I Know Why The Caged Bird Cannot Read Analysis

613 Words2 Pages

True education is the process of developing the ability to learn, apply, unlearn, and relearn. Schools mostly serve to give their students a true education, but they should focus on teaching students the facts instead of focusing on topics that should be learned outside of the classroom.
In literature, schools often teach students the morals of a book rather than actual knowledge that they should acquire in the classroom such as literary devices or sentence structure. In Francine Prose’s, “I Know Why the Caged Bird Cannot Read,” she discusses how teaching students to only focus on the moral of a book instead of the many different literary elements it contains, effects their passion for reading. “A friend’s daughter’s English teacher informed a group of parents that the only reason to study Huckleberry Finn was to decide whether it was a racist text.” (94) This acknowledges that schools do not focus on important aspects of the books. The main point that Prose forms in her essay is that students are no longer required to read a piece of literature in depth, they only have to read to identify and learn the moral, when …show more content…

It is chosen and foreordained, and he only holds the key to his own secret.” (102) In “Education”, Ralph Waldo Emerson provides his thoughts on what he believes to be a true education. Emerson wrote that the student should be allowed to determine what type of education he or she receives. He is stating that the student should have the opportunity to learn what is needed for them to succeed in life. He also makes a point that educators should direct their teachings towards factual knowledge only, keeping lessons that should be taught in the real world separate from the classroom. Emerson makes this point because students should not have to learn morals or life lessons in the classroom out of a book, students should get to learn from experiences, so they benefit more from

Open Document