Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Literary criticism of raymond carver
Prejudice as a theme
Literary criticism of raymond carver
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Inherent to Raymond Carver’s work “Cathedral,” are the themes of ignorance and prejudice as they lead to the confinement and isolation of the narrator. Carver makes these themes apparent to the reader through his distinct plot, point of view, relative tone, and use of dialogue. Carver endures a personal transformation that is demonstrated through the use of irony and symbolism. Through his profound use of symbolism and vivid imagery, Carver exemplifies a dramatic development of character that is central to the narrative as a whole and ultimately gives the narrative an unexpected turn. Carver illustrates how the plot of the narrative gives way to understand how the narrator becomes this ignorant person, expresses his tone to show the way he …show more content…
The reader is offered a clear vision of the narrator’s ignorance and prejudice by having intimate access to the narrator’s mental process. All the while, the tone expressed gives a major sense of the way he acts out towards others and himself from his ignorant nature. The entire narrative occurs in one night as the narrator hosts a guest at his house. The narrator explains to his wife that he is not thrilled about this guest; a blind man named Robert who has a history with his wife. The narrator claims he believes “the blind” to be gloomy and miserable, which he bases solely off of movie characters and his imagination, clearly demonstrating his infamous ignorance. This supposition adds a dramatic tone. Additionally, it expresses the first hints of the narrator’s ignorance towards humanity and his limited viewpoints. He says, “A blind man in my house was not something I looked forward to” …show more content…
He becomes snide and nasty as he communicates with Robert, the audience, and himself. He is bitter about the fact that Robert, unfamiliar company from the outside world, is coming to visit, not to mention he is blind. Blindess is a trait that the narrator clearly puts a bad connotation on, also expressing his hostile tone. When Robert’s wife, who passed away from cancer, is brought up in conversation, the narrator’s wife becomes extremely irritated by his reaction. "I don't have any blind friends," I said. "You don't have any friends," she said. "Period. Besides," she said, "goddamn it, his wife's just died! Don't you understand that? The man's lost his wife!" I didn't answer. She'd told me a little about the blind man's wife. Her name was Beulah. Beulah! That's a name for a colored woman. "Was his wife a Negro?" I
He constantly complains that “a blind man in my house was not something [he looked] forward to” (362). The close friendship between the narrator’s wife and Robert provokes his insecurities. This friendship has lasted for ten years and during those years, they have exchanged countless tapes regarding experiences they have gone through. Because of this, her husband feels “she [has] told him everything or it seems” (363) about their relationship. Upon the arrival of his wife’s friend, the husband is ultimately uncomfortable around Robert because he does not know how to communicate with or act around him.
Raymond Carver’s short story “Cathedral” opens with a narrator whose wife has invited a blind friend to spend the night. The narrator depersonalizes the man right off the bat and repeatedly throughout the story by referring to him, not by name, but as “the blind man” (Carver 513). He admits that hi...
The close outside friendship between the narrator’s wife and Robert, the blind man, provokes the narrator’s insecurities. This friendship has lasted for ten long years. During those years, they have exchanged countless voice tapes wherein they both tell each other what has happened in their respective lives. Because of this, the narrator feels that his wife has told Robert more than Robert needs to know. The narrator laments, "she told him everything or so it seemed to me" (1054). The narrator’s fear is somehow confirmed when Robert arrives and says that he feels like they have already met (1055). The narrator is left wondering what his wife has disclosed. This murky situation leaves the narrator feeling insecure, especially when he sees the warm interaction between his wife and Robert.
The narrator is biased against the blind from the beginning. For instance, he stereotypes all blind people thinking they ...
The speaker's prejudice was nearly overwhelming at the opening of the story. "His being blind bothered me," he said. "A blind man in my house was not something I looked forward to." He had never really come in personal contact with anyone before who was blind, and seemed to have no idea of what to expect. He admittedly gathered a stereotypical mind set about blind people from movies, assuming they "moved slowly and never laughed."
The usage of first person point of view traps the reader within the mind of a character who is closed off and narrow-minded for the duration of the story in such a way that it “tell 's nothing, but shows everything (Messer)” at the same time. In this way, the reader goes through the series of realizations with the narrator which convey the message of blindness in correlation with true sight and a spiritual awakening. For instance, the narrator can only feel pity for Robert’s wife, Beulah, because he was never able to see her. He imagined that Robert 's wife “could, if she wanted, wear green eye-shadow around one eye, a straight pin in her nostril, yellow slacks, and purple shoes” (Mays). However, none of this really matted to Robert, and the narrator finds it utterly pathetic. Yet, the narrator never really understands the fact that he does not really know his own wife, regardless of the fact that he can physically see her. Additionally, within the first paragraph, Carver uses demonstratives and possessives to draw the reader close to the Narrator of the story while also constructing a psychological distance between the narrator and other characters in the story (Peterson). In this paragraph, Carver uses the demonstrative “this” as a word to indicate distance, metaphorically, between the narrator and Robert (Peterson). In particular the sentence, “This blind man, an old friend of my wife 's, he was on his way to spend the night (Mays 33)” demonstrates the use of this as a specific person while showing the distance and dislike the narrator has of Robert. As a result, the narrators prejudice is presented to the reader in a way that shows his blindness as
From the beginning of the story, and throughout most of it until the end, the narrator makes comments about his dislike for blind people. He is unwilling to meet Robert, his wife’s friend of 10 years because he can’t see. The narrator is so fixed on his physical handicap that it makes him unable to try and get to know Robert’s character at all. His
The limitations that were holding the narrator back were abolished through a process from which a blind man, in some sense, cured a physically healthy man. The blind man cured the narrator of these limitations, and opened him up to a whole world of new possibilities. Robert enabled the narrator to view the world in a whole new way, a way without the heavy weights of prejudice, jealousy, and insecurity holding him down. The blind man shows the narrator how to see.
One example that shows that the husband is "blind" is shown in the beginning of the story before Robert arrives to his home. When the husband and wife talk about Robert, the husband usually refers to him as "This blind man..." (Carver 237). The narrator never uses Robert’s name when referring to him. This shows that the husband does not really see Robert as a person, but just as a blind man who is different because of his disability to physically see. When Robert arrives to the house, the husband does not know what to say to him. The husband asks questions that would normally be unacceptable to ask a blind person about the view from the train. “Which side of the train did you sit on?” (240). The husband knows that Robert cannot see the view, but he asks him rude questions anyway. The husband also thinks to himself, "I didn’t know what to say to that,” (242). This is a clear indication that the narrator does not know how to relate to Robert. Both of these quotations show that the husband does not know what to talk about with Robert becau...
The husband in Raymond Carvers “Cathedral” wasn’t enthusiastic about his wife’s old friend, whom was a blind man coming over to spend the night with them. His wife had kept in touch with the blind man since she worked for him in Seattle years ago. He didn’t know the blind man; he only heard tapes and stories about him. The man being blind bothered him, “My idea of blindness came from the movies. In the movies, the blind moved slowly and never laughed. Sometimes they were led by seeing-eye dogs. A blind man in my house was not something I looked forward to. (Carver 137)” The husband doesn’t suspect his ideas of blind people to be anything else. The husband is already judging what the blind man will be like without even getting to actually know him. It seems he has judged too soon as his ideas of the blind man change and he gets a better understanding of not only the blind man, but his self as well.
The narrator is jealous of their 10-year-old connection and isn’t hesitant to share it with reader, it becomes clear that one of key differences among these relationship is simply appreciation. The wife plays such an important role in the life of the blind man and feels acknowledged and regarded by him. On the other side, the narrator appears to have a lack of appropriate recognition for his spouse. When the storyteller shares his thoughts about the poem written by his wife, he states, “I didn’t think much of the poem” (Carver 34). Ultimately, while he shows no support to his significant other, the blind man fills in that emotional void with much needed gratefulness. I agree with KEEPING THE READER when he writes, “His [narrator] problem is that he does not ‘see’ his wife in the sense that he does not seek to understand who she is. The apparent difference between the men is that Robert, despite his physical lack of vision, is open to new experiences. (Clark 108). Clearly, the storyteller keeps himself emotionally disconnected from his wife and speaks of her past experiences, “He talks about her suicide attempt and previous marriage in a coldly analytical way, as if he can barely believe that it truly happened” (Clark 109). In addition, the narrator’s tone seems tense while describing the physical occurrence between his wife and Robert, “she told me he touched his fingers to every part of her face, her nose – even her neck! She never forgot it. She even tried to write a poem about it” (Carver 34). This kind of memory wouldn’t set well with no man, especially the storyteller. I see eye to eye with Mark Facknitz when he writes, “Robert sexually threatens the narrator, with his blindness, and by virtue of being a representative of a past that is meaningful to the wife” (Facknitz 293). The narrator can’t embrace the fact that the past can
The blind man is invited to stay with the Carver’s by Raymond’s wife for he has just been through the death of his own wife and is now alone. Even this being the case, Raymond Carver’s distaste for the blind man is evident from the first paragraph on. “I wasn’t enthusiastic about his visit. He was no one I knew. And his being blind bothered me.” (506) Carver’s distaste for Robert is blatantly apparent even subsequent to his arrival at their home. It also becomes quite clear that his wife disapproves of his attitude toward Robert and fails to see how he could be so self-centered. “My wife finally took her eyes off the blind man and looked at me. I had the feeling she didn’t like what she saw. I shrugged” (509)
The narrator's insensitivity reveals itself early in the story when his wife's blind friend, Robert, comes for a visit after the death of his wife. Almost immediately in the beginning of the story the narrator admits "A blind man in my house was not something I looked forward to." [Carver 2368] He even goes so far as to suggest to his wife that he take the man bowling. He hears the story of Robert's dead wife and can not even imagine " what a pitiful life this woman must have led." [Carver 2370] The narrator is superficial, only recognizing the external part of people and not recognizing the value of a person on the inside.
In Raymond Carver's "Cathedral," the husband's view of blind men is changed when he encounters his wife's long time friend, Robert. His narrow minded views and prejudice thoughts of one stereotype are altered by a single experience he has with Robert. The husband is changed when he thinks he personally sees the blind man's world. Somehow, the blind man breaks through all of the husband's jealousy, incompetence for discernment, and prejudgments in a single moment of understanding.
The husband's view on the world at the start of the story was a narrow one that was based on his ignorance, which prevented him from gaining understanding. His long held misconceptions, especially about blindness, defined his expectations about things he did not understand. For instance, when the husband found out that Robert was coming to stay, he disliked the idea of someone who was blind, let alone someone who he didn't know, coming to visit and the husband's "idea of blindness came from the movies." He saw the blind people as people who "moved slowly and never laughed." This was not the limit of his ignorance as it was further displayed by his constant referral of Robert as "the blind man" and his assumption of Robert's deceased wife being a black person based solely on the name of Beulah. This assumption display his bigotry is not limited to Robert's blindness and that differences that he did not understan...