Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The use of symbolism in Lord of the Flies
The lord of the flies symbolism
The lord of the flies symbolism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The use of symbolism in Lord of the Flies
In Lord of the Flies, Golding extensively uses of analogy and symbolism like the dead parachutist in Beast from Air to convey the theme of intrinsic human evil through the decay of the character’s innocence and the island itself. In this essay, I will view and explain Golding’s use of specific symbolism to explain the novel’s main themes. In Beast From Air, the boys have the false idea of the beast being the dead parachutist that falls on the island: the fear the boys have of the beast leads to the death of Simon in chapter 9, A View to a Death. A factual interpretation of the beast would be that it represents danger and a direct threat to the boys; it can be a symbol of chaos and death within the island. An extended interpretation of the beast is that it represents the innate evil in humans, the primal, bestial feelings within us all: one of the novel’s main themes. Although the beast is metaphorical, the boys' behavior is what brings the beast into existence, so the more savagely the boys act, the more real the beast seems to become. This is realized by Simon and is proposed in Beast From Water after a littlun suggests the possibility of the beast on the island: “What I mean is . . . maybe it’s only us”. Simon explains that perhaps the beast is only the boys themselves. The boys ignore Simon’s realization, yet Simon’s words are central to Golding’s point that inborn human evil exists. Simon is the first character in the novel to see the beast not as an outer force, but as a constituent element of human nature. Also, the quotation spoken by “the lord of the flies” in Gift for the Darkness to Simon during his vision contributes to Simon’s speculation in Beast From Water that the beast is themselves. This quotation deepens the them... ... middle of paper ... ...controlled by the leaders of war like puppets. In Beast From Water, Piggy, along with Simon and Ralph ask for a sign from the grown-up world because "they wouldn't quarrel....or break my specs...or talk about a beast.” This quotation shows how the children view the macrocosm as safe and ignore the danger outside the island; with the ‘grown-up world’ being at war, this leads to the apparition of the dead parachutist’s body on the island. In conclusion, we can assume that Golding was trying to use religious and war motifs as well as the themes of civilization versus savagery to illustrate the decay the island from good to evil, the reader can use Golding’s selection of words and description to deduce the way in which the island was becoming: rotten and vicious. This further on builds on Golding’s idea of mankind’s evil nature – the thematic epicentre of the novel.
The beast displays the truth about mankind and their actions, making the readers understand what is happening in the world. Sam and Eric are on duty to maintain the fire and they encounter the dead parachuter, thinking that it is the beast. The twins run being horrified from what they saw (Golding 96-98). The parachuter, the beast of air is the consequence and the result of war, exhibiting the harsh actions humans are capable of doing. The beast also incorporate the human want of having power. Jack is unable to get the English boys on his side, so he uses their fear of the beast to manipulate them stating: “I gave you food, and my hunters will protect you from the beast. Who will join my tribe?” (150). In reality, many people uses the means of fear to control and have power over people, like dictators. This shows that power given to the wrong people can destroy or affect negatively on humanity. Near the end the boys turn on Ralph and causes chaos among the island. The naval officer condemn their actions as he says: The officer says: “I should've thought that a pack of British boys. . . would have been able to put up a better show” (202). It is ironic how he chastises them for their actions, but ignore the fact he is a naval officer and participates in war and in the act of killing humans. This is how William Golding shows how the reality is shown through the beast and how power can have its
All of the boys but Simon are becoming the beast at that moment. In Lord of the Flies, Golding proves that fear draws out man’s inner evil and barbarism. Within the novel, Golding uses characterization of the boys and symbolism of the beast to show the gradual change from their initial civility to savagery and inhumanity. Learned civility, order and humanity become ultimately futile in the face of fear. The author teaches that without logic, fear consumes us endlessly.
An excuse so that the boys can be afraid of something else other than themselves. Simon realizes that they fear the beast because of it existing in themselves. They all turn “savage” as the book says, and they know it truly exists in every single person. The boys give what they are afraid of- a name, and a shape in their minds. The dead parachuting man shows up unexpectedly and Ralph thinks it’s a sign from the outside world. Piggy says, “I know there isn’t no beast- not with claws and all that, I mean- but I know there isn’t no fear, either” (Golding Ch.5) The man from the sky may have been a sign, but not for war; the beast that is in everyone. People can’t defeat it, give it a shape, or even see it. The beast forever lives in the mind’s
Atmosphere and settings are used by both Golding and Shakespeare to foreshadow future events. In the Lord of the Flies, the island stands as an allegorical object representing the general modernist view of civilisation: that the world is improving and that progress is inevitable. With its “dazzling beach” and “open sea”, the island almost creates the sense that it is the Garden of Eden; a place of perfection. However, the image becomes tainted when the reader realises that the island is not pristine: it is marked by a “scar”. Although this “scar” was caused by the plane crash that brought the boys to the island, it can be interpreted in a way that allows us to understand what or who Golding classifies as disturbed. This flaw, on the otherwise untouc...
“He says in the morning [the beast] turned into them things like ropes in the trees and hung in the branches. He says it will come back tonight?” (pg. 36). Everyone has now heard that there is a potential monster coming to hurt them, and while some of the older boys don’t believe it, the younger ones are finding it hard to shake the feeling of danger. They all relied too much on having a calm and soothing island that they forgot about the risk that lies beneath the forest ground. Fear and threats would be the downfall of this island. When the boys thought that he was the beast, the savages attacked Simon and his “...dead body moved out toward the open sea” once they were finished with their ritualistic dance (pg.154). In a normal setting, and on a normal occasion, these small children would never have been capable of killing such an innocent kid. However, because they felt threatened by the beast, they hunted and slaughtered Simon. They did feel guilty for it, but Jack reminded the savages that who they killed was not a member of their party, but the beast. Sure, it was an accident, but now that the young children had killed someone, what else were they capable
The the 1954 book of Lord of The Flies boys are stranded on an island after a plane crash and come in contact with many obstacles during their defer on the island. In William Golding’s book of Lord of the Flies it is crucial to understand the important symbols throughout his book to be able to understand the characters and story development.. Using symbols such as the conch shell, the beast, the knife and Piggy’s spectacles, Golding shows that when humans are taken away from society, they allow for the evil within them to take over.
William Golding’s book; Lord of the Flies uses defects of society to trace back to the defects of human nature. One of the many motifs Golding uses is this “beast” which represents the core of human nature, savagery. To the stranded boys the beast was seen to be a physical thing that hunted them and hid on the island, but the truth that only Simon and Jack knew was that the beast was not physical at all, but inside each and every one of the boys, covered up only by a thin layer of society. This layer is easily pulled back as the kids become more savage fueled by their belief in the beast that Jack continues to exploit.
Sir William Golding, in his best-known work The Lord Of The Flies makes frequent and consistent usage of symbolism throughout his book, with nuanced characters and developments playing an unusually important role. Indeed, where some historic authors such as Conrad and Tolkein go on at length in the backstories of unimportant characters, meaning to strengthen and round said characters, though with ultimate triviality, Golding presents perceptibly flat characters and assigns great allegorical significance to the few seemingly-minor actions they execute. Although they fail to serve, in all, to the macroscopic plot development of the story, and in that sense are surely secondary characters, making the neglect of their presence in the book a not overtly-unreasonable deed, there is considerable importance to these characters; notably Percival, Henry, and Wilfred; inasmuch as they serve to, in a detached manner, grant depth to the themes and metaphors persistent throughout the novel.
One way that Golding shows that everyone has evil in them is by the boys’ actions. The boys on the island change from how they were when they first got there. At first, everyone was innocent and unknowing of what people can do. While away from their parents, the boys have to learn how to provide and take care of themselves. Without the proper authority to tell the boys what to do, they turn savage. They do things that normal kids their age would not have to do. The boys take joy in killing pigs. They often chant after killing a pig, “Kill the pig! Cut her throat! Bash her in!”(Golding 75). This not only shows that the boys want to kill for food, but it also shows how excited they get after killing a pig. This presents the idea that even children can kill without feeling sympathy. Golding wants the reader to know that there is evil in everyone. Different
William Golding’s Lord of the Flies explores the distinct boundaries and relationship of civilization and the nature of evil. In the novel, a group of English schoolboys crash into an island and begin to divide, in war within themselves and the boys around them. William Golding’s Lord of the Flies offers insight on the duality of the human condition through characterization, setting and symbolism. Throughout the novel, Golding explores the relationship between the conceptual ideas, focusing on the internal conflict between the conditioning of civility and the innate will to act on ‘evil’ desires.
Evil is an inescapable consequence of human nature, and in the correct setting, this intrinsic evil of humanity will emerge. In Lord of the Flies, the island acts as a microcosm presenting the real world, yet it is left uncharted to creating a bare environment away from the destructive nature of humanity. The novel explores the notion in which man destroys every beautiful environment they settle in, and that when in a bare setting, free of social construct, the evil and primal urges would surface. When the boys first arrive on the island, Golding paints it to be beautiful and not yet spoiled by man, highlighted in the use of personification in ‘the palm-fronds would whisper, so that spots of blurred sunlight slid over their bodies’ which creates
This paper will explore the three elements of innate evil within William Golding's, Lord of the Flies, the change from civilization to savagery, the beast, and the battle on the island. Golding represents evil through his character's, their actions, and symbolism. The island becomes the biggest representation of evil because it's where the entire novel takes place. The change from civilization to savagery is another representation of how easily people can change from good to evil under unusual circumstances. Golding also explores the evil within all humans though the beast, because it's their only chance for survival and survival instinct takes over. In doing so, this paper will prove that Lord of the Flies exemplifies the innate evil that exists within all humans.
William Golding’s Lord of the Flies uses characters to develop his theme concerning the nature of humanity. There is an innate evil in human nature. Although certain characters appear to demonstrate the opposite, in reality, they are all defeated in the end by the evil within them and others. A comparison between Ralph’s order and Jack’s savagery will be made, followed by Piggy’s intelligence and rationality and Roger’s brute force and sadism. Finally, Simon’s wisdom and neutrality will be analyzed and compared against the previously stated characters.
Stranded on the island, the boys in William Golding's Lord of the Flies are exposed to unique elements that symbolize the author’s demonstration that humans, when taken away from society's values, allow themselves to be caught between the evils of the world.
The beast is symbolized in copious way, but there is a quote that truly shows the reader what the beast symbolize.“Maybe...maybe there is a beast...what I mean is...maybe it's only us,”(89). In this quote what Simon is saying may defy everything the boys believe about the beast, to be but it is truly important, that the beast is not a concrete object , but something inside mankind.Something inside of everyone that we control and would not let it loose because it would deem human as uncivilized.Although the “beast” Simon is talking about may be metaphorical, but when released it can send out a great malignant evil that no one will enjoy to endure.The boys deny the fact that the beast is inside them because they live in constant fear about