Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Hamlet and psychological
Hamlet and psychological
Hamlet and psychological
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In the play Hamlet, written by William Shakespeare, the main character Hamlet experiences many different and puzzling emotions. From contemplating suicide to being motivated to kill Claudius to avenging his father’s death. A common question that’s asked about Hamlet is whether or not he’s sane or insane. Although the answer could go either way, there’s only one thing going on in his mind, and that’s revenge. The three points that prove Hamlet’s sanity are, the conversation he had with Horatio in the beginning, the wittiness he has in dealing with other characters, and his most famous soliloquy.
After talking to the ghost of his father, Hamlet, comes back to Horatio and Marcellus demanding them not to speak of their encounter with the ghost of his father. Both are frightened by the event and agree to the prince’s demand but both are curious about what had happened between the ghost and him. Later that day, Hamlet pulled Horatio to the side and explains to him “how strange or odd some’er I bear myself”(1.5.190). Hamlet basically says that he’s going to put on an act and he doesn't want Horatio to ask any questions or tell anyone. This proves that he knew what he was doing and .was sane the whole time. It shows that he’s willing to
…show more content…
If he was really insane would they plan out an elaborate scheme to let Claudius know that he knows that he killed his father just so he could gain the throne. Most people going insane or already are don’t have a knack or have the mind for that type of thing, but he does. He was able to let Claudius know without even saying one single work to him. He knew everything that was going on and he had players act it out for Claudius and told them their jobs for each character. Hamlet even knows that his good friends, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern, spy on him for the King. If Hamlet was insane how would he recognize that his friends are turning on
Throughout William Shakespeare’s play, Hamlet, Hamlet undergoes a transformation from sane to insane while fighting madness to avenge his father’s death. The material that Shakespeare appropriated in writing Hamlet is the story of a Danish prince whose uncle murders the prince’s father, marries his mother, and claims the throne. The prince pretends to be feeble-minded to throw his uncle off guard, then manages to kill his uncle in revenge. Shakespeare changed the emphasis of this story entirely, making Hamlet a philosophically minded prince who delays taking action because his knowledge of his uncle’s crime is so uncertain. To begin with, Hamlet portrays himself as sane.
Many characters in the play have confidence in Horatio because of his trustworthiness. Horatio is very trustworthy, and not only in the way that he can keep a secret if needed, but he is honorable and keeps his word, and is honest to himself, showing integrity. Here, Horatio shows this trait by revealing to Hamlet that Hamlet’s father’s ghost had appeared.
The second point showing his sanity is the fact that he was able to match wits with the other characters in the play. If he was an insane person why would he plan a way to let Claudius know that he knows about the death of his father. Most insane people don’t have the mind for that type of thing, but he was able to do it. He was able to let Claudius know without saying a word. He had the players act it out for him and what a job they did to let him know. He even knows when his good friends, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern, show up that they are they to spy and find information about him to give to the king. (Act2 sc2 Line293-298). If he was insane why would he recognize the fact that his friends are turning on him.
...ever be truly known if it was an act or not, one can surmise from the information given that Hamlet never truly went insane and he remained clever throughout the entire story. Only certain people ever say a side of insanity in him, and those who witnessed it were his enemies. Whether it was to frighten them, make them believe his actions were not his own, hide his true intentions and plans, or something else is never disclosed, but one can assume that he was in his right mind the entire time. His fake insanity leads not only to his own and his enemies’ deaths, but also the deaths of those few remaining people that he truly loves and cares about. Horatio is the only survivor and Hamlet tells him to continue living so that Horatio can tell the true story of what happened without the bias of thinking Hamlet’s actions were nothing more than the insane acts of a madman.
Throughout Shakespeare?s play, Hamlet, the main character, young Hamlet, is faced with the responsibility of attaining vengeance for his father?s murder. He decides to feign madness as part of his plan to gain the opportunity to kill Claudius. As the play progresses, his depiction of a madman becomes increasingly believable, and the characters around him react accordingly. However, through his inner thoughts and the apparent reasons for his actions, it is clear that he is not really mad and is simply an actor simulating insanity in order to fulfill his duty to his father.
Throughout the Shakespearian play, Hamlet, the main character is given the overwhelming responsibility of avenging his father’s "foul and most unnatural murder" (I.iv.36). Such a burden can slowly drive a man off the deep end psychologically. Because of this, Hamlet’s disposition is extremely inconsistent and erratic throughout the play. At times he shows signs of uncontrollable insanity. Whenever he interacts with the characters he is wild, crazy, and plays a fool. At other times, he exemplifies intelligence and method in his madness. In instances when he is alone or with Horatio, he is civilized and sane. Hamlet goes through different stages of insanity throughout the story, but his neurotic and skeptical personality amplifies his persona of seeming insane to the other characters. Hamlet comes up with the idea to fake madness in the beginning of the play in order to confuse his enemies. However, for Hamlet to fulfill his duty of getting revenge, he must be totally sane. Hamlet’s intellectual brilliance make it seem too impossible for him to actually be mad, for to be insane means that one is irrational and without any sense. When one is irrational, one is not governed by or according to reason. So, Hamlet is only acting mad in order to plan his revenge on Claudius.
Shakespeare's tragic hero, Hamlet, and his sanity can arguably be discussed. Many portions of the play supports his loss of control in his actions, while other parts uphold his ability of dramatic art. The issue can be discussed both ways and altogether provide significant support to either theory. There are indications from Hamlet throughout the play of his mind's well being.
"I will be brief. Your noble son is mad," states Polonius (II, ii, 91) . Ophelia exclaims, "O what a noble mind is here o'erthrown!" (III, i, 153). "Alas, he's mad," concludes Gertrude (III, iv, 106). Claudius even instructs Rosencrantz and Guildenstern to escort Hamlet to England because "it [is not] safe with us/To let his madness range" (III, iii, 1-2). Essentially, each supporting character questions Hamlet's sanity, and most conclude he is indeed mad.
“Revenge his foul and most unnatural murder” (I.iv.31); the words that changed Hamlet tremendously. As Hamlet meets the ghost of his dead father; he finds out that Claudius, his father’s brother, poisoned him. Hamlet then puts on an act of insanity. No one really knows why he has gone so mad. Hamlet uses insanity as a weapon to avenge his father’s death. Converting back to sanity, Hamlet’s thoughts and actions lets us know how and what he is really feeling. Hamlet shifts back and forth between sanity and insanity, which ironically, slows his over aching goal of revenge.
Throughout Shakespeare’s play, Hamlet, the main character, Hamlet, must seek revenge for the murder of his father. Hamlet decides to portray an act of insanity, as part of his plan to murder Claudius. Throughout the play, Hamlet becomes more and more believable in his act, even convincing his mother that he is crazy. However, through his thoughts, and actions, the reader can see that he is in fact putting up an act, he is simply simulating insanity to help fulfil his fathers duty of revenge. Throughout the play, Hamlet shows that he understands real from fake, right from wrong and his enemies from his friends. Even in his madness, he retorts and is clever in his speech and has full understanding of what if going on around him. Most importantly, Hamlet does not think like that of a person who is mad. Hamlet decides to portray an act of insanity, as part of his plan to seek revenge for his fathers murder.
By the time Hamlet was written, “madness” was already a popular element within revenge tragedies in the Elizabethan period. But, the role of madness in Hamlet was deeply ambiguous, which set it apart from the other revenge tragedies in its time. Whereas other revenge tragedy protagonists were the complete opposite and just simply insane. Hamlet fiddles with the idea of being insane, which is where it all began. Hamlet states, “How strange or odd soe'er I bear myself, / As I perchance hereafter shall think meet/ To put an antic disposition on” (1.5.58-60) but his sane mental state began to decay over time leaving him actually insane. As the play goes on the role of madness becomes much larger and more crucial, and begins to sweep the spotlight from the other themes within it.
Shakespeare's play "Hamlet" is about a complex protagonist, Hamlet, who faces adversity and is destined to murder the individual who killed his father. Hamlet is a character who although his actions and emotions may be one of an insane person, in the beginning of the book it is clear that Hamlet decides to fake madness in order for his plan to succeed in killing Claudius. Hamlet is sane because throughout the play he only acts crazy in front of certain people, to others he acts properly and displays proper prince like behavior who is able to cope with them without sounding crazy, and even after everything that has been going on in his life he is able to take revenge by killing his father's murderer. In the play Hamlet by William Shakespeare Hamlet is sane but acts insane to fulfill his destiny of getting vengeance on his father's murderer.
One of the most persuasive arguments for Hamlet’s being actually mad is that “of the feigned madness of Hamlet there appears no adequate cause, for he does nothing which he might not have done with the reputation of sanity” (Crawford). It was never necessary for Hamlet to act mad. He could have plausibly set up the play under the guise of sanity to determine if Claudius’s was actually guilty of his father’s death. Also, he could have secretly killed Claudius as Claudius did to his father without anyone knowing and without ruining his reputation by feigned madness. Additionally, the state that Hamlet mind that Hamlet sees Ophelia in after speaking with the Ghost of his father the first time speaks to the lack of self awareness that the Prince of Denmark had. Hamlet confronts Ophelia shaking, under clothed, and soiled (Shakespeare 79). There is no logical reason that a prince, raised to uphold social pretense, would go see his former flame in an unrefined state no matter what
Hamlet is instructed by his father to get revenge on Claudius. Old Hamlet wants his son to act insane to possibly get away with the revenge he is going to place on Claudius. “Haste me to know’t, that I, with wings as swift as meditation or the thoughts of love, may sweep to my revenge. (Shakespeare I. v. 33-35). Hamlet is all for getting revenge on Claudius but this does not show that he is insane it shows he is just obeying his father. Further within the play Hamlet begins to show us that he is really sane and begins to feel some shame. “.. I do not know Why yet I live to say 'This thing's to do,' Sith I have cause, and will and strength, and means To do 't. Examples gross as earth exhort me: Witness this army of such mass and charge, Led by a delicate and tender prince, Whose spirit with divine ambition puff'd Makes mouths at the invisible event, Exposing what is mortal and unsure To all that fortune, death and danger dare Even for an eggshell. Rightly to be great Is not to stir without great argument, But greatly to find quarrel in a straw When honor's at the stake. How stand I, then, That have a father kill'd, a mother stained, Excitements of my reason and my blood, And let all sleep, while, to my shame, I see The imminent death of twenty thousand men That, for a fantasy and trick of fame Go to their graves like beds, fight for a plot Whereon the numbers cannot try the cause, Which
Hamlet is one of Shakespeare’s most well-known tragedies. At first glance, it holds all of the common occurrences in a revenge tragedy which include plotting, ghosts, and madness, but its complexity as a story far transcends its functionality as a revenge tragedy. Revenge tragedies are often closely tied to the real or feigned madness in the play. Hamlet is such a complex revenge tragedy because there truly is a question about the sanity of the main character Prince Hamlet. Interestingly enough, this deepens the psychology of his character and affects the way that the revenge tragedy takes place. An evaluation of Hamlet’s actions and words over the course of the play can be determined to see that his ‘outsider’ outlook on society, coupled with his innate tendency to over-think his actions, leads to an unfocused mission of vengeance that brings about not only his own death, but also the unnecessary deaths of nearly all of the other main characters in the revenge tragedy.