Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Traditional and modern literature
Turgenev's opinion on nihilism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Traditional and modern literature
Immunity to Nihilism in Turgenev's Fathers and Sons Whenever reform or revolution is possible, it is because a new, progressive ideal has been quickly and widely perpetuated among the people of a particular nation. It is often a country's youth population that most readily accepts such new ideals, since they, being in the process of education and the development of their personal beliefs, tend to be malleable to new ideas and standards, and ready for change and development. The older generation is thus an opponent to change, or at least, not passionately motivated towards any revolution, being older and accustomed to certain ways of life. Ivan Turgenev's novel Fathers and Sons, presents this very dichotomy; he places two generations face to face, and forces them to encounter Bazarov, a very influential character with revolutionary ideas. Perhaps the most interesting result of this is seeing which characters, or which members of a generation, are won over by his ideas and join his side. By the end of the novel, one notes that, just as in the beginning, Bazarov remains the only true nihilist; none of the people with whom he has come into contact have been moved deeply enough by his teachings to join him as a nihilist. Evgeny Vasilevich Bazarov claims that he is a nihilist, a person who believes in no principles, but rather in logic and science. As a nihilist, he saw that somehow society was wrong, and the only way to correct that was to reject commonly accepted views and belief systems, to reject the government, religion and social standards, in order to be able to start anew and build a more ideal society. On page 40, he is referred to as a `denouncer', for example. Superficially, this was easy to accept for young, idealist... ... middle of paper ... ...t in favour of the married life. Although at first, he even went as far as believing himself to be a nihilist, the deep instillation of the values of his father's generation (i.e.: romanticism, arts, love; everything rejected by Bazarov) leaves him immune to Bazarov's nihilism, as well. Though throughout the novel, the only consistent nihilist is Bazarov, a reader notes how both the generation of the fathers and the generation of the sons are affected by his influence and by nihilistic views. With examination, one can attribute the profundity of this influence to the age and education of the characters; youth being more susceptible to nihilistic ideals than its comfortably settled, traditional elder counterpart. However, every character who came into contact with Bazarov acknowledged and felt a certain respect for his nihilism, proof of its wide influence.
Hansen, Bruce. “Dostoevsky’s Theodicy.” Provo, Utah: Brigham Young University, 1996. At . accessed 18 November 2001.
Author Leo Tolstoy had a privileged upbringing however, despite the fact that he was born into the Russian nobility, he desired nothing more than to live the simple life of a peasant. As a young man attending the University of Kazan, Tolstoy was prone to gambling, drinking, smoking, and hunting. He eventually dropped out of school and gave up his sensualist lifestyle, opting for a life of simplicity. Tolstoy was an intellectual who favored the heart over the workings of the mind and, throughout his life, was skeptical of the practices of the Roman Catholic Church. He came to believe that the church was corrupt and abandoned organized religion entirely, instead developing his own set of beliefs.
Dostoyevsky's writing in this book is such that the characters and setting around the main subject, Raskolnikov, are used with powerful consequences. The setting is both symbolic and has a power that affects all whom reside there, most notably Raskolnikov. An effective Structure is also used to show changes to the plot's direction and Raskolnikov's character. To add to this, the author's word choice and imagery are often extremely descriptive, and enhance the impact at every stage of Raskolnikov's changing fortunes and character. All of these features aid in the portrayal of Raskolnikov's downfall and subsequent rise.
In the novel Fathers and Sons by Ivan Turgenev, Arcady plays a major role both in his own life and the lives of others. Arcady, despite the shield he surrounds himself with, is not a true Nihilist like his friend Bazarov through his thoughts and actions we see his change. To begin, Arcady shows signs of Romanticism Early on in the novel despite the announcement of his Nihilist beliefs. For example, Bazarov and Arcady were walking one afternoon in the garden and overheard Nicholas playing his cello.
This man is the absolute opposite of everything society holds to be acceptable. Here is a man, with intelligent insight, lucid perception, who is self-admitted to being sick, depraved, and hateful. A man who at every turn is determined to thwart every chance fate offers him to be happy and content. A man who actively seeks to punish and humiliate himself. Dostoyevsky is showing the reader that man is not governed by values which society holds to be all important.
Tolstoy portrays Ivan as a common, unassuming conformist that is more concerned with meeting society’s standards that making his own choices in order to criticize a very shallow, materialistic society dominated by aristocrats simply concerned with obtaining status and delving in pleasures above living real, authentic
Turgenev, Ivan Sergeevich. Fathers and Sons: The Author on the Novel, Contemporary Reactions, Essays in Criticism. New York: Norton, 1966. Print.
Brothers Karamazov, written by the accomplished Russian novelist - Fyodor Dostoevsky, is an ambiguous and somewhat contradictory novel when it comes to the issue of belief and disbelief in God. The ambiguity seems to represent Dostoevsky’s constant spiritual struggle with the issue of faith. This struggle is best reflected in the enlightening interactions between the two Karamazov brothers, Ivan and Alyosha throughout the novel, each appears to embody a different side on the spectrum of religious belief in Dostoevsky’s mind. They are Dostoevsky’s ultimate depiction of the conflict of faith and reason in light of the suffering in the world.
God’s divine plan for man starts and ends upon love. God provides overflowing and unconditional love so we can grasp the extent of His love for the purpose of developing our own love of self. The evolvement of our personal faith instills in us the divine sense of worth and desire, we some how come to “know” originates from our Creator. Ivan has neither grasped nor developed this love, let alone experienced this instilment. Genesis states God said, “Let us make man in our image, after our likeness” (KJV Gen 5:26). In the shared likeness of God Himself, we must assume we all have the full capacity to experience and share God’s innate love and joy. God’s sending of His son in order to redeem us, His children, is the ultimate act of both heavenly and earthly love. Through His written word and through His son, God explicitly teaches us that love and joy are the nature of His being. Man, in God’s likeness, must actively counter this nature in order to derive an attitude of suffering, through the denial of natural joy and love. Ivan is a clear example of this suffering activism, as he clearly stands against most issues rather than necessarily in agreement or support of any higher principal. In Feodor Dostoevski’s book The Brothers Karamazov, this excerpted chapter is appropriately titled “Rebellion”. Rebellion is defined as the willful resistance or defiance of an established principal or authority. In our definition of activism, Ivan’s rebellion would be considered the most aggressive and destructive form of activism.
The Great Reforms of the 1860's generated an era of social and economic turmoil in Russia. These unstable times spawned the growth of a radical intellectual group known as, the intellegencia. These new reformers or radicals were the sons and daughters of the heads of Russia. They wished to sweep away the assumptions of the romantic generation of the 1840's that "refused to accept the supremacy of reason over emotion" (Kishlanksy, Geary and O'Brien: 755) and any other non-scientifically proven truths of social, political, emotional and spiritual life in Russia. They rejected all common assumptions about serfdom, the foundations of Russian hierarchy, and its reform, including all of its social and economic ramifications. Turgenev's novel "Fathers and Sons", successfully identifies these diverse views (Romanticism vs. Realism) on reforming Russia through the depiction of its characters. Turgenev represents a contrast of old generation of liberal/conservative romantics, through the portrayals of Nicholas and Paul Kirsanov and the new radical, nihilist generation through Basarov.
...l […] his passing from one world into another” (542). Without Raskolnikov’s relationship with Sonia it would have been impossible for him to become this new man, to convert to Christian existentialism and find happiness and meaning in life.
Raskolinkov’s beliefs transform from the beginning of the novel to the ending. His theory was never complete and to test his theory he commits the murder of an evil soul. The irony of this novel is Raskolinkov who though he was an extraordinary men, have the will to commit murder but not the power to live with the crime on his hands.
Bazarov gives Fenichka a kiss which is observed by Pavel and feels it is his duty to defend his brother 's honor, and he challenges Bazarov to a duel. Pavel is wounded slightly, and Bazarov leaves Marino. Bazarov returns home and contracts typhus from performing an autopsy on a body. Arkady and Katya get married as well as his father and Fenichka. Arkady begins to manage his father estate. There are many themes in the later part of the book. In chapter 15 for the first time see Bazarov in an uncomfortable situation around Madame Odintsova. This shocks Arkady as he never seen his friend act like this before. Continuing in chapter 17 Bazarov begins to develop feelings for Madame Odintsova which he struggles with because it conflicts with his ideology of nihilism. This conflict is notice by Arkady who starts to lose faith in his friend. In chapter 20 Bazarov makes everyone uncomfortable even his parents. Like Nikolai, Vassily Ivanovitch Bazarov has tried to keep up with current events in the field of medicine to impress his son. This does not impress him saying "I 'll say this to console you,"Nowadays we make fun of medicine in general and don 't bow down before anyone." "How can that be? Don 't you want to become a doctor?" "Yes, but one thing doesn 't prevent the other.”(p.93) This shows how out of touch his father is with his sons ideology. This to some extent parallels when Nikolai learns that
...g. Sonia, being the second major character that acts as Raskolnikov’s religious mentor, brings together the religious ideas of a Christian seeking her out her own form of hope and contrasts them with Raskolnikov, a struggling character and fellow sinner. These religious elements throughout Crime and Punishment intertwined with one another leaving the reader to see Raskolnikov’s path to redemption not only as a hero’s journey, but also as a religious rebirth. In all, the religious impact throughout the novel brought a perspective to how Raskolnikov’s character developed as well as how Dostoyevsky intertwined religious meaning into his theme of a lost man trying to find meaning in a life of solitude but instead finding it in in the midst of love.
"It is not for the gods to glaze pottery . . . . Only now, at this very instant, was the whole bottomless pit of Bazarov's arrogance and pride revealed to him. So you and I are gods? Or rather, you are a god and I'm a mere lout, isn't that so?' Yes,' Bazarov repeated firmly. You're still stupid.'" (112). Not only does this remark allow Arcady to see that Bazarov had never considered him an equal, but also that Bazarov believed himself a god dwelling above all others. This prompted Arcady to reconsider his relationship with Bazarov. He realized they were never friends, but only mere traveling companions on the road of life. Arcady seemed to realize also that he was never a pure and true Nihilist. He had been drawn into that particular way of thinking by his mentor, Bazarov, not his willingness to uphold Nihilism. Turgenev does a very good job in showing the changes taking place within Arcady. His true nature is slowly revealed throughout the book and we see his way of thinking by reading about his actions. Arcady is truly a dynamic character, as can be seen by his Nihilist beliefs changing into romantic ideas. Arcady enjoys beautiful language and is also a bit of a philosopher. For example, his description of a falling leaf: "Look! A withered maple leaf has left its branch and is falling to the ground its movements resemble those of a butterfly in flight. Isn't it strange? The saddest and deadest of all things is yet so like the gayest and most vital of all creatures" (134). By the conclusion of the novel, we see that Arcady was part of the novel because he had the most influence on others as well as on himself, and also because he had the most to learn from life's experiences. He has established a life of his own. A life where he if free from Bazarov's hold and Nihilist ! ideas, and a life where he is free to be himself. His voyage: