Hsün Tzu's Perspective on Human Nature

631 Words2 Pages

Rosario Ayala Olmos
862010566
Fridays 12:10
Lucas Lutthmann

Hsün Tzu believes that human nature is bad, reflecting on this, humans are unlikely to naturally feel sympathy toward a child falling in a well as proposed by Mencius. Not everyone will feel sympathy towards others put in a dangerous situations because humans are born evil and with a profitable mindset. They are likely to follow their natural way, ending up in crime and corruption. Opposed to naturally being good, Hsün Tzu believes that we are able to do good due to our conscious activity. In other words, our experiences shape us into the people that we later become. Hsün Tzu’s metaphor indicates that all men are like warped boards, that require straightening. That straightening will happen over time, same with our conscious it needs time to be built up with customs and rituals. …show more content…

Our natural impulses are not always naturally acted upon. Hsün gives the example of those who wait until his elder eats and those who eat before them. (Hsün Tzu p.159) As he mentions, just because we get these natural impulses to save the child or in this case to eat doesn’t mean we will act upon them. For example, the child falling in the well, even if they don't save the child, they will still get a natural impulse and nonreflective gut feeling that something bad is going to happen. According to Mencius, men are born good and are always practicing good. So in this case, in Mencius’ view, everyone will feel sympathy toward the child. This is because they will think and reflect toward the situation. As Mencius quotes, “Everyone has a heart-mind which feels for others.” (Mencius 2A6) We are not humans if we don't feel sympathy towards others, because that is what make us humans, having the ability to reflect toward our

Open Document