More handpicked essays just for you.
Cultural influences personality
Examine various understandings of the concept of free will
Perspective on humanistic theory
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
All of these theories, I believe are imperfect. I will explain the differences between the Humanistic Perspective and the Sociocultural Perceptive and I will provide background information on the different theorist’s. First, the definition for Humanistic Perceptive is a clinical viewpoint emphasizing human ability, growth, potential, and free will. With this perspective, identification with other human beings is the most important aspect or association. Humanistic perceptive is focused on each individual's potential and it stresses the importance of growth and self-actualization. The fundamental belief of this perspective is that people are naturally good and that mental and social complications result from deviations from this natural tendency. Human beings are motivated by a need of personal growth and fulfillment. This perceptive offers free will to allow them to pursue things that will help them achieve their full potential. People are constantly looking for new ways to grow, to become better, to learn new things, and to grow. This is what the Humanistic perceptive is all about. …show more content…
It is built upon the idea that culture and society are necessary factors that influence personal development. It is believed that we are all shaped by our environment and we are influenced by our authority figures. For example, if a child is in an environment where some sort of abuse is occurring, whether that be neglect, divorce, death, drug abuse or a similar type of traumatic environment, it is believed to lead to lifelong struggles trying to deal with and cope with what happened to them or around them. This is why sociocultural perspectives are believed to be so influential and
Additionally, Humanistic Psychology studies how people value themselves. Today’s Psychologists are often faced with problems when diagnosing patients, and utilizing a Humanistic approach to their prognosis facilitates a more broad study of what may be occurring. Taking a step back, Jake is having a tough time with his classes; his classes are now more difficult than before, and they might be affecting how Jake perceives his own values. I.e. because Jake feels more nervous, he could be losing his sense of control, which goes against his personal growth and affects his values and image of himself. Applying the humanistic approach to Jake, his fulfillment as a student is his personal growth. However as the difficulty of his classes increase, so does his own personal perception on how much he is growing. For Jake, realizing that he’s not suited for a particular difficult class is upsetting and induces anxiety. Modern day Psychologists would concur because Jake is feeling less valued and lacking a proper humanistic view of himself, he is feeling uncomfortable, and thus more
This approach would have a person take immediate responsibility for their feelings as actions in the present moment; focusing on and exploring feelings as they occur. The ideal humanistic solution is that a person’s problems will diminish as they get in touch with their feelings.
Sociocultural psychology began with Lev Vygotsky in 1931 in dealing with how people react to their environments, pressures, and influences that surround the individual in everyday life. This is a slowly expanding approach that is working towards treating psychological diseases such as obsessive compulsive disorder, also commonly known as OCD.Social psychology focuses mainly on how people react to their surroundings and others in society. Many psychologists go about treating illnesses, such as OCD and eating disorders, by placing people into situations where they have to confront their problems. Many psychologists such as Solomon Asch and Stanley Milgram performed experiments to observe how people react to surroundings and pressures.
In this section of the assignment I have chosen to compare a trait theory and a humanistic.
Humanistic psychology relies on client centred therapy and the idea that each individual has the potential to achieve a position in their psyche named self actualisation. Humanistic psychology differs from psychodynamic theory in that it is optimistic about the human psyche and does not view conflict as inevitable. Humanistic psychology assumes people attach meaning to their unique perspectives on the world and that behaviour is strongly influenced by this. Carl Rogers defined the healthy personality as being one that had congruence between the perceived self and the experienced self and that the individual in question experienced unconditional positive regard from their parent or guardian. He defined an unhealthy personality as being one which lacked these components. Abraham Maslow alternatively suggested a hierarchy for which a person’s healthy personality could be measured by stages of psychological and physical needs (see diagram 2). He suggested that, for a person to achieve self actualisation and become a fully functioning person, they must first satisfy all the needs of each level in the pyramid before moving onto the next
From a social-cognitive perspective your environment can change your personality, however, humanistic approach implies and event happens in your life and you apply your free will which defines your personality. The social-cognitive approach emphasizes the importance of cognitive processes, situational influences, observational learning, and self-efficacy while, the humanistic approach emphasizes free will, personal awareness, and psychological growth. The social-cognitive theory explains behavior is guided by cognitions of the world, in contrast, the humanistic approach stresses the importance of free will in explaining behavior. The social-cognitive theory incorporates mostly objective and some subjective information, while, the humanistic approach is more concerned with the subjective experiences of the individual. The social-cognitive perspective does not regard humans a unique. The humanistic approach places a high value on humans and does not believe they are comparable to rats in an experiment. Social-Cognitive approach takes into account biological factors related to cognition. The humanistic approach rejects biological determinism. The social-cognitive theory is grounded in empirical, laboratory research, in contrast, the humanistic viewpoint has no empirical research but assumptions or clinical observations. The main perspective differences between social-cognitive and humanistic perspectives are social cognitive theory believes the interaction between the environment, cognition, and behavior influence personality; and the humanistic theory believes people have free will, individual work and potential to reach
Features of the Psychoanalytic and Humanistic Perspectives Outline the key features of the psychoanalytic and humanistic perspectives, and briefly compare and contrast their views on conscious experience, a person as an integrated whole, and the role of therapists in arriving at changes. Answer In explaining and predicting animal behaviour, different schools of psychology are of different perspectives; e.g. cognitive approach focuses on the mental processes, behaviourism is based on external stimuli and reinforcement, biological approach is concerned with the relationship between the mind and body and the influence of heredity. However, they are only cope with a specific part of people, but neglect human as a whole.
The humanistic perspective on personality deals exclusively with human behavior. Humanistic psychologists believe that human nature includes a natural drive towards personal growth, that humans have the freedom to choose what they do regardless of environmental factors, and humans are mostly conscious beings and are not controlled by unconscious needs and conflicts. They also believe that a person's subjective view of the world is more important than objective reality. Two of the humanistic theorists that have made an impact of humanism are Carl Rogers and Abraham Maslow.
Off the five developmental theories, I would like to describe and explain two grand theories, Cognitive theory and Behaviorism.
This psychology perspective emphasizes individuals ' inherent drive towards self-actualization, the process of realizing and expressing one 's own capabilities and creativity. It helps the client gain the belief that all people are inherently good. It adopts a holistic approach to human existence and pays special attention to such phenomena as creativity, free will, and positive human potential. It encourages viewing ourselves as a "whole person" greater than the sum of our parts and encourages self exploration rather than the study of behavior in other people. Humanistic psychology acknowledges spiritual aspiration as an integral part of the human psyche. It is linked to the emerging field of transpersonal psychology. As per usual, there are advantages and limitations to this particular theory. One of the greatest strengths of humanistic psychology is that it emphasizes individual choice and responsibility. Humanistic psychology satisfies most people 's idea of what being human means because it values personal ideals and self-fulfillment. Finally, humanistic psychology provides researchers with a flexible framework for observing human behavior because it considers a person in the context of his environment and in conjunction with his personal perceptions and feelings. As with any viewpoint, humanistic psychology has its critics. One major criticism of humanistic psychology is that its concepts are too vague. Critics
The humanistic-existential model’s main issue is the lack of empirical research. Similarly to the humanistic-existential model, the sociocultural model has difficulty establishing a cause from the research available. It is also difficult to predict abnormality in society using the theories of the sociocultural model. For example, if discriminated and underprivileged individuals of color tend to suffer from depression and anxiety, shouldn’t this apply to all individuals fitting these characteristics?
In my point of view, "humanistic" in nature and approach, whatever the subject, seeks to solve problems "from a human-centered viewpoint." And hence this paper could be an attempt of such effort.
Sociological Perspective: says that human behavior is a social act that can be traced to powerful forces in the social environment surrounding each actor. In other words an individual’s social environment is very influential.
Socio-Cultural Theory. The socio-cultural theory is a concept by experts that looks at the essential influences that humanity makes to individual development. It stresses the collaboration between developing individuals and the ethnicity in which they exists. It indicates that human learning is largely a societal process.
Alongside the other two perspectives, I consider how Roger’s humanistic perspective played a part in my life. Humanism emphasizes that people have a natural capacity to make decisions about their lives and control their behavior. This theory takes into account the self of people and their free will to make choices instead of relying heavily on societal standards. People inherently start out good, growing through experiences that are suitable to them. Positive regard is often a need people seek out and it is best recognized by other people. From my experience, Julia became a role model for how strong of a woman I wanted to become during emergencies. As I grew up learning how to handle my dad’s episodes, it did earn the respect from everyone