Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Cinema in our society
Cinema in our society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Cinema in our society
Rambo, a Dangerous Way to Make Money Movies are the most wonderful medium created by mankind. They can affect the subconscious as no other means can do. No television show, no book has a power like that of the audiovisual image projected on a large screen. Since its origins, cinema has always acted as a model that shapes attitudes and lifestyles, as a mirror in which we all look to decide our models and our patterns of behavior. That's why film movies have such a great influence on our perception of reality. When you begin to see a movie, the viewer unconsciously seeks out which character to identify with: he wants to see it from a point of view, to live it from one of the characters, and this leads to a process of empathy - usually with the protagonist - that is known in the film industry as “transfer of image or personality”. The first Rambo movie focus on mention the Vietnam War and his …show more content…
In 1985 came Rambo: First Blood Part II on big screen. Directed by George P. Cosmatos. The original script was based on an idea by Kevin Jarre and was written by James Cameron. Later this script was rewritten by Sylvester Stallone, something that did not finish liking Cameron. The main reasons why Stallone rewrote it was that it took too long until the first action scene. The film touches on an issue that was controversial at the time; the soldiers disappeared in Vietnam or made prisoners who were “forgotten” by the American government. Rambo’s character is power and power, without complexes or culpability. He knows what he wants and how to get it; in a word, he is a pure male, who hates all: the Vietnamese, the Soviets, the American military, the Government, and all the Americans who do not want ex-combatants. Rambo is beyond the law and beyond good and evil. His right is his strength, and his goal,
One could easily dismiss movies as superficial, unnecessarily violent spectacles, although such a viewpoint is distressingly pessimistic and myopic. In a given year, several films are released which have long-lasting effects on large numbers of individuals. These pictures speak
An interesting aspect of the two films, Rambo / First Blood Part II (George P. Cosmatos, 1985) and Clear and Present Danger (Phillip Noyce, 1994) is the differences the two men display, despite the fact that what they represent is extremely similar. John Rambo is more of a renegade, a decorated soldier of the Vietnam "conflict," with only his mentor Colonel Trautman at his side. He was jailed for blowing up a small town in Oregon (a detail from the first film). The mindless, fickle public would then overlook all of the great things he did in the war because he blew up an "innocent town." On the other hand, Jack Ryan is an important member of the CIA, a very noble position to hold. It is also revealed in the film that Jack Ryan is a very noble man, not violent unless absolutely forced to be. Little could change society's view of him. Within their own films, Rambo and Jack Ryan are the only men capable of "saving" America from the evils that plague it. The difference is that Rambo is looked at as a violent killing machine, whereas Jack Ryan is seen as a man who will do only what is necessary to "do the right thing."
For this free choice final paper, I decided to analyze Oliver Stone and his two films Platoon and JFK. Oliver Stone, a three-time Academy Award winner and known as one of the best filmmakers in his generation, ignores Hollywood convention warning against making films with a message. Among some of his great films, he made the two films Platoon and JFK. In Platoon, he presents a gritty and emotional examination of American soldiers during the Vietnam War through the lens of Chris Taylor, a biographical representation of himself and so...
The first movie ever created was made by Louis Le Prince on October 14 in 1888, back then all movies were silent and the movie theatre was consider a simpler, cheaper way to entertain the masses. Since 1888 millions of movies have been made in every language and in every part of the world. Many of those movies have a connection with psychology and its theories, my favorite movie is The Breakfast Club which has a connection with the contact hypothesis of Gordon Allport. The Breakfast Club was made in 1985 and since then it has been used by various psychologist to explain psychology theories in a simple way.
In film, many times the auteur often uses the medium to convey a moral or make a social commentary. In the case of Howard Hawkes’s original version of Scarface, there is more being portrayed through the characters then merely the story. Hawkes makes a statement about the façade of organized crime, and the farce of the American Dream.
Rambo: First Blood is a 1982 action film that follows John Rambo (Sylvester Stallone) as he deals with life after the Vietnam War and the difficulties he must deal with. John Rambo was a war hero who had even received a medal of honor for his acts of heroism during the war. When wandering the highways of America, he reaches the town of Hope, Washington. Once he arrives he meets the town sheriff named Will Teasel who insults him. Upset, Rambo continues to head into town to get something to eat. Teasel, Frustrated with Rambo’s attitude towards him, arrests him for vagrancy. Rambo then escapes the jail during while he is being cleaned and is on the run from the law. The Vietnam War had a great impact on many soldiers just like Rambo, both physically and emotionally. There are many factors that determined the outcome of the Vietnam War. The factor that was shown in Rambo: First Blood was the morale of the soldiers. Some soldiers didn’t even know what they were fighting for. John Rambo did all he could for his country to win for a war he didn’t even understand and people told hi...
Film and literature are two media forms that are so closely related, that we often forget there is a distinction between them. We often just view the movie as an extension of the book because most movies are based on novels or short stories. Because we are accustomed to this sequence of production, first the novel, then the motion picture, we often find ourselves making value judgments about a movie, based upon our feelings on the novel. It is this overlapping of the creative processes that prevents us from seeing movies as distinct and separate art forms from the novels they are based on.
While hundreds, even thousands of excellent movies have been made over the years since motion pictures were invented, there are some movies that stand out among the best. There are various reasons for these standouts, sometimes incredible acting, sometimes impeccable story lines, but in many cases, it is the issues addressed by the movie. Most of the greatest movies contain commentaries or analyses of certain issues, be they moral, social, or otherwise. John McTiernan directed one of these films, The Hunt for Red October, based on the similarly titled best-selling novel by Tom Clancy. The Hunt for Red October, a product of the anti-communist attitudes of the 1980’s, is above all a commentary on morality. It follows a critical moral decision made by one man, Soviet Captain Marko Ramius, portrayed by Sean Connery, and follows the consequences of that moral decision to their conclusion. While this is not the only instance of morality being questioned in this movie, it is the most important, as it is the decision upon which the story is based. Other characters, like Alec Baldwin’s character of Jack Ryan, and Scott Glenn’s character Captain Bart Mancuso also have to make moral decisions that will have important effects on Ramius’ decision.
In the midst of enjoying their movie, they are exposed to the frightening events which may occur in the not too distant future should they decide to remain the way they are. Movies such as King Kong and Godzilla depict symbolic representations in attempt to display current issues within society. From revolution against authority to environmental activists proclaiming their concerns, films are a means to which the world may receive a message through entertainment. .HELP ME FINISH PLEASE Bibliography:..
...ese scenes is to simultaneously offer and deny the promise of Reagan prosperity to the viewers of Rambo films. Rambo’s painful self-surgery insists that the national body can both heal itself and remain strong and combat ready despite its wounds, offering a reassuring form of “national pleasure” as audience members can identify with the hard national body that survives and defeats its enemies (Jeffords Pg. 51) It’s very interesting how politics and the film industry are one in one with each other. How cleaver of the film industry to use movies to persuade or even manipulate the public to agree or think like them. Reagan’s philosophy in my opinion was more of a fantasy then reality. Regardless, with or without a hard body we have to keep in mind that moves are make belief they are not real and if we want to inspire change then every individual needs to take a stand.
"Rambo: First Blood Part II (1985) - Synopsis." Internet Movie Database. Amazon, n.d. Web. 6 Apr
There is no doubt that movies entertain a person. However, over sexualized movies have the capability of poisoning minds which are easily shapeable-for example Fifty shades of gray. Children are told not to view it, however that does nothing to stop the viewing of the movie. Not only does it corrupt young minds it hands them unlimited access to the findings of adult
The feature film, Rambo: First Blood, carries an impactful message that lasts and remains relevant through the decades. It portrays a message about what was arguably one of the most important topics of the time. Rambo: First Blood details some of the many struggles that some of the returning veterans of the Vietnam war had faced. This movie carries an important, very gritty, and extremely important message about the treatment if our returning veterans from the Vietnam War, behind its cheaply made action film cover.
When you stop to think about it, our ability to understand what goes on in a typical Hollywood film is shocking. Images jump from one to the next with little to no linearity. Perspectives jump around as if a person is spinning and floating around, and music and sounds emanate from nowhere and everywhere at once. The lights dim. Your body shifts about to get comfortable. It’s not bed time however. It’s time for a movie! The strong correlation between our film watching setting, and our dream making setting is too closely tied to be considered mere coincidence. Colin McGinn, author of The Power of Movies, in chapter four titled “Dreams on Film”, says “A child has to learn to read before a literary narrative can be processed, but watching a film requires nothing much beyond the capacity to dream” (113). McGinn argues that the reasons we are able to understand film so easily and readily, is because of our ability to dream. In dreaming, we create visual fantasies that seem to reflect memories and images we experience in our own lives. We might wake up in a heavy sweat, a confused state of mind, or a smile on our face, and it is these same emotions that can be brought about by film. Our ability to create and consume film stems from our innate ability to imagine and understand dreams. Robert Rodriguez’s film adaptation “Sin City” is a perfect case study of how film and dreams are interrelated.
Movies take us inside the skin of people quite different from ourselves and to places different from our routine surroundings. As humans, we always seek enlargement of our being and wanted to be more than ourselves. Each one of us, by nature, sees the world with a perspective and selectivity different from others. But, we want to see the world through other’s eyes; imagine with other’s imaginations; feel with other’s hearts, at a same time as with our own. Movies offer us a window onto the wider world, broadening our perspective and opening our eyes to new wonders.