Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
An essay on imperialism
Rise Of Imperialism
Impact of imperialism on the world
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: An essay on imperialism
Imperialism
Whether for economic, nationalist, or humanitarian reasons, more powerful nations have
often interfered with the affairs of weaker nations. These more powerful nations, including the
United States, Britain, and several European countries, have in the past exploited less fortunate ones
for resources, capital, and knowledge. Yet in return countries located in South America, Africa, and
Southeast Asia have gained the technology and capital that, over a period of time and development,
improves their quality of life.
One point of view could be that imperialism results in oppression and abuse. While this is
sometimes a temporary side effect of larger nations adopting protectorates, the long term effects
often cause the weaker nation to grow stronger. Even when a country feels they must rebel against
their suppressor, they gain a sense of nationalism and independence, resulting in a more distinct
culture than before. Why then, should a country have to withdraw from such interference?
Another argument could be that only when needed, should a country be involved with
another’s affairs. Yet with this point of view most would agree that there would be too much
diversity in opinion when deciding exactly when help is needed. Also, countries such as Japan
would never have developed, whose primary success was to take the ideas of other nations and
better them.
Stronger countries must interfere in the affairs of weaker nations for the gain of both nations.
A more powerful nation can better its own economy by sharing the resources of other nations and
weaker nations are able to obtain an improved standard of living by learning new technologies that
are more advanced than their own. Third world countries can receive food from stronger nations
and heathen nations can learn to be civilized from missionaries. Imperialism also follows the laws
of social Darwinism, where the “fitter” and more advanced countries must prosper.
An excellent example of how imperialism can benefit a weaker nation as well as a stronger,
more dominant one is the Treaty of Kanagawa in 1854. This treaty, forced upon the Japanese by
the Americans, opened up two Japanese ports to foreign trade as well as meeting other demands of
the Americans. Japan’s point of view was that by surrendering to the more powerful Americans
they could a...
... middle of paper ...
...nd, resources, and money. Use of this
theory has resulted in the creation of Canada, the United States, and many other former European
colonies. By exploiting natives, European nations (primarily Britain and France) were able to create
colonies that bettered their economy. When these colonies became independent and rebelled, it
created an even more powerful and nationalistic country, the United States. This knew country then
created a theory using social Darwinism called Manifest Destiny where Americans believed they
would soon conquer all of North America. Thus the struggle for survival of the fittest went on.
These theories of Darwinism are easily be used to justify the imperialistic views of more powerful
nations.
By learning from the past it is easy to see that nations help each other when imperialism
occurs, and even when oppression of some nations does happen, a stronger, more patriotic nation
is able to come to power. Through helping themselves, stronger nations are able to create economic
conditions beneficial to all nations. Allowing stronger nations to intervene in the matters of weaker
nations should be encouraged for the growth of both countries.
An example that significantly proves this was Canada’s contributions in World War I and its aftermath. As a colony of Britain, Canada entered the first World War under the nationalism for Britain and its citizens. Their loyalty and motivation to fight was still tied to their mother country. However, as fights occurred, nationalism for Britain started to transition to nationalism for Canada and Canadians. The Battle of Vimy Ridge was a victory that marked Canadian nationalism. This was a battle where Canadians fought for Canadians and Canadians won for Canadians. Not only did it increase nationalistic feelings with the Canadians, but it also gave recognition of independence for Canada, from the other countries. This triumph and motivated battle showed many countries and nations that Canada was responsible and capable of handling their own. It proved, that with Canadian nationalism and capability, Canada can be an independent nation. Later, after the war, this caused Canada to be able to sign the Treaty of Versailles under Britain’s signature and as well get representative seats for Canada in the Peace Conferences. These events show how sufficient levels of nationalism causes successful turn outs and healthy recognition from other
Imperialism had some positive effects regardless of how strict and unfair it was. Some positive effects can be seen in documents 2 and 7, which talks about what the mother nation gave to their colonized nations. These oppressors built them roads, canals, railways, and gave them education. They also introduced to them telegraphs, newspapers, and overall made them economized. Another positive effect can be read on documents 1 and 5. These documents show how both the oppressors and oppressed benefit from getting new resources such as raw m...
In the early 1800’s, Japan had blocked off all trade from other countries. Foreign whaling ships could not even reload or repair their ships in Japan territory. This offended many other countries. In 1852, Matthew Perry was sent to Japan to negotiate open trade. Japan felt threatened by the United States, and gave in to their demands. Japan was frightened by their stipulations, and immediately began to reform. They developed a new education system that was similar to America and Europe’s. They also developed a Western style judiciary system.
When it comes to dating, we like to put our attention on seeing the fun and attractive side of them. Sometimes when we fall for our partner, we may believe how much they have or how much money they earn doesn’t matter because we may be in the stage of “are they the one?” (Leavy, 2013). You have the right mind set if you believe money shouldn’t matter, but the harsher truth is social class does affect our romantic relationship. If you and your partner grew up in different economic environments, you should be aware of the difference because they may have taken life so easily to appreciate that may cause you to feel uncomfortable because you may have had to struggle for it (Jezebel, 2015).
The third part of this book is the essential element of this form and function argument. It is entitled “Part Three: Amazed by Sadness”. This section of the novel explores the facts and takes a more serious and analytical tone about the incident. For example, one section within this part of the novel is entitled “About the Facts”. Vasily Nesterenko, the former director of the Institute for Nuclear Energy at the Belarussian Academy of Science tells about his reaction to the incident, and he includes more facts than we have seen thus far in the novel. He talks about how he tried to call the the First secretary of the Central Committee, but no one would listen to him. Desperately, he insisted that no one should be within 100 kilometers of Chernobyl, but his findings
It is obvious that imperialism was not fair to Asia and Africa, but there is no doubt that in some ways these lands did benefit from western ideas. Time proved in efforts of both modernizers and traditionalists that modernizers fared better. There was a lot to gain from Western knowledge and modernizers embraced this concept. There is always more to learn and ways to improve things and that is the main reason why modernizers were more effective in dealing with imperialism.
Countries who have made it, however, have acted as almost complete opposites to this, with surpluses of nutritious food, reliable and efficient crops. animals to domesticate, and time to spend in specialized careers, trade and
In a nutshell, project manager basically starts with coordination, and then keep the wheels turning by allocating labor and capital, further ensure the entire work is well done and right done by continuous reviewing. Throughout the progress, project manager often take the initiative to keep the project in right track. As during the process of assigning work, the project manager has an opportunity to consider the client development needs and goals. All in all, we can see that project manager add values in various stages of construction and his position is vital in the overall success in the project.
Everything that grows begins with a foundation. But likewise, if we try to build something without a foundation, it won't grow. If we help other countries build a foundation for themselves, they can grow into independent self-sufficient countries of their own. But if we simply do...
According to Greenwood and Lawrence (2005), Weber believed that all organisations need to be managed impersonally on the basis of a specific set of rules. Weber (1978) was convinced that authority should be based on a person’s job and not on his/her personality. The main idea of the bureaucracy theory lies in the fact that authority should be passed from one individual to another as one of them left his/her job and another took it (Houghton, 2010; Law, 2011). Hence, bureaucracy can be defined as “management by the office or position rather than by a person or patrimonial” (Styhre and Lind, 2010, p. 109). It was believed by Weber that bureaucracy is the most effective and efficient form of any organisation since “the decisive reason for the advance of the bureaucratic organisation has always been its purely technical superiority over any other form of organisation” (Weber, 2009, p. 75). This superiority is achieved due to a well-defined line of authority and clear and strict rules (Styhre and Lind, 2010).
Why Nations Fail takes an in depth look into why some countries flourish and become rich powerful nations while other countries are left in or reduced to poverty. Throughout this book review I will discuss major arguments and theories used by the authors and how they directly impact international development, keeping in mind that nations are only as strong as their political and economical systems.
Nowadays, due to the advances in transportation and communication technologies, globalization generates further interdependence of both the economics and cultural activities among countries. This interaction causes mutual understanding, balance, and also conflict. Thomas Friedman, the author of “The Dell Theory of Conflict Prevention”, speaks highly of globalization. He claims that it could bring peace to human beings, since countries in the same global supply chain are less likely to go to war. Andrew Marantz, on the other hand, realizes that cultural assimilation accompanied by the international collaboration creates an identity crisis in India in his essay “My Summer in an Indian Call Center”. Globalization could cause cultural cost, such as a loss
The basis of the world is built on interdependence. The actions that go on in one country will have some impact in another country. Throughout the past 20 years, global interdependence has created a sense of great competition between many national economies, yet this sense of competition has also created benefits and new opportunities in every part of the world. This kind of mutuality has led to the many politics, developments, conflicts, and social justices that all nations face today. It shapes and continuously changes the world in many ways. The United Kingdom, Mexico, Russia, China, Iran, and Nigeria all are interdependent of each other. This interdependence is how I see the world develop and grow into the communities that are present today.
If these developed countries continue to prejudge underdeveloped countries by wealth or other conditions, when people are faced with serious problems in society, these problems become global. By helping each other, all countries offer hope and compassion, and share new knowledge with each other. Therefore, people all over the world suffer less, because they know they are not alone.
Large organisations with established rules and regulations with multiple hierarchical layers tend to structured and work effectively. However, Weber also recognized that bureaucracies could have negative consequences such as inflexibility and dehumanization. The over emphasis on structure, rules and regulations, could restrict employees to be innovative, as they are not given the opportunity to voice their own opinions. This is known as Rep Tape. Weber also talked about the ‘iron cage’ of instrumental rationality. Employees are almost trapped in a calculated system that has major emphasis on efficiency and control with little concern for the wellbeing of the employee and their individual freedom. The division of hierarchical layers may slow down the process of communication, which effects the organisation negatively. Bureaucracy has proven itself to be the most successful way of running an organisations. “society has yet to discover anything that works better.” (Kettle,2006) However, Goffman’s sociological studies of institutional life highlight the dehumanizing effects of bureaucratic systems. (Cooke and Philpin,