Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The powerful influence of movies
Topics on how American film affects culture
Globalization of indian cinema
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The powerful influence of movies
The pleasure of watching a great cinema or conversely the disappointment and frustration of watching a poor film, is familiar to most of us. Cinema is one of the most popular and vibrant cultural practices reflecting a plethora of social, economic and cultural phenomena in modern societies. Cinema sometimes is the cultural reconstruction of our daily lives, sometimes an entree to a different time or place or idea that otherwise is difficult or even impossible to access. They remix the real, the unreal, the present, real life, memory, and dream on the same shared mental level. Cinema has the power to move people; it has been a very successful medium with a global reach and speaks the language of universality. It has entertained and influenced people across the spectrum in places as diverse as Jakarta, New York, Tokyo and Mumbai. This paper will try to look into the mass appeal and popularity of Indian cinema.
“Cinema in India is like brushing your teeth in the morning, you can’t escape it”, quipped the Indian superstar Shahrukh Khan and it holds true as Indian cinema today has grown to achieve global status. “India is the largest producer of films (over 1,000 films per year) with annual ticket sales of nearly 2.8 billion, a box office of $ 1.53 billion and growth across international markets every year. According to a recent report by Deloitte, the Indian Media and Entertainment industry is expected to grow at a CAGR of 17%, contributes $8.1 billion to the nation’s economy, supports 1.8 million jobs and constitutes 0.5% of the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) of India.”( MPPAA) MPAA’s recent annual theatrical market statistics report says that India ranks fifth after China, Japan, U.K and France in box office performance. These grow...
... middle of paper ...
...f Pi, A Mighty Heart) and Priyanka Chopra (Planes).
Commercial cinema has a multitude of audience coming from a diverse spectrum; it cuts across myriad ethnicities and lifestyles of the people. While the films talk a mixture of class tastes, some having lower or working class as its major social referent, others speak about middle class values and the bourgeoisie class. Rachel Dwyer in her work “Bollywood Bourgeoisie” speaks about how the middles are establishing their cultural hegemony. Their depictions of lifestyle becomes the benchmark to which the lower classes aspire and thus appealing to a broad social spectrum. Ashish Nandy opines that commercial cinema emphasizes on lower middle class sensibilities and how this cinema is a reading of haute bourgeoisie by the lower middle classes. This explains the medium's stylization, grandeur conventions and mannerisms.
One could easily dismiss movies as superficial, unnecessarily violent spectacles, although such a viewpoint is distressingly pessimistic and myopic. In a given year, several films are released which have long-lasting effects on large numbers of individuals. These pictures speak
Sparking debate over the nature of its viewing, film is now being questioned in social, political, and moral arenas for its potential impact on an audience. Critics claim that watching films is a passive activity in which the viewer becomes subconsciously absorbed, and creates a reliance or "addiction" to the medium, and thus can be influenced by any perpetual concepts or images. Advocates, however, argue that viewing such programs is an active process in which audience members are able to choose to what they are exposed to, and interpret messages based on their individual needs and background. Perhaps both views are too extreme? Film from the 1950s to present, as will be explored in this essay, is an extremely useful medium, often underestimated within the label of "entertainment".
In Hollywood today, most films can be categorized according to the genre system. There are action films, horror flicks, Westerns, comedies and the likes. On a broader scope, films are often separated into two categories: Hollywood films, and independent or foreign ‘art house’ films. Yet, this outlook, albeit superficial, was how many viewed films. Celebrity-packed blockbusters filled with action and drama, with the use of seamless top-of-the-line digital editing and special effects were considered ‘Hollywood films’. Films where unconventional themes like existentialism or paranoia, often with excessive violence or sex or a combination of both, with obvious attempts to displace its audiences from the film were often attributed with the generic label of ‘foreign’ or ‘art house’ cinema.
Gallagher, T. 2002. Senses of Cinema – Max Ophuls: A New Art – But Who Notices?. [online] Available at: http://sensesofcinema.com/2002/feature-articles/ophuls/ [Accessed: 8 Apr 2014].
At the forefront of Sontag’s argument, lies a description of the first ever showing of moving pictures in 1895. The audience ducked and gasped in anticipation of the oncoming train footage, and cinephilia was born. Later, audiences went to the movies to be “kidnapped” and inspired. Today, the relationship between audiences and film remains quite similar. Movies of incredible value are recognized for being, “completely absorbing,” “moving,” and memorable (Tyler).
Since the creation of films, their main goal was to appeal to mass audiences. However, once, the viewer looks past the appearance of films, the viewer realizes that the all-important purpose of films is to serve as a bridge connecting countries, cultures, and languages. This is because if you compare any two films that are from a foreign country or spoken in another language, there is the possibility of a connection between the two because of the fact that they have a universally understanding or interpretation. This is true for the French New Wave films; Contempt and Breathless directed by Jean-Luc Godard, and contemporary Indian films; Earth and Water directed by Deepa Mehta. All four films portray an individual’s role in society using sound and editing.
" Cinema and the Nation. Ed. Mette Hjort and Scott Mackenzie. New York City, NY: Routledge, 2000. 260-277.
Cinema as a form of art is just like painting, music; its purpose is to deliver the message, information to its audiences. The information is interrupted differently by different audiences; popular cinema plays to our unconscious desire, it reflects the unconscious desire in a certain level. Therefore it is popular. The movie I chose in this essay is ‘Avatar,' it is one of the most famous ‘blockbuster’ movies in history, it released on 2009, the budget of this film is ‘237 million USD.' The box office is 2.788 billion USD and was once the highest-grossing film of all time. James Cameron created this dream-like world called Pandora, which everyone fell in love with. The film came in 3D and in some selected cinemas in 4D to allow the audience
Genres are helpful in the general public as they give spectrum to different people and their different tastes. It also accommodates for any mood one may be in if they wanted to watch a film. It characterizes the films and sorts them into place for the viewer’s pleasure, “At all levels of the filmmaking and film-viewing processes, then, genres help assure that most members of society share at least some general notions about the many films that compete for our attention.” (Bordwell & Thompson, 2004: 110)
Going to the movies is probably one of the most enjoyable pastimes throughout the world. From western society to the Asian countries, watching movies is pleasant for nearly anybody. I currently work at the local cinema. Therefore I have decided to study the culture of moviegoers. I looked at many different aspects within the past months. I took time for myself in small, little, breaks to study and document the actions of the people. From their attitudes entering and leaving the cinemas, to the way they behaved and even the way they clothed themselves. I will be going into the field with a general question in mind of what I wish to learn. “How do individuals respond to each other in a moving going experience?” I will also look into how families communicate to each other compared to how a group of friends interact. In contrast to that outsider or etic outlook at our moviegoers, I will take an insider or emic perspective of the site and actually go out on my days off work and watch a movie portraying an actual moviegoer while no one in this culture within Stars will suspect a thing.
Movies take us inside the skin of people quite different from ourselves and to places different from our routine surroundings. As humans, we always seek enlargement of our being and wanted to be more than ourselves. Each one of us, by nature, sees the world with a perspective and selectivity different from others. But, we want to see the world through other’s eyes; imagine with other’s imaginations; feel with other’s hearts, at a same time as with our own. Movies offer us a window onto the wider world, broadening our perspective and opening our eyes to new wonders.
The Cultivation of Cinephilia Introduction Cinephilia is excess, detail, a justification for our taste, a hyper-sensitivity to everything transmitted between our body and the cinema, an intense desire for immersion and oneness in and with a moment or image, participation, activism, an education and an educator. The love for cinema, as cinephilia is commonly perceived, has come to acquire several layers of additional meaning rendering it an open-ended, somewhat vague vessel designed to carry, in any which way, the meaning appropriated to it. Thus, it is the idea of this paper that cinephilia, far from dead or decaying, has merely evolved from the place of its birth and grown up to be a truly global mode of thinking and being. This paper will
The film industry has always been somewhat of a dichotomy. Grounded firmly in both the worlds of art and business the balance of artistic expression and commercialization has been an issue throughout the history of filmmaking. The distinction of these two differing goals and the fact that neither has truly won out over the other in the span of the industry's existence, demonstrates a lot of information about the nature of capitalism.
In conclusion, it is worth stating that there are certain characteristics that stand out in a great film. For one, there should be a strong cast and a dominant director. With these two aspects, the standard of a film is greatly increased. Also the musical score and special effects added to a film, can raise the plateau in making it notable. It can also be seen that the criteria for making a film great, has changed over the years. What once made a film stand out in the past, doesn’t make it at present. However, this generally goes to the special effect features. Nevertheless, it can be said overall, that all these characteristics resulted in the creation of a great film, in ground breaking style and as a result, this has helped us define cinema or a film as we know it.
Since the 20th century, film has become a powerful media that is used to influence the lifestyles and behaviors of the people who view them. Film is a sort of escape from everyday life for the normal person nowadays, but it was also used to capture what was happening throughout the world. Due to the rise of technology, film has become a more enjoyable experience nowadays. First of all, it’s cheaper to purchase digital