More handpicked essays just for you.
Allegorical significance of lord of the flies
Comment on themes in the text the lord of the flies
Comment on themes in the text the lord of the flies
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Lord of the Flies: Final Essay
William Golding’s Lord of the Flies explores the distinct boundaries and relationship of civilization and the nature of evil. In the novel, a group of English schoolboys crash into an island and begin to divide, in war within themselves and the boys around them. William Golding’s Lord of the Flies offers insight on the duality of the human condition through characterization, setting and symbolism. Throughout the novel, Golding explores the relationship between the conceptual ideas, focusing on the internal conflict between the conditioning of civility and the innate will to act on ‘evil’ desires.
The characterization of the boys emphasizes the inner conflict between the civility and nature of evil within themselves,
…show more content…
especially in the absence of adult guidance. The boys are placed outside of society and though there is a lack of consequences, the boys initially struggle to misbehave, feeling the strength of civilization on their actions. Roger is tempted to throw stones at one of the littluns before he realizes his moral inclination forbids him from doing so: “Here, invisible yet strong, was the taboo of old life. Round the squatting child was the protection of parents and school and policemen and law. Roger’s arm was conditioned by a civilization…” (Golding 65). Roger is tempted to succumb to evil but the society’s suppression of those feelings, by law, overpowers Roger’s will to do evil. Though consequences are no longer present on the “uninhibited” (27) island, the fear of such has been ingrained into the boys and controls the nature of evil in them, displaying the dominance of civility over savagery. However, in the lack of adult guidance, the boys begin to struggle between the natural force to act “inhumanely” (pg) and the taught force to do good. These sides begin to contradict, shown through the conflict in the neither definitively ‘bad’ nor ‘good’ characters. The reader is introduced to Ralph, the leader leaning the most towards morality, but without the strong presence of society, struggles with his own nature of evil before he allows it to overcome the sense of civility. In the hunting of the pig “Ralph too was fighting to get near, to get a handful of that brown, vulnerable flesh. The desire to squeeze and hurt was over-bearing.” (125). The reader is introduced to a new side of Ralph where his evil alter ego begins to shine through and allows the reader to draw similarities between Ralph and Jack, the immoral leader on the island. Golding presents the back and forth between his civil self to the underlying savage. The use of characterization effectively helps Golding establish the relationship between civility and natural evil within the boys. Additionally, Golding ascribes the two opposing forces, civilization and the nature of evil to the setting of the island. Golding contrasts the environments to help illustrate the division between the beach and the jungle, separating the society that the boys created on the island and the chaotic savagery. The beach is quickly established as the representation of civilization on the island and shows the effects of the boy’s conditioning and reliance on a sense of civilization in their attempts to replicate democratic society. “‘So we need shelters as sort of--?’ ‘Home’” (53). The beach stands as civil ground, holding assemblies, offering shelter and other organized activity. The area is described as a “bright, open space” (pg).The use of light imagery acts as an archetype for intellectual illumination and awareness in their actions. The beach is constantly compared to the jungle, Golding’s physical manifestation of the nature of evil on the island. The “dark mysterious area” uses the negative connotations associated with shadows and darkness to describe the ideas associated with the jungle. Not only does the jungle harbor the “Beastie” (pg) but the anonymity and unawareness of consciousness allows the boys to indulge in animalistic inclination, “killing pigs” (pg) and ultimately leading up to the death of one of the most moral characters, Simon (167-169). The environments are described vividly with emphasis on difference. The use of contrast the reader visualize the distinct line through the representation of the conceptual ideas and one may argue that Golding uses this physical juxtaposition between evil versus civility to explore the relationship between both ideas with seemingly no overlap. Furthermore, symbolism is used extensively by Golding to portray the conflict between civilization and the nature of evil through the boys’ alter egos, allowing the boys to swing back and forth from civilized citizen and animalistic savage.
The masks and body paint, that Jack’s tribe paints themselves with, hold symbolic value in the internal conflict: “Demoniac figures with faces of red and white and green rushed out howling … Jack was safe from shame or self-consciousness behind the mask of his paint and could look each of them in turn.” (154). “‘But they’ll be painted! You know how it is--’ The others nodded. They understood only too well the liberation into savagery the concealing paint brought.” (191). The paint allows the boys to distance themselves from the evil actions by treating the masks as alter egos in which they satisfy evil desires. Golding describes the duality in Jack’s tribe and their need to please the domesticated self by distancing itself from the animalistic alter ego, which now overpowers the civil self. Another symbol Golding utilizes is the Lord of the Flies. The rotting pig head represents the same alter ego—the nature of the evil manifesting itself through the antagonistic Beastie which taunts Simon: “‘I’m the Beast … For a moment or two the forest and all other dimply appreciated places with the parody of laughter. ‘You knew, didn’t you? I’m part of you?’” (158). The projection of the evil within the boys shows antagonism towards the boys’ attempt at civilization, furthering the distinct opposing forces in and around the boys. The nature of evil is treated as an enemy that speaks to them, rather than speaks within them. The use of the boys’ differentiation of the two alter egos adds to the reoccurring conflict between the inner savage and the learned citizen. Golding uses the contradiction between the civil selves and evil selves, acting as alter egos, to emphasize their conflict and the boys’ desire and inability to satisfy
both. In conclusion, William Golding’s Lord of the Flies offers insight on the duality of the human condition and explores the relationship between the conceptual ideas, focusing on the internal conflict between the conditioning of civility and the innate will to act on ‘evil’ desires. Through characterization, setting and symbolism, Lord of the Flies emphasizes the inner struggle between the natural will to do evil and society’s suppression of temptations, focusing on the distance the boys’ put between each alter ego in order satisfy both.
Title Sir William Golding has constantly been a man who sees nothing good in anything. He examined the world to be a dreadful place due to the people who has populated the Earth. In order to display how he observes the world which was around the period of the second world war, he came to the decision of producing a novel. His novel was titled “Lord of the flies”. In the novel, William Golding familiarized his audience with three groups of boys; the hunters, the younger children and the gentle boys.
William Golding’s Lord of the Flies portrays the lives of young British boys whose plane crashed on a deserted island and their struggle for survival. The task of survival was challenging for such young boys, while maintaining the civilized orders and humanity they were so accustomed too. These extremely difficult circumstances and the need for survival turned these innocent boys into the most primitive and savaged mankind could imagine. William Golding illustrates man’s capacity for evil, which is revealed in man’s inherent nature. Golding uses characterization, symbolism and style of writing to show man’s inhumanity and evil towards one another.
William Golding’s novel ‘The Lord of The flies’ presents us with a group of English boys who are isolated on a desert island, left to try and retain a civilised society. In this novel Golding manages to display the boys slow descent into savagery as democracy on the island diminishes.
When viewing the atrocities of today's world on television, the starving children, the wars, the injustices, one cannot help but think that evil is rampant in this day and age. However, people in society must be aware that evil is not an external force embodied in a society but resides within each person. Man has both good qualities and faults. He must come to control these faults in order to be a good person. In the novel Lord of the Flies, William Golding deals with this same evil which exists in all of his characters. With his mastery of such literary tools as structure, syntax, diction and imagery, The author creates a cheerless, sardonic tone to convey his own views of the nature of man and man’s role within society.
Importance of Leadership Leadership is something that stands out in people. In a group, people tend to look for the strongest person to follow. However, the strongest person may not be the best choice to follow. In Lord of the Flies by William Golding, Ralph and Jack each have leadership qualities. Jack is probably the stronger of the two; however, Ralph is a better leader.
William Golding’s novel ‘The Lord of The Flies’ tells the story of a group of English boys isolated on a desert island, left to attempt to retain civilisation. In the novel, Golding shows one of the boys, Jack, to change significantly. At the beginning of the book, Jack’s character desires power and although he does not immediately get it, he retains the values of civilized behaviour. However, as the story proceeds, his character becomes more savage, leaving behind the values of society. Jack uses fear of the beast to control the other boys and he changes to become the book’s representation of savagery, violence and domination. He is first taken over with an obsession to hunt, which leads to a change in his physical appearance This change of character is significant as he leads the other boys into savagery, representing Golding’s views of there being a bad and unforgiving nature to every human.
Golding has a rather pessimistic view of humanity having selfishness, impulsiveness and violence within, shown in his dark yet allegorical novel Lord of the Flies. Throughout the novel, the boys show great self-concern, act rashly, and pummel beasts, boys and bacon. The delicate facade of society is easily toppled by man's true beastly nature.
The Lord of the Flies by William Golding is tale of a group of young boys who become stranded on a deserted island after their plane crashes. Intertwined in this classic novel are many themes, most that relate to the inherent evil that exists in all human beings and the malicious nature of mankind. In The Lord of the Flies, Golding shows the boys' gradual transformation from being civilized, well-mannered people to savage, ritualistic beasts.
Lord of the Flies is a novel written by William Golding in 1954 about a group of young British boys who have been stranded alone together on an island with no adults. During the novel the diverse group of boys struggle to create structure within a society that they constructed by themselves. Golding uses many unique literary devices including characterization, imagery, symbolism and many more. The three main characters, Ralph, Piggy, and Jack are each representative of the three main literary devices, ethos, logos, and pathos. Beyond the characterization the novel stands out because of Golding’s dramatic use of objective symbolism, throughout the novel he uses symbols like the conch, fire, and Piggy’s glasses to represent how power has evolved and to show how civilized or uncivilized the boys are acting. It is almost inarguable that the entire novel is one big allegory in itself, the way that Golding portrays the development of savagery among the boys is a clear representation of how society was changing during the time the novel was published. Golding is writing during
One of the main themes in William Golding's 1954 novel Lord of the Flies is that without civilization, there is no law and order. The expression of Golding's unorthodox and complex views are embodied in the many varied characters in the novel. One of Golding's unorthodox views is that only one aspect of the modern world keeps people from reverting back to savagery and that is society. Golding shows the extreme situations of what could possibly happen in a society composed of people taken from a structured society then put into a structureless society in the blink of an eye. First there is a need for order until the people on the island realize that there are no rules to dictate their lives and take Daveers into their own hands. Golding is also a master of contrasting characterization. This can be seen in the conflicts between the characters of Jack, the savage; Simon, the savior; and Piggy, the one with all the ideas.
The novel “Lord of the Flies” was written by William Golding to demonstrate the problems of society and the sinful nature of man.
This paper will explore the three elements of innate evil within William Golding's, Lord of the Flies, the change from civilization to savagery, the beast, and the battle on the island. Golding represents evil through his character's, their actions, and symbolism. The island becomes the biggest representation of evil because it's where the entire novel takes place. The change from civilization to savagery is another representation of how easily people can change from good to evil under unusual circumstances. Golding also explores the evil within all humans though the beast, because it's their only chance for survival and survival instinct takes over. In doing so, this paper will prove that Lord of the Flies exemplifies the innate evil that exists within all humans.
Lord of the Flies provides one with a clear understanding of Golding's view of human nature. Whether this view is right or wrong is a point to be debated. This image Golding paints for the reader, that of humans being inherently bad, is a perspective not all people share. Lord of the Flies is but an abstract tool of Golding's to construct the idea of the inherent evil of human nature in the minds of his readers. To construct this idea of the inherent evil, Golding employs the symbolism of Simon, Ralph, the hunt and the island.
William Golding’s Lord of the Flies tells the story of a group of young british schoolboys who must learn to survive together when their plane crashes onto a deserted island. At the beginning of the book, the boys are young and childish, and some believe that their stay on the island is just a game. However, as the novel progresses and the boys decide to act violently, their personalities turn from young and innocent to brutal and vicious. They lose all sense of their innocent childhoods and their innocuous personalities deteriorate. Golding shows how loss of innocence occurs when young boys have to act like grownups, causing them to act rashly and violently, hurting those around them.
Lord of the flies movie showed different kinds of human behaviour in a particular situation with the help of school children. In general, humans has love and sensitivity on one side and on other side they also have greed, hatred and brutal tendency. This duality makes human good and evil, therefore, the human mind has so much trouble in their life. If there is someone behaving same kind of behaviour then we call them bad or not good. In today’s world, we are into technology which makes human life better and simple and we are spending so much of wealth on it.