Human Trafficking In Kant's Categorical Imperative

738 Words2 Pages

While these victims are held captive, physical as well as psychological trauma is being inflicted on them. Victims of sex trafficking are stripped entirely of their rights, freedom, and humanity. This can leave emotional as well as physical scars on the victims. Erin Weaver says that in most cases, the person is physically branded with a tattoo, marking them as property. The recovery for someone who has suffered through trafficking is often difficult but not impossible. The victims, however, are not the only ones suffering from trafficking. Whole communities are often affected by this sort of activity. While trafficking is going on, the slaves are forced to entertain as many as 20-40 men daily and protection is rarely used. You can imagine how quickly diseases are spread. Men take these sicknesses home to their wives or partners and soon the whole community is going to be suffering from illnesses. …show more content…

Kant’s theory states, “Act only on that maxim through which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law." Meaning if it is something that everyone would not be comfortable with, it would be considered immoral and if it’s something everyone would be comfortable with then it would be moral. In the case of human trafficking everyone would have to consider whether they would like to be sold for sex, or if it were their kids or family members in the place of the victims, to determine if it would be acceptable. The people paying for these services would have to consider if they were the ones performing these acts or if it were their own children and usually just that thought gives people a different perspective and they will without a doubt change their stance on the issue. Of course, you will get an occasional pervert who would not mind either way, but majority would not be okay with it and would rule human trafficking

Open Document