Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Empowerment in the workplace
Empowerment in the workplace
Empowerment in the workplace
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In today’s world, the structure, content, patterns, and process of the work has changed, and this has affected the balance or power between workers and employers in the labour market. In Canada, not only the workforces are now more demographically diverse than ever, but also the organizations have shifted their ways in the way they function. The Canadian economy is becoming fast paced than ever, and this is due to competitive pressures and technological breakthroughs. Over the last two decades, there has been an evident shift in the skills that employers need from their workers. Unlike previous years, educational credentials and work experiences are now highly in demand, and it has also impacted immigration. All these factors have contributed …show more content…
Moreover, Immigration Canada has placed restrictions on required higher qualifications and changed employment requirements in order to give preference to multi-skilled workers in an ever-changing labour market (Troper, 2013). However, most Canadian companies prefer and require Canadian work experience. This recruiting strategy gives employers more power over the immigrant workers. Gogia and Slade (2011) state in their book, called Immigration, that since most employers devalue international work experience and do not draw on international academic assessment organizations to help them understand how an international degree compares with a Canadian degree, many immigrants are not fairly considered in job competitions. Because of devaluation of international credentials, experiences and professional networks, the potentially best and brightest workforce is treated as if they have no work history, no trustworthy references and questionable …show more content…
Competitive markets seem to have both positive and negative effect on skilled work force. Firms that are competing to hire from a specialized labour market may raise wages to attract and retain workers. Furthermore, ongoing competition has produced an environment where knowledge and skills are considered increasingly valued commodities in the labour market (Bouchard, 1998). However, the presence of many firms in a market does not ensure competition. Under certain conditions, firms may be able to collude with each other to create and abuse market power, for example by agreeing to raise prices or by restricting output (thereby raising prices) to consumers or by restricting wage growth for workers (“CEA”, 2016). This means not appreciating human capital and not investing in enhancing the skills that workers bring to the organization, leaving no room for workers’ growth. Moreover, due to high global competition, increase in outsourcing, and technology taking over, employers tend not to invest much in
Top management is spending too much time on employee development and not enough on the overall strategy of the business.
This article stated that, according to a study conducted by the United Way and Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), approximately 40% of young workers in Ontario are in jobs classified as part-time, temporary or self-employed. The same study also found that less than half of part-time/temporary workers were able to transition into full-time higher-wage work and, perhaps most importantly, the percentage of those able to transition will likely decline over the next decade. Clearly, the growth of part-time and temporary jobs has been growing on an upward trend over the past decade and appears to have become part of business as usual. A study conducted in 2015 by the United Way and the Law Commission of Ontario (LCO) states that approximately 22% of part-time/temporary work in the past year can be characterized as precarious work, i.e. work with poor or no benefits and job security. The growth in precarious employment is due to many factors including Globalization, improved technology, changes to business models, and the economic shift from manufacturing to the service sector. These shifts have essentially formed a new economy that has a high demand for fluidity and flexibility in the common workplace, and has low a demand for the old fashioned “Standard” model of the workplace (largely full-time employees with a full suite of
Canadian workplaces today seem to be a fairly diverse place, with a blend of many religions, ethnicities, and genders present. However, although people preach affirmative action and melting pots in current times, many inequality and power issues still abound. One strikingly noticeable example is gender discrimination. Women in the workforce face many challenges like smaller wages, harassment, male privilege in hiring or promotions, and lack of support when pregnant or raising children. One half of the planet is women, and it can be assumed the same for Canada, but they still face judgment at work because they lack the authority to dispute against big corporations or even their male supervisor. It cannot be argued that Canadian women’s status has worsened over the past hundred years, of course, thanks to feminism and activism. However, their status is not as high as it could be. Women as a group first started fighting for workplace equality during the second wave of feminism, from the 1960s to the 1990s. Legislation was approved during the second wave to try to bring gender equality to the workplace. Feminists both collided and collaborated with unions and employers to ensure women received fair treatment in an occupation. Quebec had the same issues, only the province approached the conflict differently than English Canada with its own unique viewpoint. It became clear that women were entering the workplace and did not plan on leaving. Second-wave feminism in Canada shifted power from the government and businesses to women in order to try to bring equality, although the discrimination never completely disappeared.
One of the biggest factors for immigration is Canada’s economy. Skilled worker immigrants or the Economic class
Carnegie states, “Under the law of competition, the employer of thousands is forced into the strictest economies, among which the rates paid to labor figure prominently, and often there is friction between employer and the employed, between capital and labor, between rich and poor” (393). It is this competitive nature which allows the hardest working individuals to rise above their peers, create personal wealth and continue to accumulate wealth. Competition is a beneficial to capitalism. A company can produce an item and sell the
Teelucksingh, C., & Edward-Galabuzi, G. (2005). C. Teelucksingh & G. Edward-Galabuzi (Eds.), Working Precariously: The impact of race and immigrants status on employment opportunities and outcomes in CanadaToronto: The Canadian Race Relations Foundation.
Canada has continuously served as a home to immigrants and refugees from decade to decade harbouring people from a variety of cultural and ethnic backgrounds. The first set of immigrants to settle in the country came from Britain, the United States and from other nationalities mostly including immigrants from Europe who were either desperate to escape from religious or political turmoil or were simply attracted to Canada’s economic promise. Soon after the Canadian confederation in 1867, immigrants from Irish and Chinese backgrounds who occupied most of the country were used as workers and the demand for labourers to develop the country increased rapidly as more Chinese descents were imported to build the Canadian Pacific Railway. Although, Canada opened its doors to immigrants, but the country also intended to gain human resources for work in the farms, in the forests, factories and mines but not everyone was equally welcomed in Canada.
The integration of immigrants in Canada (or any country for that matter) involves integration into three different domains: the social sphere, the economic sphere, and the institutional sphere. (12) Integration into the social sphere refers to immigrants’ ability to create relationships and have social interactions with other Canadians. Integration into the economic sphere refers to immigrants’ ability to enter the labour force and work in jobs that match their qualifications, while integration into the institutional domain refers to immigrants’ ability to become “fully functional citizens, without facing systemic barriers emanating from the structure and functioning of major institutions. A well-integrated immigrant group is one which faces no institutional obstacles, no market disadvantage, and no social isolation.” (12)
Racial discrimination in the workplace has been a persistent theme in Canada’s history as well as present-day times. The occurrence of actions and attitudes that impose a sense of one being less equal than another on the basis of one’s race in Canada’s workplace inhibits both our nation’s ability to move forward as well as strengthen unification within our country. The belief in a more egalitarian society, where one’s race and ethnic background have little to no impact on employees (or potential employees) standings within the job market, would seemingly be reinforced by the majority of Canadians, who consistently show support for Canada’s multicultural identity. Couple that with the noticeable strides Canada has made in the past several decades through legislation, in order to eliminate discriminatory practices and actions within the workplace, and one would likely assume that racial discrimination within the workplace is largely a concern of the past. However, current research supports the argument that the level of which racial discrimination occurs today is increasing, and as such it persists to be a key problem in the current workplace of the nation. In the workplace, racial discrimination is often seen with regard to uneven access to jobs, unfair selection and promotion criteria (as well as access to the means in order to meet this criteria), and workplace harassment. This paper compares similar findings of two articles; the first, Racial inequality in employment in Canada, as was published in the Canadian Public Administration (CPA), and the second, What Are Immigrants’ Experiences of Discrimination in the Workplace?, published by the Toronto Immigrant Employment Data Initiative (TIEDI).
Canada's immigration policies changed many times after the end of WWII. Before WWII the immigration policies were "picky" on the people who wanted to come to Canada, but after, it was fair and equal to everyone. Canada's immigration policies changed drastically from being discriminative to being fair and equal to everyone, every country and race after WWII. This act to eliminating discrimination was successful because of; the introduction of the Point System, the introduction of New Immigration acts/policies, and finally the changes made in accepting Refugees. These action completely changed the immigration policies.
Work is more than just a way of earning money to pay the bills; it is also a key feature of our culture and provides people with purpose and dignity. Many people define themselves by what they do. Thus, determining the future prospects for the job market in Canada is very important (Watson 2008). For the most part, Canada’s economy has done relatively well during the recent economic crisis, especially when compared to some other nations. However, the economic and technological trends that have driven changes in the workforce in recent years are likely to continue for the near future. These shifting trends will affect Canadian society and its workers in a number of areas, and it is vital that steps be taken to deal with any problems that result.
Currently, the Federal Skilled Worker Program (FSWP), administered by Citizenship and Immigration Canada (CIC), supports the entry of skilled workers including senior managers in business and other sectors to meet current labour market needs. Applicants to FSWP are eligible if they meet all admissibility requirements and obtain 67 out of a possible 100 points. To increase the number of innovative business managers, a pilot project to ascribe additional points to skilled managers who have demonstrated experience in utilizing innovative business practices and technologies will be launched. An advisory panel comprised of members from the business community and educational institutions will establish the criteria determining the threshold for these additional points, and would review this on an ongoing basis. The advisory panel will then make recommendations regarding the threshold to CIC, who is responsible for operationalizing
In order for hiring managers to best promote non-discriminatory recruitment practices, they needs to understand the purpose of the fundamental legal requirements. Discrimination refers to “any refusal to employ or to continue to employ any person, or to aversely affect any current employees, on the basis of that individuals membership in a protected group” (Catano, Hackett and Wiesner, 2016, pg,67). Canadian jurisdictions prohibits discrimination at least on the basis of race, colour, religion, ancestry, age, sex, marital status, and physical or mental disability” (Catano, Hackett and Wiesner, 2016, pg.67). There are several ways that recruitment and selection process can be discriminatory, therefore there are some conceptual issues that need to be understood. The four issues that needs to be understood are the constitution law, human rights legislation, employment equity and labour law, employment standards, privacy legislation and related legislation.