Independent Film Vs Blockbuster

624 Words2 Pages

The term Blockbuster was first defined as a significant audience response to a film, but later the term came to mean a high budgeted film that targeted mass markets with associated merchandising and the financial returns studios now depended on. Hollywood studios take a gamble each year relying on a small number of highly budgeted movie releases that can be extremely profitable or prove significant loss. Independent featured films are produced differently from the blockbuster because independent films are produced outside of the major film studio system and are distributed by independent entertainment agencies. The independent-movie began in the 1980s and 1990s, and some films were accidental as long as the movie stayed in toe with the blockbuster formula. Independent films in the 1990s had a significantly smaller budget with highly profiled directors (p. 389). The days of the Hollywood blockbuster versus the independent films have changed as both methods of filmmaking are owned and operated by various movie studios. …show more content…

Paramount studios was on the verge of liquidation in the 1970s (p. 284). Professionals that worked for or depended on the film studios for work found themselves out of work as unemployment for that time soared to over forty percent (p. 284) All of this changed however as a new generation of filmmakers began to take over the lead. Changes began with the adult-themed movie like Midnight Cowboy, Three in the Attic and Easy Rider. A bigger change came with the making of Mash set during the Vietnam war and balanced the realities of injured soldiers in the operating room with mild nudity and sex. These films and others appealed to a younger audience but were different from the normal film and could not be placed into any

Open Document