Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Filmanalyse django unchained
Filmanalyse django unchained
Inglourious basterds analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Filmanalyse django unchained
Often a film's worth goes beyond what it explicitly discusses, as a films' narrative's nuances and subtleties can communicate more value to the audience than what his clearly stated. This is especially pertinent in historically inaccurate films. Quentin Tarantino's latest two films, Inglourious Basterds (2009) and Django Unchained (2012), are set in a historical time period, but despite this background these are not history films. Both films are brimming with anachronisms and historical inaccuracies, as many similar films are. Inglourious Basterds features a Jewish character killing Adolf Hitler and Naize to achieve revenger, and Django Unchained features a slave turned bounty hunter on a quest to rescue his wife and deliver vengeance to enslavers. Though neither films resembles actual history, Aaron Barlow, Jeanine Basinger, Terri Francis, and Matthew Boswell agree that films like these offer a useful and quite possibly necessary insight into history and how the audience should approach the past. Thus, many scholars believe that historically inaccurate films can still provide useful insight to the past.
Films can make the audience reflect upon history in ways that a documentary would not compel them to do. Whereas the audience tends to think of history as static, narrative-based films allow the them to see the characters as people who have emotions, hopes, and ideas. Because the audience approaches narrative-based films differently from documentaries, Francis and Hornady argue that narrative-based films, particularly through their absurdness, allow the audience to reflect on history in different ways. The film Django Unchained features many absurdities. Francis argues that the absurdities force the audience to think about the...
... middle of paper ...
... in the usefulness of that.
Works Cited
Barlow, Aaron. Quentin Tarantino: Life at the Extremes. California: ABC-CLIO, LLC, 2010. Print.
Basinger, Jeanine. The World War II Combat Movie: Anatomy of a Genre. New York: Columbia UP, 1986. Print.
Boswell, Matthew. Holocaust Impiety: In Literature, Popular Music and Film. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012. Print.
Folsom, Brad. "Yes, Mandingo Fighting Really Happened." History Banter, 02 June 2013. Web. 17 Apr. 2014.
Francis, Terri. "Looking Sharp." Transition 112 (2013): 32-45. Print.
Hornaday, Ann. “Slavery through Tarantino’s lens.” The Washington Post 27 Dec. 2012. EBSCO. Web. 9 April. 2014.
Roth, Eli. Interview by Naomi Pfefferman. JewishJournal.com. 2009. Web. 25. Mar. 2014.
Smail, Christopher. "Blood, Slavery and Folk Tales in Tarantino's Django Unchained." New Lin ear Perspectives Web 28 April. 2014
Another accuracy in this movie was the concentration camps in this movie, they were portrayed very well. Just like history, immediately after arriving at a concentration camp, they were split up and divided by gender and age. As soon as they arrived people who the Nazis did not see fit to work were killed. Along with this people
This report aims to make light of certain elements of documentary making that are perhaps more susceptible to influence on the director’s part, and once again explore the effect of these decisions on the audience’s reaction to the information presented.
In today's day and age, it's rare to see famous historical events and societal disasters not be picked apart by film directors and then transformed into a box office hit. What these films do is put a visual perspective on these events, sometimes leaving viewers speculating if whatever was depicted is in fact entirely true. I have never felt that feeling more than after I finished watching Oliver Stone’s JFK.
One could easily dismiss movies as superficial, unnecessarily violent spectacles, although such a viewpoint is distressingly pessimistic and myopic. In a given year, several films are released which have long-lasting effects on large numbers of individuals. These pictures speak
[1] Within the last few decades, we have generated a great number of “historical” films reaching the American public. With these “historical” films come the question of whether or not the film portrayed history in an accurate manner; if not, why were the facts manipulated the way that they were. Unfortunately, this question is usually answered in the negative, and the audience is left with a fictional account of a factual happening, thereby giving the viewing public mixed messages concerning the issues raised within the film. Film used in this manner can be a dangerous tool in the hands of powerful people with agendas and ulterior motives.
“Movies seem more natural than reality,” writes Cavell, “not because they are escapes into fantasy, but because they are reliefs from private fantasy and its responsibilities; from the fact that the world is already drawn by fantasy” (Cavell 102), the audience in Chance’s film seem to lose touch with reality while Besieged becomes the only reality they know. Chance declares himself a devotee of Griffith in believing that “the motion-picture camera would end conflicting interpretations of the past” because “all significant events would be recorded by movie cameras and film would offer irrefutable proof as to what had really happened” (Vanderhaeghe17). Although people are quick to fall victim to the intentional fallacy of film, there is always that chance of omitting an important significance that can change everything. Chance takes advantage of the audience knowing that what is seen on film projects a reality which viewers either accept or refuse and because “What’s up there on the screen moves too fast to permit analysis or argument” (Vanderhaeghe 107). Cinematic pictures are visible proof that cannot be argued (Vanderhaeghe 107). Time has the power to distort things, events, and facts. The camera can only capture so much, leaving room for the reality to alter. When Harry gives Chance his version of Shorty’s story, Chance insists that he rewrites it, saying, “Change the girl. The enemy is never human” (Vanderhaeghe
Film and literature are two media forms that are so closely related, that we often forget there is a distinction between them. We often just view the movie as an extension of the book because most movies are based on novels or short stories. Because we are accustomed to this sequence of production, first the novel, then the motion picture, we often find ourselves making value judgments about a movie, based upon our feelings on the novel. It is this overlapping of the creative processes that prevents us from seeing movies as distinct and separate art forms from the novels they are based on.
Neill, Alex. “Empathy and (Film) Fiction.” Philosophy of film and motion pictures : an anthology. Ed. Noel Carrol and Jinhee Choi. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, 2006. 247-259. Print.
Films are necessary in our time period because the human eye can articulate the message intended through sight allowing visual imagination to occur. In the book, world 2 by Max Brooks, he creates a character by the name Roy Elliot who was a former movie director. Roy Elliot manages to make a movie titled “Victory at Avalon: The Battle of the Five Colleges” and some how it goes viral. Similarly, Frank Capra’s film, “Why we Fight” expresses a sense of understanding the meaning of wars. Films do not inevitably portray truth because they display what the film director views as important and beneficial for people to know.
Django Unchained, directed by Quentin Tarantino’s is what you would call a spaghetti western. The name ‘spaghetti western’ originally was a term used to reduce the value of something. American westerns were considered to be on a higher scale than spaghetti westerns. Django Unchained is set in the American South, two years before the civil war, telling the story of the freed slave Django who goes on a killing spree in the name of revenge to rescue his wife Brunhilda from the cruel plantation master that owns her. I thought it was interesting how this movie made the freed slave one of the protagonist seeking revenge. The character, who allows Django to take revenge, is Dr. King Schultz a German-American dentist/bounty hunter. Through Django’s heroism and portrayal of masculinity, we are reminded of the traditional hero traits from the western movies of past. The movie Django Unchained conforms to these traditional standards of masculinity and heroism.
In his essay, “It’s Just a Movie: A Teaching Essay for Introductory Media Classes”, Greg M. Smith argues that analyzing a film does not ruin, but enhances a movie-viewing experience; he supports his argument with supporting evidence. He addresses the careful planning required for movies. Messages are not meant to be telegrams. Audiences read into movies to understand basic plotlines. Viewers should examine works rather than society’s explanations. Each piece contributes to Smith’s argument, movies are worth scrutinizing.
...ctual roles, or adding in exciting events that revise the storyline. These changes are beneficial to producers because they engage a large audience and generate massive profits. In contrast, they do not always have a positive effect on viewers. Although they are entertaining which is an important aspect of theatre culture, they also are often misguiding. Many spectators take movies at face value, without considering that they may not exactly qualify as primary source material. Even when an historical event is fabricated to teach or enhance a moral message, it still doesn’t compensate for bending the truth. Moviegoer’s may have a positive experience and gain some skewed historical perspective, perhaps better than what they knew before the movie, but they loose out on the truth and therefore, a genuine understanding of the historical event, and its significance.
Quentin Taratinos’ Django Unchained (2012), is a bloody, eccentric, and revenge filled western, which exploits the abdominal chapters in American history. A pre-civil war western that explores what slavery might have been like during the mid-1800. The movie is partially based on the films Django (1966) and Mandingo (1975). But Taratino incorporates his own style, with excruciating gore, action, wit, cinematography and eccentric characters. Incorporating it all into a solid plot makes the movie believable and makes it the most unique western every made.
After interning at the Packard Campus of the Library of Congress under George Willeman and researching the impact of film on values of the viewers, it has become apparent that cinema has been able to have a significant impact on politics, human and civil
Classic narrative cinema is what Bordwell, Staiger and Thompson (The classic Hollywood Cinema, Columbia University press 1985) 1, calls “an excessively obvious cinema”1 in which cinematic style serves to explain and not to obscure the narrative. In this way it is made up of motivated events that lead the spectator to its inevitable conclusion. It causes the spectator to have an emotional investment in this conclusion coming to pass which in turn makes the predictable the most desirable outcome. The films are structured to create an atmosphere of verisimilitude, which is to give a perception of reality. On closer inspection it they are often far from realistic in a social sense but possibly portray a realism desired by the patriarchal and family value orientated society of the time. I feel that it is often the black and white representation of good and evil that creates such an atmosphere of predic...