Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Interviews with william golding
Literary analysis essay
Interviews with william golding
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Stranded on the island, the boys in William Golding's Lord of the Flies are exposed to unique elements that symbolize the author’s demonstration that humans, when taken away from society's values, allow themselves to be caught between the evils of the world. One of the most significant representation of evil comes from the title itself. The description of the pig’s head is ever so frightening. The meaning of this word unveils over the course of the novel, showing a sense of gore when given names like “dim-eyed, grinning faintly, blood blackening between the teeth”(Golding 137). Even though the pig’s head can’t do much itself; Golding incorporates the imagery to show savagery among the boys, mainly when Simon comes into contact with the Lord …show more content…
of the Flies in his sense of right and wrong and it claims, “There isn’t anyone to help you. Only me. And I’m the Beast…You knew didn’t you? I’m part of you? Close, close, close! I’m the reason why it’s no go? Why things are what they are?” (Golding 130). Irony posits here as Simon is the character, who confronts the true beast, making an impression on the readers that he is the least evil of the boys. Moreover, this makes the readers aware of the true source of wickedness in the beast. Even though these little conversations might have been hallucinations, Simon finally learns that the beast is not an external force. In fact, it says, "’Fancy thinking the beast was something you could hunt and kill!...You knew, didn't you? I'm part of you?" (Golding 143). This disenchants him seeing that the wicked is only an excuse for the boy's to think that the population on the island is not decreasing due to savagery. At the end of this scene, it is pedant towards the readers that the immense evil has a powerful impact as seen once again when Simon faints after seeing "blackness within, a blackness that spread" (Golding 144). Furthermore, the evil comes to sight when the boys start their journey on the island being in an isolation from the rest of the people.
This is seen through Piggy's glasses. He represents civilization by being circumspect of the rules, which causes the boys to recant from each other very quickly. After a couple of days, Piggy’s broken glasses prohibit him from seeing, causing the other boys to look the other way when it comes to doing what’s right. In a meeting, the boys make a decision that they "can't have everybody talking at once" and that they "have to have ‘Hands up' like at school" (Golding 33). Therefore, this shows that their innocence has not been lost yet. However, in a blink of an eye, the hunters start to consider slaughtering a pig to be far more beneficial than being rescued. After a successful hunt, they return chanting "Kill the pig. Cut her throat. Spill her blood’" (Golding 69). Although Ralph and Piggy attempt to elucidate that having a signal fire burning is more important than having meat for their meals, they fail to explain themselves properly as the hunters return to savagery once again. Meanwhile, as Jack and his tribe ambush Ralph and his men, Piggy’s specs are stolen. That leaves him blind and even then Jack returns to Castle Rock, "trotting steadily, exulting in his achievement," relinquishing upon a civilized life (Golding
168). In addition, these savages imagine the beast as a resonant yet a true source of evil on the island. However, in reality, Golding introduces the beast to show the evil present among the boys, which is responsible for their inhumane behavior. Simon comes to realize this before even meeting with the Lord of the Flies. It comes into sight when he shares his theory on the beast. Fearfully, Simon conjures, “‘What I mean is... maybe it's only us’" (Golding 89). Consequently, in response to Simon's statement, the other boys---who believe in strategizing their meetings with an agenda---instantly start to bicker. The crowd is in excitement to hear: “‘Bollocks to the rules! We're strong---we hunt! If there's a beast, we'll hunt it down! We'll close in and beat and beat and beat---!’" (Golding 91). The boys' fear of encountering the beast and their ambition to kill it shows that without supervision, the society’s rules, which once held them together, have been unbinded during their journey on the island. In conclusion, Lord of the Flies portrays a life that comes from an existing conflict of the evil. It has the ability to control those that are free from the commands of society. Some of the symbols that Golding works into his writing might be insignificant and taken for granted in real life; however, throughout this piece of literature, each of the symbols demonstrate a vital point in proving the theme of the book.
William Golding’s Lord of the Flies portrays the lives of young British boys whose plane crashed on a deserted island and their struggle for survival. The task of survival was challenging for such young boys, while maintaining the civilized orders and humanity they were so accustomed too. These extremely difficult circumstances and the need for survival turned these innocent boys into the most primitive and savaged mankind could imagine. William Golding illustrates man’s capacity for evil, which is revealed in man’s inherent nature. Golding uses characterization, symbolism and style of writing to show man’s inhumanity and evil towards one another.
William Golding’s novel ‘The Lord of The flies’ presents us with a group of English boys who are isolated on a desert island, left to try and retain a civilised society. In this novel Golding manages to display the boys slow descent into savagery as democracy on the island diminishes.
Evil is an inescapable consequence of human nature, and in the correct setting, this intrinsic evil of humanity will emerge. In Lord of the Flies, the island acts as a microcosm presenting the real world, yet it is left uncharted to creating a bare environment away from the destructive nature of humanity. The novel explores the notion in which man destroys every beautiful environment they settle in, and that when in a bare setting, free of social construct, the evil and primal urges would surface. When the boys first arrive on the island, Golding paints it to be beautiful and not yet spoiled by man, highlighted in the use of personification in ‘the palm-fronds would whisper, so that spots of blurred sunlight slid over their bodies’ which creates
William Golding’s novel ‘The Lord of The Flies’ tells the story of a group of English boys isolated on a desert island, left to attempt to retain civilisation. In the novel, Golding shows one of the boys, Jack, to change significantly. At the beginning of the book, Jack’s character desires power and although he does not immediately get it, he retains the values of civilized behaviour. However, as the story proceeds, his character becomes more savage, leaving behind the values of society. Jack uses fear of the beast to control the other boys and he changes to become the book’s representation of savagery, violence and domination. He is first taken over with an obsession to hunt, which leads to a change in his physical appearance This change of character is significant as he leads the other boys into savagery, representing Golding’s views of there being a bad and unforgiving nature to every human.
In the novel The Lord of the Flies by William Golding, a group of English schools boys are stranded on an island in the Pacific Ocean. The boys’ plane crashed into the ocean in a futuristic war-ridden world. In these dire times, the boys manage to create a hierarchy and assign different roles to all of them. Throughout the novel, a human element of fear terrorizes their island society. Fear is the key element in the novel. It controls how their island society functions and it controls the boys’ actions. Fear was something that affected the adolescent school boys to a large extent by that led to the corruption and crumble of their society.
The novel Lord of the Flies by William Golding used a group of British boys beached on a deserted island to illustrate the malicious nature in mankind. Lord of the Flies dealt with the changes the boys underwent as they gradually adapted to the freedom from their society. William Golding's basic philosophy that man was inherently evil was expressed in such instances as the death of Simon, the beast within the boys, and the way Ralph was fervently hunted.
Circumstance and time can alter or determine the different paths a group of young boys will take. These paths can have the power to strip children of their own innocence. Such a statement can be explored in William Golding’s “Lord of the Flies” as it ventures into the pros and cons of human nature. William Golding’s tale begins with a group of English school boys who crash land on a deserted tropical island during World War II. In Lord of the Flies, the island that the boys crash on is beautiful, glamorous, and magnificent; yet, it proves to become a dystopia by the horror of the cruelty, violence, and inhumanity.
During his search for the beast, Simon was surprised by what he found. The beast was not really a physical creature, but something very different. Simon mutters in his shock, “‘Pig’s head on a stick,” and later the beast said, “‘You knew didn’t you? I’m part of you” (Golding 143)? The pig’s head on a stick, or the Lord of the Flies, is symbolic of the evil nature within the boys. The use of a pigs head on a stick is symbolic because savage nature is what sparked Jack’s desire to brutally kill a pig, and the murdered pig later became the being which represented that same savage nature. The symbolism in the Lord of the Flies was also important in advancing the plot of the story, by teaching the reader and Simon that the “beast”, which was referred to all throughout the story, is really just the nature of the children. Another symbolic item that was important during the story was the conch. Early in the story, when the children were trying to peacefully settle into their new environment, they decided that the conch will be their alternative to raising hands. Ralph said, “‘I’ll give the conch to the next person to speak. He can hold it when he’s speaking”’ (Golding 33). Golding used the conch to symbolize the boys’ connection back to society. Later in the book, when the conch was destroyed, Golding made the kids act even more savage and violent because they had lost all ties back to regular society. This symbolism showed how good human behavior is strongly connected with society. By symbolically creating a pig’s head on a stick and a conch to represent much bigger ideas in the lives of the kids, Golding helps the reader to understand his belief that without society, humans’ savage nature would be
In his perspective, he has found a paradise where he can abandon all memories of a proper society in exchange for a world where he has absolute power. In order to prevent their chances of being rescued, Jack devises a plan to steal the glasses they used to create the signal. When Jack’s hunters slip into Ralph’s shelter during the night and steal Piggy’s glasses all remaining hope for Ralph is lost. Desperate and left with no other options, Ralph and Piggy attempt to confront Jack. Motivated by his feelings of hatred and betrayal, Ralph’s reasoning with Jack is futile and a fight escalates quickly between the boys. In result Piggy is murdered by a falling boulder, as Ralph runs to seek refuge in the
One of the main themes in William Golding's 1954 novel Lord of the Flies is that without civilization, there is no law and order. The expression of Golding's unorthodox and complex views are embodied in the many varied characters in the novel. One of Golding's unorthodox views is that only one aspect of the modern world keeps people from reverting back to savagery and that is society. Golding shows the extreme situations of what could possibly happen in a society composed of people taken from a structured society then put into a structureless society in the blink of an eye. First there is a need for order until the people on the island realize that there are no rules to dictate their lives and take Daveers into their own hands. Golding is also a master of contrasting characterization. This can be seen in the conflicts between the characters of Jack, the savage; Simon, the savior; and Piggy, the one with all the ideas.
One of the most important and most obvious symbols in Lord of the Flies is the object that gives the novel its name, the pig's head. Golding's description of the slaughtered animal's head on a spear is very graphic and even frightening. The pig's head is depicted as "dim-eyed, grinning faintly, blood blackening between the teeth," and the "obscene thing" is covered with a "black blob of flies" that "tickled under his nostrils" (William Golding, Lord of the Flies, New York, Putnam Publishing Group, 1954, p. 137, 138). As a result of this detailed, striking image, the reader becomes aware of the great evil and darkness represented by the Lord of the Flies, and when Simon begins to converse with the seemingly inanimate, devil-like object, the source of that wickedness is revealed. Even though the conversation may be entirely a hallucination, Simon learns that the beast, which has long since frightened the other boys on the island, is not an external force. In fact, the head of the slain pig tells him, "Fancy thinking the beast was something you could hunt and kill! Ö You knew, didn't you? I'm part of you?" (p. 143). That is to say, the evil, epitomized by the pig's head, that is causing the boys' island society to decline is that which is inherently present within man. At the end of this scene, the immense evil represented by this powerful symbol can once again be seen as Simon faints after looking into the wide mouth of the pig and seeing "blackness within, a blackness that spread" (p. 144).
In Golding’s The Lord of the Flies, he effectively uses many symbols to enrich his message about human behavior. He uses one specific symbol the pigs head as a symbol of the inner beast that lurks within all humans to expound his main idea that humans are fundamentally evil. He argues that human are savage by nature as seen through the boys who revert to barbarism when left to their own devices. Through Golding’s use of the of pig's head he is able to deepen his argument that humans have an innate darker side. This is seen throughout the novel such as when Simon has a confrontation with the pig's head on the stake that says, “ Fancy thinking the Beast was something you could hunt and kill… I’m part of you? Close, close, close!” (Golding 143).
The pig’s head has its own biblical background, which is that the head represents Beelzebub, who is the devil. Golding has effectively manipulated this to create a scene where Jack who represents evil creates the devil, hell and evil on the island. Golding conveys the bond between the responder and Jack through the evil within
One boy breaking conformity can cause a whole society to fall apart, and can result in savagery. In the novel “Lord of the Flies” by William Golding, a group of young boys end up on an island due to a plane crash. Without adult supervision, they attempt to create a small organized society. However, when individuals such as Jack and Roger decide to break conformity, catastrophe strikes the island and trust is lost between the boys resulting in savage behavior. The transformation of Roger from civilized to savagery, highlights the idea of gradual decline in morals, which ultimately proves Golding’s belief of every human having a capacity for evil.
Without authority and proper leadership, humans will wander off from the morals that they thought they had, and plummet straight into savagery. In the book, Lord of the Flies by William Golding, a group of young boys between the ages of six to twelve get stranded on a deserted island. The boys try to build a functioning society in order to get rescued, but eventually, conflict occurs and the boys behave savagely, killing one another until they are rescued at the end. Golding’s view on humanity is that humans will naturally descend into savagery without society, rules, and authority. Jack and Roger’s nature prove Golding’s view as they are the main characters that descend into savagery and act sadistically. Although there are characters, like Ralph, who try to keep things on the island in order, they ultimately fail because savagery prevails.