Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Distributive or integrative negotiation strategy
Negotiation strategies and their strengths and weaknesses
Negotiation strategies and their strengths and weaknesses
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Distributive or integrative negotiation strategy
I believe that an effective negotiation attitude is confidence with honesty. The negotiator should have a clear view of what the outcome should look like before entering in the negotiation. Every negotiation is different, so the negotiator will need some patience with good communication skills. Not every deal someone makes is going to be hard or long. Some call for different types of approaches to make it an effective negotiation. There are routine negotiations that need patience from both parties, like, family’s negotiating what they will have for diner when they go out. Having dilemma’s in either honesty or trust can make negotiations ineffective for both parties. A lot of cultures value honesty very high. So to find out someone that wanted to do business with you was lying will ruin the relationship. Just like the used car negotiations, when people lost trust in each other, they could not benefit from that relationship again. …show more content…
Without honesty it would be hard to trust someone especially if you lost money before. Even if the negotiations are routine that does not mean my approach should be. There are two common methods of an effective negotiation. A negotiator that has the skills can negotiate the two different types while understanding what kind of negotiation they are in. A bargaining is where immediate economic outcomes are desired, organizations will label a certain team members as an effective negotiator if the employees’ negotiation skills lead to consistently maximizing their share of available resources. However, a negotiation is where there is two or more parties that want to share gains for both sides and have a continuing
Communication skills are important in professional negotiations and in personal life. This book discusses why we find some dialogue difficult, why we avoid it, and why we often address it ineffectively. Most important, the authors suggest methods for more effective, productive, and rewarding, interaction.
Through out history people have been influenced by what they want to hear and the way a current trend is happening. The evolution of mankind has drifted towards a different society than what we where born to sustain. We are emotionally driven human beings that want to feel accepted by the rules of society. Sometimes an individual can confuse actions or emotions towards trying to fulfill the standards society has imposed. I have analyzed two articles that incorporate how a society reacts towards integrity as well as honesty and the belief that an individual in order to be a part of society one must comply with the standards that are set. As I began to interpret what Stephen L. Carter explained in “The Insufficiency of Honesty” I examined they
Negotiations are supposed to begin in a positive way in which the negotiators consider the needs and wants of the others involved and their shared interests and interdependencies.... ... middle of paper ... ... References Michael R. Carrell, C. H. (2008). Negotiating Essentials: Theory, Skills, and Practice.
Negotiations styles are scholastically recognized as being broken down into two general categories and those are distributive bargaining styles and integrative negotiation styles. Distributive bargaining styles of negotiation are understood to be a competitive type of negotiation. “Distributive bargaining, also known as positional bargaining, negotiating zero-sum, competitive negotiation, or win-lose negotiation, is a type or style of negotiation in which the parties compete for the distribution of a fixed amount of value” (Business Blog Reviews, 2011). This type of negotiation skill or style approach might be best represented in professional areas such as the stock market where there is a fixed goal in mind or even in a garage sale negotiation where the owner would have a specific value of which he/she would not go below. In contrast, an integrative negotiation approach/style is that of cooperative bargaining, or win-win types ...
Negotiation, as we’ve learned, is the process of communicating where parties can discuss problems and/or targets and attempt to solve them via dialogue in order to reach a resolution. While many individuals feel successful negotiations are due to a natural skill, the truth behind reaching a prime agreement is preparation. You need to know the issue, know yourself, and know your party. This type of preparation also includes knowing your needs and limits, understanding what the other party wants and anticipating their limits, asking the right questions, and being creative in your counteroffers.
The topic for my real world negotiation is to come to an agreement with my supervisor for a promotion as well as an increased salary. I currently work as a student assistant at the student services Planning, Enrollment Management, and Student Affairs (PEMSA) department. My goal is to increase my hourly pay from $10.15 to $12.70, a 25% increase. Having worked in this department for three years, I have taken on tasks not part of my job description such as processing return mail, data entry, and supervision.
Negotiating styles are grouped into five types; Competing, Collaborating, Comprising, Avoidance, and Accommodating (Colburn, 2010). Even though it is possible to exhibit different parts of the five types of negation styles in different situations, can see that my tendencies seem to default to, Compromise and Accommodating. In reviewing the course work and reviewing my answers for Questionnaire 1 and 5, I find that the data reflects the same assumption. The accommodating profile is one where relationship perseveration is everything and giving what the other side wants is the route to winning people over. Accommodators are well liked by their colleagues and opposite party negotiators (Colburn, 2010). When analyzing my accommodating tenancy in negations, I find often it is easier to give into the demands when they are within a reasonable range. I often consider it the part of providing a high level of customer service. It has been my experience that continued delaying and not coming to an agreement in a topic will only shorten the window in which you will have to meet the request since. The cons to this style are by accommodating highly competitive styles the accommodator can give up to much ground in the process. “Giving away value too easily too early can signal to your negotiation counterpart that you've very deep pockets, and your gift is just a taster of bigger and better gifts to come”. The other negations type I default to is compromising. Compromising “often involves splitting the difference; usually resulting in an end position of about half way between both parties’ opening positions” (Colburn, 2010). In the absence of a good rationale or balanced exchanged concessions, half way betwee...
Often people think that telling lies will persuade the other party to comply with our preferred outcome, but that does not always work. Lies bring more consequences than benefits. The problem with lies is that they are lies; they are fabrications of the mind and does not hold any factual value, thus people tend to forget them, and leaving them more exposed to being caught. Lying in negotiations can come in various forms, but often comes in the form of fraudulent statements. A given statement may be defined as fraudulent when the speaker makes a knowing misrepresentation of a fact on which the victim accepts as true, and causes damage (Lim, 2011, pp. 171-178). If the liar is caught, the liar may be faced with possible criminal charges for falsification, or making false statements. The reputation of the liar would be significantly damaged and relationships would be twisted. Often, if one is caught lying, the trustworthiness of the liar would be severely diminished. The relationships between the liar and the other negotiating party would be damaged. In this case, lying would be considered as a breach in the relationship between the negotiating parties, as it is the cause that the relationship has gone sour. When a sense of mistrust develops, future negotiations would be very difficult, and or near impossible. This is very true in certain Asian countries like China. The Chinese put great emphasis than Americans and Europeans on respect and friendships (Lim, 2011, pp. 240-245), aspects of relationships in negotiations. Thus, if there was a breach in the relationship caused by lying, which leaves an impression of disrespect and unfriendliness, a favorable outcome from the negotiation would most likely be denied. Therefore, for any negot...
To be truthful is to express the truth, be honest. Being truthful is a necessity of human society; it's a virtue. Truthfulness benefits people because it helps them avoid mistakes, Shows a person's true nature, and brings justice.
Everyones heard the tale of the Boy who cried Wolf right? Sure, shepherd boy thinks he's funny, makes a fuss about imaginary wolfs, villagers come running - no wolf. Then when wolfs actually do come, he yells and screams, yet villagers weren't about to play his game again, his sheep get nailed by the wolves. Moral of the story.
During this course, I have learned a lot about negotiating. We learned about almost every negotiating technique there is. We learned about cross-cultural negotiations, body language, Best Alternative To a Negotiated Agreement (BATNA), variables in negotiating, and many more. Before this course, I did not know that much about negotiating. I thought that negotiating was just about trading or convincing someone to give you what you want and you did not care about the other side, resulting in a win-lose. I now know that negotiating is about getting what you want, but also giving the other side what they want as well to result in a win-win. This paper is about how I am going to improve my negotiating skills over the next six months. In order for me to improve my negotiating skills, I believe I need to improve the following skills- my body language, communication, planning, and my interpersonal communications. By improving those skills, I can become an effective negotiator.
Negotiation approaches are generally described as either distributive or integrative. At the heart of each strategy is a measurement of conflict between each party’s desired outcomes. Consider the following situation. Chris, an entrepreneur, is starting a new business that will occupy most of his free time for the near future. Living in a fancy new development, Chris is concerned that his new business will prevent him from taking care of his lawn, which has strict requirements under neighborhood rules. Not wanted to upset his neighbors, Chris decides to hire Matt to cut his grass.
I do not know of anyone who wants to be known as Pinocchio, the wooden boy who lies and in a result, makes his nose grow bigger. As an old proverb says, honesty is the best policy. I agree with being honest at all times. First, telling the truth to me, is always the right thing. When I catch someone in a lie, I just think to myself, what has come up of this world? A person’s truths and lies prove who that person is, and what that person is capable of. Second, people can earn a great deal of respect and trust from telling the truth. Now, people trust their “gut feeling”, but someone’s “gut feeling” should always be truthful. Respect is something that is earned, and at sometimes, given to people who do the things that they are supposed to do for themselves and for others. Last, most people were taught to tell the truth at a very young age. A truth is
Negotiation has been used as a vital communication tool not only in business but also in social intercourse. It helps people make common agreement and avoid conflict. So we need to use the tactics which we learned from this course and books to do more practice, only in this way we can gain advantages in negotiation.
Honesty is a characteristic that everyone should possess. However, being honest is a difficult task for many people. Living honestly means allowing a person’s true self to be exposed to others. Honesty is considered owning up to one’s wrongdoings and not lying, cheating, or stealing. Being honest is a trait that many people believe is obsolete. Even though every person interprets honesty differently, it all stems back to telling the truth. Being honest allows a person to earn respect from their peers. Honesty is allowing oneself to be completely exposed by being truthful.