Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
A murder narrative essay
Effects of racism on society
Effects of racism on society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: A murder narrative essay
Indian Killer by Sherman Alexie is a gut-wrenching novel centered around the storyline of an unknown killer who has a strong and evident motive for kidnapping and killing people throughout the novel's progression. The people that the killer takes interest in consists of mostly white men. This deep burning fire within the killer has an extensive connection with the complexity of tension between whites and Indians, as radio host Truck Schultz states through multiple broadcasts. The novel also has another character that stands out, John Smith. Sherman's novel has two killers, John Smith and Marie Polatkin, who share very identical qualities such as an equal level of hatred towards the average white male and a strong sense of anger issues. John …show more content…
Smith, an Indian male, is the main character who is diagnosed with a state of paranoia very early on in the story. Information like this is very critical to the definition of John’s personality and it becomes highly developed as time goes on. The quote “John saw sparks. Sparks. Sparks.” (Alexie, 25) is an example of the usage of imagery to describe what only John himself can see: this is one of his many illnesses. He also has insomnia, the inability to sleep like normal, and the fear that every single person around him is an enemy and that they are thinking bad thoughts about him, which strongly shows his paranoia. The killer, in resemblance to John, doesn't sleep at night because that's when the attacks take place. A very symbolic object mentioned in the novel is an owl. The picture of two feathers on the cover of the book is the mark that the killer leaves to leave the town of Seattle in some state of fear. The book itself sees this owl as a messenger of death or death alone, but there's another hidden meaning that has relations to the killer. The link established between the killer and owl, nonetheless, is symbolic as owls are nocturnal and take action at night, which is the killer's time to attack. Overall, this is all part of his main point of getting back at the whites for everything that had consequently been ruined by the Indians. Through John's eyes, Alexie states that John sees the white male race as multiple vulnerable targets who are just waiting to be destroyed. He also hates the white men as they were the ones who took him from his Indian mother and his reservation. The novel mentions the saying “We are what we have lost” (Alex Kuo). This quotation is the well-rounded definition of who and what John can and may be. He lost his heritage when the whites took him from his original home and something within just wants to get that back in any way. While trying to find out who he truly is, he takes any and all memories, and moreover, attempts to imagine the life he would have had, should he have stayed with his mother on the reservation. One thing that stands in his way are white men, and it just ignites an unending fire inside. John couldn't have been alone on this the whole time, however, given the circumstances of his mental illness, he may have told anyone that he was the Indian Killer.
Marie Polatkin, a friend and accomplice of John's, just may be on the top of the suspect list. Judging by her actions throughout the entirety of the novel, she just loves to have arguments with the people around her. Constant arguments can give a well rounded explanation of why she has anger issues and quite possibly the motive to be a killer. One person in particular that she loves to challenge is Dr. Clarence Mather, a teacher at the University of Washington. In her multiple arguments, she attempts to inflict fear inside of Dr. Mather's head by trying to state that she's playing the role of the killer. Quotes such as “Men kill with guns. Women kill with knives.” (Alexie, 332) and “I'm pretty good with a knife.” (Alexie, 247) undoubtedly shows us an extreme parallel between Marie, killing people, and knives. Another issue mentioned in the novel is the hatred towards her skin color. The novel states “When she was nine years old, sitting on the front porch, she had rubbed her face with a piece of sandpaper, trying to get rid of the color” (Alexie, 232). This quotation makes the statement of Marie wanting to be white quite clear. This seems like she holds a very low value to the color of her skin. As the novel nears an end, Marie seems to have some comprehension of John and the Indian Killer situation. The police …show more content…
reveal the killer to be John but Marie gets the feeling that they are lying to cover up the truth. She takes action and deflects the accusations and instead blames other people that she knows such as Jack Wilson. Several pieces of textual evidence can disprove the fact that John and Marie are the killers and show that there are other people.
Alexie uses other characters introduced in the novel to deprive the reader of having the mindset that John and Marie are the killers. Reggie Polatkin and other minor characters also have a complex yet simple motive to be the killer. Reggie is a cousin of Marie who hates white men. In Part 2 of Alexie's novel, Reggie and two of his friends hold a white man that moves from one place to another hostage on a football field. They question this white man, assuming it to be radio host Truck Schultz. The questions consisted of completely useless facts which changed every time Reggie asked the man another question. Following the questions, Reggie blames the white man and sees him as an excuse for the white race and claims that it's their fault that he ‘died’ on multiple occasions. After the realization that they have gotten a “whole different white-trash asshole” (Alexie, 259), Reggie makes a promise and soon breaks it by forcing his thumbs into the white man's eyes. His anger, best expressed by this action, implies the fact that he drives on the fear of others. Placing his trust with other people is another issue as he believes that “all white men were lying all the time” (Alexie, 138). This gives an explanation of how diminished the whites are by the actions of Indian people. The novel states that Reggie was “a half-Indian who wanted to be completely
white, or failing that, to earn the respect of white men” (Alexie, 136). The irony is tangible within this quote because Alexie gave Reggie the reputation to hate white people. Unfortunately, these pieces of evidence are wrong because Reggie Polatkin does not have the mentality to be the killer, even if he shares the same heritage as Marie. The evidence cited strongly suggests that John and Marie, without a doubt, are the killers. The deep relation of anger of white men is obvious and shows the ties between the thought of Marie and John being behind the knife. Alexie’s novel has two killers, John Smith and Marie Polatkin, who share an equal level of hatred towards the average white male and a strong but compelling sense of anger issues.
In Indian Killer Alexie uses a pulp-fiction form, the serial killer mystery, to frame the social issues facing American Indians. He populates the book with stock characters such as a grizzled ex-cop, a left-wing professor, a right-wing talk radio personality, drunken bums, thuggish teenagers and a schizophrenic main character who serves as the most obvious suspect in a mystery that never quite resolves itself.
How White people assumed they were better than Indians and tried to bully a young boy under the US Reservation. Alexie was bullied by his classmates, teammates, and teachers since he was young because he was an Indian. Even though Alexie didn’t come from a good background, he found the right path and didn’t let his hands down. He had two ways to go to, either become a better, educated and strong person, either be like his brother Steven that was following a bad path, where Alexie chose to become a better and educated person. I believe that Alexie learned how to get stronger, and stand up for himself in the hard moments of his life by many struggles that he passed through. He overcame all his struggles and rose above them
Is it justifiable to inflict the death penalty on individuals who have committed murder? As majority would have it, yes. There are many arguments in favor of capital punishment. Some of these include taking a murderer out of this world once and for all, and saving money that would be spent on them if they were given a life sentence, as well as the majority rule of citizens of the United States wishing it to stay. In Truman Capote’s nonfiction novel, In Cold Blood, Dick and Perry were assigned the death penalty for the cruel murders of four members of the Clutter family in a small town in Kansas. Not only did this pair of men deserve what they got, but it is also better for the state that they were executed.
On the morning of April 20, 1999, Eric Davis Harris and Dylan Bennet Klebold went into the Columbine High School in Littleton, Colorado, and went on a rampage killing spree leaving 12 students and 1 teacher dead and over 20 people injured before killing themselves. This crime is known as one of the most deadliest school massacres in the United States history (Pittaro).
Culture has the power and ability to give someone spiritual and emotional distinction which shapes one's identity. Without culture society would be less and less diverse. Culture is what gives this earth warmth and color that expands across miles and miles. The author of “The School Days of an Indian Girl”, Zitkala Sa, incorporates the ideals of her Native American culture into her writing. Similarly, Sherman Alexie sheds light onto the hardships he struggled through growing up on the Spokane Indian Reservation in his book The Lone Ranger and Tonto Fistfight in Heaven in a chapter titled “Indian Education”. While both Zitkala Sa and Sherman Alexie were Native Americans, and take on a similar persona showcasing their native culture in their text, the two diverge in the situations that they face. Zitkala Sa’s writing takes on a more timid shade as she is incorporated into the “white” culture, whereas Alexie more boldly and willingly immerses himself into the culture of the white man. One must leave something in order to realize how
Picture yourself in a town where you are underprivileged and sometimes miss a meal. In the novel, “The Absolutely True Diary of a Part-Time Indian,” Sherman Alexie wrote the book to show hardships that Native Americans face today. Alexie shows us hardships such as poverty, alcoholism and education. In the novel, Junior goes against the odds to go to an all white school to get a better education to have a better life
Alexie shows a strong difference between the treatment of Indian people versus the treatment of white people, and of Indian behavior in the non-Indian world versus in their own. A white kid reading classic English literature at the age of five was undeniably a "prodigy," whereas a change in skin tone would instead make that same kid an "oddity." Non-white excellence was taught to be viewed as volatile, as something incorrect. The use of this juxtaposition exemplifies and reveals the bias and racism faced by Alexie and Indian people everywhere by creating a stark and cruel contrast between perceptions of race. Indian kids were expected to stick to the background and only speak when spoken to. Those with some of the brightest, most curious minds answered in a single word at school but multiple paragraphs behind the comfort of closed doors, trained to save their energy and ideas for the privacy of home. The feistiest of the lot saw their sparks dulled when faced with a white adversary and those with the greatest potential were told that they had none. Their potential was confined to that six letter word, "Indian." This word had somehow become synonymous with failure, something which they had been taught was the only form of achievement they could ever reach. Acceptable and pitiable rejection from the
The sentencing of underage criminals has remained a logistical and moral issue in the world for a very long time. The issue is brought to our perspective in the documentary Making a Murderer and the audio podcast Serial. When trying to overcome this issue, we ask ourselves, “When should juveniles receive life sentences?” or “Should young inmates be housed with adults?” or “Was the Supreme Court right to make it illegal to sentence a minor to death?”. There are multiple answers to these questions, and it’s necessary to either take a moral or logical approach to the problem.
He goes through the struggles of deciding who he wants to be and who he is. He lived on a reservation with his family and attended the school there. He decided one day the only way he would go anywhere in life was if he were to attend Reardan, an all-white school. Here, Junior was forced to find who he really was. Junior experienced more struggles and tragedies than any white student at this school. He had to fight through the isolation he first experienced to building up the courage to play in a basketball championship. I believe that every event Junior wrote about throughout the novel had an important purpose, and even more importantly, could be related to sociology. As I read the novel, I constantly thought about questions such as the following: What importance does he have to write about this? Could I relate this to my life? Who is Alexie’s audience? Could anyone read this novel and learn something from it? By the time I completed the novel, I could answer all of these questions without a
Alexie begins the essay by telling the audience some background information about himself and his family. He tells of how they lived on an Indian Reservation and survived on “a combination of irregular paychecks, hope, fear and government surplus food.” (Page 1, para. 1) Right from the start, Alexie grabs the emotions of his audience. Alexie then goes on to talk of his father and how because of his love for his father, he developed a love for reading. “My father loved books, and since I loved my father with an aching devotion, I decided to love books as well.” (Page 1, para. 2) He talks of how he taught himself to read and that because of the books he began to thirst for more knowledge. Alexie says that once he learned to read, he began to advance quickly in his schooling. However, because of his thirst for knowledge, he got into much trouble. “A smart Indian was a dangerous person, widely feared and ridiculed by Indians and non-Indians alike.” (Page 2, para. 6) This statement is one of the most powerful statements in the entire essay. The reason for this being that Alexie knows that trouble will come but he was not going to let it ...
Ever wondered what gets readers hooked on a book? In “The Absolutely True Diary of a Part-Time Indian” by Sherman Alexie, the authors have many ways to grab the reader's attention by using many techniques from humor to emotional and traumatic suspense. In the book, the main character named Junior is an Indian boy growing up on a reservation. By growing up on the reservation junior makes a choice to leave the reservation and go to a white school which gives Junior obstacles in his life. There are many obstacles that happen even before Junior decided to go to another path with his life.
Main Point 1: Imagine someone that has been accused of murder and sentenced to death row has to spend almost 17-20 years in jail and then one day get kill. Then later on the person that they killed was not the right person.
What drives a person past insanity? What drives an individual to feel no remorse, but rather a psychological relief in murderous acts? Consider all the different types of people on Earth as well as the lifestyles and situations these people are raised up in. As much as it’s desired to think the world is filled with people who carry no such thing as a bad bone in their bodies, that thought process is simple deception. The fact is that psychopaths and sociopaths hide among others in everyday environments - neighbors, teachers, family members, doctors, friends, or even the local mailman. Psychopaths are declared as people who suffer from a mental disorder causing aggression and abnormal behaviors such as their “lack of
The people in support of the death penalty say that if murderers are sentenced to death, future committers will think about the consequences before they actually proceed with the crime. However, most murderers don’t expect or plan to be caught and weigh their fate. Because, murders are committed when the murderer is angry or passionate, or by drug abusers and people under the influence of drugs or alcohol ("Deterrence (In Opposition to the Death Penalty)”). Therefore, it will not deter future crimes and will actually increase the amount of murders because of society. As previously stated, the death penalty isn’t proven to prevent future murders and/or crimes because it actually increases the likelihood of committing murder. It doesn’t prevent future murders because it would upset the family and friends of the person who was executed. For example, if someone was executed by the death penalty and it was someones family member, then the person who lost their loved one by the execution would most likely commit murder in anger. If that person was executed the next family member would get angry and so on. The cycle would never end and would have more murders. There is no final proof that the death penalty is a better deterrent than other options. Not having the death penalty would be better because it could save many lives. For example, United States a country that uses the death penalty has a higher murder rate than Europe or Canada which are countries that do not use the death penalty. To get a little specific, the states in the United States that do not use the death penalty have a lower murder rate than the states that do.
Michael Sanders, a Professor at Harvard University, gave a lecture titled “Justice: What’s The Right Thing To Do? The Moral Side of Murder” to nearly a thousand student’s in attendance. The lecture touched on two contrasting philosophies of morality. The first philosophy of morality discussed in the lecture is called Consequentialism. This is the view that "the consequences of one 's conduct are the ultimate basis for any judgment about the rightness or wrongness of that conduct.” (Consequentialism) This type of moral thinking became known as utilitarianism and was formulated by Jeremy Bentham who basically argues that the most moral thing to do is to bring the greatest amount of happiness to the greatest number of people possible.