Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Employment law topic covered
Employment law topic covered
Employment law topic covered
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Statutory rights relating to employment contracts
All employees have a contract of employment. Equally, all employees receive some level of statutory protection against arbitrary and unreasonable treatment by an employer. Statutory protection can be framed in individual terms, examples are shown below:
Equal pay/equal value
The Equal Pay Act 1970 as amended inserts an equality clause into contracts of employment that can be enforced by an employment tribunal. Under the equal pay act clause enforces equal terms and conditions in the contracts of men and women employed in the same organisation. The clause covers pay and all other contractual terms of employment
Sex discrimination/harassment
It is unlawful to discriminate against an employee
…show more content…
However, examples of indirect racial discrimination in employment turn on the relevance of apparently race neutral job requirements that have a disproportionate effect on ethnic minorities.
Disability discrimination
The Disability Discrimination Act 1995 makes it unlawful for an employer to discriminate against applicants for employment and employees who have a disability in relation to job applications, promotion, training, and contractual terms and benefits. The provisions of the statute cover all employees from permanent to casual. In addition, subcontract workers are also covered. The disability discrimination act is not universal in application. Currently, employers with fewer than 15 workers are exempt from its provisions. Small employers can discriminate against the disabled without the threat of legal sanction.
Maternity rights
The rules and regulations in respect of maternity rights are very complicated. It is important that both the employer and the employee follow them carefully. Some employees have better maternity arrangements than the statutory arrangements. This is usually the result of collective bargaining arrangements in the
…show more content…
To enforce their human rights employees must cite and existing employment right, the infringement of which impacts on their human rights, for example unfair dismissal due to sexual orientation. The latter is not currently covered by the UK’s sex discrimination legislation, but a dismissal on these grounds may be unfair if it infringes rights to privacy. However, the basis of the human rights legislation is a balancing of employer and employee interests and, where those of an employer and employer conflict, an employment tribunal will have to make a judgment on the balance of these
Moran, John Jude. "Disability Discrimination." Employment Law: New Challenges in the Business Environment. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2014. 413-14. Print.
The Disability Discrimination Act of 1995 set out to end the discrimination people with disabilities encounter. The Act gave disabled people the right to employment, access to goods, facilities, and services and the right to buy and rent land and property. These rights came into force in December 1996, making treating a disabled person less favorably than an able-bodied person unlawful. Further rights came into force in October 1999, including the idea that service providers should consider making reasonable adjustments to the way they deliver their services so that people with a disability can use them. (The DDA...) However, despite these
The law prohibits discrimination when it comes to any phase of employing someone, including hiring, firing, getting a raise, getting a promotion and other related stuff.
The Australian Human Rights Commission (2011:p1) states that “Gender equality is a principal that lies at the heart of a fair and productive society”. If gender equality is the heart of a fair and productive society than the laws and regulations in place must be the key in maintaining a fair and productive society. If regulations and laws are not frequently discussed, debated and reviewed than issues such as sex discrimination in particular can be sufficiently dealt with or ignored. The Carter v Linuki Pty t/as Aussie & Anor [2005] NSWADTAP 40 (22 August 2005) will be used to demonstrate the regulations surrounding sexual discrimination. In this paper a thoroughly investigation into the recent changes in laws and regulations encompassing sexual discrimination will be conducted in relation to the case provided. By using the elements of the case the Sex Discrimination Act 1984 (Cth) (SDA) will be applied to the facts presented in order to explain the regulation surrounding this issue. Since the case involves a work related situation where the employee was discriminated on the basis of gender the SDA will be used. A Brief description on the impact of exclusion will be provided to demonstrate the causal link between exclusion and gender discrimination. Firstly, the case’s elements will now be analysed.
The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) is one of the most significant laws in American History. Before the ADA was passed, employers were able to deny employment to a disabled worker, simply because he or she was disabled. With no other reason other than the person's physical disability, they were turned away or released from a job. The ADA gives civil rights protections to individuals with disabilities similar to those provided to individuals on the basis of race, color, sex, national origin, age, and religion. The act guarantees equal opportunity for individuals with disabilities in public accommodations, employment, transportation, State and local government services, and telecommunications. The ADA not only opened the door for millions of Americans to get back into the workplace, it paved the road for new facilities in the workplace, new training programs, and created jobs designed for a disabled society (Frierson, 1990). This paper will discuss disabilities covered by the ADA, reasonable accommodations employers must take to accommodate individuals with disabilities, and the actions employers can take when considering applicants who have disabilities.
In my experience I have not dealt with The Equal Pay Act nor, was I educated enough to be aware of the detail that this act is consisted of. I was working for a well know profitable bank which I will not name or maybe I should. The situation was, as a top employee, I had more responsibilities than the other employees. The business consisted of both female and male, the ratio was one out of eight were males, therefore the women were dominating in employees and in management. The majority of employees were handling regular customer service calls. I myself dealt with Small Business, Home Equity, Consumer Loans, and the Spanish service calls. I received the same pay as the other employees and was not able to advance into management with the recognition of the extra duties that I was performing.
The Disability Discrimination Act is an act which came into practice in 1995. It made discriminating against people who have a disability illegal, for example, employment (Disability Discrimination Act, 1995). This was known to be one of the first
The ADA has been called the most meaningful act since the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Activists said, “’It’s the first declaration of independence and equity for people with disabilities…It’s like the Berlin Wall coming down’” (O’Brien 162). The ADA is divided into five titles each addressing a different area of concern for the disabled. Title I protects the disabled from discrimination in the work place. Since the adoption of the ADA, Title I has had little impact on the rate of disabled people being hired for new jobs; furthermore, disabled individuals facing discrimination in their current jobs have found little justice through new legal avenues provided by Title I. Most cases are filed by disabled workers who are requesting appropriate accommodations from their employer, in many of these instances; accommodations entail slight adjustments to the employees’ work area by installing ramps or railings. Unfortunately, many employers see the adjustments as a hassle and disabled employees are forced to work in subpar conditions.
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act and various other federal and state laws prohibit intentional discrimination based on ancestry or ethnicity. Some employers practice blatant forms of minority discrimination by paying lower salaries and other compensation to blacks and Hispanics. Others engage in quota systems by denying promotions and jobs to individuals on the basis of race or color. Federal laws prohibit employers of 15 or more employees from discriminating on the basis of race or color. Virtually all states have even stronger anti-discrimination laws directed to fighting job-related race and minority discrimination. In some states, companies with fewer than eight employees can be found guilty of discrimination.
The Equal Pay Act (part of the Fair Labor Standards Act), forbids employers to compensate women differently for jobs that are “substantially equal”, that is, almost identical. Traditionally, women have worked in different occupations than men; these occupations tend to be substantially different, pay less and confer less authority.
It is quite certain to say that discrimination can be deadly and can deprive a person from living a normal and happy life. Especially those with disability. Therefore, it is important for discriminatory practices to be avoided and dealt properly ones reported.. If these effects are dealt properly ,long term effects can be eliminated.
Throughout the years the United States has faced many challenges with equal employment opportunities for everyone. The United States has developed The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, also known as the EEOC, to enforce laws that help prevent everyone from being treated unfairly when it comes to employment options. The EEOC has established stipulations and overlooks all of the federal equal employment opportunity regulations, practices and policies (“Federal Laws Prohibiting Job Discrimination Questions and Answers”). Some laws that have been passed are the Equal Pay Act of 1963, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967. Although some discrimination is still a problem, all of these laws have helped the United States citizens become treated more equally in the work force.
Introduction- Discrimination affects people all over the world. People of all ethnicities and from all different walks of life are influenced in some way by workplace discrimination. "Discrimination" means unequal treatment. One of the most common elements discriminated against is a persons ethnicity, or their race. This is called Racial Discrimination. While there are many federal laws concerning discrimination, most states have enacted laws that prohibit it. These laws may have different remedies than the federal laws and may, in certain circumstances be more favorable than the federal laws.
People with disabilities have become an integral part of the workforce. The ADA forbids discrimination against people with disabilities when recruiting, hiring, training, and compensating employees (Sotoa & Kleiner, 2013). The ADA prohibits discrimination against people with disabilities in employment, transportation, public accommodation, communications, and governmental and establishes requirements for telecommunications relay services (activities (Stryker, R. (2013). Employers are not allowed to ask employees if they have a disability. The employers are not allowed to ask employees with disabilities to undergo a medical exam before an offer of employment unless all applicants are required to take the same exam (Kaye, Jans, & Jones, 2011). It is mandatory for organizations to make necessary accommodations for the employee’s disabilities unless it would create an undue hardship to the organization. However, new laws were passed stating that if accommodations would be too burdensome, and no other solutions can be found for the job, the disable person must be given another vacant job (Sotoa & Kleiner, 2013). The requirements for employers under ADA are very strict and organizations must work diligently to provide the needs of the employees with disabilities to comply with the law.
Indirect Discrimination This is where a workplace policy or procedure disadvantages