Psychodynamic Theory Paper

The dynamics of clinical relationships and the client’s progress in therapy can vary based on theoretical or therapeutic approaches and individual client preferences. Therefore, the driving force behind successful or lack there of treatment is largely dependent on the client’s wants and what they hope to achieve or not in treatment. Therapy can be an ongoing work in progress for a client, that can last many years, can be said to be indefinite, while for others its short lived as they took what they needed out of therapy. Some clients may sporadically come and go from treatment. Some clients may enter treatment as resistant, unwilling, and uncompliant to various approaches. According to McCarthy & Archer (2013), Freud would attribute such resistance, as a

Therapists, can certainly be influential, in creating a positive therapeutic experience for any client, including resistant ones. Edwards & Murdock (1994) mention, that some therapists find the need to self-disclose in order to either model appropriate behavior or to increase similarity (Edwards & Murdock, 1994). Some theoretical perspectives such as psychoanalysts disagree with self-disclosure due to the dangers of transference, while humanistic approach view it as a relationship building tool, and behavioral therapists view it as a modeling tool (Edwards & Murdock, 1994). For the most part, boundary crossing is harmless, as it is utilized in an effort to adapt treatment to the individual client (Glass, 2003). However, Glass (2003) also mentions that boundary violation and boundary crossing must be considered, and often times are considered to be grey areas (Glass, 2003). Boundaries in the workplace or therapy can be thought of as a safety net, which is a fine line, that an employee must proceed with caution and avoid overly crossing. For instance, aggregated boundary crossing, is persistent in nature and can be considered to be a form of malpractice (Glass, 2003). Therefore,