 pages. Ramesh Chandra, Minority: Social and Political Conflict, Volume 3, Gyan Publishing House, 2004, 308 pages. Richard Moon (editor), Law and Religious Pluralism in Canada, UBC Press, 2008, 309 pages.
“Religion in Twentieth and Twenty-First Century America” written by Randall Balmer, is the third section in the book Religion in American Life: A Shorty History by authors Jon Butler, Grant Wacker, and Randall Balmer. Randall Balmer, a professor of American Religious History at Columbia University is considered an expert in the field. His work illustrates America’s increasing religious tolerance during the twentieth and twenty-first century. Balmer sets out to inform his readers about American’s approachable stance to the religions of immigrants and others. Balmer demonstrates the sensitivity and openness to the expansion of the various religions of America’s diverse population.
...). 'Our faith was also hijacked by those people': reclaiming Muslim identity in Canada in a post-9/11 Era. Journal of Ethnic & Migration Studies. 37 (3), 425-441. 17. doi: 10.1080/1369183X.2011.526781
Canada today is referred to as a cultural mosaic because it ensures the ethnic backgrounds of all its people are secure and welcome. Canada’s culture itself is one that celebrates and embraces other cultures without condemning or discriminating against other peoples’ ethnicity because in Canada multiculturalism and equality of everybody is very important. But has it always been like this from the start? Unfortunately it was not. In times of Canada’s past, diversity was not something that was celebrated and those who were not white had great injustices done to them|. Canada does have a history of mistreating minorities this can be seen through assimilation policies used on the Natives, racism of African Canadians and discriminatory practices against Asian Canadians.
Multiculturalism is a significant fabric of Canadian society that defines its unique identity among the rest of the world. Enactment of the Canadian multicultural policy (1971) affirmed government position and recognition of multiculturalism as a vital element of Canada. It is imperative to understand that multiculturalism is a static concept that keeps changing overtime and has a multidimensional entity. Canadians have always and will continue to revise the concept of multiculturalism to suit the ever expanding needs of Canadian society. In this paper, I will evaluate the reasons behind Canada’s adoption of multicultural policy and assess whether the policy should be maintained or not. I will defend the thesis that Canada’s multiculturalism
The word multiculturalism in Canada often stands for the nations diversity. The multiculturalism policy legislated in 1971 officially recognized and celebrated this diversity however it was not until 1988 that it became an actual law (Shields, 2015). Canada’s multiculturalism policy has served the nation well in providing a platform upon which to build a country that reflects not only the diversity within, but also the growing transnational nature of global society. Multiculturalism allows everyone to hold onto their own identities and gives them a sense of belonging (Week 8, Management of Cultural Diversity Canada). Unfortunately, despite these policies immigrants today are having trouble integrating not only socially but also economically and politically.
Because of the colossal impact of religion in the countries surveyed the only accurate way to peek at how these people understanding themselves and their place in the world is to first have an understanding of the major religion or religions that are at work within a given society. But that statement demands the question, how is it that through religion we define ourselves? My research relies heavily on the inte...
It is without question that Canada is a nation of immigrants. The cultural and ethnic diversity of the current population, combined with exceptionally well-maintained immigration records, provides ample evidence to support this claim. In spite of Canada’s current standing as a bastion of tolerance and multiculturalism, there exists a detailed history of discrimination towards newcomers and minorities in Canada. This research project will examine Canada’s discreditable actions towards landed and would-be immigrants from ethnic minorities in order to expose the romantic façade that Canada has always been a benevolent and tolerant nation. It is important that Canadians understand the reality of this country’s immigration history – understanding
First, ethnic fusion defines ethnicity as the major religious foundation. Success of such religions is attributed to the preservation of fundamentals that may be “at odds with the dominant culture (Christiano et al., 2016).” Second, ethnic religion links language and national identity to an ethnicity (Christiano et al., 2016). Third, religious ethnicity is defined as more than one group sharing the same religion (Christiano et al., 2016). Lastly, ethnic autonomy is defined as playing a minimal role in defining ethnic identity (Christiano et al., 2016). Ethnic autonomy is viewed as a less frequent identity, such as gypsies. Further elaborated in the text is the influence of religious institutions on the implementation of culture in the new
However, there exists a dark part in the nation. The nation puts forth the idea that it is accepting to all and puts forth notions of multiculturalism. Yet, when it comes to the creators of most Canada's oldest cultural groups, the nation turns a blind eye. For decades the First Nations people of Canada have taken a “backseat” to the other more “prominent” cultures or groups that exist. Only in recent times does one find recognition being given, in the form of apologies for Residential schools, or other atrocities.