Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effectiveness of humor in persuasion
Effectiveness of humor in persuasion
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effectiveness of humor in persuasion
For centuries, humor has been utilized as a catalyst for bringing tears of joy and endless laughter to people in a variety of cultures and settings around the world. Its impact and influence can be seen in everything ranging from comedies to commercials. Throughout the years, humor has proven itself to be an effective tool in persuasion and more specifically, persuasive messages. Like any other persuasive tool, though, the effect that humor has on the audience that's receiving the persuasive message can be either positive or negative. Depending on whether this effect is negative or positive, humor can either support or limit the effectiveness of persuasion theories. Positive aspects of humor can be easily seen in the fact that audiences are …show more content…
It is essential that humor is only applied once the variables of the situation are considered. If these variables are not thoroughly considered, the persuasive message could be received negatively by the audience, thus limiting the effects of persuasion. One example of the risks in using humor is with controversial situations/topics. In terms of controversial topics, it is best to avoid humor. In many cases, using humor could backfire on the source and cause outrage. In these sorts of situations, it is best that non-humor persuasive messages/advertisements be used. Another risk is that not everyone take kindly to the humor that is used. Some may be offended by the type of humor that is used in the persuasive message. Offending a very powerful person or a large number of people can cast a negative light on the message and the source (Yoon, 2015, p.126). A third risk deals with the strength of the message itself. If the persuasive message itself is weak, then there's only so much that humor can do to strengthen it. This means that humor is a helpful tool for strengthening/enhancing a strong persuasive message. However, it will not my make a poorly-crafted one strong. Due to this, it is essential that the persuasive message itself is strong. Humor should only be used to enhance it (Lyttle, 2001, …show more content…
This theory states that how you feel about something becomes information that your mind uses to evaluate something. Humor plays key role in this. For example, a person may prefer a humor advertisement as opposed to a non-humor advertisement. His reason for preferring this may be because he feels more at ease when he sees an ad that makes him laugh. This will influence the way in which he evaluates ads. He will probably will be more likely to listen and less likely to disagree with a commercial that involves humor because that is what makes him comfortable. On the other hand, he will be less likely to agree with or feel at-ease with commercials that don't involve any humor at all (Magee,
In the Jordan Spieth commercial they used humor as a message appeal. In the commercial Jordan Spieth is talking to his caddy about whether he should use a fork or spoon for his macaroni. This commercial relates to golf fans and sports fans in general. A simple commercial like this is good for humor and draws a bigger audience than if this commercial had no humor and was a regular golf commercial with no humor.
For example, the comedy shows The Tonight Show Starring Jimmy Fallon expresses satirical humor concerning politics. His show also demonstrates political satire by telling jokes and even impersonating political figures for the audience. He creates humor through sarcasm that focuses on real issues. His sarcastic humor causes others to feel more confident in their criticism toward politicians. For example, “Jimmy Fallon expresses his humor about Donald Trump, impersonating his appearance and imitating his voice while talking about politics. He uses his humor by impersonating Donald Trump and his sweeping generalizations with Madea (Rogo).” Jimmy Fallon shows people his views through humor and it creates a sense of community to express their agreeable and disagreeable views. As we discussed some ideas about satirical humor that affects political changes, it was important to reveal their feelings about changes in life and drove them to look upon their society or government more
Psychologists, sociologists and anthropologists study humor because it is a fundamental culture value, but they still can’t determine why certain things make some people laugh and others not. There are “humor quotient” tests that are designed to measure an individual’s sense of humor, but these tests are questionable. These tests aren’t accurate because almost all humor depends on cultural background knowledge and language skills. Not every person in the whole world, or even in one country share the same background knowledge and skills, therefore they cannot have the same type of humor. “The fact remains that individuals vary in their appreciation of humor” (Rappoport 9). Since humor varies from individual to individual, humor lies in the individual. How successful or funny a joke is depends on how the person receives the joke, humor cannot be measured by a statistical
Steve Almond’s “Funny is the New Deep” talks of the role that comedy has in our current society, and most certainly, it plays a huge role here. Namely, through what Almond [Aristotle?] calls the “comic impulse”, we as a people can speak of topics that would otherwise make many of uncomfortable. Almond deems the comic impulse as the most surefire way to keep heavy situations from becoming too foreboding. The comic impulse itself stems from our ability and unconscious need to defend and thus contend with the feeling of tragedy. As such, instead of rather forcing out humor, he implies that humor is something that is not consciously forced out from an author, but instead is more of a subconscious entity, coming out on its own. Almond emphasizes
When there is humor involved people seem to enjoy things way better, the reason for this is that people will
“The practical disengagement of humor…helps explain the opposition between amusement and negative emotions.” (530) There are three effects of humor; irresponsibility, blocking compassion, and promoting prejudice. Humor can take away what we are/should be doing in life and sometimes there isn’t anything wrong with that. Sometimes when we hear a hateful thing we just laugh it off as if it was no big deal when it really was. “An
According to Everything’s an Argument by Andrea A. Lunsford and John J. Ruszkiewicz, “Humor has always played an important role in argument…” (38). Humor itself is something that activates amusement or laughter. Moreover, in popular culture satire is a tool that is used to point out things in our society. Satire opens the minds of people to philosophies they might completely deny, using humor. There are many elements of satire that identify flaws within our society. A couple of satire elements that will be discussed are irony and exaggeration. In addition, a parody is used in popular culture as a way to mock or mimic situation or person.
Humor can come in many different forms. Many people are aware of the blatant humor of slapstick, but it takes a keener mind to notice the subtle detail in sarcasm or satire. In A Modest Proposal, Jonathan Swift was able to create a piece of literature addressing the faults of the Irish culture while embedding in a humorous essay. Swift’s satire allows for the gravity of the Irish standings to be exploited under the disguise of a proposal for economic benefit.
Scholl, J. (2007). The use of humor to promote patient-centered care. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 35(2), 156-176.
Humor is more than just amusing entertainment to pass the time. Though jokes and witty banter can be shallow, humor can go deeper than surface level to convey messages to audiences who would otherwise be close-minded about certain ideas. Humor is a great tool to get audiences to change the way they think, feel, and act. In “Saying Goodbye to Yang,” Alexander Weinstein uses humor to criticize some of society’s faults such as the way it has become heavily reliant on technology, racially insensitive, and judgmental.
In Alain de Botton’s book, Status Anxiety, he argues that the aim of humorists is not solely entertainment, but also to convey a message that isn’t always okay to state directly. There are many places where his argument can apply. Even with humor, some topics are still too controversial to joke about; However, in most cases, humor can lighten things up and make it easier to discuss topics that otherwise would not be as easy to talk about without heavy arguments. There are many cases that would make his argument true. There are many examples that support his argument, and that help to show the importance of humor in arguing, including cartoons, comics, works of literature, and also when thinking of hosts of television programs.
Persuasion is a process by which the persuader, through communication, gains the approval or support for the topic (Let's Compare Motivate and Persuade, 2013). The arguments to motivate this change in thinking comes through careful use of rhetoric, but one must also be able to define the six principles of persuasion in social psychology: “Reciprocity, Scarcity, Authority, Commitment and Consistency, Consensus, and Liking” (McLean, 2010, p. 521) and be able to recognize them as they are taking place. Then, one must carefully apply these concepts in order to find the means to effectively facilitate persuasion (p. 518).
James Conroy argues that laughter in serious topics has been regarded through the ages as dangerous, deviant, and subversive; yet equally as refreshing, challenging, and constructive. Political humor is extensively used in almost all countries, but political satire is perceived differently from one country to another. The research question is as follows: what factors make political satire an effective tool that affects politics and policy? I argue that humor is more influential when blended with serious topics, such as international relations or politics. Laughter is a great means to put serious topics under the lenses of critical thinking. The use of humor, and political satire specifically can bring about serious political change. Humor can play all sorts of roles in the political process through being informative, educational and influential while keeping its captive entertaining
If there is one way to bring a smile to someone’s face, it is laughter. Funny jokes, comical stunts, sarcasm- Every person is different when it comes to what makes them laugh. Some find dry humor comical. Others think sarcasm or joke-filled ranting are the best. ‘Comedy’ is such a broad term, broad enough to allow everyone to find something they find comical. In fact, ‘comedy’ includes a specific type of drama, one where the protagonist is joyful and happy endings are expected. Comedy is like a drug; it allows you to escape reality. When we say the word ‘comedy’ in the present, we are generally referring to a type of performance which provides humor. However, in its broadest sense, comedy has only one purpose: comedy makes people smile and
Humor has been the source of entertainment throughout history. Today humor is practiced in movies, plays, songs, television shows and radio. Humor has brought fame and fortune to those who have mastered its power.