Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Authority and power in government
Ethical values and their importance
Morality and moral decisions
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Authority and power in government
“If God does not exist, everything is permitted.” by Fyodor Dostoyevsky is a popular phrase used by theists, theologians and conservatives when questioned about the connection between faith in God and morality. In other words it is claimed that without the belief in a supreme supernatural figure who maintains law and order in the whole of cosmos, a man cannot regulate himself as a socially and morally acceptable individual. This in fact presents a major logical fallacy since it is based on a belief of reward and punishment in the after-life, which doesn’t always imply in the case of theist, who according to research in the area of social psychology has shown having innate human desire of social acceptance and a sense of control, which can only be acquired by establishing a co-relation between supreme authority and morality. Morality can therefore be argued as a separate entity, built on what society see as lawful and just and free from religious obligations.
We as humans have a tendency to belief in an authority figure. Someone who has control and can provide us with laws or simply rules of living. We are so accustomed to having lawmakers and enforcers, that the conception of having none has a ring of chaos to it. The thought of having none simply depolarizes our compass and brings the feeling of chaos and confusion. Therefore our brain resort to making connection between authority and a sense of rightfulness. The chain begins with God- the ultimate ruler of the universe, followed by our government and all the way down to law enforcers. This chain of thought is explained by Dr Shermer in his book the “the believing brain’’. His words “We form our beliefs for a variety of subjective, personal, emotional, and psychological reasons i...
... middle of paper ...
...N, Genocide, Children, Women, Violence, Holocaust,." UN News Center. UN, 09 Apr. 2014.
< http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/Oxfordpaper.pdf>
Hamdani, Yasser Latif. "Do Ahmadis Deserve to Live in Pakistan?" Ahmadiyya Times. 09 Apr. 2014.
< http://ahmadiyyatimes.blogspot.com/2012/08/religious-intolerance-do-ahmadis.html>
Hamdani, Yasser Latif. "Are Ahmadis Non-Muslims?" Pak Tea House. 09 Apr. 2014.
< http://pakteahouse.net/2011/12/15/are-ahmadis-non-muslims>
Jinnah, Muhammad Ali. "Jinnah's Quotes." – Wikiquote. 09 Apr. 2014.
< http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Muhammad_Ali_Jinnah>
"Lahore Tense after Mosques' Attacks - Central & South Asia." - Al Jazeera English.28 May 2009
< http://www.aljazeera.com/news/asia/2010/05/2010528923401784.html>
"Nuremberg Laws." Wikipedia. Wikimedia Foundation, 04 Aug. 2014. Web. 09 Apr. 2014.
“Religion Gives Meaning to Life” outlines how life is given meaning through theistic religion in Louis Pojman’s opinion. In this short reading, autonomy is described as in the meaning of freedom or self-governing and argues how it is necessary for ideal existence. By being honest and faithful with ourselves shows how we can increase our autonomy. “I think most of us would be willing to give up a few autonotoms for an enormous increase in happiness” (553) shows our willingness to practice good purpose.
Major newspapers around the world wrote about Masih’s story, even though it was often demoted towards the end of the newspaper. It was not long before both the media and the public disregarded it. A little less than seven thousand miles away from Pakistan, however, another 12-year-old boy in Thornhill, Canada devoted Masih’s story to memory, an undertaking that signified the beginning ...
Mere Christianity is divided into four books or sections that build and expand off of the prior. The first book is entitled “Right and wrong as a clue to the meaning of the universe” and he examines the common understanding among all men of a universal moral law hardwired in the minds of men. He begins this examination with a presentation of man’s concept of right and wrong. The simplest understanding among all men is the concept of fairness. This fair play points to a law and can be seen in the reactions of mankind to justice and injustice. He contrasts this moral law, the Law of Human Nature, with the law of nature found in the world. The mind of the moral relativist denies such standards yet fail to recognize their call for fairness as a fatal flaw in their reasoning.
In Western society and culture, religion and morality have often intertwined and they have reflected their values onto each other. Today it is sometimes impossible to make a distinction between the two, since their influence has transcended generations. In modern Western culture, religion and society preach conformity. In order to be a “good” person, one must conform to the values imposed by the church1 and state.
Broadly, the divine command theory is a religious moral code in which God’s commands determine what human beings should or should not do. As such, it is expected for theists to subscribe to the divine command theory of morality. The deontological interpretation of the divine command theory separates actions into one of the following categories: mandatory for human beings to perform, prohibited for human beings to perform, or optional for human beings to perform. Those actions that are mandatory to perform are ones which have been expressly commanded by God. Failing to commit a mandatory action would be defying God’s commands, and thus, according to the divine command theory of morality, immoral. Actions that are prohibited are ones that God expressly commands human beings do not perform. Consequently, to perform a prohibited action would be immoral. Finally, those actions that God does not expressly command that human beings should perform or should avoid performing are optional; there are no moral implications to performing or not performing such acts. The rightness or wrongness of an action is inherently and wholly dependent upon th...
Morality and ethics have always been a large source of debate and contention between different factions of various interests, beliefs, and ideals due to its centrality and foundational role in society and civilization and incredible importance to everyday life and decision making. In many of these disputes religious belief, or a lack thereof, serves as an important driving force behind one or both sides of the argument. In the modern world, one of the bigger instances of this can be seen in the many debates between Atheistic and religious individuals about the implications of religious belief on morality. One of the most famous Atheists, Christopher Hitchens, asserts that religion is not only unnecessary for morality, but actually impedes it. In his work God is Not Great: Why Religion Poisons Everything, Christopher Hitchens challenges religious believers to “name an ethical statement or action, made or performed by a person of faith that could not have been made or performed by a non-believer”, and proudly states afterwards that many have made the attempt but no one has given him a satisfactory answer. However, the best response to this challenge is to point out the inherent flaws in his logic, the unfairness of his challenge, and the fact that Hitchens is asking the wrong question in the first place.
The statement by Dostoevsky is directly related to the scope of the divine command theory, as it is also based on viewing God as the main source of moral norms, and considering morality impossible without the existence of God. Let us consider the reasons that may have led to both the creation of th...
Religion is an organized collection of beliefs and cultural systems that entail the worship of a supernatural and metaphysical being. “Religion just like other belief systems, when held onto so much, can stop one from making significant progress in life”. Together with religion come traditions that provide the people with ways to tackle life’s complexities. A subscription to the school of thought of great scholars
Bhutto, Benazir. “Three Victims of Terrorism.” 2002. World Views: Classic and Contemporary Readings, 6th ed. Eds. Darren Felty et al. Boston: Pearson Custom, 2010. 293-304. Print. Web. 22 Apr. 2014.
Goodstein, Laurie. "Islam: Not in My Backyard?" New York Times Upfront 20 Sept. 2010. Print.
In Pojman’s essay, “Religion Gives Meaning to Life,” he presents eight premises of what theism would make true. Pojman’s deems religion provides life meaning; whereas a secular life is not significant to the way individuals view the world. He argues that autonomy is freedom with no restrictions and religion gives meaning and purpose to life, even though there are sacrifices to our freedom. Pojman suggests a number of conditions that something must meet in order to count as what we might call a "meaning maker" for life (Matheson, Lecture 5). One of these conditions is premises three, individuals comprehend and know that God loves and cares for us; this love that we have from God offers humans the motivation needed to live a morally good life (Pojman, Louis P. "Religion Gives Meaning to Life.” The Meaning of Life). Ultimately, people live morally good lives since God is known to love all children, which influences those t...
In God and Objective morality: A debate, Craig interprets the objective morality and states that the existence of God is the only foundation of objective morality. My purpose of this paper is to argue against Craig’s argument. My thesis is objective morality does exist in society to both theists and atheist, and the foundation of the moral value to individuals does not have to be God. For an atheist, God is also an abstract and not reliable foundation. Social harmony is the general foundation of moral value in modern society, and it is objective without the existence of God. In §1, I present the Craig’s argument and explain the motivation of each premise. §2, I present my critique and show that Craig’s argument fails. In §3, I defend against possible rebuttal.
It seems as if the constant argument of how much religion should play a role in our lives will never end. The Divine Command Theory is a theory in which one may receive a revelation from God telling them that doing a certain thing is good. This meta-ethical theory states that actions are only good if God deems they are good. This statement poses various advantages, disadvantages, and arguments as to whether we should conduct our morality based upon the acceptance of a higher being. Many religions are based upon the idea of reward and punishment for good and bad deeds, respectively, and this is a great problem that critics bring to the front.
Thesis Statement: This paper intends to discuss that morality should not be the basis of
Hamdani, Yasser L. "Do Ahmadis Deserve to Live in Pakistan?" Editorial. The Friday Times Aug.-Sept. 2012: n. pag. The Friday Times. Web. 08 Apr. 2014. .